Robin Pagnamenta
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
A group set up by the Government to help businesses to reduce their carbon emissions has had only a limited impact and must do far more to meet the scale of the challenge, according to Whitehall’s top spending watchdog.
A report on the Carbon Trust by the National Audit Office (NAO) said only 12 per cent of large UK businesses had worked with the group to lower their emissions. What is more, only 40 per cent of the possible savings identified by the trust between 2003 and 2006 had been implemented.
The NAO said the low level of implementation was due to competing investment priorities at large businesses and public sector bodies, as well as a lack of commitment to the proposed changes from top-level management.
Sir John Bourn, head of the NAO, said in the report that the Carbon Trust’s achievement of cutting emissions by up to two million tonnes this year was commendable but was a small one in view of the scale of the challenge ahead.
The Carbon Trust was created in 2001 as a private company intended to accelerate the adoption of energy efficient technology and the development of a low-carbon economy. It received more than £103 million of public funds in 2006/07.
Other observers were more candid about Carbon Trust’s achievements and its cost effectiveness in the battle to counter climate change.
Alex Lambie, head of greenhelpline. com, said: “At an annual cost of £103 million of taxpayers’ money, their achievements are worryingly small and symptomatic of the Government’s persistently disjointed and misguided approach to tackling climate change.” He called for greater government support for green energy products aimed at consumers, such as 100 per cent renewable energy tariffs.
The Government is trying to reduce UK emissions of carbon dioxide by 20 per cent from 1990 levels by 2010, reducing the total amount produced by the UK from 592 million tonnes per year to 474 million tonnes.
The NAO said that the Carbon Trust’s two million tonne reduction in 2006/07 represented a cost saving for the bodies involved of between £410 million and £655 million.
It said the trust was “likely” to achieve a 4.4 million-tonne reduction in emissions by 2010.
Tom Delay, chief executive of the Carbon Trust, said the NAO’s report was “ very welcome” given the urgent need for business to take further action on reducing carbon emissions.
He said the report “has some valuable recommendations that we will examine as part of our ongoing commitment to accelerate the move to a low carbon economy”.
Yesterday the UN’s weather agency published data that showed greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere reached a record high last year with carbon dioxide playing an increasingly significant role in global warming.
Average global average concentrations in the atmosphere of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide were higher than ever in measurements coordinated by the World Meteorological Organisation, Geir Braathen, a climate specialist at the Geneva-based agency, said.
“CO2 as a greenhouse gas is getting more and more important,” he said.
The NAO’s report on the Carbon Trust’s effectiveness comes ahead of a key meeting of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Bali, Indonesia, next month.
The conference will bring together representatives of more than 180 countries, seeking to continue the work of the Kyoto Protocol.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
As an engineer working in industry on energy saving projects with electric motors fitted to fans and pumps, I can confirm that many companies will not spend the money.
Electric motors consume approx 65% of ALL ELECTRICITY GENERATED. I have regularly quoted and underwritten projects with paybacks of less than one year which have been rejected. Projects which have been installed usually HALVE THE CONSUMED POWER, there is no need for new technology it is just a matter of making companies fit technology that already exists
What is required is real action and government legislation:
policy number one:
All fans and pumps fitted with electric motors above 3.0kW must have variable speed drives and closed loop control systems tuned to system demand.
As a very rough estimate based on my personal experience, that would save in excess of the15% of generated electricity in the UK.
policy number two:
force companies to fit high efficient EFF1 motors rather than the cheaper alternatives
victor harris, madeley, uk
The debate is over; itâs political propaganda NOT science. UK court says Gore is a fraud. August 2007 Update: Man-made Catastrophic Global Warming Not True. Unfortunately, Hansen is a political hack of George Soros. Further, flawed NASA Global Warming data paid for by George Soros. In order to be an intelligent reader you must have a basic knowledge. Please do your own homework; a starting point http://www.InteliOrg.com/ Remember CONSENSUS is NEVER science itâs always a POLITICAL STATEMENT (Party Line).
Dr Coles, Los Angeles, USA
I'm sure that the government appointed crony still got paid his bonus for whatever this quango managed to do.
what did we expect from a poultry £103 million?
Other countries solve technical problems by developing technical solutions to those problems.
The British Government knows best, don't give the money to scientists and engineers so that they can develop technical solutions. We must give it to quangos, they know what to do because the men running them have very nice suits and polished shoes.
why can't the info be given out via a website? does it really need a hundred million of public funds per year?
The Carbon Trust has offices in London's popular west end so the office space is nice and cheap but so what, its not their money they're spending, it's ours.
Graham, St Albans, uk