Philip Webster, Political Editor
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
Ministers insisted last night that they had enough money to implement new tests on all incapacity benefit claimants after Conservative claims of a “con”. Disability charities also voiced concerns about people being “thrown off” benefits under the scheme.
James Purnell, the Work and Pensions Secretary, said yesterday that all 2.6 million benefit claimants will be forced to undergo tests from 2010 to prove that they are unfit. The Conservatives said that money allocated in the Budget for the tests was insufficient.
Mr Purnell gave warning that for people who did not play by the rules there would be “clear consequences” for their behaviour.
“For those who play by the rules we will provide extra support so they can realise their ambitions,” he said in the Commons.
Chris Grayling, his Conservative shadow, said that only £10 million extra had been put aside to pay for assessments – not even enough to cover reassessments for 16-24 year olds announced last November.
“That will leave 94 per cent of current claimants – some 2.5 million people – outside the Government’s plans. There is no money set aside to pay for them to have assessments, and no money to pay for expanded back-to-work programmes of the kind in use in countries like the United States.”
Describing the announcement as “the worst kind of political fraud”, Mr Grayling added: “When you read the small print, it is simply not true. The money being set aside amounts to less than £4 per claimant – enough to pay for their bus fares to the local job centre and nothing more.
“It will cause considerable disquiet among incapacity benefit claimants, without giving them any promise of extra support to get back into work. It is designed to create headlines, without the Government actually having to deliver the kind of radical welfare reform that this country needs.”
Officials insisted that the total allocated for testing in 2010 was £30million, with a further £20million coming from departmental savings. In addition there was already money in the system for reassessing of claimants.
They added that it would take three years for all the claimants to undergo the tests, and that there was sufficient money for that to happen.
Meanwhile, charities voiced worries. Paul Treloar, the director of policy and services at the Disability Alliance, said that his charity supported efforts to help disabled people into work, but said it was “dishonest” to use a more stringent test simply to reduce the number of claimants.
Moving the bar higher to claim incapacity benefit was not a solution, he told the BBC.
“When people have been on incapacity benefit for significant periods of time, simply moving them to the job-seekers’ allowance is not going to help them back into work.”
He said that, in his experience, “it does cause concern when people think there are intentions simply to throw them off benefits”.
Kevin Doherty, the director of services at Disability Action, added that the “overall ethos” of the vast majority of those claiming incapacity benefit was the desire to work.
He called for “creative programmes and initiatives to be introduced to the overall working environment”.
Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats’ Treasury spokesman, accused Labour and the Tories of “dishonesty and naivety” in “imagining people who want to work are being barred from doing it because of the benefits system”.
Many of those claiming incapacity benefit were mentally ill and were unable to seek employment.
I would love to work again but I’ve been in too much pain
Tracey Follis, 28, suffers from osteochondritis dissecans lesions (OCD) of the knee, causing her great pain when she walks or stands.
She worked as a carer for eight years while suffering from the disease, but two years ago was told to have an operation, which has only exacerbated the problem. She has not worked since.
She thinks that government plans announced in the Budget to subject people who claim incapacity benefit to an eligibility test are insulting.
She says: “It makes me feel like I am doing something wrong by claiming incapacity benefit. I would love to work again, but ever since I had my operation I’ve been in too much pain.”
A cocktail of six drugs helps to relieve her symptoms, but she struggles to pay for the prescriptions, as well as living costs, on the money she gets from the Government. She is currently given £98 a week in incapacity benefit.
“Thankfully, I’ve got a partner who works full-time to keep a roof over my children’s heads,” she says.
Ms Follis, who lives with her partner, Mark Bennett, 28, and two children, Megan, 7, and Leah, 3, attends courses at the Birmingham Disability Resource Centre in the hope of returning to work.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

From mortgages to savings, borrowing to consumer affairs, our collection of tools, services and guides will help you make your money go further
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
sadly being ill/incapacitated & in receipt of benefits other than Income Support, is a question of what the government system give you in one hand, they take away from the other!
it may seem the disabled are well looked after & cared for but in reality it's just another Targets & Figures Scam that Nu-Labour are so fond of.
they think it makes them look efficient.
& then to rub salt in, the MPs have the nerve to ask for increased allowances!
suzyn, clacton, UK
Forcing people to prove they're disabled will do nothing to improve the fearful and ignorant attitude of employers which is the main barrier to disabled people securing employment. Most of us want to contribute to our society and economy. These changes are just more blaming-the-victim nonsense, and they're happening in other countries too.
Sacha, Auckland, New Zealand
I am scared to death i cannot work through mental illness.My wife is with me all the time .She is my carer and feels very upset thet if i am bluntly rubber stamped as fit for work which is what i feel this is about she to has given her life up to be with me for no more than he is fit you have been lazy along with him you make me sick labour!!!!!
Mansfield, Notts, UK
This is a 'con' because Labour has no intention of putting MOST of these IB claimants back to work. That's because most of them are people who can't get work because of discrimination and Labour's not happy about that fact coming out.
judy, Liverpool, England
There are certain benefits that one only gets if on INCOME SUPPORT. If one is simply on IB one will NOT get free proscriptions for instance.
Laura, London, England
ive been in a wheelchair for 26yrs. the modern "disability awareness" is merely another way for the govt to screw the folks who've PAID TAXES, and NI all thier lives, whilst giving it away to johnny foreigner hand over fist. they get more and we don't!
i live in social housing and exist on £160, thats me, the wife and 2 daughters, 13&17. my new car is 15yrs old and we havent had a holiday since 1986... and despite this our children are both at the top of their school year. yes, we get a pittance, but with good finances and the right priorities we manage and have NO debts.
STUART LANIGAN, coventry, England
Let me offer readers a very obvious point on these proposed changes.
First, people will have the right to appeal and appealing costs money and time.
If people are thrown off this benefit they WILL appeal. How much will that cost the Government.
And will the EU Convention on Human Rights come into this?
If someone has been deemed unfit to work for years and their condition has not improved, but worsened, then how can they say they are now fit to work?
I believe the proposals are unworkable and will be counter productive.
As for those that may be thrown of this benefit, they will simply go onto another benefit.
Mike, Manchester, England
The Government can't afford to pay for its own disabled people, but it can spend billions, and is still spending billions, on wars in the Middle East which kill and maim hundreds of thousands of people, and which are aimed solely at assisting the USA in its failed policy of putting and keeping in power puppet governments.
Neil, Gloucestershire, England
no she will not get any thing more than £98 a week if her partner is working as she says he does everyone assumes that these people get a lot of money , that is not true most of then don't even get enough to live on and are running into dept more and more every day..i think we should be saving much more money if we turned to over paid people like the lady that sits in the Suffolk county council earning £4000.00 a week for doing nothing instead of insulting the sick people of this country....
allan pemberton, NORWICH, NORFOLK
There is quite a bit of work out there which does not require walking or standing.
You just have to look for it and if need be train for it - if you want to.
Ms Folis's attituded abuses the many prould dissabled people who, despite their difficulties, manage to hold down some level of work and do it well.
The dissability rights does not just apply to shopping !
Roger, Plymouth, Devon
Ms Follis will not get free prescriptions on IB. Have you every tried living on £98 a week, Theodore? Do you think that people who are ill/have been ill are welcomed with open arms by employers? What do you think her pension will be like, having missed so much work? What about people who are ill and have no adequate treatment for their illness but will still be put back into the workplace? Have you any experience of IB or long-term illness? Anybody can fall ill.
AR, London,
if ms Follis is on benefit then does notl her prescriptions come free ??? and she will get housing benefit, council tax rebate and etc.
theodore, manchester,