Alice Miles
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
But what about the teachers? I feel like the child who had to point out that the emperor isn't wearing any clothes. What we got this week, from the Government's primary schools adviser, was a rehashed curriculum in fine new garb, and a rather verbose way of setting out what good teachers do already - but not a word about what really matters: the quality of the teachers.
Sir Jim Rose's report is a tragic missed opportunity. If this is the limit of ministers' ambition for primary schools then they might as well go home early, clutching those little prizes which schools award the slower pupils for “effort”. There certainly won't be any progress.
Sir Jim is in danger of giving bad and mediocre teachers even more jargon and curricular complexity to hide behind. The Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum is itself smothered in it. Sir Jim sums up his ideas: “The report explores a curriculum design based on a clear set of culturally derived aims and values, which promote challenging subject teaching alongside equally challenging cross-curricular studies.” You what?
This sort of jargon filters down through teachers to the classroom, with lessons wrapped in equally incomprehensible verbiage. “Are we doing reading now?” I asked one primary school teacher recently. “Oh no”, she replied, “this isn't reading - this is literacy.” Er...
There is something wrong with the teaching profession. Not all of it, but some of it - and presumably the part that curriculum reviews are intended to reach. The teachers have turned insular and defensive; even their language has become alien. It's as if they inhabit a different world.
So spelling isn't spelling any more (there is but one mention of “spelling” in Sir Jim's 73-page report): it has become “decoding” and “encoding”. Is it really necessary for an educational adviser to write out the following: “Children may know how to decode and encode print but must then apply that knowledge and skill to understanding the words on the page.” You mean, children should be taught to read, sir?
Good teachers - even barely competent teachers - do not need to be told that. Good teachers will already apply the best of the ideas in Sir Jim's report, while good schools will do some of what he recommends already, such as using specialised teachers in certain subjects. Good teachers do not hide behind jargon.
The problem is with the bad schools and the bad teachers, who rigorously apply the rules handed down by ministers and officials to groups of baffled children. Like the chilling Ofsted official who described Baby P as a collection of data last week, they can talk the strange talk, but they cannot walk the walk.
So children unable to write their alphabet sit in circles parroting the definitions of “phoneme” and “grapheme”: “sound” and “letter” to you and me. “It's in the curriculum,” shrugs a teacher. “Silly, isn't it?”
Incompetent teachers, or those lacking in confidence, and afraid of the authorities, stick rigidly to any script they are given, carefully ticking all the little boxes. And Sir Jim is about to hand them quite a script.
Take the idea of a “theme” uniting all the primary subjects. This could be done well, so that a Second World War theme for the term incorporates European geography as well as a spot of French, and the mathematics of how many planes in a squadron returned if seven were shot down - that sort of thing. But it could be done badly, like the early-years teacher I saw writing down “a” for “aeroplane” in a child's first reading lesson - “because the theme this term is travel”.
It's all very well trying to make the curriculum “relevant” but the fundamental purpose of education must be that the basic building blocks are taught well first. “Relevance” can crowd out education.
Take mathematics: Sir Jim issues a familiar warning that children are not being taught how to apply their mathematics skills to the real world. Teachers have heard this complaint many times before. So keen are they to listen that many have overcorrected, asking a child, for instance, how he would hand out 12 chocolate bars among four children, but not teaching him that 12 divided by 4 is 3.
“What is that?” a six-year-old asked me the other day, pointing to a minus sign. He knew how to “count back two from five” (although he couldn't read the words; they had to be read to him) but he was unable to decipher 5 - 2 = 3. A seven-year-old state school child taking a maths exam for private school entry asked his mother of the multiplication questions: “Why were there kisses all over the paper?”
There will be many teachers who insist this does not matter; that children are picking up the concepts or themes, or developing understanding, or some such. But it does matter. So hard are educationists trying to keep the attention of every child with “varied and matched learning”, to use some more jargon, that education has become frighteningly dumbed down.
Middle-class flight from state schools is directly attributable to this happy-clappy, thematic, lowest-common-denominator, “entire planned learning experience” approach. Some kids enjoy learning times tables.
