Dominic O’Connell
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
AN ambitious plan to build a high-speed rail line north of London via Heathrow – relieving the pressure for a third runway at the airport – is being drawn up by Arup, the influential engineering firm.
Arup has a history of originating big transport projects. In the 1980s it came up with the scheme to route the high-speed line to the Channel Tunnel via Stratford in east London, ending a planning impasse that had threatened its construction.
The Heathrow scheme is in its early stages, and has no official backing from government.
Its first public airing is likely to be tomorrow at a parliamentary reception to launch The Right Line, a book on the history of the high-speed link.
Mark Bostock, a director at Arup and one of the key individuals in the battle over the routing of the Channel Tunnel line, said: “There is total logic in seeing how Heathrow can be connected to the national and international rail network.
“This is fundamental to the sustainable development of the airport and would be a step-change beyond [airports operator] BAA’s extremely modest ambitions for shifting passengers from road to rail,” he said.
Arup’s plan would see the Channel Tunnel line extended west, parallel with the Great Western line. After Heathrow, trains would turn north along the alignment of the Chiltern line, running to Birmingham and Scotland.
“What this plan brings is connectivity – not only bringing the north and the Midlands onto the international high-speed rail network, but also bringing Heathrow within two-and-a-half hours of central Paris,” Bostock said.
The plan would also free capacity at Heathrow by cutting the need for short-haul flights to Europe. This could detract from the justification for a controversial third runway at the airport, plans for which were outlined by the government 10 days ago.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sounds like a great idea, anything that stops expansion of the airline industry cannot be bad.
David Hoyle, Preston, UK
The government is worried about the City but the City has been doing very well thank you without more than 46000 flights from Heathrow, so don't fall for that argument. What about the human argument, villages wiped out, villages blighted, more homes than ever affected by noise right across London and to the west country, this is madness. Will someone from the City put Kelly right, that name doesn't bode well in any case, Kelly.,
pam, twickenham flypath,
Cheapest way out for our government every time i cannot see them investing in the future even if it is better for the enviroment. I live in sipson and they want to take my home and give profits to foreight companies the third runway as a family will cost us money.
So putting it in a nutshell the rail system is a great idea but we must get rid of this goverment and we must lead by example the future is green or we have no future.
maxine payne, sipson village, middlesex
With the Open Skies deal and any European carrier being permitted to fly the Atlantic, BA have already stated that they are keen to offer flights from other countries and Virgin are also looking at their options. The airlines themselves should be looking at better ways to move people around and to maximise transfer passengers. Air France manage extremely well between Paris and Brussels with TGV. Brussels is practically CDG North Terminal.
Craig, London,
The presence of a TGV terminal at Paris-CDG airport allows airlines like American, United and Air France to code share with the TGV and sell "flights" to destinations for which they have no slots. This has dramatically reduced the number of internal flights. This probably explains why the unpopular project of adding a runway at one of the Paris airports has never re-surfaced. If it worked for Paris, why wouldn't it work for London?
Concerning the comparison between rail and maglev, Benbow is quite right. The loss due to wheel-rail friction has been made negligible by modern engineering, but nothing can be done about air resistance. It grows with the square of the speed, so at 500 mph this resistance becomes enormous and both TGV and maglev would become wasteful electricity guzzlers.
Peretti, Bastia, France
When will the protagonists of Maglev think through their arguments. Through out UK and Europe we have standard gauge rails on which all trains can run - either from High Speed lines such as HS1 and the French LGV network or from conventional regional lines. This gives real "connectivity" and not just a shuttle between cities on very expensive right -of - way! And to travel at the claimed 500mph of Maglev don't forget that the aerodynamic losses and hence energy consumption would be approaching that ot aircraft.
BENBOW, Andover,
It's a great idea, but this would be inferior to the Maglev option: http://www.500kmh.com/projectinfo.html.
James Brown, London,
This seems a very useful and constructive idea, with plenty of wins. Shame it'll never be approved.
Justin, Nr. Lincoln, UK
I think that an increase in the accessibility to high speed trains in UK should be welcomed and supported by the government. However, these trains should be put in competition with the car not the plane. What we need are trains that can take us from the centre of town to the centre of town. Can get us from home, to port, air or sea, to work and are affordable.
Let us also not forget that these trains are often powered by mains electricity which, if produced from coal firing stations.. is much dirtier than any plane.
Calvin Bailey, London, GBR
I think that the idea to link Heathrow Air Port to the Channel Tunnel is a great idea.
I hope that it will be succssees.
Because I think that trains use less energy
than air craft and produce less pollusion.
It will also reduce the number of cars
on the roads.
Joel Fridjohn, Hod Hasharon, Israel