Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
In a report published today, the Human Genetics Commission says that the genetic profiling of all newborn babies is feasible but is premature and unlikely to be cost-effective for the NHS. But private companies might well offer such a service within the next few years, Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws, QC, the commission’s chairwoman, said. If so, parents should be cautious. “It is far too experimental and the health benefits are far from clear” she said.
There were also fears about tests being used in a discriminatory way, or forced on people who would simply rather not be told. Knowing that a child might develop a disease later in life could have damaging effects on family life, especially if there were nothing that could be done to prevent it.
The commission was asked by the Government to look into the idea of producing, at birth, a genetic profile of every baby that would be used to predict future health problems. With this information, parents might be able to take preventative action, such as controlling a baby’s diet carefully.
The report says that at present such genetic profiling would be too expensive and its predictive ability too limited. But the whole subject should be re-examined in five years, when things may have changed.
The idea is feasible. To list the entire genetic complement of an individual baby — its genome — would at present cost about £5 million. In practice, much more selective screening is all that is needed. Looking at the 5 per cent or so of genes thought to be of medical importance might cost £25,000. Examining only markers known to be important in disease would cost £10,000.
This is still some way from the £1,000 per baby that some people have predicted, but developments in technology could quickly narrow the gap. In 20 years, the report says, it will be feasible to acquire sufficient information from every baby to cover the most important genetic variations.
They could be stored on a single CD-Rom, which would form part of every person’s medical record. A GP could keep records for all his patients on a database, interrogating it to provide information useful in diagnosis and treatment.
The problem, however, is that too little is known about the function and importance of genetic variations to make them really useful. The link between the genes and the diseases is often unclear. That, too, may change, which is why the commission recommends keeping an eye on advances in knowledge.
Sir John Sulston, co-chairman of the working group responsible for the report, said that there are also wider implications, citing issues of consent, non-discrimination and confidentiality. The report says: “If profiling were to go ahead nationally there would have to be comprehensive safeguards around confidentiality and non-discrimination. It would be very difficult to ensure that the information was not misused, possibly leading to unfair discrimination in areas such as insurance, employment and education.”
Risks include people being unable to take out medical insurance if they are carrying a damaging gene.
Helen Wallace, deputy director of the pressure group GeneWatch UK, said: “Genes are poor predictors of most illnesses, so most children would get misleading information.”
Ministers are still basing genetics policy on science fantasy, Dr Wallace added. “Most diseases in most people depend much more on social and environmental factors. Better school dinners are much more important for most children than genetic testing.”
SCREENING NOW AVAILABLE
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.