Win a holiday

Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Navigation - link to other main sections from here

From The Times

April 24, 2008

Yes it's politically incorrect but race matters

The Democrats must admit it: Obama would lose to McCain

Anatole Kaletsky

American Presidential elections have been compared with reality TV series or game shows, in which a gaggle of jumped-up nonentities aspiring to be celebrities are ritually humiliated in public and offered entertaining opportunities to self-destruct, until only one survivor remains. But this time round, a much more elevated analogy is sadly apposite.

The 2008 US election has all the makings of a Greek tragedy, in which noble heroes and heroines are forced to follow a course to catastrophe, divinely preordained as punishment for sins and blunders committed by their forefathers in the dim and distant past. In acting out their ineluctable doom, the eloquent protagonists do not just destroy themselves but also their cities, their nations and even their entire civilisations.

If this description sounds too grandiose, consider yesterday's results from the Pennsylvania primary. The outcome seemed to be precisely calibrated by the gods to maximise the agony of the Democrats. It gave Hillary Clinton just the support she needed to stay firmly in contention, but not quite enough to turn the tide in her favour.

Worse still, this result underlined the fear that senior Democrats have long been aware of, but have never dared to express in public: America may not yet be ready to elect a black President. Worst of all, it has created conditions for the possible election victory of a militarily belligerent and economically unqualified Republican candidate who supports many of President Bush's worst policies. Given the Bush Administration's domestic and foreign failures, the disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan and, most recently, the slump in the economy, the possibility of a Republican victory in November would seem to overturn every principle of proper democracy - and also the hope of America and its system of government being rehabilitated in the eyes of the world after the Bush years. The fact that Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton are both such impressive candidates, intelligent, sincere, articulate and in command of the issues, while John McCain does not qualify on any of these criteria only makes matters worse.

That Mrs Clinton will now carry on with her campaign is not just probable but essential. For the voting in Pennsylvania confirms that she has a much better chance than Mr Obama of winning the White House for the Democrats. According to the Associated Press exit polls published yesterday, 16 per cent of white Democratic voters considered race an important factor in the Presidential election and 43 per cent of these said they would either vote Republican or not vote at all, if Mr Obama were the Democratic nominee.

Given that Mrs Clinton's clear victory over Mr Obama in Pennsylvania followed similar results in other “must-win” states with large working-class constituencies, such as Ohio, Florida, New Jersey, Michigan and even New York and California, the conclusion would be fairly obvious, were it not for the political correctness that makes it almost impossible for American politicians or commentators to express such a view: Mr Obama may by unable to carry large industrial states with socially conservative white working-class populations simply because of his race. This is especially true now that the televised rantings of Rev Jeremiah Wright and Mr Obama's own gaffe about the “bitter” white working-class culture of “guns and God”, have reminded Americans that race is not just a matter of skin colour. Rev Wright embarrassingly revealed in his “God damn America” and “Chickens come home to roost” sermons that his African-American vision of America is be profoundly at odds with the white majority view.

The latest polls in the two most important swing states show Mr McCain easily beating Mr Obama in both Florida and Ohio, while Mrs Clinton comfortably beats the Republican in Ohio and is neck and neck in Florida.

Mr Obama has, of course, apologised for his condescension towards working-class church-goers and hunters - probably the most important group of floating voters in the electorally critical mid-Western states. He has tried even harder to dissociate himself from Rev Wright's anti-American tirades, which really have to be seen (on YouTube) to be believed. And Mr Obama's supporters have chastised Mrs Clinton for turning to “negative campaigning” and “scorched-earth” strategies in her desperation to stay in contention.

The trouble is that Mr Obama's efforts to suppress the race issue are doomed to failure. For the influence of Rev Wright on him is a matter of public record. Indeed, the phrase “Audacity of Hope”, which is the title of Mr Obama's political autobiography as well as his presidential leitmotif, is attributed in that book to a sermon by “my pastor, Rev Jeremiah Wright”. The Republican political machine, which demonstrated its mastery of the arts of character assassination in the two Bush presidential contests, will have no compunction in exploiting the Wright relationship and portraying Mr Obama as an anti-American in the general election, even if the Clinton campaign and the media observe a self-denying ordinance on the race and patriotism issues, as they broadly have so far.

The certainty of a no-holds-barred attacks by the Republicans brings us to the potentially most tragic aspect of this election. If ever there was an election the Democrats ought to win this is the one. Yet on the basis of the primary results so far, they are all too likely to lose it. Mr Obama may be marginally ahead of Mrs Clinton in the popular vote but the Democrats seem to have forgotten that all the votes cast so far have been by their own supporters. In the general election their candidate will have to win over Republicans and right-leaning floating voters. Most of the evidence so far suggests that the Repulicans will find it much easier to frighten voters about the prospect of a President Obama than a President Clinton.

Professional Democratic politicians now have the casting vote in their party's nomination and could yet force the two candidates into a “dream ticket” led by Mrs Clinton with Mr Obama as Vice President which would sweep all before it and would probably make Mr Obama unbeatable as a presidential candidate in 2012 or 2016. Yet the Democratic superdelegates who could now secure years of hegemony for their party seem to consider it “unfair” to use their professional judgment to overturn the “democratic” verdict of primary voters.

The Republicans will have no such compunctions about the fairness of launching personal attacks against a potentially vulnerable Democratic candidate. In this respect this Presidential contest may again manifest the tragedy of left-wing politics through the ages. Parties which care more about fairness than about power, end up achieving neither.

Obama won. Some people don't how far our country has come.

Scott, dorchester, USA

race does matter in the usa and every where else . Obama is going to lose to McCain as well he should he is not qualified for the job and his judgement is very suspect . Raines ,Ayres,and his crazy preacher will do him in even if he were white ,being black doesn't help the clintons knew this.

george, atholusa,

Bravo! These are my sentiments exactly!

Apparently American Democrats are either: idealists to the point of impracticality or - as we say in my country - "del tipo que incendia su casa con tal de ver arder la ajena" ("the kind of people that would set their own houses on fire, just to watch the..

Juan Carlos, Mexico ,

Things have not changed much in America. We like give the illusion that all is well concerning race-relations; however, we are only fooling ourselves. We will be a lot better off when we judge a man by the content of his character and not the color of his skin.

sachincko, savannah, U.S.A

My blessing for Barack Obama in this presidential election. If it's the skin color we did have 2 prev. white presidents who did more harm to the country than imaginable. America - please wake up and face the real world.

Kelya, Montreal,

If Britain had still to elect its first woman prime minister, I doubt very much if Margaret Hodge, Ruth Kelly, Jacqui Smith, Theresa May etc. would be worthy pioneers. Similarly, if Barack Obama loses the U.S. presidential election, I am sure he will do so entirely on his own merits.

Kevin, London,

Its funny:
Many moderate, Reps, Dems and indepentants support or at least respect Obama, and hard-core Reps oppose him because he is a "Liberal Elitist" and a "Euro-Socialist" (things they would say about anyone with similar policies). Only the left/liberals are saying "A black man can't win".

Andrew, Taunton,

I think America is ready to elect a black president; just not Obama.

Nan, Houston, USA

Mr Obama is a CREDIBLE person...But in American politics, we know very well that the Corporate Media controls the election. They had to bring down his credibility by ASSOCIATIONS. Freedom of Expressionj, is DEAD. So if Rev WRight says things then Obama should be BLAMED. If Ayers says something bad

rabby, flushing, usa

"16 per cent of white Democratic voters considered race an important factor..."

You didn't mention anything about black voters considering race an important factor. I think we all know why.

Black man good. White man bad.

Pathetic!

Tonigol, Brisbane, Australia

"Is not Obama a black and white person? --Kevin Straw, Leicester,"

You're joking right Kevin? Please see the "one drop" rule. It is so ingrained that it is simply taken for granted.

Joe, Ontario, Canada

Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Barack sincere? You are pulling everybody's leg ant' you?

I thought that Mr. Kaletsky was a learned man. It kept puzzling me how ignorant I am.

SEBASTIAN PERONI , HALIFAX, VA, USA

Is not Obama a black and white person?

Kevin Straw, Leicester,

Anti-black racism is so ubiquitous in the USA it is invisible to them.

Obama was always unelectable, and it was always because he was black.

Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada

Sir,
Race is an important factor, as our concepts of nationality are essentially derived from tribalism. The US is a nation where the concept of race is amongst the most studied & politicised in the entire world. Those who prefer not to see the elephant in the room are quite simply in denial.

SC, London, United Kingdom

Some American people pounce on Britsh media & people. But not only the Brits think Obama can't win becse of race :many French and Spaniards I know, do feel the same too.
Though evryone of us hope to be mistaken eventually...

Eka, Soissons,

I keep hearing Americans accusing Brits of having a poor understanding of your electoral system. Perhaps it's because we can't understand how a system that doesn't give equal weight each citizens ballot can truly claim to be a democracy - we assume we must be missing something.

Esther, London,

Anatole Kaletsky is correct, I believe in his analysis. Clinton leading a 'dream ticket' is the only way for the Democrats now to win particularly after today's words from Rev Wright . Sadly for the Free World, Democratic leaders will probably ignore all the polls and therefore hand it to McCain!

Mike , Manchester, England

Hillary and Obama are both doctrinaire left-liberals, and both have awful personal liabilities which would make either one unelectable. Democrats got caught up in the mystique of having both a black and a woman to choose between that they forgot that one cannot have the cake and eat it too! Fools.

J Cline, Seattle,

Clinton is, " intelligent, sincere, articulate and in command of the issues" and McCain is none of those things?

McCain may not be as articulate, but he's certainly more sincere than Clinton.

Andrew, Abu Dhabi,

I am from the US & if it is anyone who makes it a racial thing, it is the african americans doing so. Nevermind that Clinton is more experienced, they simply want a black to win the nomination. For THEM it is about skin color. Everywhere I go I hear they want a black man in office.

Kim, Rocky Mount, NC, USA

Obama will lose, but not because of his race. He'll lose because, when all is said and done, he's just not ready to be president. He's still too green. Plus, I really believe that many of the folks who did vote for him (in the primaries) did so because they dislike Hillary.

Nancy, Valencia, CA, USA

To Padrig Hogan, Tampa, Fl, USA

"If Clinton or Obama win, can I move to the land down under? ...I own guns, so that makes me scared of Obama and Clinton"

Unfortunately you won't be able to move "down under" mate, as we have outlawed guns unless you have mitigating circumstances, e.g farmer

Tessa, Sydney,

The claim that McCain is insincere, unintelligent and inarticulate is not borne out by the talk he gave to the BBC a year ago. He was subjected to many difficult questions by the invited audience and answered them fluently and without prevarication. He may have other faults, but not these.

