Patrick Hosking, Gary Duncan and Miles Costello
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Bank charges and insurance premiums are set to rise after high street banks and insurers were ordered to pay up to £14 billion under the terms of Bradford & Bingley’s nationalisation.
Some analysts suggested that the bailout could hasten the end of free banking for current account customers as banks attempt to pass on the cost to their customers.
All banks face huge increases in the levy they pay to the deposit lifeboat, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, after it borrowed £14 billion from the Government to underwrite Bradford & Bingley deposits transferred to Banco Santander.
Banks and building societies will be asked to chip in £900 million a year just to pay the interest on the bill. That works out at more than £100 million each for large banks such as Royal Bank of Scotland and Barclays.
“The banks will be in a militant mood after this,” Alex Potter, a banking analyst with Collins Stewart, said. They had already had their arms twisted by regulators to support an earlier £400 million capital raising by Bradford & Bingley last month.
Stephen Hadrill, head of the Association of British Insurers, said that premiums would have to go up. “Insurers are livid at the way that this has been handled. If it’s going to fall on the companies in due course, insurers are going to have to try to find that money from somewhere,” he said.
The anger erupted after the Government confirmed yesterday that it was nationalising the bulk of Bradford & Bingley, seizing £50 billion of assets and bankrolling the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Banco Santander, the Spanish bank that owns Abbey, has bought the £20 billion deposit business and the network of 200 branches.
The remaining assets and liabilities of the former building society, including its £41 billion mortgage book, personal loan book, Yorkshire headquarters, treasury assets and wholesale liabilities, will be taken into public ownership by the transfer of all shares to the Treasury, Alistair Darling said.
Shareholders look likely to be almost entirely wiped out, although the Treasury is expected to appoint an independent valuer to set compensation, if any. Trading in the shares, which last changed hands at 20p on Friday, was suspended.
The victims include more than 800,000 Bradford & Bingley customers who received free shares when Bradford & Bingley became a listed company in 2000.
Branches opened normally yesterday under Santander. Borrowers were urged to continue making their repayments in the normal way.
The Chancellor disclosed that the immediate cost to taxpayers would be a £4 billion payment to Abbey together with the £14 billion loan to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
The Government had acted on the advice of the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority, “to maintain financial stability and protect depositors, while minimising the exposure to taxpayers”, the Treasury said.
The Financial Services Authority, which supervises British banks, concluded on Saturday that Bradford & Bingley no longer met threshold conditions for operating as a deposit taker, the Treasury said. “Savers’ money remains absolutely secure,” it added.
The nationalisation could push government borrowing this year to levels not seen since the mid-Nineties, adding to the possibility of huge tax rises after the next general election.
The Treasury insists that it expects to recoup all, or the vast bulk, of the £18 billion paid directly, and indirectly via the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, to Santander within months rather than years, through disposal of Bradford & Bingley assets. The Government has first call on this money as it becomes available.
While most of the £18 billion may well be recovered, the exposure nevertheless adds to already intense stress on the Government’s finances.
The £4 billion paid directly to Santander will have to be added to total government borrowing for 2008-09 – already set to soar far above the Chancellor’s £43 billion forecast as the downturn hits tax revenues. Officials remain uncertain whether the £14 billion transferred to Santander through the compensation scheme also count against borrowing but admit that it may have to. The decision will rest with the Office for National Statistics.
Even before the latest costs, economists expected public borrowing to climb to as much as £60 billion.
The initial impact of Bradford & Bingley may now drive this to £78 billion, which would put the Government’s deficit at more than 5 per cent of GDP. In future years, the Treasury will have to add to its borrowing the cost of any defaults on Bradford & Bingley mortgages. With £1.3 billion worth of Bradford & Bingley’s £41 billion in mortgages already in arrears, those losses could pile up quickly as the housing market slumps and unemployment rises.
Eventually, with the Government so deep in the red, taxes will have to rise to bring down public borrowing to more manageable levels.
In the meantime, Bradford & Bingley’s debts will add to those of Northern Rock in swelling the national debt, lifting this by a further £30 billion or so, Capital Economics estimates.
The impact is likely to push total debt up to some 45 per cent of GDP - smashing the 40 per cent ceiling imposed by the Treasury, which looks set to be formally abandoned by Mr Darling in his autumn PreBudget Report.
