Richard Ford, Home Correspondent
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper, is likely to be told that he will never be freed when he is given the minimum term he must serve for the murder of 13 women. He has instructed lawyers to apply to the High Court for a tariff – the minimum term – to be set for the first time since he was jailed in 1981.
Sutcliffe, who has changed his name to Peter Coonan, is currently held under mental health laws in Broadmoor top-security psychiatric hospital near Crowthorne, Berkshire. He was given 20 life sentences at the Old Bailey for the murder of 13 women and the attempted murder of seven more across Yorkshire and Greater Manchester.
The trial judge recommended that he serve a minimum 30 years but a formal tariff was never set. At that time tariffs were set by the Home Secretary after receiving advice from the trial judge and the Lord Chief Justice. Since then the law has changed and tariffs are set by the judiciary alone. The judges have also been given a set of starting points for minimum terms for murderers.
Sutcliffe, 62, was transferred to Broadmoor in 1984 after paranoid schizophrenia was diagnosed. He has instructed Bindmans, a firm of solicitors in London noted for their human rights work, to deal with his tariff. A statement from Bindmans said: “Any prisoner is entitled to have a tariff set within a reasonable time of conviction which will set out the minimum term of imprisonment to be served.”
The firm declined to say if Sutcliffe is to argue that he is sane and can be transferred back into the prison system or whether his human rights have been breached because of the failure to set a tariff. However, it is unlikely that Sutcliffe will receive anything other than a whole-life tariff, meaning that he will die either in a top-security psychiatric hospital or in jail.
The High Court will set the tariff under rules laid down in 2003, which set out the criteria for a whole-life tariff if the court considers that the seriousness of the offences is exceptionally high. It would normally be imposed if two or more persons were murdered, where each murder involved a substantial degree of premeditation or planning, if the victim was abducted or there was sexual or sadistic conduct. One source said: “He would appear to fit the criteria.”
Olive Smelt survived after Sutcliffe attacked her with a hammer as she returned to her home in Halifax after a night out in 1975. Her husband, Harry, said: “He didn’t give the victims many human rights did he?”
Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, said that she found it difficult to see how Sutcliffe could be freed. “Top of my list of priorities, I have to say, is not Peter Sutcliffe’s rights, it’s the rights of those people who were his victims, and how we keep this country safe.”
James Welch, legal director of Liberty, said it was established law that all life prisoners should know the minimum amount of time they must remain in prison. “If there is uncertainty in this case, it is in everyone’s interest that this is rectified,” he said. “Prisoners use any argument available to them, but the courts’ role is to weigh these arguments against the interests of victims and society as a whole.”
More than 35 offenders have been told that they will die in jail, including Rose West, convicted of ten murders, Ian Brady, the Moors murderer, and Dennis Nilsen, who killed six men.
Trail of a murderer
— The largest police taskforce in history was assembled in the hunt for Sutcliffe, but he managed to evade capture for more than five years
— The police collected a quarter of a million names of possible suspects and took more than 30,000 witness statements during their investigation
— Most of Sutcliffe’s victims were prostitutes and more than a million car number plates seen in red light districts across the north were logged
— Sutcliffe himself was spotted 60 times picking up or talking to prostitutes and was interviewed and released by police on nine occasions before his eventual arrest
— Two hoax letters and a cassette tape sent to police and purporting to be from the Ripper sparked 50,000 calls from the public, all of which were followed up by police
— George Oldfield, the officer in charge of the police operation, suffered three heart attacks during the hunt. He died four years after Sutcliffe was arrested, aged 61
— Sutcliffe was finally caught in January 1981 after police on a routine patrol found him with a prostitute. They discovered he had attached false number plates to his car and detained him for further investigation, which eventually revealed his identity
Source: Times archive; Crime Library
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Overseas contacts and local business information
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Tom, well let's hope he stays that way [incarcerated] - though personally I think it's a waste of taxpayers' money and such creatures should be publicly hanged.
Marco, KrakOw, Poland
If these 'monsters' were dead their just wouldn't be a problem with their 'human rights'. Hang them when found guilty. Better still save the tax payers money and hang them before a trial!
Kenneth Wheatley, St Pée sur Nivelle, France
As much as I agree with all the comments, it is important that even for the most obvious of cases we still go through the official judiciary procedures. The moment we start to ignore our judiciary procedures we are lost. Oh wait, that's already happened with the rules on how long terror suspects can be held without charge...
George, Reading, UK
Another waste of public money. No hearings etc should be necessary. It only needs a minute for the judiciary to say "You're in forever".
Instead the taxpayer will be paying for his legal aid, and footing the bill for whatever hearings now have to take place.
ws, Manchester,
No convicted prisoner should have any 'human rights' they should only be for those who respect the law - a life sentence should not require the provision of a 'tariff' to be set, any life sentence should mean just that, untill the offender dies in prison or untill they opt for euthanasia!
Les, Southport, England
The death penalty is the answer to Sutcliffe, not freedom. We all know this except the weak and faint law makers.There is a strong case for some killers to be eliminated after trial and conviction. Sutcliffe, if freed, will cause a social outcry for change to the sentences of convicted killers.
Jim Wills, Brisbane, Australia
Apologies Dave, but could you possibly enlighten us as to the precise case-law and relevant sections of the HRA that has been used for PI (I assume you mean PI by 'ambulance chasing') profiteering? Again, please excuse my ignorance.
Chris, Winchester,
This Disgusting Criminal Should Die In Prison He Did Not Give His Poor Victims Any Human Rights.
The Home Secretary Says She Is More Concerned With The Victims And To Keep The Country Clear Of People Like Him,Thats a Laugh,Having Made This Country A Crooks Paradise Over The Last Ten Year.
Thomas, Surbiton, uk
Look to the companies that use the human rights act to gain money for their ambulance chasing lawyers.
Look to the left wing fools that have destroyed society as nature intended it. Political correctness and the human rights act have destroyed Britain.
Sutcliffe should have hung long ago.
Dave, Lincoln,
more money for the likes of madame blair and co all at taxpayers expense
jim, edinburgh,
He is surely detained at Her Majesty's pleasure and therefore doesn't have to be given a tariff.
I hope he is not being given Legal Aid.
leila, manchester, uk
Isn't it convenient that 3 years into his sentence Sutcliffe is declared insane & with 3 years before the minimum sentence would be deemed served he is questioning his rights. I think the 30 years should represent time served in prison not hospital, therefore he has 27 years to go!!!
R HOLMES, London, UK
That's easy - all the judges do is set a tariff of 300 years (which will mean he will die in jail!) which is lawyer is asking for.
John Sime, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
Its quite simple they should set a term of not less than 100 years. He'll never come out alive which is just as it should be.
john, Chichester, UK
He has lost his human rights Marco; he is incarcerated.
Tom, London, UK
When will someone in government have the balls to stand up and say that those who abuse others' human rights (e.g. by killing them) thereby forego their own?
Marco, KrakOw, Poland
We're trying to get government money for an education program, and we've been turned down. Why is there ALWAYS money for this kind of charade, but none for the good guys?
Miss Dee, Tayside, UK
Totally agree with Phil. Why can't the judiciary just simply announce the tarrif to him and save the tax payer the cost of going through all of the hearings etc... Who is paying for his Lawyer? I hope it's not me!!
David Conquest, Finedon, Northants, England
13 murders? Life is 25 years, at least? 13 x 25 = 325 years. How about that as a 'tariff?' Seems fair to me.
I dont hold with Capital Punishment but I cant see any reason why people such as Peter Sutcliffe, who deny others their human rights ,shoud be expected to have their 'human rights' upheld.
Phil Austin, RAUNDS, England