Hey Paul, In the end it's only money, & a paltry little amount at that in the whole scheme of things. I saw a picture of you in the paper last night, God man she isn't worth it if that is what it's doing to you. Give her the money & move on. It dosen't mean you are weak. You are the man.
Good luck

Ken Carter, Mt Maunganui /Tauranga, New Zealand

Remember the famous 'Mrs Merton' interview question asked of Debbie McGee. "What first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels"... Mills is a gold-digger, and that was plain for us all to see.
NS, Kent

NS, Kent, Kent

She should only be entitled to child support - that's it. She had to support herself before and she should do it now. He does not owe her anything more than child support.

Lorraine, Edmonton, Canada

She needs the money so she can devote it and herself to charity... ;-)

J, Glasgow,

She should get money because they were married. We live in a common law system, which includes precedence, so to disallow the few rich women a share of what was earned during the marriage would be to disadvantage the vast majority of women in the weaker position financially that this law was designed to protect.
That being said, if she gets anything from Sir Paul's fortune that he amassed before they were married, that would be plain ridiculous.

Alejandro, Fornalutx, Mallorca

She should receive only child support. She took advantage of an older man on the rebound from his first marriage. A woman with her resources would not have had gotten iinvolved if it had not been PAUL McCARTNEY !

Kevin Jagoe, Toronto, Canada

She doesn't deserve anything but child support. That is if she even wants to take care of her and Paul's child. She had money before Paul and should be ok after. Why should she get money just because he's a wealthly man. She's like any other woman. If she works, which she has no problem making money and did before marriage, then she should not get anything else.

Vickie Forrest, Amelia Island, USA, FL