Gráinne Gilmore and Rebecca O’Connor
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

Millions of homeowners will pay more for their mortgages next year despite the Bank of England’s decision to cut the base rate yesterday.
Only borrowers who are on the right type of mortgage deal will enjoy lower bills following the quarter-point cut. But many will have to find extra cash to meet their monthly repayments as lenders try to boost their profit margins in the wake of the credit crunch.
Around 12 per cent of homeowners who have a tracker deal – which moves in line with the base rate – will enjoy a cut in their mortgage repayments. The average homeowner could see repayments fall by £18 a month.
But borrowers on other variable rate deals may not be so lucky, as they depend on their lender passing on the rate cut.
Halifax, Nationwide and First Direct said yesterday that they would do this, but some other banks may not.
James Cotton, of London & Country, the mortgage broker, said: “We are bound to see some lenders dragging their feet and others who don’t pass on the cuts at all.”
The real losers are homeowners who have fixed-rate mortgage deals. About 1.4 million borrowers coming to the end of a fixed-rate deal in 2008 face much higher repayments after five interest rate rises since August last year.
Those hoping that yesterday’s base rate cut would take the sting out of the soaring repayments are in for a disappointment. They may be forced to find more than £100 extra each month to meet their bills.
Experts say that banks and building societies, which face a £30 billion black hole in their mortgage funding next year, are changing the way they price fixed-rate home loans so that lower interest rates will no longer automatically result in cheaper deals for homeowners.
Lenders have traditionally reduced the cost of fixed-rate deals in line with falls in swap rates – the money markets that predict movements in the base rate. But recently fixed rates have fallen more slowly than swap rates.
Melanie Bien, director of Savills Private Finance, the mortgage broker, said: “Lenders have introduced quite a margin between the cost to them of borrowing and the price they are charging borrowers for it. It is likely that lenders will continue to attempt to improve margins by keeping fixes high, relative to swap rates.”
In an additional blow to borrowers, lenders are also boosting their margins by charging higher arrangement fees for setting up a home loan. Five years ago the average arrangement fee for setting up a two-year fixed-rate loan was around £200. Now lenders are charging as much as £4,500 to set up a £150,000 mortgage.
Experts say that the high fees can be used to camouflage uncompetitive deals as lenders charge low interest rates, but recoup extra profit by levying a high arrangement fee.
Mr Cotton says that borrowers who take out Halifax’s two year fix at 5.29 per cent, which charges a fee of 3 per cent of the value of the loan, are paying an effective interest rate of 6.79 per cent.
There are also fears that borrowers who cannot afford the high fees are storing up trouble for the future by rolling the charges into their mortgage. This means that they must pay interest on the fee and any subsequent fees, which could add years to the term of their loan.
Ray Boulger, of John Charcol, the mortgage broker, said: “Borrowers need to remember that they may be paying interest on the fees if they add it to their mortgage. But the important thing is that borrowers have a mortgage at a rate they can afford to repay.”
The Government is trying to encourage homeowners to take out long-term fixed-rate home loans for up to 25 years to help to stabilise the mortgage market. Brokers are reporting that five-year fixes have become more popular than two-year fixed rates over recent months. However many homeowners balk at the prospect of long-term arrangements which can carry hefty redemption charges if borrowers later decide to move house or improve their home.
Savers, who are usually penalised when the base rate falls, may emerge unscathed, experts say. As banks try to shore up their deposits they are unlikely to pass on the full rate cut to all savers. Financial advisers believe that banks which cut some savings rates may even increase the returns on other accounts in an attempt to boost their market share.

Losers
Victoria Jones and Mike Reddy, of Cwmamam, Wales, pay 4.84 per cent interest on their £145,000 mortgage from Nationwide. But they face an increase in mortgage payments when their deal runs out in July.
They currently pay £890 a month in mortgage repayments, but the best five-year fix on the market is now pegged at 5.39 per cent, which could take their repayments up to £988 a month.
Ms Jones said: “This cut won't make any difference to me unless rates continue to fall quite considerably before next summer. If there are cuts I think Nationwide will follow suit. I am worried that people will go out and spend excessively over Christmas now that the Bank of England has made this cut, which could mean the Bank is less inclined to make more cuts in the new year.
“It will help retailers in the short term but it probably won't help me in the long term."
Winners
Christine Cole, of Bury St Edmunds, has a £30,000 offset mortgage on her three-bedroom home at Yorkshire Building Society at a standard variable rate of 6.5 per cent. She is confident that the lender will pass on yesterday’s interest rate cut in full so her payments will fall. The 53-year-old office manager pays £270 a month, including a £55 overpayment. She said: “If my rate drops, I'll continue to pay the same and my cash will go further. I think the rate cut is a good sign.”
