Alice Miles
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
I find myself a bit jealous of the Scots and the French. Admittedly I enjoy elections full stop, however and wherever, but these neighbours of ours appear to be having what I think of as real elections: old-fashioned slugging bouts with ideology and political parties who stand for instantly identifiable things. Differentiate between Labour and the SNP north of the Border? Easy. Scottish independence. Between Ségolène Royal and Nicolas Sarkozy? Of course: the Socialist and the rightwinger. And an 85 per cent turnout! We can only gasp in awe. Good for the French.
Of course there are caveats: does she really believe . . . ? Do the Scots really want . . . ? But the outline of the contest is clear. Like Tony Benn and Ann Widdecombe on their popular speaking tours, like Boris Yeltsin in his heyday, or Boris Johnson “putting his foot in it” again — here is conviction, here is argument, here is plainspeaking. We like and respect it, even if we do not agree with the opinion.
For the British, drifting into a potential two-year election campaign stuck in the ever-shrinking centre ground, our main parties dancing cautiously on pinheads, the sight of real politics is invigorating. It feels like you could breathe in Scotland and in France; debate serious issues, not whether a small percentage difference in a rise in GDP would “destroy the health service” or a twiddle to tax credits might shatter social progress.
British electoral politics is dominated by visions of defeat. People no longer win elections; they only avoid losing them. Campaigns are wary, defensive, dishonest and cowardly, and the electorate responds by refusing to vote. Rhetoric fills the vacuum where bold policy should be; new Labour was never so cautious as when it claimed to be radical.
David Cameron protested this week that politics too often treats citizens like children, by pretending to be able to solve everything with an initiative or a new law. “Think of the messages parents give children from an early age. Be careful. Don’t do that. Do it this way. I’ll do that for you. That seems to me a fair summary of most of the messages that government gives the public. We are infantilising people — treating them like children, with the result that many of us are behaving like children.” The days of government solving a social problem with a summit, an initiative and a five-point plan are dead. But crowding onto the centre ground to appeal to an ever-narrower band of swing voters and then pretending there is a great choice before them patronises the electorate, too.
This lack of courage has fed a crisis in British democracy, bred partly by that infantilised belief that it’s up to “them” to make things better, partly by the knowledge that too often participation doesn’t make any difference or is stifled by bureaucracy. This makes it harder and harder to fill vacancies in our democratic system at grassroots levels, such as parish councils and school governing bodies.
When people do put themselves forward as leaders, we jeer and hector them. We moan. We whine. We dissect their personalities as if they are characters on a reality television show. And where are the worst examples of this behaviour? Right at the top. Next time you brand Gordon Brown dour and sulky, Mr Cameron, do not talk to us about infantilising politics. Next time your henchmen attack Mr Cameron for being a posh airhead, Mr Brown, do not lecture us about turning our backs on the politics of personality.
Labour’s failure to find a serious challenger to Mr Brown for No 10 only drips further water on to the embers of what ought to be our flaming democracy: it looks as if the party cannot be bothered, as if it lacks the heart and possibly even the questions for a debate. Mr Brown’s “fait accompli” premiership will be weakened by that.
And the candidates for the Labour deputy leadership, those proposing themselves as Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom? Force majeure! What does Peter Hain promise? “Real renewal”, a — what do you know — “ten-point plan to renew democracy”. Hazel Blears has been handing out “Hazel Beers” beer mats (no, I am not making this up), and Harriet Harman proposes [drum roll] “a new pledge card ten years after our last one”. This has been, so far, a pathetic excuse for a debate.
The only candidate who seems not to have disappeared up his own cul de sac — and the only one to have stated he does not want to be Deputy Prime Minister, with all its flashy trappings, but deputy party leader — is the Dagenham MP, Jon Cruddas, the least known and most interesting of them all. But then he hails from an area of London where they can see at first-hand the impact of closing down serious debate on difficult issues (immigration, the rise of the BNP) that matter to people on the ground: “We triangulate around immigration and collude in the demonisation of the migrant whilst relying on the same people to rebuild our public and private services and make our labour markets more flexible.” Discuss.
“We don’t live in a classless meritocratic new Labour nirvana, right?” says the man who advised Tony Blair in No 10 throughout his first term. What refreshing plainspeak. Allow me to offer you Mr Cruddas’s opinion of his rivals for the post: “They’re playing smoke and mirrors to find themselves. After ten years of doing the nodding-dog routine, they try to reinvent themselves as more radical.”
