Alice Miles
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
Oh Gord. Can we take another two years of this? Anything - anything - would be better than the plan confected by the coalition of cowards and egotists that the Labour Party, MPs and ministers alike, has become.
They didn't allow a contest to choose their next leader; now they want a contest, maybe, but not for a bit in case the result turns out even more scary than things are now. Everyone with influence on this decision appears to be working not in the interests of the country but in their own interests - from those who would be leader but not of a party likely to lose, to those trying to protect their seats by waiting a bit longer to see if things improve before really, really panicking and demanding a new leader, through to those in No 10 unable to see beyond their stubborn determination that they can turn things around just by sitting firm.
They cannot. An administration that everyone from backbenchers to truckers now dares to hold to ransom cannot manage a way through the next two years. I cannot see any difficulty at all in sorting out the current row over additional fuel and car taxes. And were I in No 10, I would be perfectly comfortable making the case for dumping them both, and still touting my credentials for being as green as the next girl.
It is a sign of how twisted this Government has been under Gordon Brown's leadership, so lacking in clarity and coherence, that it no longer has the ability to cut through the smog. Pilloried for a U-turn on the new 10p tax rate that was both expensive and entirely ineffectual, sneered at for lacking any coherent ideology, mocked for tacking to the latest whim of the voters and of any protesting Labour MP who gives a quote to a Sunday paper, the Government seems stuck in a quagmire of indecision. If this is moral compass, I'm the North Pole.
I wouldn't normally have much sympathy with fuel protesters, either private drivers or hauliers. The truckers can and should pass on the transport costs to their customers. Once you start allowing an “essential-user rebate” on fuel, as they are demanding - 25p a litre, no less! - where do you draw the line? Nurses, teachers, emergency services, night workers, any commuter from a rural area who needs to drive to the railway station, the mother taking her children to school in an area without public transport... we could most of us claim essential usage of one form or another.
The 2p duty increase due in October is different. It has already been deferred once and the Government could do so again. It isn't a U-turn: the Chancellor simply announces that when, in March, he declared that the increase would go ahead in October, fuel prices were expected to have fallen by then. Instead, they have shot up higher. If there is no fall in prices before the autumn, the fuel duty increase will be deferred again. It is an honest solution to a real problem not of the Government's making. The achingly high price of fuel is punishment enough for the motorist today - take it from someone who doesn't live in a city and does need to drive on a daily basis.
The other tax causing anguish - to Labour backbenchers although not yet to most drivers - is the hidden increase in vehicle excise duty on “gas-guzzling” cars first registered after spring 2001. This puzzles me a little, as I repeatedly read that MPs are upset because it is going to hit poorer families who own older cars. But seven years is not old for a car, at least not outside London and other high-status areas. Most poorer families, if they own a car at all, will own one that is older than seven years and not hit by the £200 tax rise. It seems more likely that the tax will strike slightly wealthier families - politically damaging, yes, but not financially devastating. If the Treasury is to start giving into pressure from every MP afraid of losing votes in his or her seat, we are in for a really dangerous two years.
Yet no matter what the truth about the victims of this tax, it should be deferred anyway. It is dishonest, stealthy and unfair. It is wrong to impose a tax with retrospective effect on people who have already bought a car relying on knowing roughly the future level of taxation on it. Nor does it help to change behaviour, as the same car becomes impossible to sell in favour of a greener alternative. “Sorry, we made a mistake” would do just fine here.
The Government is too stuck to do it just like that. Instead, it will dither and hint and change it in the end anyway. Driving taxes are a toxic subject, as Mr Brown will remember from the fuel protests of 2000. All of us want to be good and green, but the cost of petrol is squeezing enough already. I wouldn't want to be a minister in a government that hiked it up further now.
