Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

The sight of a parking attendant sticking a ticket on your windscreen makes the heart sink. But from the end of next month even a ticketless car will not mean you have escaped.
Under an overhaul of parking regulations set out by the Government, a new era of “remote enforcement” will become commonplace. From March 31 councils across England will be allowed to use CCTV cameras to detect parking offences.
Drivers will not know that they have been caught until a letter arrives up to 14 days later, by which time they may be unable to gather evidence to defend themselves.
Cameras can be used only in areas where it is too “difficult or sensitive” for an attendant to operate such as a fast-flowing road or a busy junction, according to the new regulations.
Parking attendants will be renamed “civil enforcement officers” and given powers to post tickets they do not have time to finish writing before motorists drive off. Under current rules a ticket must be placed on a vehicle or handed to the driver to be valid. Wheel-clamping will largely be reserved for persistent offenders.
Ministers said that the changes would make parking enforcement “fairer and more transparent”, with greater clarity on the appeals process and what constitutes an offence.
But the AA said that thousands of innocent drivers would receive penalties from attendants seeking an easy way to meet performance targets. Councils receive more than £1 billion a year in parking fines and charges; many rely on the profits to pay for services such as free bus passes for the over-60s. Under the new rules they will no longer be able to set targets for revenue from parking or for the number of tickets that must be issued. However, attendants are still likely to come under pressure from contractors to issue a certain number of tickets to prove that they are working.
All authorities will have to copy the London system of having two tiers of penalties, with a lower fine for overstaying in a bay and a higher fine for parking on yellow lines. Authorities will have to publish clearer policies and explain how they exercise discretion when considering challenges. They will also have to tell drivers how to appeal. Many pay fines that they believe were issued unfairly because they fear having to pay a higher amount and do not realise that there is a a good chance an independent adjudicator will find in their favour.
According to the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service, London motorists won three quarters of appeals in 2006. Almost a third were not even contested. In the rest of Britain more than 50 per cent of appeals succeeded.
Edmund King, the AA president, said: “The last-minute change in the law to allow the serving of parking tickets by post if the ticket was started is worrying. We believe in real-time tickets, not extra-time tickets. The civil enforcement officer will not know if the driver is a blue-badge holder and the driver will not know a ticket has been issued. Enforcement should be about prohibiting obstructive parking, not about postal fines after the event.”
The DfT said that attendants would have to provide evidence of offences if a ticket was issued by post. This might be a photograph but some councils are planning to require simply that the attendant record the number plate and tax disc number.
Rosie Winterton, the Transport Minister, said: “Parking enforcement must be fair, clear, consistent and based on robust evidence. We want to increase public confidence in parking. Parking rules exist to help beat congestion and improve road safety. With more than 30 million vehicles on Britain’s roads, just one vehicle parked in the wrong place can cause traffic jams. It can also put other road users in danger.”
The new rules
— A penalty notice can be sent by post if the car is driven off before the warden can hand it over
— Councils can use CCTV cameras in places too dangerous for wardens
— Authorities should not set targets for tickets or profits
— Profits must be spent on improving transport
— Parking attendants will now be known as civil enforcement officers
— Lesser offences, such as briefly overstaying a ticket, will incur a fine of £80 in London (£50 outside). More serious offences will incur a £120 fine (£80)
— Tickets can be issued for parking next to a dropped kerb or 0.5m from the kerb
— If an authority rejects a driver’s challenge it should offer the 50 per cent discount for 14 more days
— Clamping should be used largely for persistent offenders. In other cases it cannot take place for 30 minutes after the penalty is incurred. They must be released within two hours
— If a driver returns, the vehicle should be released unless the clamp is secured or all wheels are on the towtruck. The driver must pay the ticket
— When a vehicle is clamped or removed the driver can be forced to pay all outstanding penalties (at present a driver is only required to pay for the latest offence)
— Authorities must publish their policies on how they exercise their discretion and should produce annual reports on parking activities
Source: DfT
75% chance of appeal success
51,484 Appeals against parking tickets issued in London in 2006
38,579 Number of appeals won
9,449 Appeals against parking tickets issued in the rest of Britain
5,341 Number of appeals won
2.5m The number of blue badges issued in Britain
50% Proportion of badges which councils say may be fraudulently used
7 million Number of parking tickets issued in Britain in 2005. 800,000 were in Westminster
£7,500 Amount spent by driver in Cowbridge, South Wales, as he challenged a £60 ticket for parking on zigzag lines near a pedestrian crossing. The challenge failed
Sources: Which?, Times database
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What about those of us that have a Blue Disabled Badge? how will we be affected???
