Robin Pagnamenta, Energy and Environment Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Britain’s main nuclear safety regulator is struggling to halt a staff exodus that threatens to delay construction of a new generation of nuclear power stations.
A brain drain of senior inspectors and engineers has left the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) so seriously understaffed that only 16 people are overseeing a highly complex approval process for new nuclear reactors that the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) says requires at least 40 people.
The Times has learnt that the Government is so concerned about the situation in the NII that it is considering radical changes, including inflation-breaching pay increases, moving the agency from its base in Bootle, Merseyside, and introducing a new corporate governance structure. “They are trying to stop the brain drain,” one nuclear industry executive said.
He pointed out that skilled nuclear engineers are already a rarity in the UK and the nuclear industry’s renaissance is compounding the NII’s problem by triggering departures of staff to private sector companies.
“People with good UK regulatory knowledge are getting poached left, right and centre,” he said. “There’s a real risk of serious delays, which could jeopardise the whole programme.”
A spokesman for the HSE acknowledged that a lack of resources was “undeniably an issue” in the NII and that there was a risk that it would lead to delays in the new-build programme.
Faced with a yawning gap in Britain’s power-generating capacity as old plants are retired, the Government wants the first new nuclear plant to be operational by 2017 or 2018. With basic questions such as the ownership of British Energy, the nuclear power producer, still unresolved, many experts believe that this is a highly ambitious timetable.
The NII, part of the HSE, employs 159 inspectors, responsible for ensuring safety at all of Britain’s nuclear power stations. The HSE admits that it needs many more and the NII is seeking dozens of staff.
It needs more than 30 simply to complete its work programme of preparation for the new nuclear building programme.
Since the Government’s decision in January to give a green light to new plants, the NII has also been given the complex task of assessing and approving reactor designs and sites – a key role involving highly detailed engineering reports and safety studies.
However, an acute shortage of skilled nuclear engineers and low pay and morale in the NII have left it facing a widening skills gap.
The reform of the NII is being led by Tim Stone, a partner in KPMG, who is advising the Government on a range of nuclear issues. He is understood to be drawing up an action plan to strengthen the organisation.
Dr Stone’s proposals include ending public sector pay constraints, drafting in senior managers and creating an advisory board to boost efficiency. A chief operating officer may also be appointed.
The recommendations will be considered by John Hutton, the Business Secretary, in the autumn in consultation with the HSE.
A lack of skills is viewed as one of the biggest challenges facing Britain’s nuclear industry. Only one nuclear power station, Sizewell B, has been built in Britain since the 1970s. Many universities closed their nuclear engineering departments decades ago on cost grounds and because there was so little interest in the speciality.
Although the Treasury has awarded only limited extra funding for the NII, the agency’s problems are viewed within government as a key concern.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
same old story. the uk does not reward the people who make the country tick ie scientists/engineers. this is nothing new and it has in fact been the story of this country for decades. the current government are more interested in PC policy than thinking about strategic needs
alan todd, glasgow,
Peter Russell: Which would you rather have, nuclear waste that sits in a nice tight 55-gallon drum for 100 years, or mercury that gets into the groundwater and is poisonous forever? Carbon dioxide that can't possibly be contained and will heat the whole planet?
Mike Powers, San Jose, USA
Peter Russell - The problems of dealing with nuclear waste are almost entirely imagined and are often exacerbated by the reactionary policies arising from the misguided fear of most of the general public - here's an interesting piece about it: http://depletedcranium.com/?p=301
Peter, Dublin, Ireland
My say is that we should not be building more nuclear power stations - we already have enough problems coping with the radioactive residues from the ones we already have, without generating more deadly waste for which in 50 years we have failed to find any SAFE way of dealing.
peter russell, Plymouth, UK
the curse of Magna Carta is obviously still haunting this government
peter c, devizes, wessex
Labour used the regulator to drive British Nuclear into virtual bankruptcy so they could nationalise it without payment. This meant selling off our foreign assets (one in Canada sold for $230 million, got a new British manager & is now worth $2.5 billion) & driving most of the top staff to seek jobs
neil craig, glasgow, scotland
"Supply-side, economics or monitorism - believes that the focus should be on controlling inflation primarily, even if this means risking high unemployment" And so it came to pass. We lost almost all our heavy industries, engineers, scientists, professionals to the idea we did not need them any more.
Chris Coles, Medstead, Alton, United Kingdom
I once had an interview to go and work at Dungeness B in Kent; I was told my wages wouldnt allow me to own my own home (at the time I had a nice place near Huddersfield) and that the place was so isolated that all I could do was fish!
Shame - I really wanted to work in the nuclear industry.
GMT
Matthew Taylor, Brisbane, Australia
A combination of misguided academics, unions, government interference in education, overtaxation causing a brain and skills drain which is still going on, has cost us our place in the world of engineering. Where we once led the world in producing engineers and scientists, we are now third rate.
Ian Turner, Shenzhen, China
When I worked at British Energy from 2001-2002 the government was vacillating over building new reactors, and they still are. With this lack of commitment to a UK nuclear programme, it's not surprising highly-qualified engineers are leaving to work in other countries.
Ben Garside, Loughborough, UK
So Much for "Forward Planning", & Investing in "Education"!, ring "Al Quada" they will surely be able to "Bridge the Shortfall from "Self Tought Individual's""
Apologies for being "Cynical" but the "Truth will Prevail"!
Paul, Newtown, Powys, UK
At the time I left the nuclear industry a large number of us went into financial analysis. Perhaps this would be an opportune time to reverse the procedure and send all the surplus physicists engineers and mathematicians back into the nuclear industry
Bob Gibson, New York, USA
The French have a large nuclear industry - why not use them if we can't find the skills required? We are in the EU, and others are well ahead of us.
Colin, shrewsbury,
By the looks of it there will soon be a surplus of Iranian nuclear engineers so I don't see a problem
Alex Penn, Kingston upon Thames, UK