Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Among the passengers crushed into the corridors of commuter trains, the Department for Transport’s latest solution for rail overcrowding is unlikely to provoke spontaneous applause.
Officials have found a way of reducing the number of trains deemed to be overcrowded without requiring any passengers to get off and without adding a single seat.
They have achieved this by changing the definition of the “acceptable loading of passengers on trains”.
Under the old standard, used in the West Midlands and some other parts of the country, it was considered acceptable to have ten people standing for every hundred seats. The new national standard, which will apply to all routes, has tripled the acceptable number of standing passengers to 30 per 100 seats.
The department said that its loading standard assumed that each standing passenger would have 0.45 sq m of floor space: any less and the train would be officially overcrowded.
Centro, the public transport authority in the West Midlands, has complained to the National Audit Office (NAO) that the new definition would result in even worse conditions on trains in the region and encourage people to travel by car.
Despite being easier to meet, the revised standard is being breached on hundreds of trains each day. According to the DfT, the most overcrowded service is First Capital Connect’s 7.15am service from Cambridge to King’s Cross, which has 76 people standing for every 100 seats.
In a report published today, the NAO said that overcrowding would continue to get worse until the Government fulfilled its pledge, made 18 months ago, to introduce 1,300 extra carriages. To date, only 423 of the carriages have been ordered from manufacturers and none has been delivered.
The department said that it was unable to give details of when the carriages would arrive except to say that they should all be in place by 2014. It was also unable to say to which lines the carriages would be allocated.
Demand for rail travel has been outstripping the supply of extra capacity for the past decade. Passenger numbers have grown by 50 per cent and the amount of freight carried by trains has grown by 60 per cent. But the number of trains has risen by only about 20 per cent. The Government announced last year that it would in- crease capacity by 22.5 per cent in the seven years to 2014. Network Rail has said that this would be inadequate if passenger numbers continued to grow at the present rate of 7 per cent a year.
The NAO, which investigated the value for money of eight train franchises signed by the Government since 2005, said that they all faced “severe capacity pressures on a number of routes, with increasing levels of crowding on peak commuter services, notably to London”. It said that the train companies, encouraged by the Department for Transport, were increasingly opting for “airline-style pricing techniques” to deter passengers from travelling on the most crowded trains.
Virgin charges £215 for an open single in standard class from London to Warrington, but as little as £13 for passengers able to book several weeks in advance.
The NAO said that the Government’s approach of encouraging train companies to maximise income from passengers meant that fares would continue to rise above inflation. It concluded: “Most passengers can expect to pay higher regulated and unregulated fares in the future.”
Edward Leigh, chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, said: “The news that fares are likely to rise above inflation in these difficult times will infuriate many passengers who have no alternative but to travel day after day on packed trains.”
Theresa Villiers, the Shadow Transport Secretary, said: “Excessive government micromanagement of our railways is delaying the delivery of vitally needed capacity enhancements, which means passengers suffer.”
Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat transport spokesman, said: “People are being forced off the trains and into their cars by unacceptable ticket prices.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Ironically I'm so innured to overcrowding that I also consider 10 persons standing for every 100 sitting to be acceptable. Its normal to have 30 people standing for every 100 on the trains I use.
Simon, Sevenoaks,
How on earth can this government 'push' public transport for green issues, then herd everyone in like cattle, and charge far more for a poorer service? 2014 seems a very long way off....
jelli, Birmingham, uk
Nice to see Labour is still using the same old tactics they've used for the last 11yrs.
Step 1: Announce headline grabbing 'solution' with impressive but otherwise inadequate figures.
Step 2: Fail to deliver on step 1
Step 3: Fiddle the figures instead.
Step 4: Claim you're succeeding.
Anthony Lester, Brum,
If they hadn't electrified the network we could sit on roof!
I can't pre-book & regularly end up sitting on floor by the toilet for double the cost of a pre-booked ticket. If you can't get a seat you should get a refund voucher. Better still stop thinking of fat profit & provide longer trains.
Claire, Reading,
If all persons using the service pay the same price they should all have the same facility - either all seated or all stand!
Just another example of rip-off Britain! I believe that on airlines each passenger pays and each gets a seat.
marion marchant, reigate,
I travel every day from New Malden to Green Park, have never been able to sit on Train or Tube and get charged £1400 p/a for "my seat". I'm also quite sure there are far more than 30/100 standing every morning, most the time you can't get off the trains let alone on them. TFL, more like TFHell
Craig , London, UK
I thought the railways had been privatised, surely a private company might think oh look we can run more trains and make more money...or are the railways run by ex civil servants who are comercial idiots?
George, London,
Better yet, don't bother having seats at all and just use cattle trucks instead. Who'd bother to go by train in this day and age?
Chris, Derby,
An employers may supply their product/service to an employee without creating a taxable benefit, provided the employee pays the marginal cost. Many DoT (and other?) civil servants & railway workers receive free rail travel. If more carriages must be purchased, isn't their peak-time travel taxable?
Alex, Surrey, UK
We pay high prices for a seat on these trains. If you are forced to stand you should be entitled to a discount of at least 50%.
Time to introduce a standing class and have a carraige or two solely for those who don't mind tottering on their feet for 100's of miles.
Disgraceful.
Paul Ritchie, Southampton,
WHAT became of the oft stated claim that rail transport rules for livestock are far more humane than policies governing human passengers?
WHERE is the Health & Safety on an issue which so clearly ignores the health and safety of passengers?
Dennis, Portland OR, The American Colonies
How come it is unsafe not to be sat doen and wear a seatbelt in a car yet it is in a train?
akr, Carlisle,
Yet another example of this government's misuse of language to hide its incompetence and/or complete disinterest in the welfare of the British people. More often than not whenever it acts, both motive and consequences turn out to be exactly the opposite of what it originally pretended.
L Greene, London, England
Typical government tactic, misusing statistics to support their lying stance.
paul downes, milton keynes, uk
Is this a joke? try using first great western paddington to Bristol and you will find so many standing you cant get to the doors or the toilets
chris, bristol, uk