There are big arguments to be had for dramatic shifts in lifestyle and in the tax system, but a Government bogged down with day-to-day survival will not make them. For instance, the proposal from MPs for a system of tradeable personal carbon allowances, as backed by David Miliband when Environment Secretary, deserved more than the cold shoulder it received from environment ministers yesterday. But nothing can be done while every MP can hold the Government to ransom, and while each decision or lack of one is read as a judgment upon the survival of the Prime Minister.
The coverage of Mr Brown's premiership has almost reached the critical mass that forced Sir Menzies Campbell's retirement as leader of the Liberal Democrats. Labour MPs might like to note that his replacement with a charismatic young moderniser has done absolutely nothing for the revival of the Liberal Democrats.

Alice Miles has been with The Times since 1999. She began as a Parliamentary Sketch writer before becoming a columnist, writing mainly on politics and national issues such as education and health. She won Columnist of the Year in 2007.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I am not worried about carbon footprints or global warming but we must address the fact that we will run out of oil .
ian cheese, london, uk
Truckers can't just pass on fuel costs. They go out of business because overseas competition buys its fuel before working for a few days in the UK.
Labour is starting to realise that plundering the economy for tax to waste is not free. Pity they wasted boom-year revenues first.
D Murphy, Skipton,
"We can't do that again" says a "senior official" with regard to concessions on road and fuel tax. "money does not grow on trees"
No, it doesn't. It grows on Petroleum Revenue Tax, with oil at $135 per barrel. It grows on Vat on petrol with unleaded at £1.16 per litre.
Think of another excuse !
Stan O'Neil, MELTON MOWBRAY, England
Alice sounds as though she's been throughly brainwashed by the global-warming-is-your-fault brigade.
Phill , The Wirral, England
Since ministers and MPs are asking where the money for a fuel tax rebate is going to come from - let them look at the quangos, which Labour promised to abolish but which have proliferated to an enormous extend - costing the taxpayer £64 billion a year.
Vivian Evans, Cardiff,
Petrol prices should go up ONLY when the cost of living in areas such as Rents/Mortgages (outlaw BTL) and Council Tax (let's see a 50% reduction and more subsidies from Cent Gov) go down. The tax for bigger vehicles is a con. If the Govn' are serious, ban these vehs from the road altogether
Nick, Bristol,
The headline to this article says "No 10 must not give in to the protestors..." .... & why the devil must they not ? ... the voice of the people is ignored by foolish governments ... once into Westminster they seemingly have no need of our opinions but act & vote to the party line .... BAH
r rogers, bedford, UK
The immediate way to solve the foreign truckers problem:
1. Any truck with a full tank must pay a contribution, equal to the amount of filling their truck in the UK with diesel.
2. Tolls on roads leading out of UK ports-all UK tax disc payers are exempt from paying
Bertie Bassett, Brighton, UK
Oil is a limited resource. We have to wean ourselves off it sooner or later. This is not a "green" perspective, just reality. Trying to micromanage the market with 2p here or there is like Canute telling the waves to retreat. Some stuff goes up in price - get used to it.
Nick, France,
The first thing they should do is take away fuel duty and other taxes in general, as they are currently taxing fuel at a horrendous rate with fuel duty and then double tax with VAT at 17.5%.
If Government could run itself efficiently it could reduce staff and charge less tax on fuel and in general.
Dave Andrews, Glasgow, UK
Why's GB talking to OPEC about the cost of oil?
They're never going to cut their profit margin.Should be talking to himself instead,maybe he is since his cabinet seems to be split.HMG are never going to radically change the road tax system ie.no road tax at all,since they're use to a level of income
john , shrewsbury, uk
We have always had high fuel prices relative to the EU and the USA thanks to fuel duty at 70%. When oil prices rise and fuel becomes highly priced around the world it becomes extortionately priced here. Bring UK & EU Fuel Duty into line now. Why does the UK Govt need more fuel tax than others?
K Shad, Towcester, Northants
If all of the money from green taxes went into Innovation to provide a solution then I would be less upset by them. They aren't. They are needed to fund second homes (fully furnished) to MP's and their gold standard pensions as well as the army of middle managers in public services.