Julie, Harrow,
I just cannot believe this, although I should as I have just had cctv enforced fine for picking up the misses from ourside her work..2minutes I reckon.
I am afraid the media is reading the wrong DFT paper or is desperately misinterpreting it; these cameras can be used to enforce anywhere, the definaition of a dangerous spot for wardens is left to the "discretion" of councils, Jesus, if ever two words did not belong in the same sentence it's discretion and councils.
The motorist is an easy target, easy for revenue and easy to rack up crime statistics, still we live in the most antisocial times ever....
Who do you think you are running this country for...I'll give you a clue.....it's all of us........................!
S.Wilson, Aylesbury, bucks
the ch 5 report showed what s an accidental or planned trap for motorists. 1st identify a nice set of shops near a roundabout. Then put double yellows off the roundabout (which you can legally stop to drop off) But they stop the double yellows & replace with zigzags before you can get far enough away from the junction. So drivers see shops, see double yellows & try to get as far away from the roundabout as possible. Result, they either stop too close to a junction (illegal) or on white zigzags (illegal).
When the motorist comes in and chooses the safest place to drop off (just before the zigzags) theres the camera!
This is such a stupid example of profiteering. They could have stopped this stopping much cheaper than installing the camera by a) Putting railings up in front of the shops, or b) extending zigzags, or c)using the red route no stopping markings (not quite so obvious to motorists).
andy, oxford,
The thing no-one seems to have mentioned is that for any parking ticket to be valid, the road markings have to comply with regulations.
The regulations regarding road markings (TSR's - Traffic Signs Regulations) clearly state "no variations". As most of the parking bays / double-yellows i see day-to-day, even without carrying a measuring-tape, are visibly non-compliant, any ticket issued is hence unenforceable.
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si2002/20023113.htm
Maybe the councils should put the money they earn back into painting the road markings correctly, thus ensuring that tickets are valid in the first place!
Chris Jones, Birmingham, UK
This has very little to do with regulating traffic and parking and everything to do with raising revenue and extortion.
It just drives a further wedge between those who make the rules (and allegedly represent us), and the vast majority of people in the country.
I am sure that many drivers will deal with it by having illegible, broken or false number plates.
Rob, Wirral, UK
At a cost of more than £20,000 for this type of camera equipment I am very surprised that more cameras aren't being stolen; in Manchester the number of CCTV cameras being stolen is reaching epidemic proportions.
The weakness in SPECS is at the root, chop the damn thing down - the steel in the post is well worth the effort!
Let's hope this crimewave strikes other parts of the UK.
Harry, London,
What will academics in 100 years time make of the Beatles song Lovely Rita?
And how will they explain the opening scene of Joe Orton's Loot?
David Moss, London, UK
This is wrong, wrong wrong and we should act against it. It is a misuse of CCTV's - I am in favour of them in use against crime but a social offence such as parking is a blatent misuse and will further undermine the confidence and trust-worthiness of local and national government and the police.
Tim Murray, London,
Make a stand people! Kick nulab out at the first opportunity. Fuel now over £1.10 per litre & rising because they know we will just moan & pay up! Same with parking.
Steven Brown, Chesterfield,
The opportunity to end our national suffering is approaching, in the form of a General Election and the remedy is in our hands.We should push for legislation for a maximum of two terms of office for the elected government ,as we know from bitter experience that ,with the advent of the proffesional politician,once they get towards the end of their second term and into a third term they think that they can walk on water and start to abuse the system and milk it.With the present crew,I doubt if many of them,if they hadn't been elected,would qualify for a job paying above the minimum wage.