David, London, UK

Whatever said and done.....Racism will play a major role prior to and after the elections. Its ingrained in the minds of the Whites. Its all talk and being politically correct. Be it Europe or the US or Australia. Racism spans every issue in life if a coloured person encroaches into the White space

John, cambridge, UK

Obama will lose, but not because of his skin color per se. He's aligned with a minority mindset called 'black identity' which is not 'American identity.' The Presidency is not an 'equal opportunity' position. If Obama was a medal of honor winner, he'd waltz into the White House.

Canaan P., New York, NY, United States

The reason votes in Florida hardly count is because we were told our votes WOULD NOT COUNT. Many Floridians decided not to vote because of this. Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, and there was no option to write a name down.

Jasmine, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

No Greek tragedy here, just democracy in action. Regardless of who wins, we will have a vast improvement. Is Obama not qualified to be president just because he is a two-year senator? Our nation remains together thanks to a two-year senator who became president, Lincoln, thank you very much.

Ben, Austin, TX, USA

Those who believe Americans are not ready for a black president don't really get us. We are blamed for being ignorant about the world, yet the world cannot understand that the reasons we became a superpower are the same reasons why come next January Barack Obama will be president. God Bless America

Ben, Austin, TX, USA

I will not give up on hope to promote, endorse, or vote for the certain detriment of our country (represented by either Clinton or McCain). Obama is our ONLY hope for change and a better America. The only thing that you have demonstrated with this article, sir, is the audacity of hubris.

Fran, BEAVERTON, USA

I dont know about y'all but i can't take the sight of either of them anymore. If I am bored and poisoned by them, imagine how Independents and Republicans feel. So as in the article, McCain will probably win.

Jim, Montreal, Canada

Americans should not have to look exactly like folk that came from Europe a thousand years ago; yet these are exactly the ones accepted without question.

David , lafayette, USA

Julian. We do not elect a "head of government" in the United Kingdom. We elect a party to govern. The labour party was elected, Gordon Brown was elected as a MP by the people of his constituency and was elected to be the leader of his party by party members. All done very fairly.

Taff, Newport, South Wales

Thank god you Brits can't vote in our election!

CAK, Denver, USA

The British criticize American provincialism, yet have a stunningly poor understanding of our electoral system. Polls show Obama will easily carry many of the states that he lost to HRC -- NY, California -- and will win different swing states that result in a net gain of electoral votes over HRC.

John Durrant, Los Angeles,

The Democratic Party set up the rules for the "Super Delegates" not the US government. So they have no one to blame but themselves.

Jim, Atlanta, USA

The American generosity of spirit will ensure that after so many decades; prejudice will not matter and Obama may make it to the White House.

Devasis Chowdhury, bangalore, India

'the renewal of America, its youthful and inclusive politics (i.e. Obama) is deeply threatening to European identity.' Er,what?Really,the inability of Americans to come up with a coherant argument is truly dazzling.If you guys travelled the world rather than invading it you might undestand it better

simon, cardiff, wales

Hey, "John in London"--no, America is NOT a Democracy. You are. We "left home" to become a Constitutional Republic ON PURPOSE.... cheers, though, we still love you.

Daneen Petty, Las Vegas, USA

I am black, not American and was excited by Obama's rise. I still think he's the best candicate out there; at least two economics Nobel Laureates think so as well. But you know what? Forget it, he should just give up. Some of the reasons given here, it's ridiculous. Let them be.

Joe, London,

People talk about experience in becoming a president, but what experience, other than a great understanding of history and current events, a level head, and a will to put knowledge into action, does a president need? I think Obama excels in all those respects.

Jasmine, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

Its sad i told everyone this would happen. if the Clinton get back into office it will be a disaster for our country. The Country needs change. I will not vote for Clinton never ever i was a strong Democrate. I felt they cared for blacks what i have seen in these past months. most people want change

Myra Washington, SAN DIEGO, usa

America does not want the socialism being spewed out by Clinton or Obama. Free Markets will always solve the problems in the best way. Government interference never works and creates a beaurocratic nightmare. McCain will defeat either Clinton or Obama in the general election

David, Nashville, USA

obama is the right candidate

john smith, london, uk

Hillary and Barack do not share the values of most of America (whether you Europeans like that or not), and are particularly unqualified for the job. In one year's time, you will be welcoming President McCain to your country. Better get ready!

Mark Dickens, Memphis, USA

I agree with your conclusion, but not with your reasoning. Obama is not losing the largest states solely based on his race. He is not connecting with working class voters, because he is elitist. People are worried about gas, jobs, foreclosures and health care. Clinton offers specific solutions.

fran, Hillsdale, NY

Mr Obama and his supporters imagine he must be able to transcend the racial divide simply because he is black. Unfortunately he has more racial baggage than all the other hopefuls combined and is not about to transcend any such thing. A Colin Powell or Mrs Rice might do so, but not Obama.

John B, Teesside, UK

Senator Obama will never be able to win the general election this Fall. True or not - the narrative against him is not hard to put together - the video clips of Wright are damaging enough, but add Ayers and Michelle Obama's thesis - and he simply cannot win.
Not sure Clinton can, but Obama cannot.

Adam, New York, USA

Obama can't lose.
While I love McCain (I really do) I have to acknowledge the Bush base that will betray him. Nobody on the right knows if he will tow the Bush line. Nobody on the left trusts him to rise above it. I haven't met anyone who likes Hillary. I haven't met anyone who hates Obama.

Dennis, Omaha, USA

"Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton are both such impressive candidates, intelligent, sincere, articulate and in command of the issues"
Obama and Clinton are two stunningly unqualified candidates. The American system's major weakness is that such people can be elected. (Cf. Carter,Bill Clinton,&Bush II)

tom farrelly, seattle, USA

When it comes right down to it, the Presidency is the toughest job in the world and the political dance is the hardest in that position.

Obama is leading for two reasons 1) he is Black and 20 the press gives him a free ride.

As a one term Senator he is not qualified for the position.

Richard Cole, Richmond, United States

SIR,
In your analysis of the three candidates with all the superlatives that you use to describe the two socialists...err, democrats as you compare them to the "oh so lacking" McCain you forget another comparison: they are both LAWYERS, McCain is not..that alone should disqualify them.

Dr. Mark, Omaha, USA

I have to say, at the risk of sounding elitist, that these Americans crack me up... You're afraid of European style socialism and lack of growth?!! You all should be so damned lucky! What is that you're all afraid of exactly? Universal health care?? Go ahead and vote for Bush MkII. What a sad bunch!

john, London,

The world doesnot need one more stupid american president
after George W Bush. I support a notion of "dream ticket" led by Mrs Clinton with Mr Obama as vice president.

Rahman, Karachi,

The underlying issue is experience. McCain has as much as one can want to have, Obama as little as possible to run for President. Although I am a Democrat and no racist -- I would have voted for Colin Powell -- I can't see Obama having the full powers and responsibilities of the Presidency.

Joe, Baltimore, USA

Race may be an issue, but clearly stated views is the biggest isue. Obama calls for 'change' but is less specific about which changes he hopes to make. His rhetoric is fine, but what is his bottom line? Having a Muslim father is a minus. Being educated in Catholic schools is another minus,Wright..

Joseph, London, UK

Florida and Michigan completely Irrelevant? 28 Million people? -Spoken like a true liberal Massachussetts Dem.

D. Todd, PC, Florida, USA

Whichever way you look at it, the Democrats are going to lose. When your candidates are either the 'first woman president' or 'first black president', prejudice against both will be the downfall when it comes to the real election, unfortunately.

JR, Bristol,

It is because of political correctness Americans spend 18 months choosing a president who turns out ridiculous.We have to accept we are all human with human frailities otherwise government can't function. Race, Sex, Age, did you really choose the best available, or the least like to offend?

ged, manchester, england

Bruce McLarron in Tucson - What, you think it's better over here? At least you guys elected your head of government!

Julian, Warwick, UK

It is wrong that people's voting is influenced by race?! Being a non-white man does not make his policies/beliefs any less credible that Mrs being a woman. Surely it would be better for the American nation to be led by Hilary or Barack than the much less knowledgable Republicans.

Julia Goolia, Glasgow, Scotland

This article makes it seem that we live in Russia. This is a true Democratic Republic which the founding fathers wanted NOT a true Democracy.

Another thing will be that until we can address the RACE ISSUE this country will always have problems. I see blacks use that card all the time.

Figus, Charleston, US of A

What a myopic view, the analogy of Hilary & Barack as "noble heroes and heroines forced to follow a course to catastrophe" and John as "militarily belligerent and economically unqualified". Both sides are as bad as each other, I didn't realise that we need a Democrat to win for the sake of humanity.

Ken, Ashford, England

Daniel, Palo Alto writes:

'Let Americans handle their own politics'

As well as the politics of whichever other countries they decide to invade in the name of 'democracy' right?

Gabriel Casey, Belfast,

I stopped reading this article when he referred to Mrs. Clinton as being "sincere".

Nick, NY,

Tell me again how many black Prime Ministers the U.K. has had? To call people racist because their politics are different is a stretch. Obama isn't qualified and yet he's a frontrunner BECAUSE of his race.

Pam, Washington, USA

Many UK citizens are interested in USA. We think USA elections are important to the whole world. Many people in UK have relatives in USA and scattered all over the globe. What happens in USA and elsewhere does have effects in UK. This is why some of us are interested. Would you rather we were not?

grace kelly, stirling, scotland

New Jersey has a large working-class consituency? HAH! You're talking about the richest state in the union! Ohio, sure. Pennsylvania, sure. But what's this about Florida and Michigan? No one but Hillary even campaigned in either state--they're both completely irrelevant, much like this article.

Jack, Boston, US

Americans are generally more conservative than their European counterparts. Obama won't be rejected because of his skin, it will be his liberal views. His social views don't agree with many in the Bible belt or even those of conservative Catholics, of which there are many.

Jake, Baltimore, USA

Why does no one mention the fact that all three that are getting attention from the media are members of the Council on Foreign Relations? That said, as an citizen of the USA, I don't think race should have ANYTHING to do with who will be the POTUS.

Andrew Heermans, NYC, United States

With comments including phrases such as "Hogwash!”,
“you tools”, “bunch of tripe” and “shafted themselves”; maybe us Brits have more in common with you Americans than I first thought!

This has been an entertaining read, and I would also love for Ms Rice to run for US President.

Sally, London, England

I live in London and am smart enough not to comment on British Politics - because I grew up in America and don't understand the complexity of the political landscape which is exactly the reason that Mr. Kaletsky's column holds no credibility. All politics is local, pay heed Sir.