Martin, Darwen, Lancashire
I understand that something needs to be done to the amount of cars on the road both from a pollution and traffic perspective, but I just can't see any viable alternative. Can they make the trains more attractive? I don't think so. So what next?
Nick, London , UK
Peter in London - it is always those who are living with a great public transport system (paid for by the rest of us) who are in favour of putting up tax on fuel. I cannot afford to live closer to work and public transport in the local area is a joke.
Some of us have no choice but to drive.
JLP, Cambridge, UK
We have become so addicted to the car that we can't think of life without them. I couldn't ask my kids to walk to school or even go by bike because roads have become so large and congested. We don't even have a pedestrian crossing that connects the village to St. Albans, We need more choice, dont we?
Graham, Bricket Wood, St. Albans, uk
Green tax is just tax with a word added. There is no 'green' benefit to extra duty on fuel, as people still need to drive (no alternative), food still needs to be produced and delivered, electricity still needs to be supplied. If the tax reduced demand, and thus the revenue, it would be cancelled.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
It is possible to deliver a different Britain. Why do we still see ourselves as global police. Good strong well equiped home defence forces would be sufficient and at a fraction of our current defence bill. We dont need billion pound aircraft carriers and overseas capability anymore
mike gee, bournemouth, uk
Cut out the ID card project, the NHS computer project, get out of Iraq, then abolish National Insurance ( a tax on the poor). That would improve spending power to the economy, and might even make the government less unpopular.
DR ANDREW JOHN KITCHING, Reading,
I agree with much of what Alice Miles has written. However, I do think, given the impact that high fuel costs has on so many elements on our daily lives, that the government should reduce fuel tax for everybody, particularly if it true the exchequer is gaining extra revenue from high oil prices.
Sean, Plymouth, UK
I agree with Vishal - the petrol tax would be justifiable and effective if it actually was used to subsidise public transport, which is ridiculously expensive, and, even with rising petrol prices, not very competitive compared to motoring (bus companies just pass on petrol costs by raising fares)
Jay Kennedy, Liverpool, UK
I am getting sick of the expression "being held to ransom" used every time some group has a legitimate protest against getting ripped off, be it pensions, or everyone with our taxes. The message is simple, stop the government wasting money on things we don't need like ID card schemes
Tim, Dundee, Scotland
There isn't much this government or a government of PC Dave's nonentities can do about this issue. Has anyone here ever heard of Peak Oil? Type that into Google and find out.
Barry, Brentwood, United Kingdom
Um, just why must the government "not give in" to popular protest? Isn't this supposed to be a democracy?
Roger, Ipswich,
"Road fuel is far too cheap - the government should aim to increase road fuel tax so that the price of fuel doubles over the next five years"
Peter from London, next time you stray beyond the M25, have a game of 'spot the bus or train'. It's really challenging!
Jim, Exeter,
Thank you D Cage, for a blast of common sense regarding the whole anthropogenic climate change pseudo-science. Taking personal responsiblity, recycling, using resources carefully, respecting the environment and having a reasonable size family are no-brainers. We don't need to be taxed into penury!!
JC, Bere Alston, England
personally i think most of the "green" issues are scare mongering at best and dishonest at worse.
politicians knew they were getting to the limit of acceptable taxation, then they jumped on the green bandwagon. Boom instant taxation..
green = tax
billy, edinburgh,
The dishonesty of the government to say that the proposed increase in road excise for older cars is for environmental reasons as it is actually better environmentally to keep existing cars running than manufacture new ones.
A Hearle, Guildford, UK
What happened to Dave Camerons PR Hype on Green Issues.As he backed off when they are no longer popular with the public.Green Dave has also hidden his Green advisor Goldsmith away.Cameron is a political weather vaner thats why he does not like giving detailed policies its then difficult to U Turn.