He is so unafraid of debate it goes without saying that Mr Cruddas is derided by “proper” politicians (ie, the ones who calibrate every utterance before speaking it) as being somewhere nearer barking than Dagenham. Which enables them to write him off. Which, come to think of it, is what the French political establishment at first did with Ms Royal. Vive la différence.
Alice Miles has been with The Times since 1999. She began as a Parliamentary Sketch writer before becoming a columnist, writing mainly on politics and national issues such as education and health. She won Columnist of the Year in 2007.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
France is nice. But only because it has got a vibrant city and fancy beaches.
Real good politics should not strive to be radical, interesting, or revolutinary.
It should simply strive to be plain good.
France is simply not practicing good politics. But yes ,the article is right when stating that those (nationalist) politics are more fun and more exciting.
Still wouldn't want it for more than a week in my own country.
Felix, Hamburg, Germany
Agree with Alice that Jon Cruddas MP sounds sensible, talks well and looks a bright prospect - is that what excludes him from running?
Peter York, Tonbridge, Kent
I keep wondering why so many Brits (at least on this website) have the idea that France is some kind of developing country. I think that on the whole quality of life in France and Britain are quite close, with some advantages and disadventages, depending on what you look at and what your priorities are.
Reguarding politics, I would be amazed that such a high turnout maintains during the next years. I think it comes from the disastrous results of the last presidential elections.
marine, grenoble,
The UK political system is a lot more sinister than this article makes out. Both Tories and New Labour are in the pockets of big business. The reason why nobody with a brain can be bothered to vote is because it's the system that's the problem not just the parties.
John Lilburen, London,
Are high property prices to blame? In England, particularly the south, everyone lives precariously and craves stability that leads to craven pandering to dull "stabilising" politics. Prices are lower in Scotland and in France... and politics... and people... can afford to have more of a soul.
Joe, brussels, belgium
What makes you think this is going to change? You raise the Brown dilemma, or is it a study, as though it is a cul de sac. I think it is more likely to be increasingly typical. The problem is the freedom of speech we have in this country. You are free to speak without need to relate that speech logically or to the visible facts, but you must stick to the PC environment. The consequence is that no one knows quite what may be going on and the wordsmiths rule. Your article is a good example of the current genre. Nobody is going to commit themselves a priori to this mélange. Either they get caught up in it, probably initially against their better judgement, or they give it a wide berth.
Henry Percy, London, UK
And who has been sitting there doing its best to close down open discussion - who has more actively pursued the politics of personality and celebrity. Who has poured ridicule and scorn on politicians and activists generally.
It couldn't be the UK media could it?
Try challenging orthodoxy and watch the person concerned get torn apart - while some half wittted football player or cricketer who earns seven figures a year because he can (sometimes) kick a football or wield a bat and looks good in dark sunglasses and Italian clothes is lauded.
What honest person would want to expose themselves to this sort of open contempt.
H, London,
Our system is becomomnig much like america. It started during Thatcher's reign as she became more presidential, and Blair and co have taken it to the same extreme as in America about 20 years ago. It can only get worse (not better).
I trust Ms Miles means the press and the establishment when she says "When people do put themselves forward as leaders, we jeer and hector them. We moan. We whine. We dissect their personalities .... " because we (the people) don't have a say in the world of professional industrialised politics.
Neil Murphy, cromer,
"When people do put themselves forward as leaders, we jeer and hector them. We moan. We whine."
Very true. In France, François Bayrou 'lost' by British standards, in that he now has a 0% chance of becoming the next President. Yet the French see this as a victory - his high percentage puts him in a strong position for the next time in five years. If he was a Conservative, there would be no next time: he would have been fired from the top post by now.
The reason for this? The respect for ideas present in France. There was no smear campaign against him; instead his rivals showed that they were better than him. They built themselves up, rather than knocking him down. Here, as you say, is argument.
BW, France,
I think Alice is dead right. John Cruddas is the only option. If only he was in Gordon's place. People don't know who John is but he seems very honest and approachable
martin shiels, bedford,
Who are you kidding. You in the media wanted all three parties to hold center-left views which you try to pretend is the 'center ground'.
If 12% voted for Le Pen here and another 30%+ for the rightist Sarkozy you lot would force the government to arrest the population and charge them with racism/fascism/nazism and being evil.
There aren't enough English people left in London to vote for anything other than the status quo, and the rest of Southern and urban GB is heading the same way.