Aaron Schaal, London,

Clinton and Obama are "in command of issues" because you agree with their political agendas. When will you understand a vote against Obama or Clinton is not racism or miscogyny, but against far left liberalism. Does the name Michael Dukakis mean anything to you?

Steve, Rochester,

Obama? Sorry! Just his wife being in the white house scares the hell out of me!

Sabre460, Martinez, USA

Obama won (by landslide) in many lily white states: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maine, Washington, Missouri, Connecticut, Colorado, Wyoming. She won PA, OH because the Governors mobilized their entire machinery for her, not because Americans are racist.

Lem , Las Vegas, USA

This is an article built on sand. Obama is not 'in command of the issues' he flounders when speaking in other than meaningless generalisations & Clintons attack machine could teach the Republicans a thing or two. & why no mention of crossover voting, or 'Operation Chaos' (no space left, Google it)

Kev Wilson, Slough,

If McCain wins this election, which unfortunately I think he will, then you can expect another 4 yrs of the same Bush nonsense! HELP!! I'm going to UK!

White middle-class USA is NOT ready to put a young inexperienced black man in charge of their affairs! Trust me!

Obama ruined it for Clinton!!

Bruce McClarron, Tucson, USA

The only principle in 'proper democracy', Mr Kaletsky, is that the democratic majority wins. Get used to it.

Terry, London, UK

i posted this yesterday, but somehow it was censored, so again.

Let's give BA three strikes:
-he's a democrat- strike one
-he's a liberal- strike two
-he's unqualified- strike three
There's nothing "politically incorrect" about it.

lee ho, norfolk,

If a black or a woman wins the BBC won't be able to use its standard sneering jeering tone every time it mentions the president. It will cost a fortune in retraining

John Ledbury, Kings Lynn, England

Kaletsky truly is clueless. To suggest McCain, a senior senator, is somehow unqualified, but two junior senators are highly qualified for the job of president is really quite something. I'd like to know what makes Obama so qualified? Oh, I get it. Kaletsky agrees with his ideology and not McCain's

Ninette, Los Angeles, USA

Forget the candidates for a moment and lets look at the people who will be in their "cabinet".We are entering one of the most challenging periods of History.The World's Superpower must have a strong leader with the very finest advisors from ALL political parties.Otherwise we're all in trouble.

EDWARD SYNGE, TISBURY, UK

I guess some in Europe still don't get it that just because you guys hate Bush, doesn't mean 50.1% of Americans do.

Ken, Irvine, CA, USA

This is rubbish. So far more than 10 million whites have voted for Obama and as a result, he's the virtually certain Democratic nominee. In head-to-head polls with McCain, he's generally stronger the Clinton. If he loses to McCain, it will be because McCain is a moderate and Obama is too left.

John, New York, USA

Ben, Obama's reason is that it's ridiculous to suggest that by doing so makes you more patriotic than not doing so. It's not him that looks ridiculous, but the people who believe that this is important and vital for the display of ones patriotism. People show patriotism in different ways.

Taff, Newport, South Wales.

Deeply flawed argument. Let Americans handle their own politics. Stick to what you know best; financial matters. Thanks.

Daniel, Palo Alto, USA

Barack Hussein Obama wants a vague "change"!

Hillary wants "EuroSocialism"!

An "oppressed" liberal in America has ay least one late model vehicle, several large screen TVs, Cable or satellite TV service,
a dishwasher, DVD, a home or apartment bigger than in any foreign country, and a large representative republic (not a democracy!) country with no restrictions on where the live or travel or how much they can legally earn.

Jungle Jim , Pompano Beach, Florida, United States of America

Well that's excellent because there's no black presidential candidate only 2 1/2 whites! What's the deal?

Barack Obama is half black so there's no full black president in the race. Finally we can drop the race card!

Noelio, Gander, Canada

I am SO going to enjoy watching Obama crash and burn come November, assuming that the Democrat party and especially its superdelegates are too stupid and too blind to see the McGovernesque wipe-out that's coming their way. I'm going to enjoy even more the tears of young, idealistic Obama voters.

Right-wing Conspirator, Menifee, CA, USA

To all those saying Obama isnt "black"...well you are seriously delusional. The man is black as black gets, he just doesnt use the street slang, but his wife is "straight outta the hood" and Americans will not vote for these types. Americans will not elect a black President, not ever most likely.

Mike, Smalltown, USA

This is obviously an article written by a Republican, who knows how lame their OLD and creaking candidate is, and therefore the plan is to try and exploit the race card and to promote the politics of savagery and fear! IT WON'T WORK THIS TIME. IT IS TIME TO TURN THAT OLD SMELLY PAGE!

Elias, Stevenage, UK

Since we're talking about race, who are those white presidents that black people have been voting for from late 1800's til now?

Whether their vote was actually counted is a whole different topic.

Larry, San Francisco, USA

Don't underestimate Clinton fatigue. Hillary can't achieve orbit because she's weighed down by Bill. They claim the Clinton years were great, but most people recall the scandals. Obama 's advantage is he's fresh and voters will give him a chance. Race is overestimated, this isn't the 1950's anymore.

Jigs, Hawaii, USA

Amazing that you would cheer Mrs. Clinton for being articulate. I guess you think that being articulate is better than being honest. Ditto for Senator Obama.

MJ Hoeber, Miami, Florida USA

It is always Europeans who argue that Obama MUSTN'T win. This says a lot about Europeans, who need a backwards/declining America as a foil to conceal their own decay, racism, etc... the renewal of America, its youthful and inclusive politics (i.e. Obama) is deeply threatening to European identity.

Andrew, San Francisco / Oxford, US / UK

Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan you tool!

Roger Donalds, Omaha, U.S.

Seeing Americans on this forum refer to Obama or Clinton as a Marxist, socialist etc. just demonstrates how incredibly clueless they are of politics and ideology

As for the article it is spot on! II've been saying this for months now.

Natasha, Manchester, UK

We never really have that much to say about politics in the UK as we admit that we don't know that much. But why is it that every European thinks they have a clue about what's going on in the US? Not only Democrats are interested in fairness and Bush is hardly a Republican. Go back to making tea.

Felix, Westport, USA

Spot on ! If 90% of black people in places like Pennsylvania vote along racial lines then why wouldn't you expect white voters to do the same when it comes down to the crunch? I fully agree with the view that the US is not ready to vote in a black president. It's human nature, right or wrong.

Alan, buenos aires,

Obama is a man who has made calculated decisions to NOT put his hand over his heart during our national anthem and to NOT wear an American flag lapel pin. This makes him look ridiculous and is not emblematic of someone we want leading our nation. He deflects any tough question he is asked; pathetic.

Ben Sivright, Boston, MA, USA

I would vote for Condi Rice over B.O. in an instant so there goes your theory. Oh wait! Condi is "objectively" white in liberal lexicon, so I am still guilty. Time after time liberals reveal their true passions - identity politics and wealth redistribution or racism and stealing in common terms.

TOM, Alexandria,

Race does not matter.Gender does not matter.What matters is experience & certain issues.Obama's elitiest, uninformed comments, and past voting record have made me decide against him. He is not prepared to be president and the audacity/arrogance of the man to think so. Hold my nose & vote for McCain.

Susan, Fort Collins, USA

I'm all for a black president, or a women president, or a octogenarian president; but if they're engrossed in their blackness or their womanness or in their age, that's creepy. Beyond that, I want a president that considers themselves moreso of a victor, rather than a victim, of life.

BarneyCrush, Huntington Beach, USA

The Democraps have shafted themselves. When it comes right down to the wire many may realize that they only supported Hill or Obama to prove to themselves that they are neither chauvinistic nor racist. With that epiphany will come realization that McCain is the least of all all evils.

Karla H, Margate, USA

Qualifications more than race will be what keeps Obama out of the Whitehouse. If anything, race is the one thing keeping Obama in: the overwhelming majority of blacks are voting for him. Democrats should be happy to have McCain as their next President since he's practically a Democrat himself.

Sean, Manhattan, USA

I think that this article raises a very true fact that race will be significant in this election. If even the Democratic primaries are showing racial fissures, do we honestly think the general will be any different?

Steve, Greenville SC, USA

Agree w/ Hugh: I am not a bigot. I have no reservations with race, but I don't like Obama. He is inexperienced and comes off as arrogant and condescending. Don't care about his shady associations either-- if you weren't born with a silver spoon than you just might have to make deals with the devil.

Phoebe, Paoli, PA, USA

The idea that the United States isn't ready for an African-American president is incredulous. Be it a man or woman of any color, Americans want the best person to be commander-in-chief.

Todd Gibson, Woodway, USA

America is ready for a black president. If that black president is, say, Condoleeza Rice.

The Dude, SoCal,

Obama never apologized for the "church and guns" remark. To qualify as an apology the words, "I'm sorry" have to be uttered.

billy, houston, united states

I wish Colin Powell was running for President. I would vote for him in a heartbeat regardless of his party affiliation. And I'm a white male, registered Republican from Mississippi. A few years ago many voters were practically begging him to run.

Christopher S., Hattiesburg, MS, USA

It is sad, and I had hoped that Americans would see Sen. Obama as a new vision of hope to bring us all together. I still believe that he can if given a chance. Obama can change the divisions between the parties and races; get us out of this downward spiraling economic slump & end the war. Chance!

Marci Browne, Hampton, USA

"left-wing parites care more about fairness than about power"...oh, yes, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot were very fair! Time to read a bit more history Mr. K, and a little less European coffee house dribble...

Adam, New York, USA

What a bunch of tripe
Rationalizing hillary's win in Pa because white people wont support Obama is absurd
Pa was a closed primary, no Independents allowed to vote, only registered dems. When independents get thrown into the mix, the numbers go overwhelmingly toward Obama
OBAMA will be President

Alex Morris, NYC,

Family in USA makes me an interested spectator.
I do not see the Democrats winning in November. Wrong candidates - neither popular enough in general population. Nothing to do with gender or race.
I will be amazed if McCain loses!
I sit on my rock and watch from afar with interest!!

Grace Kelly, Stirling, Scotland

"I await eagerly the election of first black or asian Prime Minister. I worry, however, that maybe you Brits aren't quite ready."

We do NOT elect our Prime Ministers. We have plenty of black and asian MP's. If their party choses them to lead - then win an election - THEN we have a blck /asn PM

Grace Kelly, Stirling, Scotland

Mr. Kaletsky misperceives American politics. Half the voting public will not vote for Ms. Clinton due to her history. Mr. Obama, one of the Senate's most liberal members, has no record of bi-partisanship. Even those disagreeing with McCain genuinely admire him as a war hero, bi-partisan maverick.

