Anatole Kaletsky
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
What is the significance of the latest round of financial chaos - the fire sale of Bear Stearns and the short-sellers' conspiracy against HBOS? Does this mark the beginning of a much more painful phase of the financial seizure that, despite all the lurid headlines, has so far done surprisingly little damage outside the rarefied world of global high finance? Or will these two incidents be remembered as the cathartic moment of maximum panic that occurs near the end of every bear market, the point that drew in largescale unlimited government and central bank support without which no financial crisis is ever complete?
The second, optimistic, conclusion was suggested by the stock market activity in the first half of the week, after the government bailout of Bear Stearns, the biggest player in the US securities market, when Wall Street enjoyed its biggest rally for five years. By Wednesday, however, the markets appeared to be sending the opposite message, reversing most of the previous day's stock market profits, succumbing to the malicious rumours about HBOS, Britain's biggest mortgage lender, and sending commodity prices into a tailspin. Many analysts interpreted this reaction as proof positive of a coming deep global recession.
So which interpretation is right? Almost all financial experts, from George Soros and Alan Greenspan to the City and Wall Street analysts who dominate the airwaves and the newspaper columns, insist that the worst lies ahead, indeed that events so far have only hinted at an impending financial apocalypse. I feel equally confident, by contrast, that the banking cycle is now at, or very near, its nadir and that conditions in America will soon start improving, although more trouble is still in store for Britain and the eurozone.
The honest truth, however, is that nobody has any real idea - not Greenspan nor Soros and certainly not the loud-mouthed leader writers and media commentators, which of course includes me. Convincing arguments certainly exist for both the pessimistic and optimistic versions. It is plausible, for example, that banks will become even more reluctant to lend as the US and world economy sink into recession and house prices keep falling. This tightening of credit will, in turn, push asset prices even lower, precipitate corporate bankruptcies and job losses and make bankers even more scared. The world economy will thus be sucked into a vicious circle of dislocation and financial panic that cuts in interest rates and taxes will be unable to stop or reverse.
There is an equally persuasive argument that the US economy is not even in recession, since growing exports are compensating for much of the weakness in housing and consumer spending. And better still, a period of much stronger growth lies ahead only a few months ahead.
In May and June every American household will receive a cheque for between $600 and $2,000 under the $165 billion fiscal stimulus plan passed last month by Congress. As a result of these tax rebates, personal incomes in America will grow by an astonishing annualised rate of 14 per cent in the third quarter. If even half this money is spent in the following six months - and it surely will be, since the tax rebates have been targeted at poor Americans who spend their entire incomes and then some - US consumption is bound to enjoy a strong rebound in the second half of this year.
And once the stimulus from the tax rebates runs out at the end of the year, the US economy will receive another shot of adrenalin from low interest rates. Interest-rate changes always take 12 to 18 months to affect the economy, so the steep rate cuts introduced since last November will have their maximum impact on consumption, investment and employment in the first half of 2009.
The implication of this cleverly designed combination of fiscal and monetary stimulus is that decent growth is virtually guaranteed from the summer onwards. Provided a total financial collapse can be avoided for the next three months or so, therefore, the risks of the vicious circle of recession and credit contraction will have vanished by July.
These diametrically opposite stories are both plausible, so how can anyone decide which is true? One way is to look for evidence in the financial markets themselves. But this is useless at present because investors are so confused that different markets are sending opposing signals. Bond prices, for example, now point to the deepest depression for 40 years, while stock markets suggest only a mild recession - and commodities and oil prices imply a global boom. To make matters worse, the signals have recently been reversing almost daily.
A second approach is to focus on economic theory and past experience, but this is no help either intoday's specific circumstances. There are some very powerful forces acting in opposite directions on the world economy and theory does not make it possible to say in advance whether the expansionary forces of fiscal and monetary stimulus or the contractionary forces of falling house prices and tightening bank credit will prevail.
Does this mean that we must simply shrug our shoulders and resort to the cliché “time will tell”? To do this is certainly more honest than pretending to be clairvoyant. But for businessmen and investors there is another approach. This is to supplement economic theory with an understanding of politics and human nature. If we apply what we know about human nature, the balance between the depressing force (the credit crunch and fear) and the opposite, the stimulating force (tax cuts, interest-rate reductions and state bailouts), becomes much clearer to judge.
America, with its “can-do” optimistic approach, always has a bias towards growth rather than stagnation - and this bias is likely to be overwhelming in an election year. The Federal Reserve Board, the White House and Congress will do whatever it takes to revive growth, support the financial system and mitigate the damage from a house-price decline.
And if their actions appear to be insufficient at any stage, they will just keep doing more. They will bail out their banks, use public money to guarantee mortgages, offer new legal protections against foreclosures and do anything else that seems to be necessary until recovery is assured.
