Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona

Zany pop star Prince is taking on YouTube over unauthorised use of his music.
The singer is launching legal action in a bid to "reclaim his art on the internet".
He wants to ban any unauthorised video clips taken of his performances.
He is believed to be the first major artist to do battle with the online giant.
"These are steps that the ever innovative Prince is taking to reclaim his art on the internet," a spokesman for the star said.
"Prince believes strongly that as an artist the music rights must remain with the artist and thus copyrights should be protected across the board.
"Very few artists have ever taken this kind of action over their rights. Yet Prince has showed time and time again he is ready to challenge the system in new ways to put artists and music first."
The singer has instructed Web Sheriff, a company which specialises in combating online piracy and copyright infringement, to act on his behalf.
Prince is famously protective of his music rights - in the mid-Nineties he changed his name to a squiggle and wrote the word 'slave' on his cheek as part of a contractual wrangle with then record label Warner Bros.
Fans at his recent gigs at The O2 arena in London were banned from taking photographs or video footage on their mobile phones, but many still posted clips on YouTube.
John Giacobbi, managing director of Web Sheriff, said: "Some artists are very relaxed about the use of their image and music on the internet, some less so.
"Prince feels very strongly that people should remember his concerts as they were, not as some grainy mobile phone footage."
He went on: "The vast majority of artists have little or no control over their rights on the internet, with piracy rampant and very little regulation.
"Prince's actions are a brave and pioneering step to challenge the status quo and hand control over internet rights back to the artists."
Web Sheriff has succeeded in taking more than 1,000 unauthorised Prince video clips off YouTube in the past few days, some of them from the O2 gigs.
But Mr Giacobbi said: "As soon as they are taken down, more spring up the next day. The onus is on the artists as opposed to YouTube itself.
"There is zero pornography on YouTube because it is filtered out. It would be perfectly feasible for them to filter out unauthorised music material, but they choose not to do this.
"At the end of the day, if you take copyrighted music and film off YouTube, most of its business would be gone."
Prince is also targeting eBay, amongst others, for selling unauthorised merchandise.
Mr Giacobbi said: "We are not targeting fans who might want to sell their copy of Purple Rain, we are targeting companies in China manufacturing Prince handbags and selling them in their thousands. There is a distinction to be drawn there."
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
yep prince belongs in the 1980,s this is pure selfish profiteering most stuff on you tube is back catalogue that has been payed for a million times in the past why do music fans have to keep on paying for these people to keep on shoving stuff up there noses? your art prince? you need your fans
spud, bishops stortford, united kingdom
Can anyone seriously believe he's doing this for publicity? Prince knows as well as we do the best way for him to get publicity is to announce more live gigs - he's just finishing a legendary run of concerts that will go down in UK history, he doesn't need to try get more press by suing online companies - he could announce a free half hour gig at hyde park and get 10x as much press.
Alex, Shipley, Bradford,
Spare me, Prince has faded from the limelight in the last few years and this is merely an oppotunistic bid for 'just a little more' attention. Once he has been around as long as, say Cher (also a single named musical artist), AND remake his image as many times needed to keep up with his fans such as she did, then maybe, just maybe, listening to his blather might make sense.
The comment below is what set me off.
"Prince believes strongly that as an artist the music rights must remain with the artist and thus copyrights should be protected across the board."
Steve, Brewster, USA
I'm a prince fan from the early 80's ,and i'm also a artist who owns his music aswell .No one understands what an artist gose through when it comes down to ownership of what is his ,dosent matter what kind of art it is theres a need for ownership of the work . Ray charles left a record company in order to obtain the write to have control over his creations,then went to a larger company that granted him the writes to his music,but who also hesatated before giving him total control.So in closeing -keep it up prince, you are and have always been an pioneer keep paveing the way for more artist like your self to help find a way to own there art like it should have been at the very began. Dr.Earl
steven earl, carolstream, usa/il.
Prince is an idiot! If you take all the coyrighted material off youtube what are we watch. All home grown video? You are taking most of the business away and the liberty of sharing. Oh! And you are out to control the world by taking away cellphones away in your concerts. This is a changing world and your still living in the 80's. Boycott his music!
kamikazeAce, Tokyo, Japan
I think YouTube is worse than Pirate Bay. YouTube has a copy of the music video and distributes it for free. On YouTube music search engines like www.tubejuke.com you can get a feel for the massive amount of music videos that is on there...
Paul Bower, Oslo, Norway
Recon his popularity and hits songs are all in the past, whats wrong with free publicity for him via the net? alot of people become famous that way or even more famous. From a marketing point of view, i personally believe thats not the way to go.
Funnyman-JIM, Bong city, Surbaban