Josh Martin, Oxford, Gt.Britain
As if the Council TAX, TV Licence FEES, 0870 numbers and Billions of £££s generated by Parking attendents was not enough to ripp off Britons. Well done Labour; Squeeze Hard Mr Brown you have to get the last penny out of peoples pockets, You waited 10 years for this job....I am lucky that I am not there any more to enjoy all this...
Adnan, New Jersey, USA
Our once honourable public services are now staffed by bullies and thieves, backed up by their corrupt masters in the House of Commons, who won't be satisfied until they have criminalised the entire population.
I just hope the Tories get the message that we won't tolerate them keeping up these measures when we finally manage to get rid of NuLab. If they promised to take down the speed cameras they'd be sure of a landslide.
Bev, Bucks, UK
Stealth Tax #3721 in a series of 10000.
Thanks Gordon.
Jeremy Poynton, Frome, Somerset
and they wonder why theft of number plates is on the rise
DAVID FENN, luton, uk
Now we have seen the function creep on CCTV, i.e. going from a security measure (of questionable effectiveness in reduction in crime etc) to a ruthlessly efficient revenue generator.
Now imagine when we get our nice shiny ID cards imposed on us by this vile government, the possibilities are endless for 'function creep'. The authorities, general busy body council nosy non-jobs will have a great tool for helping to enforce 'general social policy' whatever that will be. Linked with CCTV, quite a powerful tool. Sounds fanciful but fast approaching I'm afraid.
Neil H, Hampshire, UK
There are so many insidious layers of this legislation. But one of the most disturbing elements is changing the title of these operatives from Parking Attendants to Civil Enforcement Officers.
Given this change in title, these same individuals, in years to come will doubtless be given all sorts of other powers and ticket the public for all sorts of other minor infringements.
Where will it all end? Probably in a State dominated by CCTV cameras in the air and Scrutinisers on the ground, dishing out penalties at will!
This country was once a lovely place to live in. Whatever happened? We lived beyond 1984!
David Weedall, Brighton, East Sussex
In September last year, Jacqui Smith (the Home Secretary) attended the Police Superintendents' Association of England and Wales annual conference [1]. The theme this year was the "New Normality".
She didn't mention CCTV cameras issuing parking fines but, in a lyrical passage in her speech [2], the did extol the merits of something she calls "virtual courts", an example of "how we can push the boundaries of 21st century crime fighting even further", coming soon to a magistrate's court near you.
Virtual courts will presumably dispense virtual justice, the boundaries of which are fast receding ... from our memories if not the 21st century.
Welcome, everyone, to the new normality.
----------
1. http://www.policesupers.com/uploads/news/PRESIDENT.doc
2. http://www.policesupers.com/news/full.asp?id=77&news=227
David Moss, London, UK
Oh good, another tax because there are not enough already.
Paul, Andover,
I have noticed a growing campaign against the humble motorist, I was in Dewsbury driving five miles an hour over the speed limit and I got stung for a three points and a sixty pound fine (a little excessive don't you think?). The cost of parking outside my place of work has risen steadily (the 2 hour disc zone that worked so well has been replaced with £7.80 per day pay & display meters with Traffic Warden's wandering around like vultures). I wouldn't mind if it was quicker, easier, cheaper, more conveniant or more comfortable to use public transport but usually it isn't, outr public transport system is a joke, an expensive poorly maintained joke. It now costs more to go to london by train than it does to fly to Germany, there's something very wrong with that.
Rob Lindsay, Wallasey,
We'll soon reach the point where computers will be fining computers, what with humans having long done a bunk from this green and pleasant land. Emigration is picking up momentum: I wonder why?
Escapee, Macau,
The relentless march to an all encompassing surveillance state takes another step. It is going to be used eventually for the most innocuous of crimes, but serious crime is sidelined in the pursuit of revenue and compliance with state propaganda.
'Ministers said that the changes would make parking enforcement âfairer and more transparentâ.' - Just like their expenses no doubt?