This is the main lesson from the Bear Stearns rescue. Unfortunately, there can be no such confidence in Britain or Europe.
Anatole Kaletsky writes for The Times Comment pages on Thursdays. One of the country's leading commentators on economics, he was formerly Economics Editor and is now an Associate Editor of The Times. He has won many awards for his financial and political journalism. Before joining The Times, he worked for 12 years on the Financial Times
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If Mr Kaletsky is calling the bottom of this one then, with his track record, I'm off to stock up in baked beans and tins of condensed milk and to see where I can buy a cheap nuclear bunker!
Eric Murphy, London, UK
Didn't you say at the start of the year that the global financial markets would be functioning normally by February, March at the latest?
Andrew, London,
"If even half this money is spent in the following six months - and it surely will be, since the tax rebates have been targeted at poor Americans who spend their entire incomes and then some"
In the past, yes. But today? Is it not more likely that this money will be spent in minutes, and disappear entirely in merely reducing the indebtedness of these families?
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
Wasn't quite a 'storm in a teacup' when the credit crunch came about, was it Mr Kaletsky? More of a calm before the storm or rather storms...
jollytall, Ipswich,
Nice try to make this appear better than it actually is ;)
Robert, Bratislava, Slovakia
The crux of this problem is the opaque nature of mortgage backed securities which obscures credit worthiness and bad lending, leaking significant uncertainty into the entire financial sector until they inevitably form lakes.
It is conceivable that these securities are actually now undervalued, assuming US & UK exports rise with the falling currency, fiscal and monetary expansion mitigates the slowdown in the business cycle, and the big emerging markets keep developing and expanding at pace, all helping to keep people in work and on good terms with their mortgage lenders.
It would not be the first time markets have taken an overly pessamistic view in uncertain times. I share Mr Kaletsky's view that current conditions are somewhat ambivalent and I believe a new equilibrium will be found in the not-too-distant future with sanity returning accordingly.
Ross, Aberdeen, Scotland
Robert,
IMHO the US problem isn't so much that the consumer here is "binged" on debt. Rather the Gvt is binged on debt and the balance of trade is in such a deficit. Strangely the latter could quite simply be largely reversed if US States allowed more drilling on the Continental shelf (only 15% is opened up right now). Thanks Florida, Califirnia etc! The Budget deficit is harder to fix.
Back to consumer if the level of consumer debt in the US worries you, look closer to home. UK Real Estate has ballooned far more than in the US and the UK consmer has 50% MORE debt. Add the Buy to Let syndrom and.......
Doesn't make me feel better knowing the UK has potential much deeper problems than the US. I don't like the printing of monmey in the US either, but it may have been essential to stop world markets from imploding.
At issue going fwd is that it's likely the US will now be entering economic recovery mode just as the rest of the world enters their period of slow growth....
Ian, Madison, USA
Let's see the banks reveal their aged debt before bringing out the bunting! I'd warrant the 90 day, 120 day and higher numbers don't look too clever for some of them!
Sorry, I'll want until some much more bearish people capitulate and call the bottom before I'll believe all the toxic waste has been found.
Colin Soames, London,
Dear Mr Kaletsky,
Let's hope your optimism is correct. I am more concerned.
It seems that simply printing cash to give away as a tax rebate on top of existing massive federal government and current account deficits is hardly a new policy. Surely this problem has come about because US consumers and the federal government have binged on too much debt for too long. Otherwise presumably the mortgages and other loans could be repaid and the banks would be safe. Surely this prescription will produce more inflation and not do anything to stop a recession.
The big fear has to be that the bank losses are too big to bail out via consolidation and then the Federal Reserve has little option other than to inflate the supply of money and also effectively nationalise some or all of the banks. Why has the Fed stopped publishing M3 data?
Will this become a major piece of unpleasant financial history which will be studied closely for years? The big inflation tsunami - perhaps.
R E Lambourne
Robert Lambourne, Burley, Hants
I think the problem is much too big for central banks to deal with. They presumably know this, which is why they were so timid earlier. We are talking dodgy foundations for trillions of USD, not a few billion here and there. Massive potential defaults.
The collateral for huge sums on both sides of the Atlantic appears to be so vapid that something basic will give and it will not be pleasant. We may not be able to inflate our way out of this one.
Meanwhile Brown and Darling and the BoE (not to mention US officials) give the impression of leading a dance orchestra sliding gently into the sea on the deck of an old-style steamer. You know the one.
Keep calm, everything is fine, the fundamentals are solid.
Except for the debt mountain, that is.
It will be interesting to see how this affects northern Europe, traditionally more careful with matters economic. Maybe our much vaunted financial expertise and economic management are about to be exposed for what they really are.