Listen to this terrifying sentence in the Rose report: “The teacher who once said: ‘If children leave my school and can't paint, that's a pity but if they leave and can't read, that's a disaster' was perhaps exaggerating to make a point.” Exaggerating? It's appalling that the man reviewing the primary curriculum considers that an exaggeration.
Children are leaving primary schools unable to read and write and do basic sums - a fifth failed English this year, a fifth maths and almost four in ten failed in combined reading, writing and arithmetic - and they tip into the secondary system already five years behind their peers, too late for many ever to catch up. It is absolutely essential to get this right. Yet nowhere in Sir Jim's report (because it wasn't in his remit drawn up by the Schools Secretary Ed Balls) is there anything about improving the quality of teachers.
A McKinsey study last year, conducted by Tony Blair's former policy adviser Sir Michael Barber, examined school systems around the world to see what made the difference in the best. The absolutely key element, beyond new buildings and class sizes, the curriculum or the structure of the system, was the quality of teachers. Yet Britain is still stuck in a rule-bound, jobs-for-life education system that rewards laziness and mediocrity as highly as real talent and drive.
The gulf between the public and private sectors gets wider and wider. Sir Jim is in danger of pulling up the drawbridge.
Alice Miles has been with The Times since 1999. She began as a Parliamentary Sketch writer before becoming a columnist, writing mainly on politics and national issues such as education and health. She won Columnist of the Year in 2007.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I used to be a teacher and left because it is a nightmare of a job. Kudos to those who do it and do it well.
And with regards to taking teacher pensions away; they should be at the bottom of the public sector list in this respects. If there was ever a profession that deserves a happy ending!
Peter Brown, Bristol,
Thank you Helen, I was getting quite depressed there.
As a newly qualified primary school teacher REQUIRED to "talk the talk" or fail my induction year, articles like this make me feel just great that I work 60 hours a week for a little over 20k a year. Want to swap jobs, Alice Miles?
Hannah, Market Harborough, Leics,
Is it not now time to introduce a system such that a minimum standard must be reached before students progress to the next 'year'. Such a system works in North America and allows students to be taught with others of similar ability levels rather than students of the same age.
Jonathan Norton, Edmonton, Canada
What about all the mediocre parents? Do they not have any responsibility? And yes, I am a teacher. I am so tired of working all the hours God sends only to have jumped up journalists take another swing at my profession. Go and be a teacher for a week, then write your column. I dare you.
Laura, Edinburgh,
Simple idea, any family receiving any income from a government job, has to enroll their children in a government school (especially the pollies).
Think you might see a change very quickly then.
Alex samad, Rhodes, Australia
The last article I read before coming to this one was about employment and the difficulties of finding work for our unemployed. Could there be any connection do you think?
Peter Miles, Crediton, UK
Put me in class of 100 with a good teacher and I'm happy. Put me in a class of 5 with a bad teacher and my future is ruined. This would naturally happen if pupil, teacher and school were given free choice instead of arbitary placement or via manipulative rules.
Vouchers might be a good start.
Greg Lorriman, Leatherhead, UK
Your point around the simplification of real mathematical operators reminds me of a similar point brought up in the early pages of Edsger Dijkstra's manuscript "On the cruelty of really teaching computing science". Pop along to the archive at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ and read 1036.
Oli W, London,
In reference to:
"A seven-year-old state school child....kisses all over the paper?
Just so 'we are all on the same page' * is the 'new' x, or that's what my 10 year old twins tell me!
Kelly, Vienna, Austria
Another round of redefining failure as progressive education and of ignorance as creativity. Leftist educationists are preparing the nation's children for life in caves . . . just in time for the onset of the next Ice Age.
Quinx, Nottingham, England
Not to worry. They will still get into University.
b.davies, newcastle, uk
Let's see. Back in the 1960s Wilfred Hyde-White and Richard Murdoch were cocking things up royal as The Men from the Ministry on BBC Radio. Then there was Yes Minister on BBC TV.
Why should we imagine that today's real life Teachers from the LEA would be any different?