Enjoy.
xxxCORRECTxxx, London, England
Fabulous article, sums up our pathetic excuse for demoncracy very well!
I intend to watch Jon Cruddas' career with great interest. He is the only person left in Labour who seems able to think outside the New Labour box and actually comment on what he sees in front of him not what the politicians wish to see.
Jenny, London,
Perhaps you have the classic British pessimism coursing through your veins as well, Alice. Could it not be that low voter turnout reflects contentment, rather than dissatisfaction?
France, economically stagnant for a decade or more, in the throes of social unrest on an unprecedented scale, and encountering steep competition in its core markets from a resurgent Eastern Europe... High voter turnout.
Britain, an economic paradigm, leading Europe in high technology and financial services, with a resurgent geo-political standing on the global stage... Low voter turnout.
Mark, Woking, UK
France has its advantages and the turnout was admirable. But remember this: ten percent of the turnout voted for a fascist party.
Would the UK electorate as a whole do likewise?
Tony G, brum, uk
The only problem with reducing government management of the minutiae of our lives is - what do we do with all of the civil servants that new labour hired to police their directives. They would have to find some real work to do and earn a living for a change.
KR, Stockport,
It's all very well wishing for more extreme politics, but let's just look at the state of the French economy, shall we? Its taxes, its crumbling institutions - created by years of 'ideologically-committed' politicians trying their own thing. Give me the cautious centre ground any day - it doesn't matter that it makes politics less interesting, it makes life more stable.
Carolyn, Oxford,
Zut alors! Im sick of brainless Journalism!!
The number of articles about the French (see TGV article) that start with Mon Dieu! Zut Alors! or with some reference to Allo' Allo' etc. etc. is quite frankly alarming. Just highlighting the inherent xenophobia in the "most fair-minded society in the world" (tm).
Jon Kingsbury, Southampton, UK
Chinese elections could be the next big thing.
Warminster, Warminster, UK
This has been occuring since 1997, when a large number of conservatives jumped benches to New Labour, (rats and sinking ships anyone), I have far more respect for the Tories who went down with the ship and stood on thier priciples. this country should be run by representatives , in other words they represent the electorate in government. many of them seem to have forgotten this and endlessly say anything to get elected. I agree with this article entirely, though 1 question remains , how does it get fixed? do we throw out all the current politicians and elect new ones? possibly too radical but it might just work.
Ben, Folkestone, kent
One thing we don't have in France is aggressive interviewers like Jeremy Paxman or John Humphreys. Watching French politicians interviewed by French journalists is pretty boring; journalists have been to the same "grandes écoles" as the politicians, and it is probably fair to say that there is a kind of politico-media establishment which decides what us proles can hear. And I'm sure the televised Royal-Sarkozy debate on May 2nd will be a pretty stilted affair too. A lot of French people have found the campaign dull because there has been no real confrontation, of candidates or ideas.
Stephen, Nantes, France
Hurrrrah. When resigning as Chairman of my local Conservative Association in January 2007 I stated, in my view, the lack of interest in politics and poor election turn outs were the direct result of a lack of "politics."
Shame on the political parties.
However, they are creatures of the press who demean and blow-up every difference highlighting selective comments/issues and who refuse to report the details and arguments in case their customers get bored. This is a media/political pact made in hell. Unfortunately we both serve a switched off electorate; our joint challenge is to turn them on again!!!!!
Colin MacMillan, Redditch, Worcs
I totally agree with the article.Unless the Tories have the courage to put forward genuine Tory policies to address the key issues facing British society here is one life long Tory who will not be voting for them.
R G James, Brasschaat, belgium
Alice ; you have summed up Britain & the British succinctly.
The voting public expects the government to "do" something , anything to "fix " their problems.
Nowhere in the debate are Britons freedoms explored or deemed worthy of expansion. Neglected is any sense of individual's responsibility for their own lives and the governments responsibility to beef up those freedoms.
The litany of ever greater Big Brother government under Blair is endless, from cameras monitoring , policing of people's homes for smokers,idiotic political correctness, irresponsible immigration with importation of third world ideologies shredding society, speed cameras and bumps , egalitarian school policies that discount differences in intelligence and life paths,tax ,tax and more tax for a collapsing socialist health system , long past its sell-by date. Its endless.
When are Britons going to rise up and take their lives back ? A land fit for heroes ??-I think not.
will knight, orange county, california usa