Bill Rees, Truro, Cornwall
It's all about managing decline - the UK is supporting an unsustainable public sector. If we reduce this burden, we could lower taxes and skew our transport systems towards public transport. As long as we have a bloated public sector we are going to face social unrest as the economy is squeezed.
Steve Marchant, Broadhempston , UK
Its time to move away from taxation of petrol to fund general expenditure of the government.
Instead allocate all taxes from petrol towards:
1) a Green Fund - which will subsidize alternative energy
2) towards maintaining the road network
3) subsidize public transport.
Vishal Patel, London, UK
I didn't vote for the 100's of pieces of reactionary legislation, I didn't vote for the massive amount of research that gets wasted. I voted for education but not monstrous amounts of costly testing and certainly didn't vote for expensive wars. Sick of paying tax for all this!!
Dave, coventry, uk
Don't worry guys the Green Brigade will soon have all Brits living in tree tops with no jobs, no money and no food. Gordon is only there to help them, the rest of the world will live happily ever after.
Peter Fordham, Pego, Spain
I would say that Gordon Brown is finshed, but the truth is that he never really got started. We need leadership more than anything now and he cannot provide it. He must go.
Carl, London,
"Gas-guzzling" cars don't emit carbon dioxide.
Burning petrol emits carbon dioxide, and it's the same amount of CO2 per litre whatever you burn it in: 4x4s, minis, or lawn-mowers.
Abolish car tax and put it all onto petrol duty, and people will be able to take rational decisions about their lives.
Jane Dinham, Oxford,
You only hear of taxes when you hear of 'green' policies. When do we get some positive input in the way of spending more on subsidising car sharing, park and ride schemes etc.?? Not from central government - it's mostly left to the vagaries of local government councils who are notoriously inept.
David Nammory, Liverpool,
I have no problem paying higher fuel tax if the money was going to be used to make public transport better. Instead there is zero accountability and there is no effort by this government to use the money collected to the betterment of public transport.
Tim, London,
I had my second hand SAAB 9-5 Estate converted to LPG, earlier this year. My last fill up cost 56p a litre and the kit costs about £1,500 so most would be charged towards £2,000 for the change.
Geoffrey Keith Nathan, Grays Essex , UK
We will be running out of oil pretty soon, at the present rate of consumption; the debate shd. move on to what we do then.
Will there be a viable alternative? eg. can we imagine a sky without planes?
ian cheese, london, uk
What is wrong isn't the tax, it's the taxer, the Chancellor who demonstrated his lack of backbone with Northern Rock - where he's about to do it again - who buckles under every pressure. It was and is logical to RAISE fuel tax, as he knows perfectly well, but Darling hasn't the stature to do it.
Noel Falconer MEcon, Couiza, France
A 40%+ increase in oil costs will be included in the rise in all prices in all shops - since the price increase must be passed on to the consumer. This means increases in prices in the pipeline for EVERYTHING you purchase not just Fuel for transport, but all your purchases and the utilities too.
Rob, Nottingham,
If (and I mean IF) CO2 is responsible for global warming, more of it is produced in manufacturing a new car than any car will ever emit in its lifetime. Ergo - the greenest car you can own is the car you already own. So claims that higher taxes on older car are green taxes is spurious.
S Foster, Doncaster, UK
Road fuel is far too cheap - the government should aim to increase road fuel tax so that the price of fuel doubles over the next five years
Peter, London,
A fairer way would be to reduce both road and fuel tax but have congestion charging in cities, the profit going to improve public transport. Many would benefit from the latter, and hauliers (most of whose mileage is outside cities) and rural motorists alike would benefit from the fuel tax cuts.
Barry, Wallington, UK
People are sick of the subterfuge and chicanery that this government has displayed in the past ten years. We pay road taxes, vehicle taxes, parking fees, resident parking fees, speeding fines, bus lane transgression fines, before we add fuel duties. Where does this money go? Er... try MP's expenses.
Sanjay, London,
The "dramatic shifts in lifestyle" required are unpalatable to the 'I want' British public and undeliverable by any government that wishes to stay in office.