Brian Rosner, New York, USA

I do not view this is racial as more ignorance. Bill pardoned two members of the Weather Underground in 2001, Rev. Wright visited the White House and counseled the Clintons, backed NAFTA in 95. See a pattern? Incite the populous against Obama, play dumb on any rebuttle. HRC voters do not fact check.

Spirro, Chicago,

Since when has America been a "civilisation"?. At best, it's a hotch- potch of different cultures, some of which have accidently melded together well, while others have acted like opposing magnetic poles.

Bill Peter, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

America voted for change in 2006 & got it's Democratic Congress. Gas is over $3.50. Unemployment up 10%. $2.3 trillion in stock & mutual fund losses. $1.2 trillion drop in home equity. 1% of American homes in foreclosure. They wanted change.. well they got it!

Evan Pickus, Morganville, NJ, USA

Obama's delegate lead is entirely from states that held caucus votes rather than open primaries and particularly from states that seldom vote Democratic in the general election. Just check the results in the 2 Texas contests to see the difference in victory margins and delegate apportionment.

Steve S, L.A., USA

I wouldn't care if it was Karl Marx himself instead of Obama, I would never want to see another two faced Clinton in the whitehouse. At least you know what you're gonna get with Obama

Rich, Tillamook, Oregon, USA

you are missing the point completely - it is not about Race - it is about the direction of the country, and following a European socialist approach to wealth transfer doesn't wash in the USA. We have no wish for a "Nanny State". Less government, not more - that's the heart and soul of the USA.

E D Gil, Calabasas, California, USA

<i>The future of America is a racially-mixed progressive one. In the future most Americans will look a lot like Brazillians.
Obama represents our future. The only people holding that back are the small-minded.</i>

It's small minded to not want to turn this country into Brazil?!! More like sane.

Marc, Alexandria, USA

I'm tired of bigots saying they won't vote for Obama because other people are too bigoted against blacks to vote for him.

Roughly just as many bigots won't vote for a woman as won't vote for a black man.

If you won't vote for Obama because he is black, have the courage to face your own prejudice.

Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada

I'm sorry, but America was very ready to have a black president. Look at Obama's popularity and polling before all of the skeletons came out of his closet!

It isn't that America isn't ready, Obama just isn't the guy for us. To radical, to far left, too much controversy.

Mr. Brown, Carencro, US

You can't tell Americans that they are racist. They all have "a friend that is black" Sadly though, you are correct. A black man could not get elected to national office in the US of A. Witness the majority of comments. This from the more educated Americans that are drawn to your paper.

Dave McEvoy, ottawa, canada

America has long been ready for a black president–it's the Democrats who aren't. If Obama were a Ronald Reagan conservative, he’d have the election locked up.

Nick Costantino, Ridgefield, New Jersey, U.S.A.

Hogwash! As a white male, aged 50, college educated and a raving conservative, I call hogwash. My choice in candidates has nothing to do with race or gender. It does have a lot to do with values.
No I won't vote for Obama or Hillary. I'd have no trouble voting for Dr. Rice if she were to run.

Russ Jansen, Kaysville, USA

Bigots are the new minority. During this urgent election, the vast majority of Americans will put race aside. Obama is like a neo-Lincoln, uniting a politically divided country.

Nigel , San Francisco,

Its not that America wouldn't elect a black president, they just don't trust a liberal one.

Rdc, modesto,

If Obama had been willing to be VP on the dream ticket in the very beginning when the Democrats had a clear path and Hillary had a commanding lead is a prime reason I won't vote for him - in running for president and specifically catering to the liberal left showed he's not a team player.

ted, raleigh,

Bob, I don't vote against Obama because I'm a racist. I vote against Obama because I'm not a socialist.

Andrew, Greencastle, Pennsylvania, US

Black candidates have rarely, if ever, lived up to their poll numbers. No one admits their racism in public but it has always come out in the privacy of the polling booth.

Dave McEvoy, ottawa, canada

This author fawns over the democratic candidates, apparently incapable of seeing into the Clintons' amoral lust for power and Obama's anti-capitalist and socialist nature. McCain is not without faults but he represents the segment of America that knows that this is a hardball world.

Jim Graves, Tampa,

Americans are perfectly prepared to elect a black candidate -- had Colin Powell run in 1996 (or, more precisely, had his wife allowed him to run), he most assuredly would have defeated Clinton. What Americans are not prepared to elect is an EXTREME LEFT-WING candidate, of whatever colour.

Jack Jolis, New York, USA

What an entirely cynical point of view. Obama may loose to McCain but that is in the future. Right now he should be supported for what he is and for what he stands for. If he is to be defeated because of prejudice, so be it. His nomination will be a first . Even in loss the US community may grow.

Ted Keating, Queensland, Australia

Not to mention that McCain has been the favorite Republican of many Democratic voters for nearly a decade now. I've personally heard more than a few AZ Dems speak openly about their admiration for him. And the GOP campaign attack machine hasn't even started yet! Obama doesn't stand a chance.

Matthew, Tucson, USA

The Clintons brought up race. America is perfectly ready for a black president, just not a one who thinks European socialism and government-controlled economy, with its attendant high unemployment and lack of growth, is a good vision for our country.

Mary McLemore, Pike Road, Alabama, USA

And further more, should we elect or give extra consideration to a candidate BECAUSE they are black? I don't think so. I've heard it said that a liberal American is a conservative European, so please realize that to us (US citizens) Obama is pretty far out in Left field.

Dave, Dallas, USA

I have no problem with a black man or a woman in the White House. The issue is Obama and Hillary; can't stand either one of them. I feel lied to every time Obama or Hillary opens their mouth. I'm so tired of hearing the word 'change'. What change, show me something, say something, do something

Debbie, Sunnyvale, USA

The ONLY artical that is the factualy stated situation in this Primary is by Mr.A.Kaletsky. It dos not take a Genius-only a literate person to read it and understand English. Mc Cain Vs Obama- I am giving 10 to 1 odds--any takers?? I could use some easy US Bucks. Good luck Yanks!

Adam, Vancouver,

After reading this article and several of the UK and European comments, it is inreasingly apparent just how ignorant we are on American politics. As ignorant as they are perceived to be on world politics! I wonder who's really wearing the blinkers?

Rob D, Dulwich, uk

Actually, the tragic component of this political campaign is that the Left has become completely intolerant, is accusing anyone and everyone of being a racist for no reason other than the fact they don't vote Obama. The result is an erosion of the democratic process and the first amendment.

Sofia, Chicago, USA

Are you kidding me. I have no problem voting for a black person, and I have no problem voting for a women either.

I'd vote for Condi Rice in a heartbeat. What a stupid article.

Ed, North Bend, WA

i fear that both deserving democratswill lose to the terrifying mcCain (as in mark of) due to the divisive nature of two such popular candidates running against each other when mcCains run is unopposed for the republicans - obama - clinton - toss a coin - loser endorses the winner

fc, newcastle upon tyne, uk

To say you have no idea what you're talking about is an understatement. First of all, America would elect a black president. Second of all, it is John McCain who has the smart economic policies. And it is Hillary and Barak that espouse the same old liberal socialist big government propaganda.

Ryan, Austin, USA

To John who stated: "It is a shame that America is not a democracy. If it was then the superdelegates would not be able to overrule the democratic wish of the American people."

The "Democratic" Party chooses its nominee with Super-Delagates the Republicans choose the nominee based only on votes.

Kurt Strawhecker, Omaha, USA

As a country we have yet to grow up, other countries have had black leaders and women leaders, we still hold racist and gender problems and it's evident by the voting. we are behind in the way this country teaches children in values and in schooling.

Bob, Boston,

If Hillary messes up her term as much as Bill did, then VP Obama would be as likely to win as Gore was. Come on people, let's remember what a mess the Clinton's were when he was in office. There was a scandal almost every week, and his trade policies helped create the economic problems that we face.

kelly, wheaton, USA

Everyone has the right to voice their opinions, yet I can't help but ask...how can Anatole Kaletsky be so obtuse? That question is, of course, rhetorical. It's quite understandable how someone who does not actually live in the U.S. would have little "real world" knowlege of what America is all about

Rick, Portland, USA

Whites/Hispanics are racist for voting 66% for a white candidate but blacks are not racist when they vote 90%+ for black candidates and ADMIT that they do so based on race.

Go figure.

Rich Gonzalez, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Obama wasn't a senator when they voted to invade Iraq. So, it's easy for him to say he was against it, he wasn't there to vote either way. The American people have little affinity for Obama nor Hillary. They'll both lose.

J.G. Wentworth, santa cruz , USA

This article was right on the money. If Obama were half as smart at some assume, he would be excited to run as VP with Hillary. That is the only way he will ever be president. If this ticket does not materialize, then John McCain will be the next president and we will have war with Iran!
rusty

rusty, helena,

America is indeed ready for a female or a black president. Condoleeza Rice, Michael Steele, Colin Powell and JC Watts are examples of black Americans who could be elected president. They are not liberal, radical, socialists as is Obama. THAT is why Obama will never be President.

Doug, Houston, USA

I was born in Pennsylvania, and I've been observing elections for years. The results of the PA primary are in no way predictive of the American election. The only state older than PA is Florida, and seniors skew for Clinton in a big way. The national polls have Obama leading McCain.

Leslie, New York, USA

Democrats easily forget that Hillary voted for this ridiculoius war along with John McCain. Now she sells herself as the candidate of "Change." If you are a democrat, your only logical choice is Obama as they are almost identical on policy except the War in Iraq, which is the most important issue.

Jason, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A

Im a white female from PA. My family all white from PA. We have poor ones and not so poor ones too. Im sorry I dont agree with you. I do belive that the republicans that switched over to vote for Hillary to keep this alive voted to reflect your argurment. B will not be here just on the blk vote. NO

Linda, PA, USA

The author shows his ignorance of American politics...president has NOTHING to do with the economy...read the USConst. if you can stand it...republican crossovers voted for Clinton because they believe,well,figure it out..Talks about how bad Obama is,then mentions a "dream ticket" with...Obama...lol

tc, oakland, USA

Saying that we Americans won't elect a black president is absurb. We just don't like Obama who cannot close the deal. BTW, would someone please point out that Mr. Obama is bi-racial? He isn't a true black candidate no matter what the media thinks or says.

Matt Keegan, Cary, North Carolina

Please quit whining about the Republicans. Both parties are equally guility of inappropraite personal attacks against individuals of the opposing party. It is simply inappropriate no matter what party one supports. To think one party is more inappropriate than another is absurd and childish.

