Robin Pagnamenta
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

The future of coal-fired power generation in Europe was called into question yesterday after a European Parliament committee backed new laws that would force power companies to pay for all of their carbon dioxide emissions from 2013.
The decision, which could cost the power industry €30 billion (£23 billion) a year and trigger a steep rise in electricity bills, represents a huge boost for Europe’s renewable energy industry. It also casts fresh doubt over the likelihood of a £1.5 billion coal-fired power plant being built at Kingsnorth, Kent, by E.ON, the German power group.
In addition, it flies in the face of British government policy. Last month, John Hutton, the former business secretary, told the Labour Party conference that “no coal . . . equals no lights. No power. No future.”
Chris Davies, an MEP who backed the legislation, said that the decision by the European Parliament’s environment committee “effectively prevents the building of new coal-fired power plants from 2015 unless equipped with CCS [carbon capture and storage technology]”. The new rules require final approval from the European Parliament and EU countries. If granted, they will transform the economics of burning coal to generate electricity.
The move came despite fierce resistance from power industry lobbyists, who said that that the EU’s aggressive emissions-cutting targets should be weakened because of the global financial crisis.
Avril Doyle, an Irish MEP on the committee, said: “For all the trouble we have, the single greatest challenge facing us is climate change.”
The committee backed proposed changes to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), an existing programme in which the bulk of permits are handed out to energy companies for free. Members voted in favour of auctioning all emissions permits after 2013 for power companies. The committee proposed that other polluting industries, such as steelmaking, should pay for 15 per cent of permits in 2013, rising to 100 per cent by 2020.
It had been unclear how the ETS programme would evolve after 2012.
The committee also offered to plough $10 billion from the scheme into carbon capture and storage (CCS) research, an untried technology designed to strip out greenhouse gases at source and store them underground.
The bill is a key plank of the EU’s plan to reduce Europe’s carbon dioxide emissions by 20 per cent by 2020.
The CBI welcomed the scheme last night, saying that it would provide greater clarity for businesses.
Europe’s renewable energy industry also endorsed the decision. Maria McCaffery, of the British Wind Energy Association, said: “This new target underlines the urgency of action to deliver clean, sustainable energy now if we are to keep global temperatures within acceptable limits.”
A spokeswoman for E.ON, which relies heavily on coal-fired power stations in Germany, as well as in the UK, said: “We are taking our time to review and assess the decision.”
A vote before the full European Parliament is likely in December, although opposition is expected from some heavily coal-dependent countries, such as Poland. France, which has the EU presidency at the moment, wants to enshrine the Bill in law by the end of the year.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Leave the EU!!!!
mark a, warrington,
get out of the EU and lets make our own decisions, we would also save a lot of money that we have to pay to them.
Maggie, London, England
why do let the EEC dictate our every move
den, halesworth, suffolk
Global warming is one thing. The world has been warming and cooling for hundreds of millions of years. The actual concentration is circa 387 ppm (= 0.0387%) or ~0.0016% per 10 years since the industrial revolution. But are the models right? Sun used to revolve around the earth according to experts
M. Cawdery, Portadown, Co. UK, EU Courtesy Brown
Europe? Who?
Hey, I've got an innovative scheme for the crumbling Battersea Power Station - turn it into a modern coal-fired power station using latest technology to redically reduce carbon emissions.
If you don't like nuclear and don't like being dependent on imports it's a real option.
James McColl, Guildford, UK
How much longer are these AGW alarmists going to call the tune? There has been no warming since 1998 and now the earth is cooling. The climate computer model predictions have been shown to be completely and utterly wrong and an increasing number of scientists are sceptical of the whole manmade climate change rant. Yet we and the rest of the EU face the lights going out whilst China demands we cut emissions by 95%, not 80% so that they can go on increasing their emissions. Absolute madness.
E Saunders, Richmond, England
The 'pollution' from those towers is steam!
F Rasmin, Brisbane, Australia
The march of the climate change fascists carries on. They will not be happy until the lights go out and you huddle round a candle for warm and light but be warned they will tax you for carbon credits even for that. CO2 is a life gas, no CO2 everything dies, perhaps that is the idea...
Alan, Luton,
When will everyone wake up and realise that now is the time for CO2-intensive industries to start internalising the costs of the pollution they create, not in five years time. If we don't act now to create a level playing field for all, alternative sources of energy will never become established.
Tobias Precio, Barcelona, España
While Rome "burns" the EU Parliament carries on as usual.
Are EU politicians completely and utterly insane?
The world as we know it is falling apart and they carry on as if nothing has changed.
Barry Samways, London, UK
The Companies arn't going to pay for the 'new tax'...The 'user' will..as always....Get rid of the EU and all the elitist that run it..
MrTim, san marcos, U S of A
A bigger boost for nuclear: low-carbon but also no intermittency issue. But renewables and nuclear take too long to build to keep the lights on. If we can't have coal, we'll have to have oil and gas - and be more dependent on imports. And no coal means no China-relevant CCS: disastrous for planet.
Heidi, London, UK
Coal isn't clean by any means, but the plants are already in place. The net pollution created by building equivalent MW producing green plant would be much larger than continuing the use of a coal-fired generator.
Wait until technology allows a suitable alternative, lest the benefits are negated.
William, Seattle, USA
Now would be the time to escape from the prison (or madhouse) which is the European Union)
The progressive loss of national rights, which in turn has led to the reduction of the rights of the individual has made the the EU into an oligarchy with dictatorial powers
David Chorley, wednesbury, england