Barbara and Mark Richards will pay £18 a month less on their mortgage repayments from today. The couple pay £749 a month on their Woolwich Lifetime tracker mortgage, which is pegged at 0.19 percentage points above the base rate. The rate has now fallen from 5.94 per cent to 5.69 per cent. The couple, who live in a three-bedroom cottage in Nottingham, say they are pleased that they opted for a tracker mortgage, which had a better rate than a fixed or discounted deal.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Paul of London has hit the nail on the head - while the couple on the fixed rate will experiance a payment shock, this dosen't distract from the savings they have made durring the fixed rate period.
Gemma, Bristol,
I think Clive of Chichester has revealed the kernel of the problem.....namely that the general population has chosen to be profligate in the extreme and throw caution to the wind by overextending themselves. Now it appears the chickens are coming home to roost.....but unfortunately those of us who chose only to spend what we could prudently pay back will have to pay the same price as the reckless. Make no mistake, this asset price inflation ( a world phenomenon) has been brought about by the world's banks throwing money at a financially illiterate population. Indeed, we all know that it has propped up economies that would otherwise be ailing. When houses earn more than those they house, the day of reckoning can't be far off. House price inflation over the past ten years of 180% is not going to be brought back to earth by the 6 to 10 % being bandied about. Mortgage terms extended to exceptional lengths or vast multiples of salaries will not be the panacea for the problem. Crash!!!
Herd averse, Nottingham, UK
The BoE lost control some time ago, when it kept rates artificially low, thus allowing both banks and the public to engage on a 'no tomorrow' credit spree. It's probably too late to sort the mess out, so the BoE should just accept that there is a coming property crash and wider credit storm, ride it out and learn the lesson for the future. Fat chance that this will happen, so just watch inflation spiral out of control. Who says that we won't see interest rates back at 15 per cent in the not too distant future?
Clive, Chichester, UK
I find it difficult to share the view that Victoria Jones and Mike Reddy are the 'losers' in this piece. In fact they appear, to me at least, to be the biggest winners. Their current mortgage rate is far below current mortgage rates so they have 'won' as a result of fixing their mortgage rate before rates started to rise. I am sure they have saved at least two thousand pounds on their mortgage payments over the lifetime of their fixed period compared to holding a tracker mortgage.
Once their fixed rate mortgage comes to an end they will be in the same position as anyone else on a variable rate mortgage. Therefore, I congratulate Victoria and Mike on their astute financial decision to fix their mortgage at the time they did. I wish that I was a 'loser' like them and had fixed my mortgage at the same time rather than being on a tracker.
Paul, London, E14
The government already skims off any real growth of your savings in tax. The BoE have said in so-many-words that its not going to react to near-term inflation. Savers are going to get screwed big time.
As the majority own property the priority is now to save the ballooning housing market. So how about bringing back MIRAS, funded by a 50% CGT on the sale of all investment property?
L Mckay, Newcastle, Tyneside
If banks do not pass on rate changes, the Bank of England loses grip of its only macro-influence over economic behaviour.
If this behaviour by the banks continues, it must be brought into line, and the best way to do that, whilst avoiding regulation, is a windfall tax, and the promise of more to come, and more than a hint at why it is being levied.
Ingslot Vonnesline, London,
If banks do not pass on rate changes, the Bank of England loses grip of its only macro-influence over economic behaviour.
If this behaviour by the banks continues, it must be brought into line, and the best way to do that, whilst avoiding regulation, is a windfall tax, and the promise of more to come, and more than a hint at why it is being levied.
Ingslot Vonnesline, London,
Lilian Stewart, Preston, Lancs. 'Savers'(?) more fool them! Quite clearly Brown, King et al are only interested in bailing out the reckless. The last few years has been akin to parents giving their children the credit cards and saying 'go for it'. Now, most are so maxed out that they can't even manage minimum payments when IRs are at a historic low (the average for the last few decades is about 8%). Why save? You might as well spend, spend, spend, remortgage, remortgage, remortgage. Once sufficient numbers of people have been allowed to get into unmanageable debt there will be absolutely no way of recouping it so the whole system will face collapse.
Clive, Chichester, UK
'Experts say that banks and building societies, which face a £30 billion black hole in their mortgage funding next year........'
I assume that's 30 billion each - the Rock managed that size of black hole just by itself. It's hardly likely that the rest of them will be far behind when their REAL figures are shown, (rather than the peanuts that most revealing at the moment to boost their shares before their final collapse).
eric campbell, harrogate, uk
Many savers who have had rates of 15% in the past on mortgages have not had the pleasure of such cheap rates as now.
If someone wants a property then they have to consider their affordabilty.
More consideration for savers is needed and fair return to them.
Lilian Stewart, Preston, Lancs
What about FTBs, are they Winners or Losers ?
Tara, London,