Christopher Chantrill, Seattle, USA
The development of the British school system (demise of grammar schools, irrelevance of spelling etc) since the 1960ies read like a recipe for precluding social mobility with maximum efficiency.
krishna, Oxford, UK
I taught at a good Grammar School in the 1970's and then spent thirty years in Industry. I returned to teaching four years ago and have been appalled at the way children from primary schools seem to expect to play rather than to work. Trying to teach science to mixed ability kids is a hard job.
Hugh Leader, farnham, UK
Two examples: Teaching basic operations.(+-*/)and equivalences including tables/ratio and proportion is a technical skill.Similarly the teaching of sight words and phonetics.Having been described in my early life as agoodinspirationalteacher. The classroom secret is Attention to detail and routine.
rwn, muston,
Its all about the ruling classes keeping the working classes down. Its a bit dangerous to have an educated population. Very victorian ideals!
I bet they don't have the same problems at Eton and Winchester?!
james, Brisbane, Australia
An excellent article, thank you.
Charlotte, London,
I'm fed up saying it, but your ruling classes, whether Labour,
Conservative or Liberal - except for inner city diehards - PAY to have their children educated. They're not going to give you the same thing for nothing. Ah, but you pay taxes? So do they.
Somebody needs to think again.
John Carty, Medellin, Colombia
Sorry, what`s your point, exactly? You veer between criticism of the curriculum and policy makers, fairly pointing out how difficult this makes teachers' lives, then target teachers as incompetent.
I think you're onto something with curriculum, but surely the teachers are a separate issue?
Colin Young, Nagoya,
What an excellent article. As the recipient of 1970s/80s state schooling, I weep to see that the old nonsense is back.
If the children could do no more than read, write clear sentences, remember times tables and apply basic maths they would be in the right place.
Is that so hard?
P Orrell, London, UK
I wonder if there will any teachers left to teach. Parents will then have to teach their own little victims of poor parenting!
maddy, ,london,
There was one line in this article I loved: "good teachers do not hide behind jargon". That's true of any profession, though. The rest of this article betrayed a common misconception - that teaching children is easy. Reading is a mass of complex processes, and the jargon simply describes them.
Philip S., Toronto, Canada
You criticize the Rose report and a 'chilling Ofsted official' and then somehow say this means teachers are incompetent. I don't think using the word 'literacy' instead of 'reading' really counts as incomprehensible verbiage. Shouldn't journalists use logical arguments, even in the Murdock press?
Glen, Melbourne,
We get mediocre schools because we have mediocre government. Mediocrities dislike being shown up by those brighter than themselves, so they surround themselves with the like-minded. Hence Ed Balls for children, and Sir Jim for a ridiculous report that rmisses the point - good quality teaching.
Jean, London,
I worked in some 40 schools in the South East as a supply teacher. One of the main problems is having any kind of control over pupils in order to teach them. Most efffective sanctions have gone & many parents, mostly single, cannot help, or obstruct. We need pupils fit for work & life.
Chris Stuart, Carentan, France
The last section, about box ticking, is entirely accurate. My computing teacher - I'm currently doing my highers in Scotland - still puts up 'OLIs' on the iWhiteboard. Yet she doesn't even cover them.e.g What are NMIs? Then she goes on to gibber about some irrelevent junk, having ticked that box.
Michael, Scotland,
Children in the UK are the top performers in Europe in Maths at aged 10-14 according to a study released today. We must be doing something right. Teachers are an easy target in a country where everyone thinks they know more about education than those trained and experienced in its delivery.
helen, Birmingham, UK
Content is dead for most of our "leaders". They just deploy the right combination of words to construct a script that has the right high-sounding tone. It is no longer necessary that it mean anything. A senior manager who can express a clear thought is a rarely sighted bird.
Jamie Gilmour, Bolton, UK
It seems Government advisers are like bad managers: they spew out unnecessary jargon to make themselves appear clever and disguise their general cluelessness. And the really frightening thing is they tend to get away with it and get taken seriously.
Chris K, Cheltenham, UK