Banco Santander will strengthen its position among the giants of British savings and mortgages, becoming No 3 in savings, outsized by the planned Lloyds TSB/HBOS combination and Royal Bank of Scotland. Thanks to the acquisitions of Abbey and Alliance & Leicester, it is No 2 in mortgages, with 13 per cent of the home loans market. It will have 1,300 branches under the Abbey, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley brands and will employ 23,000 people in Britain. Yesterday it declined to rule out job losses or branch closures, though none was planned immediately.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sorry to hear about your father Lynne, but what do you expect? If the shares would have gone up in the last few years you would have been more than happy with the higher price eh? All dividends from the last few years will have been paid out in his agreed way as if he was still alive.
dave, vienna,
So Santander "buys" Abbeys £20bn deposit business and takes over the 200 branches buy being given £18bn by the FSCS.
Your government has to borrow the money given to Santander and takes on the debt side of the business but expects to pay off this loan by selling the assets,, Which assets are these?
Tim, Mackay, Australia
interesting that the word Capitalism has recovered its its prejorativeconnotations
peter c, Devizes, Wessex
For spanish tax payers and Santander stock holders, this bailout is not a good new. Santander stock holders distrust about the terms of the agreement. Santander clients in Spain think they will pay the purchase with higher charges. Spanish tax payers think they will pay british bankrupts in future.
Oscar Jimenez, Madrid, Spain
Before you get on your soapbox , Richard of Newton Abbot, and condemn socialism lets get one thing straight. This finacial farce engulfing the world is a direct result of CAPITALIST GREED!
Dave Bridge, Southport, UK
I would like to be reassured that the Executive and Directorate who have lead B&B into this mess by their foolish lending policies are drummed out without compensation and black-balled from future careers in banking.
David, Poole,
Sr. Emilio Botin must have thought Christmas came in September and is laughing all the way to the Banco Santander having bought £20bn savings book, 200 branches and large market share for a pittance. The Chancellor saying he protected the taxpayer is untrue. All bank customers are taxpayers
Daniel Cramer, Welwyn, UK
Aren't we in enough debt already? I think it's unbelievable that Brown is willing to saddle the UK taxpayer with so much risky debt and still have the cheek to pretend that we will eventually make a profit out of it. Hasn't he learned anything from N. Rock? We need a change of government and fast!
James, M/cr, uk
Were British based banks offered the same terms to acquire B&B as Banco Santander. If not we should have a judicial review of the decision.
On the basis of the deal offered to Banco Santander the Chancellor and the Treasury should stay out of business negotiations. They appear to have been putty.
Daniel Cramer, Welwyn, UK
At least this way we have some choice about whether and/or who to pay. With taxpayer bailouts we would all be paying regardless.
Of the two options - having some choice or having no choice, I know which I prefer.
I think it's called a "free market economy" but it's been a long time gone.
David, Guildford, Surrey
This is the hangover for the cocaine fuelled financial gamblers who've personally done very well out of the proflegate and fiscally imprudent unregulated era, theyve now got a load of bad chips on their hands to dispose of, which they palm to the average saving taxpayer who wasn't even in the game.
d morgan, london,
Michael is quite right. Bankruptcy is the reasonable end for a badly-run company, and that's that. The world keeps turning, and if shares end up being priced realistically, that's what the market is supposed to do, isn't it? If these assets are worthless today, why will they be worth anything later?
Hugh Reid, Glasgow,
A Gordon Brown stealth tax - another hamfisted intervention by a socialist in the financial system - NATIONALISE - look at the Europeans and the Irish - sensible rational actions - the state taking a venture capital investment on which they will prosper in the future or guarantee bank deposits
Richard, Newton Abbot,
Spot on. Consumer will pick up the tab whatever way the numbers work. The bank should have been left to go bankrupt. Savers would have received money through the FSCS - which is happening anyway - via a government loan. Administrators would run the mortgage business at no cost to taxpayers
Michael, London,
Gordon Brown sold the British gold reserves at a knockdown price and now he has sold the best assets of Bradford & Bingley for a song. If he was in business he would be a bankrupt by now.
Deirdre McIvor, Londonderry , Northern Ireland
my father died in 2005 and my sisters and I have been too distraught to do anything as yet with his B&B shares, does this mean that his hard earned savings are lost to us? and what about the money that would have been paid to him during the last three years? We feel that we have failed him!
Lynne Beverley Jenkins, Liversedge, West Yorkshire, England
The Bank's Have to Come back to "Reallity", Monaco was "Nice for Barclay's Wealth Management", but Detrimental to the "Normal Workng Man"! Sadl'y twill be you and I who"Lose Out!" Pension Funds 31/12/07 in "Equities", what "Value Now"?At least 50% less!
Paul, Manchester, UK
Good lord! This article was written .... IN THE FUTURE .....
Vishal Kundi, London, UK