Gray, Cheboygan, USA

I'll make a deal with you: You can help elect our presidents just as soon as we can elect your Prime Ministers and Parliament.

Jeanette, Rock Hill, USA

In the absence of Obama candidacy. I will vote Mccain/Rice clear and simple.

Dotun Olusi, London, UK

Socialism is already in american policies, from nation building, farm subsidies, energy credits, the progressive tax system, deduction of state taxes paid to you because you own a house, the department of education, federally funded student loans, small business loans. so stop with the straw man!

Micheaux, Columbus , USA

Actually, for me, race is not an issue. The man's politics are what will prohibit me from voting for him. I can't vote for a blatant Marxist - Leninist. Nobody takes one or more pieces of my "pie" and gives it to someone else. I worked for my "pie", government doesn't have a right to divy it up.

Fred, Burns, USA

Barack just got 96% of the black male vote in Penn and 92% overall. Suggesting white Americans are not ready to elect a black is absolutely ludicrous. Barack overwhelmingly won states like Wyoming were you could count the black people on one hand so drop the white racist America NONSENSE.

Mike OBrien, seattle, wa, usa

America will get what America deserves in this election. In true Hollywood style the voters are blinded by the dazzle that's presented them then queue up as lambs for the next big scare tactic awaiting them. A trick played cruelly time and again upon them by those with interest in keeping them down.

darren, brisbane, australia

Is it possible that America is actually not ready to elect a FAR-LEFT candidate? Forget whether the guy is black or not. I am not voting for Obama because of his politics, not because of his skin color. If that is truly a factor in whether the man becomes President or not, then we are in trouble.

Erik, Charleston,

I'd vote for Condi Rice.... I think she is Black .... but not a man mmmm???? But she's the most qualifed

George, Harrisburg, USA

Boo hoo hoo! Will you liberal losers ever stop whining? President Bush has brilliantly led us through the war on terror and has made this country safe. I only wish we had a true conservative candidate to take over for him instead of a left leaning blue-blood like McCain. Long live Reagan!!

Brian O'Laidhigh, Corning, NY, USA

McCain more fairly represents American values than tax and spend Democrats who promise entitlements and redistribution of wealth without having a plan on how to repair our crumbling infrastructure. Americans are still patriotic and believe that democracy and freedom are still worth fighting for.

Jennifer, Palo Alto, CA, USA

I believe that both Clinton and Obama have failed to present themselves as intelligent people who are really concerned about the welfare of the US of A.. We need neither.
I do not think that this article presenting the two democrats as so much better than John McCain is at all proper or correct.

Bill Bewley, Waco, US of A

To say that we should give legitimacy to the bigots in the United States is a defeatist and fudamentally FLAWED concept. If we had given in to those people in the 60's Obama would not even be able to run for President. No ,what we have to do is overwhelm those bigots with what is right.

gail, Rock Hill, USA

Uhhhh....Excuse me how dare you say that WE the United States are not ready for a black president!! And you called hillary clinton 'sincere' LOL have you been to the US? she has the worst ratings ever on being honest and trustworthy out of all 3 that are left! HE WILL BE THE NOMINEE and win!

mike, Fort LAuderdale, USA!!!!!

Sad commentary on the supposed US white majority . Last I knew, a "gaffe" (which Mr. Obama has been accused of) is a social blunder, while a "lie" (of which several have been accorded to Mrs. Clinton) is a false statement with deliberate intent to deceive. I'll take a "gaffer" over a "liar" any day

Barbara Allen, Boston, USA

No Sir!... 16 per cent will not decide this election....We are not prisoners to bigotry!....Mr Kaletksy needs to understand that our country is worthy of its heritage. We will elect this fine young man and will reap the benefits. Power comes from all the people NOT the just bigots or conspirators.

howard, New Milfford, Connecticut, USA

As a British-American living in London, I must say that the Brits can be so annoyingly smug and self-righteous when it comes to politics. Why not write a piece about McCain's endorsement from a pastor (Hagee) who said that Katrina was well-deserved because of 'the gays'? Falwell, Robertson?

Mark, London, UK

Ouit trying to put us Hispanic Americans against blacks as one poster tried to do. Maybe Asian and whites. But stop trying to group all of us against them. The Hispanic and Latino in large part agree with Senator Obama. Don't let the media fool you.

GH, Jacksonville, USA

Given the appalling performance of the Bush gang over the past 8 years the democrats should be sleepwalking to victory with a chance to right so many wrongs. It seems to an unbiased observer that the democrat camp only opens their mouths to change feet thus allowing McCain to regain the momentum.

Neil, matamata, New Zealand

Mr. Kaletsky, please cite one achievement of either Clinton or O'Bama to support your claim that they are in "command of the issues."

Also please cite one fact to support that either of them is "economically" qualified as you contend McCain is not.

Ernest T. Bass, Mayberry, N.C., U.S.A.

Love the narrative: If Obama fails it's because of Americans' racist attitudes. If Obama succeeds, it will be in spite of Americans' racist attitudes.

I await eagerly the election of first black or asian Prime Minister. I worry, however, that maybe you Brits aren't quite ready.

Ryan, St Andrews, Scotland

The very last paragraph is a howler...I haven't read such irony since Twain or Swift.

Jim, Mint Hill, USA

I know you in Europe support the Democrats but Becareful what you wish for.With China Russia Iran and other unfriendly Goverments getting stronger and bolder.The last thing you want is a Leftist cut and run weak paper tiger liberal democrat running America.Think about it.

tyrone, fairview, USA

I love the smug British assessment that Americans are inherently racist. Excuse me, who was the last black Prime Minister of Great Britain...?

Steven R., Salt Lake City, UT,

You called Hillary Clinton "sincere." That creates a credibility problem for the rest of your piece.

Paul, Detroit,

As an Obama supporter I have to admit that the author makes a very compelling point here. The most eloquent I have seen yet. I hope he's wrong.

Bert, ft lauderdale , usa

The two Senators who actually know how to run the country (and the world actually--too bad for you) Biden and Dodd lasted about 30 seconds in the primaries...Have to wonder why...We would be better off appointing any one of 50 governors at random as president..We need Divine Guidance on this one.

Mike Leahan, Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, USA

Obama is also half white.

That is why I am voting for him.

The future of America is a racially-mixed progressive one. In the future most Americans will look a lot like Brazillians.

Obama represents our future. The only people holding that back are the small-minded.

bob, Oakland, CA,

I think gender matters more than race in this election. I am a 26-year-old white male liberal attorney living in Dallas, Texas. I just can't see a woman running the US. The young white vote is all for Obama. Plain and Simple.

Clayton, Dallas, Texas, USA

how many congregates make up reverend wright's church - maybe 1,000-1,500. i assume that 99.9% of them aren't specifically militant, anti-U.S., anti-white. so it comes down to this - what reverend wright has been saying to a large degree resonates with everday black folk.

christian, brooklyn, ny

If Obama loses, It is not that America is not willing to elect a black man for president. It is that we are not willing to elect THAT man to president. It would not matter if he was Black, green, white, or purple.

Steve Watson, Winston Salem , USA

I suppose that I could vote for a negro, if he was a conservative.

Daniel, Nashville, USA

You can't be serious. Maybe these people just don't trust Obama anymore. He has too many ties to Anti-Americans, )Ayers, Michelle Obama, Rev. Wright, etc...)! Look at Iowa, mostly white state, voted in Obama as their candidate. Pennsylvanians just cant vote for him due to his associates.

Erika , Kihei, USA

Senator Obama is a Dan Quayle who can spell "potato" and talk about potatoes in an inspiring way, but has all the nutritive value of a McDonald's Supersized Fries.. He is a party hack from Chicago with little experience in national government. I'm voting for John McCain.

Gregory Baker, Odenton, Maryland, USA

Way to be an objective journalist when it matters. You really are quite a talented and important person. Please keep writing your posts.

Jeff, Boston, USA

Although other commenters have already said it, I will say it again: it is Democrats who obsess over race and sex. Republicans look at the individual. We also look at character, and Obama has shown, through his advisors and others, that he is sorely lacking in this area. He will lose in November.

Scott, San Francisco , US

People hate Hillary. That's what these "thinkers" conveniently forget. Obama could be green, and some people may or may not like him, but a lot of people absolutely hate Hillary. A Hillary nomination would be the best fundraising event the Republicans could ever have.

Meg, Rhinebeck,

Mr. Kaletsky underestimates the huge number of people, incuding an increasing number of Democrats, who won't vote for Hillary under any circumstances. On the other hand, most of the people who won't vote for Obama because of race are voting Republican anyway.

Peter, Atlanta, USA

It's unfortunate that Obama decided to run against Hillary while he is so inexperienced. He should have experienced an election or two beforehand and been vetted. He should have built up a record of accomplishments. He is still too green.

Steve Jamieson, Charlotte NC, USA

Obama's loss in Pennsylvania has precious little to do with racism. I wouldn't vote for Obama, but it's not because he's black. It's because he's a LIBERAL, he's naive and inexperienced, and I disagree with him about most issues. If Michael Steele were to run, I would vote for him in a heartbeat.

Brenda Tighe, Marietta (Atlanta), Georgia, USA

Please, Americans won't vote for Obama because he is an extreme left winger who chooses to associate with unrepentant former terrorists and people of ill repute. Oh, and by the way, Obama hasn't "tried harder" to disassociate himself with Reverend Wright, he defended this man.

Brian, Alexandria, USA

"As for US Democrats being "Socialists" - They are further right than our Conservatives!"

Yes, and for that we pity you.

Bruce, austin,

Operation Chaos. We won in PA. Keep up the offensive in IN. Watch our flank (NBC,CNN,ABC) and keep our powder dry for the general election. March on!

Mike, West Chester, USA

Anatole's hero and heroine are not paying the price of inheritance, but the cost of the flaws in their own lives and behaviour. Place the blame where it is merited. Neither of them is Presidential material. America wants evidence of a candidate having done the hard stuff. Fluffiness won't do.

John Thom, Charleston, USA

Who are the racists keeping a black man from becoming president? The media. It refuses to give any attention to some of our great black conservatives. The last thing they want is for people to know more about individuals like Dr. Keyes, which is why they basically kicked him out of the debates.

Peter, Houston, TX,

so far i have not seen anyone focus on the black vote for obama. it would appear the black is as racist as the white. to attempt to convince anyone that 92% of blacks voting for obama is not racist , is drinking too much kool-aide.

ralph reuss, safety harbor.fl , usa

The article exposes how very little understanding Europeans have of American politics. Obama and Clinton have almost no experience and promise everything to everyone. Transfer of wealth in the US to further socialist "goals" will rob us of any chance we have to secure our future prosperity.

