Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today

More than 60 per cent of appeals against parking tickets heard by independent adjudicators are successful, but fewer than 1 per cent of drivers who receive them appeal.
From today, councils will be required to include information about the right to appeal on tickets or when issuing a penalty by post. Previously, many drivers discovered that they had the right to appeal only when their challenges were rejected by councils.
Motoring groups say that hundreds of thousands of drivers pay tickets that they believe to be unfair because they do not realise they can appeal and that they have a high chance of winning if they do so. More than eight million parking tickets were issued last year but fewer than 70,000 were taken to an appeal.
Caroline Sheppard, chief adjudicator of the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, said: “It is important that people know that they have the right to appeal to an independent adjudicator if they want to continue to challenge a penalty after the council has rejected their case and says they should pay. Each case is determined by an independent adjudicator – a lawyer who will consider evidence from both parties before making a decision.”
Councils that reject challenges will, from today, be required to offer the motorist the opportunity to pay the fine at a 50 per cent discount rate for a further 14 days. However, drivers will lose the right to pay at the discounted rate if they decide to appeal.
Last year 60 per cent of appeals outside London were successful: 32 per cent were not contested by councils and 28 per cent were won by motorists. In London in the year to March 2007, 68 per cent of appeals were successful.
The IAM Motoring Trust said that councils that failed to contest appeals should pay drivers ten times the value of the ticket in compensation for the time, stress and expense of fighting their case.
Neil Greig, the trust’s director, said: “Knowing that failure to follow through on questioned penalty charges could incur compensation of about £800 would encourage local authorities to take every motorist’s appeal seriously.”
Other changes coming into force today include a two-tier system of parking penalties, with lower fines for overstaying on meters or parking outside the markings of a bay and higher fines for parking on yellow lines or in a resident’s bay. Outside London the lower penalty will typically be £50 and the higher penalty £70. In Central London the penalties will be £80 and £120.
Councils are also being discouraged from clamping, except when the driver has at least three outstanding unchallenged penalty charge notices, or those displaying no tax disc.
From tomorrow councils will also gain powers to tackle utility companies that cause unnecessary congestion when they dig up roads for long periods. Under changes to the Traffic Management Act, councils will have powers to manage when and where streetworks are carried out.
Gas, electric and water companies will have to apply for a permit before starting work. Councils can charge companies that breach the conditions of their permit or take longer than agreed. Utility companies will also have to give councils three months’ notice of nonemergency excavations.
Rosie Winterton, the Transport Minister, said that disruption from street works costs the economy about £4.9 billion each year, and added: “These strengthened powers will allow councils to better coordinate when work happens on their roads. We are tackling the frustration of roads being dug up time and time again.”
How to contest a ticket
— Write to the council explaining in detail why you disagree with the ticket and include any evidence such as a pay and display ticket or a timed receipt showing you were collecting items from a shop. If you write within 14 days, you will still be offered the early payment discount if the council rejects your representation
— Stick to the facts and resist the temptation to be abusive about wardens or parking
— If relevant, include in evidence photographs or videos of the street showing the visibility of signs and lines
— You can also call the council’s parking office when you receive a ticket and officials may make a note of special circumstances
— If your representation is rejected, you will be sent a Notice to Owner ordering you to pay. You have 28 days from then to pay or appeal
— If the council rejects your appeal, it will send you a form that you can use to appeal to an independent adjudicator. You have 28 days to make this final appeal
— You can appeal to the adjudicator by posting your form and evidence; appearing in person at a tribunal; taking part in a conference call with the adjudicator, a council official and any witnesses; or appealing online
— The adjudication service will acknowledge receipt of your appeal. The council should send you a copy of its evidence within 21 days
— Most drivers receive the result at the end of the hearing
Sources: Traffic Penalty Tribunal, Which?
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is well worth apealing, as most councils will at some stage in the process make an error that invalidates the ticket. My current ongoing fiasco, involves my council failing to lodge the charge with the county court, but also failing to respond to my representations. I will seek the maximum damages from them for the wasted time, inconvenience and expenses incurred.
4 months after the event I am still trying to get an acknowledgement from them of any kind.
Hugh Clinton, Brentford, Middx
More attacks on the motorist to fund council WASTE!
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
Human nature being what it is, if prosecution is profitable then people will be prosecuted by the million - as indeed they are. If locking people up were profitable, we'd be building prisons by the score.The scope for widespread injustice in such a system is obvious and unacceptable.
This blatant affront to justice will only be removed when fines are ring-fenced and the prosecuting agencies derive no profit. Until then, the legalised mugging will continue.
Ken Leyland, Liverpool, U.K.
My ticket - presented by a street parking attendant who had been hiding in a shopping high street - gave me a ticket which allowed me to go to Court. I did this after needless work and photos taking many hours. As soon as I stood up in Court their solicitor withdrew the notice. I got £50 for expenses.
denise, harrogate, N.Yorks.
I did ! !
denise, harrogate, N.Yorks.
K Davis from Heatfield's coments reflect the carefully concealed facts about the racheting up of fines after response delays.
Once you have registered your intention to 'contest' the penalty, the clock stops so no further ratcheting up of penalties can happen. The facts are never mentioned on the parking ticket for obvious reasons.
Of all the reforms mentioned, the highlighting of this feature of the law on parking tickets would provoke the greatest number of appeals.
Of course this is why it is never mentioned !!!!!!!
David Nammory, Liverpol,
Why would any parking office/council cancel a parking ticket when challenged by the motorist? There is absolutely no incentive to be reasonable. Whereas the motorist has to risk a doubling of the fine in order to appeal. Even if a motorist wins the appeal, they will lose financially in time and expenses. The council loses nothing. It's lose lose for the motorist and win win for the council.
K Davis, Heathfield,
This is all very well but I was recently clamped and have appealled on the grounds that the signs were outside the carpark and were not readable from where I was parked. The clamping firm agreed with me.
However, because I had to pay the £95 to be released up-front, I am sure that I will not get it back. This article says that clamping is being discouraged, but why would any council stop doing it when it brings in so much easy revenue?
Richard , London,