Angela Jameson
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
The comeback of coal as an energy source cleared its first hurdle last night, with the approval of plans for the UK's first coal-fired power station for 20 years.
The £1 billion investment was recommended by the local council, but still faces a final decision from the Secretary of State for Business and opponents are calling for a public inquiry to address the wider issue of using coal for the first time in a generation.
E.on UK, formerly Powergen, wants to replace its existing Kingsnorth power station in Medway, Kent with a clean coal carbon capture system. The power station could also become the prototype for all future UK clean coal projects, if it wins a carbon-capture design competition, the rules of which were outlined by the Secretary of State last year.
It could take up to two years to receive approval from business secretary John Hutton, and even longer if the Government grants a public inquiry. However, Mr Hutton could take advantage of new planning legislation going through parliament to say that there is a national need for a new coal power station and reject calls for an inquiry.
E.on has said that it wants to build a coal-fired power station to give it diversity of energy sources. "It's going to take 15 years to get new nuclear up and running so in the short-term you build gas and in the medium term coal," a spokesman for the company said.
The units would produce enough energy to supply about 1.5 million homes and lead to a cut in carbon emissions of almost two million tons a year.
However, more than 9,000 people have objected to the plans and activists staged a protest at the plant last year by climbing a 200m-high smokestack and chaining themselves to the station’s conveyor belt to prevent it burning coal.
Greenpeace says the units would create a highly carbon-intensive and inefficient form of energy generation and would go against Government policy on climate change and energy sources.
Medway Council gave the go ahead last night but it only holds an advisory role and the final decision will be made by the Government. Diane Chambers, chairman of Medway Council’s development control committee which met last night, said that local opposition to the plans was limited, with interested parties such as the RSPB and the Environment Agency raising no objection.
Mrs Chambers said: “We raised no objection to the plan and the matter will now go to the Secretary of State.“
E.on's existing power station will not comply with the 2008 Large Combustion Plant directive so it will have to be closed. E.on has decided not to retrofit the existing power station with equipment that could remove sulphur and other emissions. "It would be like fitting a new transmission system to a 1970s mini," the spokesman said.
“The local opposition could be counted on the fingers of one hand but clearly there is a wider issue which we hope will go to a public inquiry,” Mrs Chambers said.
Greenpeace has led the campaign against the power station plans but local people are thought to be favourably disposed to the £1 billion of inward investment that E.on is proposing, which would be a significant boost to the local economy.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I saw Mr Golby on Channel 4 tonight. It is clear that E.on is not proposing to build a CCS coal fired station at all, but one which could be retro-fitted. If he is confident that he can do this let him have his permit and get on with it but subject to achieving very low CO2 emissions within a reasonable time.
If he really wants CCS why is he building in Kent rather than in East Anglia or NE Scotland where the access to oil/gas fields for carbon retention is a bit easier.
This is a cynical attempt to profit from the UK government's failure to find a credible energy policy.
stephen bull, fontes, france
It's all well and good for the green lobby to whinge about this, but when it comes to the crunch, they usually find reasons to oppose renewable schemes as well: Windfarms because of the visual intrusion, or impact on bird migration; tidal barrages because of the effect on Salmon and porpoises; nuclear because of radioactive waste; and incinerators because they are also a source of CO2. If we'd listened to Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, the lights would have gone out 30 years ago!
Richard, Bexhill, UK
This article is not very clear. It states "E.on UK, formerly Powergen, wants to replace its existing Kingsnorth power station in Medway, Kent with a clean coal carbon capture system."
Is E.on really proposing to build a CCS station ? If so there can hardly an objection on environmental grounds. But it is hard to believe that the technology is sufficiently proven for an investment on such a scale. We should be clear: coal with CCS is acceptable, but without, it is an incomprehensible proposal in the context of the commitment to the environment made by the UK and the EU. Per KWH of electricity a coal station without CCS produces two to three times as much CO2 as a gas fired station.
stephen bull, fontes, france