Dave, Redmond, USA

Mr. Koletsky bases his opinion on Mr. McCain from a European point of view. I am an intelligent, informed American voter and I support John McCain unabashedly. He stands for the values that most Americans feel are important.

Andy G, Canton, Ohio, USA

The fact that Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton are both such impressive candidates, intelligent, sincere, articulate and in command of the issues, while John McCain does not qualify on any of these criteria only makes matters worse.

Are you really serious you believe this

Niles Olsen, McAlester,

Big surprise - you missed the point. Here it is: America is not ready to elect a LIBERAL - whether he/she is black, yellow, red, white, male or female.

Clinton had to move to the center to win, and he never won with over 50% of the vote. He won because of 3rd-party conservative candidates.

Ted Knutson, Spokane, USA

Obama and Clinton are both well qualified. Why then are we pulling the collective race card? Is America really that unconscious that it would rather create a political monopoly of only two families ruling over a 20 yr period than to vote for A New Earth? Give Peace & America a Chance. 1865 is over

Bibi Angola, Long Beach, CA, USA

Operation Chaos....I Love It

Mitch, Atlanta,

Right, like only the Republicans go on the attack. Look at what the democrats are doing to each other. Wait till they take the gloves off against McCain. They'll call him everything but human. If Clinton & Obama., are the standard bearers for the Democrats, you're already in a heap of trouble.

Mike Harris, Beckly, United States

It has been stated so many times in these comments that it really does have some impact when this many readers of this article acknowledge that there are plenty of smart, intelligent, women, and other-than-caucasian peole that could serve as president/vice. Obama's history is now exposed.

Dennis, Omaha, USA

Florida is lost to Obama because of his pro Castro comments. Ohio is lost to the Republicans because of the past governor who makes even this Republican blush with his incompetence. The fact that Obama can't win what Hillary can is a tribute to his socialism, not his race.

Robert Nagel, Wabash, IN, USA

America won't elect a liberal. Reagan won in a 49 state landslide, Bush (1st), less conservative, won a similar landslide against an Massachusetts liberal. The Democrats haven't won with more than 50% since 1976 and no landslide since Franklin Roosevelt. Obama is on the left, he can't win.

Robert Nagel, Wabash, IN, USA

Whenever she talks etc. she doesn't deal with her HUGE negatives. Nearly 6 out of every 10 Americans say she is untrustworthy; Republicans it is 5 out of every 6. Like the guy and his friend running from the bear, I don't have outrun you, just the bear. Obama: Some chance: Hillary: No chance!!!

Alex Campbell, Rockville MD , USA

The common thread throughout this entire article is that Anatole Kaletsky is clueless. Good work Anatole.

John A. Jauregui, Garden Valley, USA

I am most certainly a white woman who voted for Obama in the Virginia primary ... and will support him in the presidential election if he is the Democratic nominee. He is the best candidate ... and I look forward to his presidency

Marlene, Alexandria, VA, usa

Isn't it just possible that instead of country full of bigots, not ready for a black president, that we simply don't like this guy's politics. I beleive most folks in the US are ready for a good president, black, white or otherwise.

Hugh, Buena Vista, USA

In my experience, Russians, at least those living in the US, are heavily pro-Republican...

Holly, Washington, DC,

You're forgetting the critical black vote which will not be there for Hillary in much higher numbers than the white vote which won't be there for Obama. NINE out of ten African-Americans vote Obama and are 13 percent of the population almost all democrat.

colleen, santa barbara, ca, usa

I agree with Kent from Pittsburgh. We its not that we don't want a woman or black president; its just that neither Hillary or Barrack deserve the oval office as they demonstrated with their campaigns. Whats the alternative? John Mccain who is still a frightening prospect as our leader!

Ken, Phoenix, AZ

I won't vote for Obama because he is not the strongest candidate running for president.

Marty, San Diego,

To be correct in one aspect of his analysis he should specify that white Democrats are not ready to elect an "African American" (eventhough he is also Caucasian). If Obama loses it will be white Democrats' fault. Republicans won't vote for him or Hillary. So you can't blame them.

Cedric, Santa Ana,

My choice hasn't got a thing to do with whether the candidate is white, black, male or female. Of course, I'm a Republican, so race and sex don't matter to me. Those things only matter to Democrats.

Hurley, Houston, TX, USA

Barack Obama would lose forty or more states in this or any future presidential election not because he is black, but because he is far to the left on issues that matter most to voters: taxes, terrorism, trade and most importantly, trust.

Tom Armstrong, east hanover, New Jersey , USA

In response to criticism that the UK hasn't elected a black PM, it should be noted that we don't actually have a separate vote for our first minister - that person is the leader of the party who gains a majority at the General Election. This leader is not decided by a vote from the general public.

simon, cardiff, wales

Before the Clintons started on the race, nobody even thought of Obama as black, or white. He is actually half and half, so some of the racists may reconsider ?

He is not 'associated' with racists (black) leaders, and I support him because his sound judgment on the war, and other issues.

S. A Jones, Naples FL, USA

Surely if whites won't vote for Obama then how come so many have already voted for him? Also isn't Hillary supposed to be disliked by a large part of the American electorate?

Dan, Winchester, UK

Funny how closet neo-cons believe that Democrats, who are registering to vote in record numbers, will fail to show up in November. Or that they will magically switch to McCain's camp if Obama is the nominee, even though centrist Republicans are voting for Obama in record numbers. Fact!

Charles, Seattle, USA

I'd like to point out - We in UK do not elect our Prime Ministers. The Prime Minister is the leader of the Party which wins the elections.
As for US Democrats being "Socialists" - They are further right than our Conservatives!
Many Moslem, Catholic, Women, Black, Brown and White people are MP's

Grace Kelly, Stirling, Scotland

The issue is really quite simple. Elect McCain if you wish to spend your taxes on wars which produce zero monetary gain for the United States, or vote Democrat to put money back into America's failing infrastructure, create jobs, increase GPD, and fund Universal Health-Care.

Curt, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.

The biggest divide in America about race is between young and old. If only voters under the age of 45 had counted in Pennsylvania, Obama would have won by more than 15 points. The memories of the sixties and the racial tension make older Americans wary of a Obama. The youth carry no such fears.

Jason F., Medford, USA

Sorry to dissappoint you but America does not care that Obama is black. We care that his policies are socialist and that his associations with racist leaders are indicative of his bad judgements. That is why America won't vote for him. We would love a black candidate such as Colin Powell or C Rice.

Dave, Phoenix,

I am tired of hearing about the Republican attack machine. What about the Democrats' attack machine?

I am a conservative who believes America is ready for a black or female president. I just don't think we are ready for this black or female president.

Kent Schoffstall, Pittsburgh, USA

"Obama and Clinton impressive candidates" Are you kidding me

Kaletsly has evidently swallowed the DNC Kool Aid. Obama was a state senator before beginning his first term in the senate, and Hillary is riding her husbands coattails and a sense of entitlement. This qualifies to run for president

Neil Pearce, Columbus, USA

Wrong. Hillary controls the party, so she wins every "closed Primary" contest (closed to official party members only).

Barack wins the caucuses by huge margins, which are open to all voters and I think that represents the true feeling amoung voters. He would win the general election easily.

Steve, Dallas, USA

Whatever makes you feel better at night, Mr. Kaletsky. I refuse to be lectured by Europeans who instigated two world wars and a more recent Bosnian war over racial lines/geography. If Mr. Obama wasn't recycling post-feudal marxism, that has been proven not to work, then he would sailing in the race.

Chris, Boise, ID, USA

The real hero is President Bush. Despite being relentlessly attacked by liberal hacks in the media and DNC, he has perservered to free 50 million people, eliminate 7000 ruthless thugs, keep America safe from attack, sustained lower unemployment rates, higher GDP, higher stock averages than Clinton.

robin, greenville,

Is this guy in the tank for Dem's or what? How about the simple fact that both Obama and Clinton or Socialist and the American people are not ready for a Socialist to be president.

Nick, Dallas, Dallas

Obama has 4 years experience. Clinton has 8 years experience and neither have any notable successes. McCain has served in the Senate for a long time and has served and honored his country with his service. Belligerent war mongerer - NOT!!! The only adult in the race.

Tom Jordan, Valley Stream, NY, USA

Colin Powell would be a black man that I would have no problem voting for. It's not the color of the man skin, it's that the country is more moderate than both of the democratic candidates. No one really knows who Obama is and now we're finding out and don't like what we learn.

Brenda C, Portland, United States

Race HAD NOTHING to do with Obama's electability. He now looks like a racist for following a racist preacher for 20 years & raising his children in the church. This has hurt him. Also the notion that obama and Hill are a dream team is silly. Whose dream- socialists? not mainstream America.

Daria, Enfield, USA

Sean in NY
If you are lacking the courage to stand up and fight in a just war against totalitaianism, I am willing, as a woman, to stand up and fight in your place.
Sara in Pennsylvania

Sara, Pennsylvania, USA

I always find it interesting that Obama is described as "Black" even though he has a parents of both African and European origins so really is half-white half-black. In the UK usually mixed raced people use the term half-(whatever ancestry) to describe themselves

raymond, the norf, UK

No, Mr. Kaletsky, America is not ready (thank God) to elect a socialist. Were a mainstream black candidate such as Michael Steele to run for president, he would be swept into office.

TJ Pierce, Alameda, CA, USA

"It is a shame that America is not a democracy. If it was then the
superdelegates would not be able to overrule the democratic wishes of the American people.

John, LONDON, ENGLAND"

The USA is a representative republic with democratic procedures. I can't think of any true Democacry.

Sean, NY, USA

Poorly written and absurd. Congrats!

Sam, Napa, United Sates

"...militarily belligerent and economically unqualified Republican candidate..." I commend Mr. McCain's military background/service, his understanding of the military's responsibilities/requirements/ procedures/protocol = hardly "belligerent." Also, he is no less qualified re: economy than Obama.

Donna Martinson, Marengo, USA

The saying "you are judged by the company you keep" is still apt. Mr Obama travelled with people that mainstream America considers radical. He will ultimately pay a price - voters will reject him in the general election.

Alida Simenhoff, Los Angeles, USA

America is ready to elect a black President. America is not ready to elect a very liberal person to president. And that's what Obama is.
If a conservative black like Condi Rice, JC Watts, Thomas Clarence, or Colin Powell ran for Pres, then u'd see real ugly racism from the Left.

Billy, Cheyenne, USA

If the Clintons steal the nomination from Obama, the African American people will leave the Dem party. Hilliary still won't win and then who do you think the American people will blame for that move. It's all about self respect for us.

