Gary Duncan, Economics Editor
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks

The blow to tax revenues from the credit crunch is set to send the Chancellor
plunging £16 billion or more deeper into the red over the next two years
than he has planned, calculations for The Times indicate today.
The estimates of the toll on tax receipts by the National Institute of
Economic and Social Research will aggravate the acute financial headache
already facing Alistair Darling.
With a general election expected as soon as next year, the Chancellor is
already boxed in. A still deeper slide into the red would leave him with little
scope for pre-election giveaways or for extra tax and spending measures to
help to stave off a recession.
The institute calculates that the severe economic and financial impact of the
credit crunch will mean that the Chancellor has to borrow an extra £8
billion in the present financial year, 2008-09, and another £8 billion extra
in 2009-10. The £16 billion total is the equivalent of adding nearly 4p to
the basic rate of income tax.
The institute also sounded a warning that in a worst-case scenario, should the
credit crunch intensify, the extra borrowing needed could double again, to
£32 billion over two years. That would inflict on Mr Darling a deficit for
this year of £59 billion, or 4 per cent of GDP.
Ray Barrell, the institute’s senior fellow, said the scale of the blow to the
Chancellor’s finances from the crunch was particularly severe because of its
impact on income tax and VAT pay-ments.Income tax revenues are expected to
be hit hard by the crunch and the resulting economic downturn, as earnings
weaken and unemployment starts to climb. One problem area will be the City,
where multimillion-pound bonus payments, which provide a rich source of tax
for the Treasury, are drying up, while banks are cutting staff and salary
bills. VAT receipts are expected to be squeezed as consumers curb spending
in shops, bars and restaurants.
The Treasury’s coffers too will feel the impact from the housing downturn.
Stamp duty payments will be hit as falling house prices and the mortgage
drought lead to a drop in numbers of people moving home. HM Revenue &
Customs figures released yesterday showed that revenue from stamp duty is
forecast to drop this year for the first time since 2003, falling to £13.5
billion, from £14.1 billion in 2007-08.
Mr Darling was forced in his Budget to raise intended borrowing for 2008-09
and the next three financial years by £32 billion compared with Gordon
Brown’s plans in the 2007 Budget. That was despite tax i n c r e a s e s
from next year worth £2.7 billion by 2010. Weakening tax payments have led
the Chancellor to raise his borrowing forecasts for 2008 to 2012 by £20
billion since October alone.
The extra £16 billion borrowing now expected by the institute would mean that
the Treasury would plunge into the red by £51 billion this financial year,
compared with Mr Darling’s forecast £43 billion. In 2009-10 the institute
predicts borrowing of £46 billion, against the Chancellor’s £38 billion plan.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Time to cut a few MPS's. Surely in the 21st century, in the age of information technology ,the electorate can vote on key issues via internet. That should save few 100 million.
MP's certainly don't appear to be adding much value to our "out of control "UK economy.
Cris, Alton, UK
I don't think anyone should blame Darling for what he inherited! Ultimately Brown should have taxed harder during the boom years which would not have impacted the economy severely. He was too conservative. How ironic!
Michael, London,
I have no sympathy for this Government . They have bled the middle classes dry and now they have no way out except cutting wasteful public spending. Get the workshy into work, stop immigrant benefits, cut consultants fees, sack 50% nhs mangers & local government officers then give me a 25% tax cut.
Charles, Birmingham,
Time for Mr Darling to go. He must be the worst ever chancellor Britain has ever had! Even worse than Gordon Brown and that takes some beating.
Douglas W Tott, Bruichladdich, Scotland
i am an American in London and am quite liberal minded but it is not hard to see that the expenses of the welfare state are seriously crippling this country and its people. it has created an entire generation of dependents who have little need (or incentive) to work. god help this once great nation
Alex, London, England
Oh dear...and he's already robbing from the very poorest with the removal of the 10p tax band. There will be a lot of people saying 'told you so' over the next few months.
judy, Liverpool, England
I know, an internet tax, to stop people becoming better informed. No, no, Alistair, I'm only joking!
Paul, Coventry,
Much as it pains me to give a tip to Msrs Brown and Darling, with all this borrowing knackering their "golden rule", perhaps it is time they stop banging on about it all the time.
The mere mention of gold, just serves to remind people of Gordon unloading ours at the bottom of the market.
Damien, Monchengladbach, Germany
So, no chance of every tax payer getting a US style £300 rebate then...
Mick, Cardiff, Wales
Sue Doughty, Twyford, UK
Messrs Darling & Brown will only consider raising taxes to fill the shortfall, they have no idea about reducing spending to save money.
JohnC, Warwick, UK
Call in the receivers for UK plc...
Bartman, London,
It's all tumbling down for Labour now. The coffers are empty, they've wasted it all on idiot ministerial initiatives and complicated tax & benefit regimes.