To quote Eddie Izzard in the recycling advert â The possibilities are eeeendlessâ. Enjoy your freedom â but keep looking over your shoulder and hope the postman doesn't come to your door too often.
winstonian, Darlington, UK
This will certainly cut down on staff costs.
But does it go far enough?
Why is there still a letter involved? Slow and labour-intensive, wouldn't it be more efficient simply to take the fine out of the car-owner's bank account by direct debit?
And why wait until an offence is committed? This unnecessarily delays the transfer of funds, leaving the government in the meantime to bear unaided the entire cost of carry for the national road system.
Modern profiling methods can surely identify those likeliest to commit a parking offence. The government could take intelligent, pre-emptive action, merely a case of recognising the inevitable, just a little earlier than we are used to.
David Moss, London, UK
Another step closer to when the people will start ripping cameras off the walls.
Cromwell, Leeds, England
In my town the traffic wardens come in a car together at 7 am on Sunday morning into our residential district where nobody minds people parking all over the place at the weekend just so they can book people and then drive to another residential area to do the same thing.
They provide no service at all. It is a scam. I am lucky to have off road parking but lots of people in my area don't.
And John Meyer, since we seem to have no say at all about the restrictions and charges levied upon us I am not sure why I should feel any sympathy with your position. If we were clearly allowed to state how we wanted parking in our town managed then he might have a point, but essentially he is just playing his part in developing a Police State in the UK where everyone is criminalised without having any say about what constitutes a crime.
Peter, Maidstone,
Legislation to allow the use of CCTV images to issue parking tickets shows a fundamental flaw in the approach to legislation. Parking restrictions should be enforced, which a traffic warden or policeman can do by telling a motorist to move his vehicle, or by simply being physically present. Using CCTV images to issue fines after the event does nothing to enforce restrictions, but does plenty to rake in money. Surely legislation should be enforced rather than allowed to be broken so that local authorities can profit by it.
Perhaps parking legislation should be changed so that if a parking ticket is successfully challenged the Council that issued the ticket should be required to pay the penalty amount to the motorist.
Immanuel Burton, London,
Southampton City Council has increased parking charges twice in the past 12 months and has also increasesd the hours the charges apply for. This includes car parks that serve mostly sports clubs. It is unjustified to increase the policing of parking without placing more controls on the incompitent money grabing councils that control them.
Dean , Southampton, England
In St Margaretâs, Twickenham, the council used taxpayers money to erect a cctv camera near the station. They said that the camera was going to be used to combat antisocial behaviour in the area. I have seen little evidence of the latter, however the number of parking tickets issued in that particular vicinity rose 900% from the year before ! My guess is, that this quiet intersection will now be designated a ' danger area for wardens ', so that the council can continue to empty the pockets of the motorist.
Ben, Twickenham,
Thank you Mr Meyers,as you say you are a veteran of parking services for 20 years and the system that you and others like you have drawn up is so fair and honest that three,quartesr of all appeals against parking fines is found in favour of the driver. Now dosent that tell us something about your systems and the rules you and others havee put in place, perhaps you could get a job driving the bus you want us all to get.
A.Mitchell, Merseyside,
I'm 75 and in my younger days people used to stick-up for themselves,but now they just take whats thrown at them.I suppose the goverment need so much money to pay themselves exorbintant expences,benefits to people who don't want to work,billions to fight in practically every war that comes along.Its no wonder their trying to raise money by any means.
Bob Madsen, Rainham, Uk
Thats amazing that CCTV is only JUST about to become a tool for spotting illegally parked cars to issue tickets. I say amazing because when I was in Brixton 2 years ago I stopped in a road to ask directions, I didnt get out of the car and I was stationary for 90 seconds. 2 weeks later I received a ticket from the council in question with CCTV stills as evidence of my illegal parking.
Suffice to say I contested the fine on the fact that I was not parked but merely asking for directions. Is was never moved on by a traffic warden and I never saw a traffic warden. I didn't even know that they couldn't use CCTV stills as proof. Goes to show that some councils have been screwing over motorists for ages and issuing tickets illegally.I can see this practice been used a whole lot more, especially in London. More councils paint more yellow lines and introduce more parking restrictions and issue less residents permits thus increasing more incidences that require a fine. Poor motorists I say.
