Carl Mortished, World Business Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Was it a cleaner retrieving a stray duster, a secretary in search of a handbag or a senior executive, hell-bent on shredding the evidence?
No one is owning up, but whoever broke the seal placed by European Commission antitrust investigators on an office door at E.ON's premises in Munich has cost the German utility €38 million (£28 million).
The Commission said yesterday that it had imposed the penalty to send “a clear message to all companies that it does not pay to obstruct the Commission's investigations”.
The European Union's sleuths conducted a dawn raid on the E.ON Energie offices in May 2006 as part of an investigation into anticompetitive practices in the German power market.
The seal - a sticker that, when disturbed, displays the word “void” - was placed over a door to protect files that had not been inspected by investigators.
A furious E.ON yesterday denied tampering with the door seal and even suggested that the seal was faulty and past its sell-by date. E.ON said that no documents had been taken from the room and suggested that Commission officials had caused the seal to break when they inspected it the following morning. “E.ON Energie will take all legal measures to contest the fine,” a spokesman said.
The Commission rejected E.ON's argument, suggesting that the explanations provided by the German utility had changed. “First it was the cleaning lady, then it was people moving furniture. A company with the resources of E.ON could have posted a security guard to protect the room,” a spokesman said.
The Commission said it was irrelevant whether the breach of the seal had been accidental as it did not need to prove any intention nor whether any documents had been taken, according to the regulations governing dawn raids.
E.ON is the first company to be fined directly for impeding a Commission antitrust investigation and the fine could have been much higher, up to 1 per cent of turnover, which, in the case of E.ON, could have amounted to €270 million.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This is quite obviously another tentacle of the creeping dictatorship inherent in the present EU organisation and regime. It smacks of all that our parents fought in Europe to prevent and to destroy 1939-1945.
In such instances as a criminal investigation then it must be necessary for a judicial warrant to be obtained for circumstances as this. If it not a criminal investigation then administrative agencies, be they EU or national, must NOT be allowed to act in such a way.
And when/if a premises is "sealed" then it must be physically sealed with a lock or a human guard.
Administrative agencies must NOT be permitted to hand out "fines" but must refer the matter to the judiciary for judgement.
We must avoid any further slip into DICTATORSHIP
Chris Goodman, Fareham, England