Colin, shrewsbury,
Not a good article...just contrarian, but with no substance as to why one should be!
Christian, London, Uk
Well argued, but I suspect the fiscal stimulus of about 1% of GDP is going to disappear into a sea of credit contraction.
Lots of Americans can no longer get a mortgage, can no longer draw down home equity, can no longer get car credit, and are having their credit card credit limits reduced. This is going to take out a huge chunk of GDP.
Added to which many businesses which rely on credit for investment and working capital are having it reduced or withdrawn completely.
For a very large number of Americans the tax rebates will replace a bit of the spending they previously financed with credit expansion. Many others will just save it out of fear for their jobs, or be compelled to use it to reduce their debts.
House prices seem certain to continue to fall and the reversing of the wealth effect is going to curtail spending that was previously financed from savings or income.
I hope you are right, but it is hard to see.
David Goldsby, Cheltenham, England
So does anyone seriously think that the deleaveraging cycle is complete ,or near to it ? Surely if it were we wouldn't have financial institutions running around like headless chickens. If I have to choose I'll go with the bond market indicators everytime as they are forward looking. As for the stock market, signals don't change everyday except for people suffering from myopia. We're in a downtrend and every decent rally to date got sold off (known as deleaveraging). Moving out of what you don't want into what you do want. Probably the last cycle of that has just started. Commodities, which is what you'd expect in cyclical terms. As banking ,retail ,real estate sectors try to stabilise they'll be doing it against a flow of liquidation from commodities/energy and agriculture.
At it's nadir all hope for investing in anything may well be gone and then you know you've found some kind of bottom. Right now people are still arguing about if this is a serious downturn so hope still abounds.
sc, Preston,
one of the biggest financial threats for decades, and economists have not the slightest idea whether this is the beginning of the rebound, or a prelude to total meltdown. Can we finally lay to rest the idea that economics is of any use whatsover? Would we have much respect for astronomers if they couldn't tell which way round the sun the earth went?
iain, oxford, uk
This idea that action by the Fed or BoE will actually achieve anything is just laughable to me.
The root of the problem is the debt mountain, plain and simple. Here you are talking trillions of dollars, not the
odd hundred billion the US Govt can take off the taxpayers.
Those with money will lose it, and those in debt will become
bankrupt. End of story.
Toby, Winchester, UK
I second Ian below, why the one line condemnation of Britain and Europe? On Britainâs part, Northern Rock was saved as was Bear Stearns, and had the government jumped in to nationalization in the first step, Times commentators would have cried foul just as much as they have over how long it took (see Cavendish article). The Bank has also injected $10bn into the money markets, swiftly launched an investigation in to the malicious speculation behind HBOS whose shares have recovered significantly as a result, unemployment figures are still falling, and retail sales are somehow up. Yet the BofE is still getting criticism for not panicking into action like the Fed. What âcan doâ and âwhatever it takesâ action are you suggesting from the Bank/Government?
KK, Manchester, UK
OK nice article, but what's with the last paragraph? Why leave us hanging like that. Where's the yet to be written piece on what's likely to happen in the UK and Europe?
To be continued Episode (1)
I am waiting....
Ian, Madison, USA
There has been a step change, now the Fed is doing more than just cutting rates, plus the changes that will kick in next week,and with the apparent green light being given to the quasi gov.agencies Freddis and Fannie.Maybe,just maybe the Fed is getting ahead of the game instead of fighting yesterdays battlles !!
Tony Cox, Cheltenham,
Mr Kaletsky, I think Albert Einstein appropriately summarised our problem "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts" It seems financial journalists are as impatient to call bottoms as hedge fund managers, are you long! How about a few disclosures.?
Mark, Bangkok, THAILAND
Anatole, if your calling it all over (again) we must be in trouble!
You understand that a financial crisis can occur in either a deflationary or inflationary environment?
The Fed printing money won't stop the crisis from unfolding. If anything, an inflationary crisis would be worse than a deflationary crisis because the engineers of this crisis and those who borrowed what they couldn't afford to repay will be protected while the rest of us suffer... I think its commonly referred to as "moral hazard".
As for the "short sellers conspiracy", part of the market's job is to predict where a company's stock price is heading. While I agree actual market manipulation is problematic to the efficient functioning markets, I can't help noticing that every institution with huge gearing and zero transparency is claiming short sellers are conspiring against them.
Michael, Melbourne,
Mr. Kaletsky,
While I certainly hope you are correct about the future of the US economy, I'm not sure why you are less optimistic about Great Britain and Europe. Do legal barriers exist to the measures taken in the US, or is the problem political?
Mike Lenox, Sacramento, CA, USA
Dear Anatole: I hope you're right. Regards, Peter Adam
Peter Adam, Chevy Chase, MD