Mark Websper, Margate, Kent
Here we go again. We really are in a police state now and nobody is stopping these bullying ministers. Whatever happened to parliamentary democracy? Lets get together and chuck them out soon
Peter Groves, Surbiton, England
New? I got a parking ticket on the basis of CCTV footage six months ago (and yes i checked the legislation and it was, unfortunately, entirely legitimate - the ticket, not my parking)
JD, London,
For someone who has been working in parking management for so long, John M Meyer seems very naive, as his list forgets one thing - the fact that there are a sizable number of "parking attendants" who issue tickets illegally and dishonestly, as can be seen whenever undercover documentaries are made about parking enforcement officials.
Alex, London,
What places would be safe enough for motorists to commint an offence but too dangerous for wardens?
John Rushton, Chippenham,
Parking fines are a stealth tax, so here's an idea. Let's have a "parking Tax" paid monthly. the authorities can then line their coffers without hassle and we can be left to park where and when we like. This will also lead to a reduction in heart related incidents due to citizens openeing the post and discovering unbeknown parking fines.
Hamad Lone, London, England
so what's to stop a parking attendant issuing false penalties now?
You get a penalty in the post 2-3 weeks later, how on earth can you prove you were never there?
This is a disgrace.
Pete, Bristol, UK
It all started when the Government abolished the Constitution to win the case against the Metric Martyrs.
We need an appeal against the judgement that Parliament can amend any law including the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights.
Brian Gilbert, HAMPTON, Middx
actually, mr smartypants meyer, that's not true now. local authority parking enforcement personnel will slap tickets on cars for non-existent infringements; what's more, the people's republic of southwark council already use cameras to justify issuing tickets by remote control.
need one say more?
grindles, london, england
John of Parking Management, thank you so much for your self-righteous primer on parking regulations. Most enlightening, I can assure you, but hardly the point. Once again, the all-seeing, all-knowing government has its (electronic) eye on the lowly peasants, just waiting for them to put a foot wrong. Thank God we have fine, upstanding individuals like yourself to show us the error of our ways.
C. Heathcote, Tonbridge,
Where in the new legislation is the requirement for councils to provide sufficient suitable parking at a reasonable price?
Approfondi, Bristol,
How can cameras detect ablue badge?
Alwx , Wycombe, UK
1984 was really quite benign.
Trevor D. Evans, Drulingen,
And to think, we were sold the concept of CCTV camera's to cut down on muggings and assaults. It turns out they are just a revenue system for the government.
Arthur, Newcastle,
New Labour taxing tax payers. (yet again). Oh doesn't it make you feel all warm and patriotic.? Me neither.
Lets all clear off and leave Labour to the people who vote Labour.
Bon Voyage.
Stella, Salford, UK
As a 20 year veteran of Parking Management I have a simple solution to all drivers:-
The simple way for drivers to avoid receiving Penalty Charge Notices is:-
To comply with the local parking regulations!
Donât stay over the paid for time in permitted Parking Places.
Donât park your vehicles on restricted parking places such as Single Yellow Lines, Double Yellow Lines or on Loading Bans!
If you are not a permit holder donât park in âPermit Holderâs baysâ
Donât use your Auntâs Disable Parking Badge if your Aunt is not with you in the car!
Parents on the School Run please donât park on the yellow zig-zags outside your childâs school!
And under the new TMA regulations donât commit moving traffic violations .... which are already illegal!
If you are not capable of following the published Highway Code ... leave your car at home and use a bus or learn the law of the land before you get behind the wheel!
John M Meyer, Hoylake, Wirral, Cheshire
"I am from the Government, and I am here to help you," the man said. And we believed him!
When the Government began placing cameras everywhere, we were told that they were there to protect us. Now with more than 4 million of them, they have made Britain the most spied upon nation in the world.
First, the traffic cameras were turned into an revenue-raising instrument. Now the Government is turning to even more money to take money from the people.
And crime continues!
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California