Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
And why? We want, quite simply, to see what we can see. We want to feel the exhilaration of expanded horizons. It’s scarcely surprising, then, that the artist, from the moment that he was handed the key by Filippo Brunelleschi (the architect who invented the system of “linear” perspective), should so often have sought out high viewpoints. It comes perfectly naturally to anyone who sets out to explore a vision of the world, and especially so to someone who seeks to capture his insights by merging the microcosm of the canvas with the viewer’s reality.
A loan exhibition, The Impossible View, currently showing at The Lowry in Salford, brings together oil paintings, watercolours, photographs and prints from the 16th century to the present day to examine the ways in which artists have sought out high vantage points, in which the panoramic vista and the shifting, multiple sweep of the bird’s-eye perspective have been used to provide the spectator with a sense of man’s place in the wider map of the world.
Lowry’s work is the starting point. Born and brought up in Manchester, his eye constantly drawn upwards by the dizzy perpendiculars of smokestacks, his preoccupation with elevated viewpoints is already apparent in student drawings. Lowry’s industrial landscapes of the 1930s to the 1960s take a typically high vantage point.And these form the core of this exhibition.
The show, however, gets off to a disappointing start. The opening room sets the scene by placing Lowry’s works in the context of a selection of painters who have chosen a similar lofty stance to present the complexities of the inscrutable urban jungle. But the lighting levels have had to be kept very low so that the beautiful bruised colours of David Bomberg’s 1944 Evening in the City of London with its smoggy sun sinking behind the dome of St Paul’s, and the impasto heat haze of Leon Kossoff’s 1975 Dalston: Summer Day No 1, turn to mud.
But persist. The lighting improves. And not only are many of the views included painted of local spots, but also, works that might in other contexts have been easily passed over, can now be admired. How many people would stop to appreciate Jacob van Ruisdael’s understated little landscape on the walls of the National Gallery? Amid a superb collection, it cannot compete. But here its subtlety stands out. And the paintings by Turner, Thomas Moran and Gino Severini positively shine.
Impossible View does not set out to provide a definitive survey of the elevated vantage point. Rather it picks out and explores a few aspects of the idea. As techniques progressed, as spreading Dutch landscapes gave way to more dramatic panoramas painted upon circular buildings, as lenses grew more sophisticated, as the Claude glass came into fashion to create instant picturesque and the camera obscura became common artistic practice, as photographic instruments were sent skywards, at first attached to balloons, later in space rockets, records of the planet’s surface grew gradually more spectacular, more comprehensive, more precise.
At its simplest, this exhibition, with its before and after etchings of the Great Fire of London 1666, its painted scenes of the 1739 Great Frost, its photographic record of the ruins of San Francisco after the 1906 earthquake, its 1971 photo-montage of a crater on the moon, could be seen as documentary. But it is about far more than topographical record. The scenes that it presents are not necessarily truth — as anyone who seeks out the actual sites from which Lowry painted will find out.
Many of Lowry’s cityscapes were composites, assembled according to loose “linear” perspective so that if you study more closely, you can see that Lowry, while achieving a sense of depth by raising his viewpoint, has painted his figures as if seen from ground level. And several artists in this show have chosen such wilfully unrealistic perspective.
So why do artists choose the impossible view? Some seem to do so for almost propagandist reasons. The painters of biblical scenes set out to echo the all-powerful overview of God. Rich landowners wanted to display their own power, flaunting the expanse of their properties. And Moran’s dramatic painting done from the banks of the Colorado River was presumably, in part, intended to entice the rolling wagons of American pioneers further west. For others the impossible view was a stylistic choice. Turner’s fish-eye lens view of sunset over Petworth Park was intended to heighten a sense of the sun’s radiance and evoke the sublime. And the Italian Futurist, Severini, captures a sense of the modern bustle of boulevard life in the prismatic planes of his busy surface.
The artists’ own perceptions are integral to their presentations of the landscape. This show is less about what we see, than how we see it and why. Perhaps Lowry chose his isolated perspective because that was the way in which this solitary painter could convey his sense of aloneness, of how removed he felt from the matchstick people who milled about below.
In his stark depiction of the road from Arras, Christopher Nevinson speaks of his horror at war’s devastation. In a photo-montage of the Grand Canyon, David Hockney seeks to capture the way we see the world, “not all at once but rather in discrete separate glances”. And by presenting a landscape in this way, he evokes our experience of it as it builds up around us, enveloping us like some aerial vision.
This show, for all its flaws (and the catalogue, by the way, is dreadful), takes us back to the fundamentals of art appreciation, to the experience of seeing as it establishes our place in the surrounding world.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Pack minimal content for maximum style


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.