Jeannetta McFarlin, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

It's Mr. Kaletsky who seems to be doing the "character assassination." Many conservatives who would never vote for Mr. Obama, would (or who have) voted for Colin Powell or Alan Keyes -- or would gladly welcome Coni Rice onto the ticket with McCain. The issue isn't race, but belief, politics, policy.

Liam, Baille nam muc-mara,

Enough white people may not support Obama to make him president but I can tell you this: NO black people will support the Clintons after the way they have conducted themselves. And she cannot win without the black vote.

Steve Hatchett, atlanta, usa

Are you kidding me with this article. I would agree that they are both intelligent but to say they are sincere and are in command of the issues is pretty wacky.I'm not a huge McCain fan either but he is far closer to the center on the issues than those two jokers.

Mike S., San Antonio, USA

Any pretense that this article should be taken seriously is summarily dashed by the author's assertion that Obama and Clinton are 'sincere'. Equally mind-numbing is the implication that Sen. Clinton cares more about 'fairness than about power' due to her political stripes. Thanks for the laugh!!

George, Portland,

The votes cast in either direction were not based on race, but on the familiararity and comfort level of the voters with the candidates. In some cases in these primary elections, there is even some mischief going on with Republicans switching party affiliations to vote for Hillary, in order to keepthe slug-fest in the Democrat party going.

If there was a racial bias in this election process, Sen, Obama wouldn't be in the race at this point, let alone leading it. You Brits see racial issues where there aren't any. It's a reflection of your own cultural biases.

Jim Lynch, Jacksonville, Florida

Sorry Anatole, America is not ready to elect a socialist for President , not because he is half black, which points out the real racial aspect of Mr Barrack Hussien Obama`s quest to be President ,which is the racial bias of black America. His anti american friend stells all about his character.

kevin, Ft Meyers, USA

Socialism is not acceptable in America in any of its forms (International Socialism, Communism, or National Socialism).
It will not matter who the messenger is or what the Race or Gender. Your efforts to use accusations of Racism or Sexism will not work to put a Socialist in office.

Brian Jones, Seattle, USA

82% of all African Americans voted for Obama and they are "enlightend". 76% of Caucasion Americans, Hispanic Americans and Asian Americans voted for Hillary , they are "racist". This is what the Democratic slander machine is up to. If your not for Obama your a racist. He is too liberal!

jerry pie, Grand Rapids, United States

Obama is getting the black vote because he is black, this is obvious. What's really dissapointing, is that in the 21st century we have a sizeable percentage of whites who would not vote for a candidate because he is black. However, you will not find blacks who will not vote for a white candidate.

Donald K. Prater, Yucaipa, CA, United States

It always amazes me that it's not racist for black to flock to Obama and vote for him because he's black, and it's not sexist for women to favor Shrillary because she's a woman, yet if a white voter votes for anyone but Obama he's racist.

They're both socialists, so I won't vote for either one.

Stewart, Topeka, USA

Sara in Pensylvannia - I suggest that if McCain wins, then you volunteer to fight in his wars that he wants to unleash on the world. Hopefully McCain will succumb to senility before year's end. He is an evil, evil disgrace.

Sean, New York, USA

Reading through the comments below, it would appear that many in the US do actually believe that Clinton/Obama are more radical communists than Lenin/Stalin. Surely, the most successful period of recent US history (including foreign policy) was under the "communist" Bill Clinton.

Alex, Portsmouth, UK

Anatole, how do you explain Obama's win in Iowa? A predominantly white district?
As far as America not been ready to elect a black president, AMERICA IS NOT VOTING. This is a Democrat primary. Democrats are the ones voting right now. Are you calling your liberal Democrat friends racists? Anatole?

Mike, Toronto, Canada

This is what should be said and needs to be heard, but the democrats will not listen, they will be defeated, I have been a democrat since I was 12 years old. I seen John Kennedy and was forever destined to be a democrat, but I can't believe what the party has done.

Linda, Marietta, USA

incidentally, how many prime ministers of color have the UK elected?

oh. that's right.

evan, new york city, u.s.a.

Why no mention of John McCain's association with Hagee, the anti-Catholic reverend who also said that Hurricane Katrina was God's punishment for sin? You want a double-standard, anything to demean Obama. If white US voters can't get over this man's skin color, then we deserve McCain.

Chris, Los Angeles, USA

Mr Kaletsky:
Is the UK ready to elect a black or Muslim Prime Minister? If not, I suggest that you look into your own race issues rather than point accusatory fingers at the US.

By the way, would Democrats elect Condi Rice, a black woman, for President? I think not. Would that make them racists?

ADR, Bellingham, WA, USA

Utter nonsense; all of the polls i have seen say that Clinton or Obama would perform equally well against McCain, & no matter how hard she tries Mrs C cannot win nomination (which is not to say that Mr O cannot lose it).

timwarren, toulouse, france

If it is so easy for Republicans to launch an attack on Obama using the Rev. Wright comments, why has Sen. McCain denounced and asked that the very first ad using the footage not be shown? Sounds like McCain is willing to run a clean campaign, yet the Democrats are already airing "he's too old" ads

Sgt Ron, Middleburg, USA

You ever think it might be ideology rather than race? I'd vote for him if he had the conservative credentials but he doesn't. Nor will I vote for him as a way to assuage my "white guilt". I detest the way the argument has become framed; if you don't vote for Obama then of course you're a racist.

Gary , Waxhaw, USA/North Carolina

Half the American electorate cannot stand Hillary, and half the Democrats didn't vote for her. That means 3/4 of the American voters don't want her, guaranteeing a Democratic Party loss. And the elephant in the living room is real: America won't elect this unqualified black man President.

Clyde, Brunswick, GA, USA

Talk seems to be some white people will abandon the Democratic party if Obama is the nominee. If his nomination is stolen from Obama, African Americans will abandon the Dem party so fast, Hilliary will not make it anyway. No one is talking about that. We are watching this very close

Jeannetta McFarlin, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

A lot of people vote in the democratic primary because the republican primary is effectively over. I voted for HRC because she was less liberal than Obama. I like Obama better, but don't share his political views. It has nothing to do with race, but the legislation the would allow to pass.

Ronald Gardner, College Station, TX, USA

Racism, shmacism! Obama is utterly unqualified to be President, period,..and for reasons that have NOTHING to do with race.

Character, judgement, honesty, and proven ability under duress are the reasons McCain will be elected!
Get use to it, Europe!

Dave, LA, CA

Because McCain opposes the drastic withdrawal of US forces from Iraq he is "belligerent"? Does the author take Obama and Clinton, by contrast, to be "peaceful"? There is little hope that the forces loosed by a hasty withdrawal will be so benign. Will "peace" be the preferred means to fight them?

Iwan Sukri, Baltimore, USA

Of the very small 16% of voters who said they were voting on race only 43% said they wouldn't vote for Obama, that means 57% would vote for him reguardless. Sounds like someone is doing funnny stats to make the problem sound wores than it really is. It's 2008 time to put race behind us.

Hailey, Memphis, USA

The issue isn't racism. It's that Sen. Obama is too far left for the majority of Americans.

To be sure, some people in any country hold to their prejudice at election time. But in this case, it's not that America won't elect a black man. It's that they won't elect one this liberal.

David, Brentwood, TN, USA

I love it when people across the pond lecture us on race and politics. Who was the last black man to achieve high office in the UK?

Rich Kline, Ashland, OR, USA

This person knows nothing about America, Republicans and the American people. This article is ignorant.

Aloke Bosu, Anaheim, USA

I've yet to meet anyone who is pro-abortion. To be pro-choice is to not allow the government to dictate what we do within our own bodies. I love it that the Reps claim to be for the least amount of gov. necessary but are willing to let gov dictate how we are supposed to live, and who we should marry

Louis, Phoenix, USA

This article is offensive to clear-thinking folks like me. I'm a white male who is not afraid to vote for either a woman OR a black (male or female) for President! All I require is that the person be conservative and have moral values that don't slap God in the face (pro-family, prolife, etc.)

Barry, Atlanta, GA, USA

McCain is a geunine leader? This man finished 894 out of 897 in his class at the US Naval Academy, a leadership training institution. McCain's claim to fame is that he was a POW. Other than that, there is not much there. That is another politically incorrect reality.

Hamilton, Atlanta, US

sincere - clinton?
insincere - mccain?
please ...

ian Bilbey, suffolk, england

What a crock! Obama won't be elected President because he's a radical leftist! He's one of the most liberal politicians in the Congress.

To Mr. Kaletsky: Is the UK (we used to just call you guys England) ready to elect a black PM?

Clarence Scott , Huntsville, USA

Were not ready to elect to particular black man. Obama is arrogant, inexperienced and liberal. However, if a solid black man like Colin Powell ran, he'd have a real chance at getting elected. It is not the color of the person... it is what the man(or woman) believes in and what their character is.

Michael , Sarasota, FL, USA

The article is very perceptive and is an accurate depiction of where things stand. Despite all of the enormous mistakes, the President was re-elected by the millions of 'Right to Life' advocates who put that issue ahead of the welfare of the general population.

Frank Shadow, MiamiU.S., U.S.A.

If Clinton or Obama win, can I move to the land down under? The USA will fall, much like Rome did. Every great nation falls. It looks as if its our time to turn into the waste land.
I own guns, so that makes me scared of Obama and Clinton,I go to church, so that makes me even more scared. HELP!!

Padrig Hogan, Tampa, Fl, USA

Race is a big part of this race because both these candidates are race-baiting. The race is only typical Clinton nastiness and vague platitudes from Obama. It's a Barbie-doll beauty contest.

Mark, Kansas City, USA

Race is not the factor. It is the candidate's political views. If the Republicans nominated Colin Powell, he would win. Possibly even Condi Rice. If they had nominated Alan Keyes, he would lose, but would any of the pundits say it was because of race? No, they would say it was his politics.

Vance, Jax, USA

I believe this to be fairly accurate except for the bashing of the opposition party.
Whites are accused by most media as either overtly rascist or hypocritically prejudiced.
Never is the fact that blacks have voted 85-90% for the candidate of their color... described as Racist. Why?

Robin, Crystal River, USA

I'm glad to hear that everyday Americans are so roundly dismissed as blathering idiots incapable of making decisions based on consideration and logic. I'm comforted by the fact that I can live my life as an erstwhile "George Castanza", happily reading articles like these and believing the opposite.

Dean Wise, Tarpon Springs, US

Bravo! I am a life-long republican who would vote for Hillary, but only vote AGAINS Obama! I need not explain, because this article sums up my reasons...

Gary, sussex, usa

America has grown considerably in the last 40 years and I seriously doubt that race baiting by Republicans, or even by UK journalists, will do anything but turn American voters OFF.

