Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
I can see why people are so hardcore on the subject: the alternative viewpoint — that wearing pretty clothes, going out at night and enjoying a drink and male company means you are “asking for it” — is as morally repellent as it is patently nonsensical, to say nothing of prehistorically misogynistic.
But since everyone is agreed that rape is a) vile and b) under-reported, and since nobody is on the side of the rapist or aggressor, it seems mad to me that the debate should get mired in black and white absolutes.
The truth of the matter is that most of the issues occupy an underdiscussed grey area — underdiscussed because the subject has been smothered by political correctness of the most irritating sort. If you dare to suggest that lying comatose on the pavement, alone, with your skirt rucked up and your knickers showing at the end of an alcohol-fuelled night is not necessarily a terribly good idea, you’re slapped down by the sisterhood (whom I expect don’t get out much, and who probably haven’t visited a city centre at chucking out time for a good few decades. Emerging blinking from the Groucho club doesn’t count).
A police study published last week found that alcohol is the main factor in most date rape sex attacks, and that those old tabloid favourite “date rape drugs”, Rohypnol and GBH, feature so little that they are heading for urban myth territory.
A 12-month study, Operation Matisse, was ordered by chief constables. It used scientists to examine 120 cases of date rape; they found traces of GBH in only two cases. But of the 120 cases, 119 involved the victim having drunk alcohol — enough to put her three times over the limit in 22 cases. Only traces of drink were found in 63 cases. Drugs were found in 57 cases, both prescription and recreational; of the latter, cannabis and cocaine were the most common. The 120 cases involved victims who believed themselves to have experienced, or suspected, a drug-assisted rape in the previous 72 hours. But the drug in question was, more often than not, alcohol — and the victims had consumed it willingly.
Now drinking — a little or a lot — is what people do. No young woman goes out on a Friday night with the clear intention of remaining stone-cold sober; nor does she make a special effort to look as plain as possible. She’s dressed up and made up. She is likely to drink quite a lot, and, it being 2006, she is quite likely to add to her consumption with the odd line of coke.
She may pop a pill or two on top, she may drink that fifth cocktail knowing she shouldn’t really, she may have to go and stand outside for a bit because she feels dizzy. And then, hopefully, she’ll walk home with her friends, drink two pints of water and have nothing more alarming than a bad hangover to deal with in the morning.
And all of that is fine: having just described my own late teens and early twenties, I’m hardly going to sit in moral judgment on a lifestyle that will be familiar to young women of all ages and backgrounds (not least Rod Stewart’s daughter Kimberly, 27, whose partying ways have resulted in “very serious liver damage”, he said last week).
However, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. If you choose, as you are free to do, to wander about drunk and not wearing many clothes, it might be an idea to wear a coat to cover up your tiny dress when it’s time to roam the streets looking for an unlicensed minicab to take you home. It might be an idea to educate yourself about unlicensed minicabs in the first place. Or indeed not to sit on the laps of the group of lairy boys you meet on the night bus and give them the “ cuddle” they’re baying for.
No, of course neither they nor the minicab driver nor the dodgy man eyeing you up in the street has any right over your person: nobody does. But that sentence presupposes we all live in the same moral universe, where people are good and righteous and respect personal boundaries. And it’s a spectacularly naive assumption to make.
In an ideal world you could cartwheel home not wearing anything at all and know that you were safe, because anyone you might pass understood fully that they had no right whatsoever to touch a hair on your head. In this utopia you could also get the grubby man who never opens his curtains to babysit, and ask the local hoodies to keep an eye on your unlocked car.
In the real world there are predatory men with demented, damaged ideas about women. There are confused men who don’t understand the mixed messages many of us sometimes give out inadvertently — especially if we are young and confused ourselves, and have spent all night flirting massively only to shriek with shock and disgust if the object of our flirtation dares to lunge. There are men who believe what they see on telly, online and in their silly little magazines — that all women, everywhere, are gagging for it.
Pointing out that these men exist doesn’t mean women are in any sense to blame for their existence. It doesn’t mean women shouldn’t continue to do what modern women do. But it does mean that there is a problem, and since it is a problem that affects women, there is no point or sense is sticking our heads in the sand and repeating, in the old 1970s phrase, “whatever we wear, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no” — because, frankly, the guy planning on pinning you down in 20 minutes’ time isn’t listening.
I repeat, the problem isn’t originated by women. But since all of us are its potential victims, splitting hairs about feminist theory and getting irate at the fact that the world isn’t how it’s supposed to be doesn’t get one far: it’s like going to bed with the door unlocked and the windows open because nobody has a right to help themselves to your property.
Instead of wittering on about how horrid it is that women are sexually assaulted (no! really?), take precautions. Wear a coat, carry a mobile, make sure you’re not alone if you’re incapacitated, stay at a friend’s rather than totter home in the dark, and learn kickboxing. None of these will make you safe, but they may make you safer. And that, surely, is the point.

India Knight was born in 1965. She lives in London with her three children, writes a weekly column for The Sunday Times, and a weblog, Isn't She Talking Yet?, on bringing up a child with special needs. She has also written two novels, My Life on a Plate and Don't You Want Me?
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
the point is to take the predators of the streets by imposing very heavy if not life sentences not only in these cases but also for assults and any other victimization crimes. protect the innocent.......punish the guilty
a clarke, hamilton, canada, ont