Kevin, Leeds,
Reduce taxes? surely that would only be a short term palliative. A few weeks or days even and we'd be back to square one again.
Rob, London, UK
I am surprised GB & AD havent put a tax on the rain that falls on peoples' heads. We do get a lot of it!! Just imagine a 1p tax on each drop that falls. BONANZA!!! The whole UK debt could be paid off in a day's rain of which there are many in these MIsty Isles.....
Louis Blanc, Liverpool, UK
Alice
It's all very well to say that the government has no control over oil prices, but what it does have is control over the price at the pumps by way of fuel duty.
Since 'they' have stopped us all smoking and hence lost a hearty whack of tax they have to get it back from somewhere I suppose.
BG
Bill Glanvill, Horsham, England
Hauliers cannot pass on costs. A truck can fill up in France, drive into the UK, pick up a load, drive it to Scotland, drive back to France and then fill up again.
What are these green taxes spent on?
Anything green?
Dominic, Manchester, England
It is road tax which should be scrapped and it should have been scrapped years ago but gutless politicians always avoided it . A high mileage, low emission car can do more damage than a low mileage high emission car. Where is the logic? Reduce mileage through petrol tax!
a.Mathman, Barnsley, England
"Nor does it help to change behaviour, as the same car becomes impossible to sell". And if people do sell their car - at a discount - then what ? It will simply be driven by somebody else. There is no envronmental gain from this tax, it is merely a way to screw more money out of the motorist.
Richard Briscoe, Amersham, England
On rereading your article your pretty sound. But I hope my contribution has Greensnobs seething. Environmentalism equals reaction. The coming right wing realignment is inevitable. Crikey! Its the Greens.
Eric Skelton, Cardiff, Wales
Alice you forgot renaming the european constitution to deny a vote, Brown and Blair agreeing a little deal to be PM, like it was their god given right to do so. You cannot consistently abuse power and insult the electorate and expect to survive. Arrogance beyond belief.
mark, surbiton,
Labour is an ex-Government - the shame of it is that we have to wait another two years before giving it its last rites. So the stinking corpse remains in the living room exuding its foul vapours!
Richard, Kidderminster, England
Another two years of Gordon and his juvenile ministers will just reinforce in the electorate's mind a combination of stealth taxes hitting the middle classes and poor, dithering, cowardice and incompetence. If Labour really are too cowardly to get rid of him, he should resign for 'family' reasons
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
D. Cage, then there are 'Eco Towns', the key to the fraud. But I think the debate has moved on. It is no longer the 2p but the vast tax bonanza that the treasury has scooped on the fuel price rise. It is not the fuel escalator anymore it is the Pacific Dodecanal Oscillator, an ice age, near you?
Malcolm Turner, Alsager, England
Why not "give in" to the fuel protestors if they're right? Is it sustainable to employ over half of northerners on the state payroll, in many areas, squandering both the nation's tax purse and North Sea oil revenues? Cut taxes now and get out of the way to ensure future economic prosperity.
Marco, London, UK
The electorate too, is fickle. 10p income, 2p "green" fuel, tax changes may have passed relatively quietly, if house prices were booming and credit not squeezed. HMG must now cut its cloth: such taxes are no longer acceptable. A year (or two) is a very long time in politics. You are right, Alice.
Mike L, Chippenham, Wilts
all taxes are too high under nulab. all taxes should be reduced
terry sullivan, morden, england
Alice misses the point with the fuel duty. Truckers and long distance buses fill up on the Continent in their 3000 km a tank vehicles because the fuel is much cheaper there. In 2014, the excise duty is to be levelled though. Big problems as the UK has high tax income from fuel.
B J Deller, Marbella, Spain
We need re-examine the CO2 issue. The fraud that it was verified science needs to be exposed. There is simply not the data available to verify computer models proving the link between CO2 and mythical global warming. have. Green taxes prevent essential energy saving.investments at a personal level.
D Cage, Highworth, UK