David Smith
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
The rise has been sudden and dramatic. Early this year a lone trader in New York pushed the price of oil above $100 a barrel for the first time, taking the world into a new era.
It did not last, sparking suggestions that the trader had ensured his place in history but very little else. Then, a few weeks ago, the upward march began again. Last weekend, with oil markets twitchy about the closure of the Grangemouth refinery in Scotland and a dispute affecting Nigerian oil output, prices came within a whisker of $120 a barrel.
The president of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec), the Algerian energy minister Chakib Khelil, helpfully added to the mix by suggesting that the price could hit $200 as investors fled the weak dollar.
As it turned out, prices spent much of last week slipping back, dropping to just above $110. But on Friday they were up again, responding to Turkish airstrikes on Kurdish rebels. Oil is a great barometer of international tension.
Is the head of Opec right about a $200 oil price? Will a more realistic target, $150, be reached this year and what would be the consequences of that for the economy? Why has oil been surging anyway, doubling in price in a year?
The rise in oil prices reflects a series of factors. In the 1990s, China was an oil exporter, capable of fuelling its own economic boom. Now, apart from being the world’s second largest consumer of oil, it is also a big importer.
Opec, which five years ago had a target range for oil prices of $22 to $28 a barrel, appeared initially worried when the price began to rise sharply, its members fearing that a sudden climb would be followed by a precipitous fall.
Now Opec, and in particular normally moderate voices such as Saudi Arabia, has changed its tune. Some attribute this to the cooling of relations between the mainly Arab Opec members and George Bush’s America in the wake of the Iraq war. Bush’s State of the Union address of two years ago, when he declared his aim of ending US dependence on imported Middle East oil, also rubbed the producing countries up the wrong way.
The result is that even Saudi Arabia appears happy with $100-plus oil, insisting that the market is well supplied and refusing to turn on the taps.
The fundamental question about whether oil prices will rise further is one of supply and demand. Over the past four years the global economy has been growing at its fastest rate since the early 1970s, pumping up demand for oil. Even the slowdown now under way will leave it relatively strong, according to forecasters.
The supply of oil, however, has risen more slowly, either because of production cuts by Opec, political problems or as a result of a lack of investment during the years when prices were very weak.
Adding to this, in the months since the credit crisis broke last summer, is the fact that investors have seen oil and other commodities as “safe haven” investments. Lehman Brothers, the investment bank, calculates that 20-30% of the current oil price reflects speculative demand from investors. That means the price could fall when this “hot” money is moved elsewhere, though most experts thinka price of around $100 is likely for some time.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The clue lies in who ever stands to gain in an extra ordinary way. That is the cause of the rise...the true cause...forget all the other demand from Asia - which contributes etc it is wrong to think the sudden jump is their fault only. Otherwise, we ain't seen nothing yet. Mark these words.
Willo, MK,
In response to Gerallt Huws' question:
To do so would cause a reduction of re-investment of capital in exploration and development, increasing the supply-demand imbalance and further increasing the price of oil. Taxation must be levied at the consumer level to reduce demand and therefore price.
Martin, Bristol,
The only upside of this is that at some point David Cameron will be PM and PMQ's will become enjoyable again as the smug git gets his comeuppance. He will be castigated for events over which he will have no control and no doubt he'll then call for an end to Punch and Judy politics.
E Heath, farnham, england
The use of oil products has underpinned our extravagant economy for decades. Worse, their use has been accelerating. Sometime soon a decline in this luxury will start, and perhaps that will also accerate. So much of our stability depends on confidence and that is so easily lost when things go wrong.
Colin, shrewsbury,
Just wait 'til the pound falls to $1.50 and a barrel of oil that now costs 60 pounds will then cost 80 pounds.
Steve Byrne, christchurch, UK
Car Sharing is surely part of the answer... why do so many people have to go to the supermarket on their own?..It cant be that difficult to find a neighbour or colleague or friend to save the use of another car?..or are we living in such a comfort zone that organising such things is "too much effort
mike, london,
It is not only oil which is soaring in price. Just look at the commodity price index: everything from soya beans to copper is taking off. The reason (which apparently has not occured to Mr S)? US monetary policy of benign dollar neglect - i.e.,inflation - which has meant the $ has been in free fall.
Frank, London, UK
The US elected to its Presidency an individual who was sponsored by oil money. The quid pro quo returns must be beyond their wildest dreams.
Stu Peters, North Sydney, Canada
Oil is the 'inifinite energy resource' that allows the impossible arena of neo-claissical economics to function. We are moving beyond the stable price/energy range that allows this illusion to operate. This is akin to taking a transistor amplifier outside of its linear range - expect a burnout.
kevin, Lincoln, UK
Yes, and donald's view is shared by just about everybody who has taken the trouble to find out the facts. But governments will continue to trot out highly optimistic predictions of enough energy for further growth, because market recognition of the true situation would cause a financial implosion.
Julian Brown, Oxford,
Boycotting oil companies on gas would make no difference: they make next to nothing in gasoline: the money is made elsewhere.
Why always look at the profit figure? What matters is the return on capital which is little better than manufacturing but investments and risks dwarf it.
John, Newport,
Why does the British Govt. not levy an winfall tax on the excess profits of such Oil companies as Shell/ B.P., to offset the reducion in excise duty paid by the consumer?
Gerallt Huws, Talsarnau, Cymru
All the worlds big oil fields are in decline. They can no longer produce oil at peak rates. There is no way around this basic fact. Supply rates are going down and demand is going up. Expect to see $300+ oil in the next decade. Expect to see petrol rationing and even more food price inflation.
donald, London,
I still believe completely that if we all chose two major gas stations such as Exxon and Shell and totally boycotted them both that sooner or later if would have to hurt their profit. We never buy at any of the big 5 and will never use a gas credit card again.
Penny, middletown, USA
f everyone would pick just one day per week to use no gas. This would make a difference.
Nancy Lawn, Irontonm, United STates