They could no sooner do what they've done in the States - give everyone a tax cheque, than fly to the moon.
New Labour? - Not a chance....
David Nammory, Liverpool,
I am not sure if can trust Alistair Darling anymore? May be i am
too mixed-up what George Osborn is written while ago?
So who to believe? May be new broom sweep clean????
Cllr Ken Tiwari (independent), Oxford, United Kingdom
Dont say Labour will have to stop throwing money at stupid and worthless schemes?!?
How will the country survive without the hundreds of quango's doing nothing but draining our cash!?!
Arthur, Newcastle,
Does this figure include lower receipts of corporation tax, for example reductions caused by banks being able to set off their bad loan provisions against profits?
David Williams, Eastnor, England
One has to feel a bit sad for Darling. He has spent years keeping his head low in other ministries waiting for this job to be handed this job by the Iron Chancellor. Now he is finding the Iron Chancellor was more rust than iron and he, as the Flunky Chancellor no longer has a place to hide!
James, Epsom, Surrey
You mention that raising £16m from tax would be equivalent to 4p on the income tax rate. But you should also mention how much the interest on the extra borrowing would cost us. I bbet that's not cheap either. My rough calculation puts it at about 0.2p on the rate - which is a 1% increase.
Duncan, Witheringhurst,
Surely this deficit will be covered from increased
income from oil and fuel revenues !!
Asco, Thrumster, UK
I find this hard to believe as Mr Darling will have benefitted enormously from the increased tax receipts taken at the petrol pump.Not to speak of increased car licence fees , taxes on Resident /non-doms and the abolition of the 10p tax band.
Ian Mcneil, Roussayrolles, France
Brown was borrowing recklessly even when the country was earning a mint - has he paid-off any of these debts, or has he just been borrowing more to pay the interest, and then borrowing more on top, year after year?
I hate to think how smashed the UK's finances really are.
Mike, Brighton, England
He must not increase taxes to pay for his oversight - he needs to cut spending and cut taxes by letting go most of the political advisors.
Sue Doughty, Twyford, UK
We heard the same in 60's and 70's under Labour. Nothing changes tax tax tax spend spend spend chickens will come home to roost. The answer is the same government spending must be reduced - the party is over. The boom was all on borrowed money now comes the bust with reality having to be faced
Pete, Barry, Wales
A depression seems to be looming....well done labour and Brown you have managed to put the country back into the dark ages....The rich will now make even more and the poor will slide further down...the result...crime goes up...social unrest.....etc etc etc etc...i will never vote labour again!!
C Kroustis, London, UK
It is interesting that the amount predicted to be the deficit is very close to the amount used to bail out the banks and encourage confidence.
R Cronin, Ipswich,
Simple answer..Abolish the tax credits system and increase the personal allowance to the level of minimum wage. This would remove overstaffed government depts, advisers and accountants and make it worth working again. Job losses in the public sector? Who am I kidding! Maydb GB and AD need a P45..
Phil, Rugby, England
Why do we have to contribute to the National Insurance? Surely, we must have an option to 'opt' out and make our own provisions for retirement or medical.
All the money in the pot is constantly being eroded. Some of that by people who are not even entitled to them, as they probably have not contributed to taxes!
I say the option to opt out because by the time we retire we will have nothing to show for !!!!
James Cole, London, UK
Don't you mean "is set to plunge THE TAXPAYERS OF BRITAIN" 16 bn into the red??
Sarah, London,
Bet they wished they acted earlier on the liquidity crisis (as the US and Europe did) and hadn't named and shamed NR! Moral hazard suddenly becomes real hazard.
David, London,
A competent Chancellor would have run a budget surplus during the 'good' years. His successor would then have been in a position to release funds now, to reduce the effects of recession.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
What happened to prudence? Why did we not save in the good times to take us through the bad? A competent Gordon Brown, I think not.
Roger Parkes, Tunbridge Wells, England
The simple answer if there is such a thing would be to cut the amount paid out in the benefits giveaway,reduce the handouts for those who only work 16 hours a week.Look again at the stupid tax credits that only serve big business and sort out the disibility scam,this would save the taxpayer £bns.
Kenneth O'Boyle, Perth, United Kingdom
If the government is short of money, why does it not increase efficiency within the civil/public sector.
But then, Civil Servants never restrain their spending, lavish pay, benefit and retirement packages.
SRB, Abergele, UK
So much for Mr Browns comments: Unlike the Conservatives we have seen an end to "Boom & Bust"!!!
Richard, Aylesford,, Kent
At least increased tax revenue due to the high price of oil should offset this a bit.
Paul, Cambridge, UK
Why on earth should he need to borrow an extra £8 billion this year?
If this is on top of the windfall profits from the increase in revenue from the rising oil price it only demonstrates, if demonstration were needed, how profligate this government is with our money.
Bernard, Edinburgh, Scotland