With the exception of Carter I've voted Republican since Goldwater, but this year I'm voting for Obama!

GreyGeek, Lincoln, USA

If Condolleeza Rice were running for president, she would win over all three current candidates.

Mark Lauman, Carlsbad,CA, USA

Maybe for some it is because he is black, but for me it is because he is way too liberal. White liberals are having no problem supporting a black candidate. I would vote for a black man or woman if they shared my views.

larry, jacksonville, usa

If the current democratic failure to get anything done in congress is any indicator of what a democratic administration could accomplish, why would any sensible voter want that? BTW, congress approved the war actions, so if you don't like it, ask them why they did! Leftism is still foolishness.

Kit, St. Louis, USA

One day I will wake up to find that gender and melanin count aren't as important as a person's character and ability to serve.
We've come a lot further than you might think. America is ready for either a woman or an African-American for president, just not either of the awful choices at hand.

MDWhite, Los Angeles, USA

All very depressing.

Don, Tampa, USA

So if I dont vote for a black supremacist then I am a racist? I swear...you can't make this stuff up!!

Scott, Denver, USA

America is more than ready to elect a black President. It is not ready to elect a Soclialist (bordering on Marxist) of any race who shares Europe's condescending views of average Americans, traditional American values and the Constitutional principles that made the U.S. the envy of the world.

Jeff Terray, New York City, U.S.A.

Describing racism as simply 'politically incorrect' defangs racism by associating it with a range of far less malignant attitudes and practices. Plenty of Americans rightly rail against 'political correctness' and its smug enforcers. Only a few on the fringe will embrace and defend their racism.

Stan, Minneapolis, USA

You refer to Hillary Clinton as "sincere". Isn't that quite a stretch? She is probably the most hypocritical and untruthful politician around.

hank scheib, boca raton, usa

I cant believe what i'm reading from this obviously biased bunch of Leftists.This is about electing the best PERSON for the job.Obama got this far BECAUSE Americans are fair and open-minded. If he loses,it is not because he is Black.It is because his weak points were revealed and the voters decided

Peter, Miami, USA

"America may not yet be ready to elect a black President."

Does it escape most that maybe
"America may not yet be ready to elect an incompetent black President."

Martin, NJ, USA

America is ready for a black president - Obama is beating Clinton in the popular vote. Black America is not ready to run a middle-of-the-road candidate.

AW, Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA

After witnessing Soccer games in England where fans throw banannas on the field towards a black player,I chuckle when its assumed WE are a bunch of racist bigots over here.
Obama? What comes out of his mouth is weak when no teleprompter is handy and his policies are far left.
People notice this.

Scotty, Kitty Hawk, U.S.A.

The article is spot on. Forget the polls that say Obama is ahead of Clinton nationally. People lie on polls so not to be lableled a racist. The left wing communist Party Moveon.org and George Soros are trying to change the culture in America. Barack is their man.

John, Millsboro DE, USA

Interesting article that neglects the fact that Obama won several states with a predominantly white population such as Wisconsin, Minnesota etc that under the theories of the article should have gone to Hillary. Finally one shouldn't underestimate the power of the hispanic vote in the '08 election.

John, Dallas , USA

Mr. Kaletsky, you're right in concluding that Mr. Obama can't win. It's not that Americans won't vote for a black man, it's that Americans won't vote for a man who, all of his life, has been surrounded by anti-Americanism. He didn't choose his anti-American mom. But he did choose his church.

Barry Wiggins, New Haven, Indiana, USA

Having reviewed both the article and comments from various readers around the world, it is clear that most of you have no idea about the way many (most?) white Americans view race. We really don't care! Mr. Obama's problem is his policy (hard left). Colin Powell could be elected in a landslide!!!

Jeff, Raleigh, NC, USA

It's not because he's black. It's because he's a bonafide socialist radical.

Kenny, Atlanta, GA, USA

I am disappointed with your thinking. Why would they then elect a "woman"? This year's choices are poor. The era of "statesmen" running for office are long gone. Although I am a conservative, I would vote Obama easily. With Hillary's baggage, I cannot. I'm having problems with McCain. HELP!

Tanner Frey, Babb, MT, U.S.A.

90% of Black Democrats who would vote for Clinton over McCain are voting for Barack over Hillary.

Who's racist?

Chris V, Hoboken, USA

If this election were not so crucial to decively ending the disastrous policies of the country-club, neo-Con republicans, I would have no problem with Democrats offering up a black candidate for president. But do Democrats really want to take such a chance at THIS particular moment of history?

Gerry Cassidy , Springfield, NJ, USA

How refreshing to see that far-left liberal wackos exist on both sides of the pond. So it would be great for either of the Democrats, who never met an abortion they didn't like, to be elected over the pro-life Sen McCain?

Stephen Boltinghouse, Hannibal MO, USA

The party of "equality" is going to let ~500 special "Super-Delegates" decide their nominee. I guess for the Dems some are more equal than others. Now there's talk of the rich white man (Gore) coming in to save the day. Ha Ha Ha! I love watching The Left hang itself with its' own miserable policies.

Jared, Washington USA,

Interesting to see all the bright letters from the UK, the epicenter of European anti-semitism accusing the Americans of racism.How are the black folks in Brixton doing these days by the way>

Norman, Montreal, Canada

It's hillarious to see Republicans crawling out of the woodwork to claim that that "race doesn't matter" and that most voters' contention with Obama is his "far-left socialist politics." Most Americans can't even spell "socialist," much less define what it means. Unfotunately, race does matter.

Mike T, USA,

White people in America want to think that they are not prejudice. Everyone harbors some prejudice. The fact that people are saying they voted for Obama in exit polls but then the actual votes say something else is telling. We tend to trust people that are "like" us.

Heather, Baltimore, USA

Since USA is the world leader and its actions affect the rest of the world, the super delegates should include foreign nationals. The rest of the world should have a say. And Americans should get out more (and not in uniform!)

David, Bromley,

Had Colin Powell chose to run the in 2000 the US would already have a black president.

Only if Huckabee had somehow managed to get the Republican Party nod would I have even thought have voting for a Democratic Party nominee for president. Obama’s race and Clinton’s gender do not matter.

Lee, Columbia, MD, USA

Senator Obama rationalized his clinging remarks -- he did not apologize. Consider his radical "leftness" or his "Harvardness" before you dismiss his electability on blackness. We Americans may vote FOR someone. We often vote AGAINST someone else.

Guyton, Petaluma, CA, USA,

Obama is not Black. He is half White. Blacks accepted him because Whits would not.

G. Tucker, Oklahoma City, USA

You are so wrong on the race issue. Alan Keyes ran for President and he was quite a bit more educated and erudite and black than Obama but he was alas not a socialist and the darling of the media. You don't understand America.

JoS. P. O'Brien, Pompano Beach, USA

Nobody has been elected President of the US beacause of "should." Obama won't be either. If he can come up with some persuasive reasons why he deserves our votes, he will get them.

Donch, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

No big deal about race influencing voter preference. Would anyone deny Obama was supported by some black voters for that reason as well? Same difference.

Dave, Cambs, UK

The democrats have literally screwed themselves. To avoid the fiasco when unelectable McGovern swept winner take all primaries, they've put in place a tortured undemocratic system which irony or ironies is going to yield them another unelectable candidate,Obama!

GMO, toronto , ontatio

The White women are openly and proudly engaging in tribalism. The Blacks are openly and proudly engaging in tribalism. I find it amusing how everybody else is encouraged to be tribal in their decision-making, but White males are damned in advance on the off-chance of rejecting Obama's tribalism.

Matt Parrott, Indianapolis, USA

Obama was ok when he seemed non threatening. As soon as he revealed his true colors, he revealed white America's fears about a black leader, that they might have too much allegiance to Africa and not America. All of us are not America haters. I am proud to be an American.

Heather, Baltimore, USA

race may play a part, but not as much of a part as obama's policies and his dodgy friends.

I can't see hillary getting elected either. the real problem for the democrats is that the race is not only between two duff horses, but is a race that is hurting the party.

jem, london, uk

First "Sir" Elton tells me I don't like women. Now you are telling me I'm not ready for a black President. You folks across the pond are very misinformed about the American people.

Kyle Otto, Las Vegas, USA and proud!

Are both candidates really "intelligent, sincere, articulate" Mr kaletsky? Neither have the intelligence or the backbone to tell Americans that Iraq is a mess and to get on with it. Instead they look for early withdrawl regardless of the concequences. Spineless

Matt, Cardiff,

Mr Kaletsky is the worst kind of white liberal elitist racist.. His condescending view of what he obviously views as white-trash Americans is infuriating. HE however is above all that. HE is an elightened liberal. America WOULD vote for an African American...one who is qualified.

Alex Campbell, Niagara Falls, Canada

The author's perspective is the int'l role of the US. Americans vote with their pocket book. Since a Democrat House and Senate entered the picture, the economy tanked. Obama and Clinton are promising more government handouts and higher taxes.. These are easy targets for McCain.

W Tyler, Easton, CT, USA

If Obama leads in delegates, there will be a violent reaction if he is not chosen the nominee, regardless of Clinton's states' wins. Even though she's won the states needed in the general election. Unless she can overtake him in pledged delegates, it's over.

Ann Playfair

Ann Playfair, Woodstock, NY,

"The Republicans will have no such compunctions about the fairness of launching personal attacks against a potentially vulnerable Democratic candidate. "

This is rich, considering what the Democrats have subjected us to. Racism, Sexism, Voter Suppression, Oh MY!

Bill , Chicago, IL

WOW! Compassionate Racism at its best!! Well spoken, poorly premised and most of all - utter nonsense. To say that a black president could not win (a left winger, novice in national government and a convoluted elitist) is racist nonsense. Public awareness of FACTS is hurting Obama.

Ralph , Ann Arbor, US

WOW I am African American and I think America needs McCain. There you have it a patriot, gun advocate, war hero, lot's of experience. Perfect candidate right? Quoting this article "while John McCain does not qualify on any of these criteria only makes matters worse." how can this be? Please expalin.

JC Watts, South Carolina,

Yet for all of her primary night celebrations in the populous states, exit polling and independent political analysts offer evidence that Mr. Obama could do just as well as Mrs. Clinton among blocs of voters with whom he now runs behind. Obama also appears well-positioned to win swing states...NYT

d. Hurlimann, geneva, switzerland

What does it say about a party when they put a mechanism in place for no other purpose than to override the vote of their constituents? The Dems have a great number of superdelegates so that the party leaders can wrest control of the nomination from their own constituents. What does that say?

Nate, