Gary Slapper
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Twins who were separated at birth, and who later married each other without knowing that they were brother and sister, have had their marriage annulled.
As babies they were adopted by different families and neither was told that they had a twin. Later in life, they met, fell in love, and married before discovering that they were siblings. They were granted an annulment at a special hearing at the High Court in London.
Marriages between people sharing blood, such as siblings, have been banned for “consanguinity” for many centuries, although modern genetic science is not precise about where to draw the line to avoid undesirable inbreeding.
A marriage between people who are too closely related isn’t valid. The law speaks of the “prohibited degrees of relationship” and two types of closeness can be measured. Consanguinity concerns people descended from the same stock or a common ancestor. Affinity concerns people related through marriage or civil partnership.
Historically, the law was that you couldn’t marry anyone within a certain number of degrees of proximity. The number of degrees at which marriage became permissible changed from seven degrees at one time to four degrees today. Now, marriages involving people related in the first three degrees are invalid but marriages in the fourth degree are okay.
How are degrees of relationship measured? The scheme is influenced by the Roman model which worked like this. Going down the generations like grandmother, mother, daughter, people are always one degree apart.
In general, if you want to know whether a relative is too close to marry, you count the spaces between each of you and your nearest common ancestor, then add together the two numbers. For instance, a brother and sister are two degrees apart because each is one degree from their common parent.
Marriage between people related in the third degree or less is prohibited. You can’t marry your mother’s sister or brother because you’re related in the third degree to them. The common ancestor is your grandmother, from whom you are two degrees away, and your aunt or uncle is one away — three degrees altogether.
First cousins are related in the fourth degree. Your common ancestor will be your grandmother. You have two degrees separating you from her, and so will your cousin (as will your mother’s sibling’s child). Added together, there are therefore four degrees of separation. In short, you can marry your first cousin.
The prohibited degrees were defined by Innocent III in 1215, recognised in an Act of Henry VIII in 1536 and are now in the Marriage Act 1949.
Specifically, the Marriage Act lists the invalid relationships and says a man can’t marry: his mother, adoptive mother, daughter, adoptive daughter, father's mother, mother's mother, son's daughter and so forth. A woman can’t marry: her father, adoptive father, son, adoptive son or former adoptive son, father's father and several others.
The principle that marriages of close non-blood relatives are unlawful was modified in Scotland by the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2005. It says that a person can now marry their mother-in-law or father-in-law where death or divorce has ended the original marriage.
The old principle was based on biblical lines, such as that in Leviticus 20:14 which says that if a “man takes his wife and her mother” all three shall be burnt alive. A law that would perhaps have given Dustin Hoffman second thoughts in The Graduate.
There was no particular science behind the old lists of prohibited degrees of affinity. According to one classic legal history, they were simply the “idle ingenuities” of men who liked drawing up tables and “doggerel hexameters” (worthless rhythmic lines).
Why did Scotland want to make special provision for a man to marry his mother-in-law or daughter-in-law, and a woman to marry her father-in-law or son-in-law, if death or divorce has ended the original relationship? The answer is that the Scottish Parliament took the view that “family law must be updated to ensure that it reflects the needs of all our people”.
Cupid can behave in curious ways, so diverse passions are legally permitted. Most things, in fact, except romantic love in the third degree.
Professor Gary Slapper is Director of the Centre for Law at The Open University

Professor Gary Slapper is the Director of the Centre for Law at the Open University. He writes a weekly column for Times Online, The Law Explored, elucidating the complexities of British law
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If laws are supposedly based upon the possibility of defects.
Should then breeding be banned for women of a certain age?
Old age and close ancestoral proximity both increase the likelihood of birth defects. Age is in fact a greater factor.
Should there be a threshold?
Dean, Sheffield,
Your article doesn't address an important point: why is marriage about intimate relationships?
Most people grow up with their siblings, and consequently have a natural revulsion to the thought of dating them. Incest is an issue, but not the main one.
The problem is that as gay marriage unlinks marriage from procreation, an increasing number of people will question the justification for penalizing two elderly ladies sharing a house if they are siblings rather than lesbian partners.
SJB, Detroit, USA
It is an interesting subject, and my heart went out to the two siblings mentioned at the beginning of the story.
Southern Cross, Brisbane, Australia
If I am correct, do the royal family of Tonga not marry their brother or sister. Did not the Egyptians do the same. I would say that marriage between brother and sister should be allowed subject that there be no offspring. After all this marriage might not last. Further, brother and sister did not have to marry, but purely live together under the same roof. What then would the law do
victor Arram, westcliff on sea, essex
Brothers or sisters, gay or straight prohibited from either marriage or civil partnership. This is currently being examined in the case of two elderly sisters who have shared a house for many years and wish to enter ito a civil partnership to benefit from the inheritance tax exemptions avaiable to those in a civil partnership.
So far their appeals have been unsuccessful. I know that there was an intention to take this to the ECJ in Strasbourg, but I don't know if that case has been heard yet.
Essentially the degrees of separation apply regardless of gender.
Jon Dawkins, Bristol,
Do the same rules apply to civil partnerships? Can gay brothers enter into such a partnership, say?
SDC, London,