Claire Smith
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air

“This is a very meritocratic environment,” says Kathy Honeywood, a corporate partner at Clifford Chance. “I have never come across any direct discrimination because I’m a woman.”
Nevertheless, in a notoriously male-dominated sector, Honeywood often finds herself the only woman around the meeting table. Fifty-one per cent of solicitors at the world’s biggest law firm are women, but at partner level that figure drops to 18 per cent — and Honeywood wants to do something about it. “Being the only woman is quite tough,” she says. “It takes a lot of confidence to find your voice and speak up. You need to develop respect and a natural confidence.”
The quietly assertive 43-year-old has worked hard to get where she is. Born and brought up in Brighton, the second of three sisters, her father was a civil engineer and her mother a nurse. There were no lawyers in the family. But in spite of the lack of role models, she wasn’t put off. “I have always been very determined,” she says. “In a way I suppose because there weren’t that many women in senior positions I have always wanted to change that. I still strive to make Clifford Chance a place where there are more senior women.”
Honeywood qualified at Clifford Chance in 1989 and made partner in 1998. Today she is one of the firm’s top performers. She recently advised Chinalco, the Chinese state aluminium giant, on its acquisition of a 12 per cent stake in Rio Tinto for $14 billion (£7 billion). And when Stuart Popham, the senior partner, wanted to set up a network to help more women into the firm’s upper tier, he turned to Honeywood to run it with litigation partner Elizabeth Morony.
The launch was held at the beginning of March, on the 30th floor of the firm’s Canary Wharf headquarters. Two hundred women were in attendance and only two men: Popham and Jeremy Sandelson, the London managing partner. “It’s the first time I’ve ever seen Jeremy nervous,” Honeywood says.
Amid the free-flowing champagne, Dr Glenda Stone of Aurora, one of Europe’s biggest professional women’s groups, spoke of how such networks could help win new business and strengthen client relationships, in addition to improving employee retention and engagement.
Law firms to date are some way behind other professions at encouraging diversity. The accounting firms, for one, have had women’s networks for years. But Honeywood is determined to close that gap. “I would like us to try to set an example for the whole legal community,” she says.
“Men have one fundamental advantage over us,” she adds. “There are simply more of them. We do lack critical mass and I really think we can support women by encouraging networking both internally and externally.”
The network’s remit does not extend to issues such as flexible working and maternity. Honeywood, who does not have children herself, says parenting is a separate issue that is ably dealt with elsewhere: “This is different. This is about personal and professional success. I’m not a working mother but I know what challenges I have faced in my career and have faced daily.”
Honeywood read law at University College London and knew as a student she wanted to be a corporate lawyer. “I loved the intellectual challenge,” she recalls. “Even then company law was by far my favourite subject. Being a corporate lawyer provides both an intellectual challenge and an opportunity to shape business decisions.”
She made her mark at Clifford Chance by advising Safeway on its £2.9 billion merger with Wm Morrison in 2004. More recently, China has more top of her agenda. Last year, she spent six months on secondment to the firm’s Shanghai office, with a brief to bring in more Chinese business.
Initially, Honeywood approached the women’s network as if it were just another transaction. “I thought it would be like a deal and I could run it with a structure and get it done,” she says.
But getting it off the ground was a tougher task than most. “I have been quite surprised by the number of different opinions that have come back from both men and women. It has forced us to step back and acknowledge that this is a really complicated issue and one where we have to be very clear about what we say and what our aims are.
“If we can identify and understand how and why some women have succeeded to navigate their way through it, that will be immensely beneficial," she continues. "That’s really the whole point of this network, to see what has worked and what hasn’t and to identify that issues that get in the way and address them.”
If she succeeds, it could change the face of the firm. “Men and women are different and they have different skill sets,” she says. “That is a positive and should be regarded as such. It’s not easy to walk into a room of 20 or 30 men, which I quite often have to do, and feel confident enough to play a role.”
Honeywood proves it can be done.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Overseas contacts and local business information
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I absolutely agree Natasha. I'd love to be partner one day but I also know I want to have children. I want to be there for my children and so that means I'll have to stop working or work part-time. Part-timers just don't end up at the top, whether they are male or female.
I suppose I could find a man who's willing to be a stay at home dad but to be honest I'd rather be the one who stays at home.
There's more to life than getting to the top anyway - I don't wish to end up a lonely old woman with loads of money but no-one to visit me in a nursing home!
Amy, Southampton, UK
I am a city lawyer at a magic circle firm (as is my husband). The only women at the top with kids either have house-husbands (or at least husbands who finish work by 6.30pm) or "live-in" nannies.
At the end of the day, to make it to the top means that work-life balance goes out of the window - for both men and women. Most men at the top don't see their kids. The reason why more men "make it" is because women are generally less willing to make the family sacrifice. They aren't "discriminated" against - women are just less likely than men to put their career first.
And I for one will be stepping down to look after my kids leaving my husband to climb the greasy pole.
Natasha, London,
Bronwyn, Ollie's comment serves to prove that 'discrimination' still exists; it is merely now clothed in more 'institutionalised' tones.
As to the matters you both raise, it takes two to create a child, yet it is astounding that to this day the presumption remains that it is solely the prerogative of the woman to raise the child. And what of the father? What of the man who'd quite like to be the house-husband? The challenge must surely focus on bringing about a true partnership in the home which will help both the man and woman realise their potential.
Networks may not be 'everyone's cup of tea', but they are not new & come in all sorts of formats. They have served men well in the past and for those women seeking to participate in a network, it may afford them the chance to be in an environment to ask eg. 'awkward questions' and remain within a 'comfort zone'. Networks are not a panacea, but rather like salt - in appropriate dosage - may enhance the meal ie. career!
Ms Ford, Paris, France
The reason there are not many women made partners is because they go get married have children and want to work part-time. It is economically unfeasible to have part-time partners. They drag the firm down.
It's no different from any other corporate environment where if you want to climb the ladder you have to be 100% dedicated and focussed. The more senior you get the more the work/life balance gets challenged.
Ollie, London, UK
Getting women into top management positions is not about setting up networks, nor about stamping out now mostly non-existent "discrimination" these days. It is about having viable childcare options and a working environment where a woman can be a professional and a mother without having a nervous breakdown or seeing her children only at weekends. The fact that people have families (and women often do most of the caring for them - by choice or necessity) is something city law firms feel should not concern them, unfortunately. As long as this is the case I wish Ms, Honeywell and her network good luck but I think they are barking up the wrong tree.
I understand flexible working is a challege for a the service sector, but there is room for some innovation. When I worked for a city law firm, working 4 days a week or having to leave at 6pm to pick up children from childcare often meant the end of significant career progression, even for the high-flyers.
Bronwyn Donne, London,