Stewart Tendler, Crime Correspondent
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Taser electronic stun guns are to be issued to more police officers under plans revealed by John Reid, the Home Secretary, yesterday.
The use of the weapons will be extended to officers such as the tactical support units, used by Scotland Yard and other forces to back large operations and raids, who may face violent and dangerous suspects.
The Home Office is also changing the rules for the use of Tasers. At the moment they can be used only in situations where officers would be authorised to use their guns, that is, where the suspect is armed and the officer believes that he or other people are in danger. The change would mean that a Taser could be used to face violent attackers even if they were not armed.
A Home Office spokeswoman said that the weapons would be tested during a 12-month trial for specially trained units who are not authorised firearms officers.
She said that the plans “would also extend the use of Tasers by authorised firearms officers where the criteria to use firearms does not apply.
“In both cases, officers will be facing violence or threats of violence, and they would need to use force to protect the public or themselves or the subject.” Mr Reid announced the move during his speech to the Police Federation’s annual conference in Blackpool. Proposals to extend use of the weapon have been sent by the Home Office to a special committee for medical assessment.
The Defence Scientific Advisory Council subcommittee on the medical evaluation of less lethal weapons is expected to report back next month, the spokeswoman said. If they agree, ten forces including a mix of large, urban and rural forces, will test the changes.
A Police Federation spokesman said: “We support the roll-out. We think it is a vital piece of equipment for front-line officers to have.”
More than 3,000 of the devices, whose name is an acro-nym for “Thomas A. Swift’s Electric Rifle”, and which deliver a shock, have been distributed to firearms officers since their introduction in 2003. Officers say that often the sight of the weapons, which have been fired more than 100 times, or switching them on, is enough to stop a suspect.
Amnesty International has opposed use of the US-manu-factured weapons, claiming that they can be lethal. The organisation’s UK director, Kate Allen, said: “We are worried that this may be the start of a slippery slope towards a situation like that in the US, where officers are routinely armed with Tasers and use them in a wide range of situations.
“Amnesty has studied the use of Tasers in the US and Canada, where more than 220 people have died since 2001 after being ‘Tasered’.
“Our message is simple — Tasers are potentially lethal and should be treated as such,” she said.
Shock tactics
The Taser is a “nonlethal” weapon that delivers a debilitating electrical charge, knocking the target to the ground. The target recovers quickly, the manufacturers claim
Widely used in the US, the Taser fires two darts up to a distance of 4.5m. Thin wires between the darts and the gun deliver 50,000-volt electric pulses. The gun is designed not to affect the heart
Tasers are used in more than 50 countries. Its makers say that it has been used successfully in 50,000 operations
Data from the US from more than 2,000 field applications showed that in 80 per cent of cases the suspects were unarmed
Source: Taser; Amnesty International
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In response to derek, aylesbury...
Police also carry batons & CS Spray...should members of the public be allowed to carry these too ?????
I would like to theorise.....It is 3.00 in the morning,You have just run about 1/4 of a mile,You are down an unfamiliar, pitch black alleyway, you hear a noise yards in front of you, you turn on your torch & are confronted by a male weilding a knife.
This is not a scenario, this happened to me & I am glad I had all the equipment that we have.
I am a serving Police officer & firearms qualified...So, Yes, I would agree to members of the public having Tasers...as long as they spend the 4 years training to use them as I had to.
AW, Dudley, UK
How can non fire arms police carry what is considered in this country as a fire arm. and must be licenced as such. Giving ordinary police the taser will only make the use of these weapons widespread and more likely to be used for cases where no weapon would normaly be needed. If these weapons can be used by non fire arm police, surely any body could posses one. The police are not above the law and so these weapons must only be available to fire arm officers.
Derek, aylesbury, bucks
"Data from the US from more than 2,000 field applications showed that in 80 per cent of cases the suspects were unarmed"
Well, of course they were unarmed. If they were armed they would have been shot with a real gun, not a taser. A taser hurts, but it hurts a lot less than a night stick to the skull!
Bill Clay, Miami, FL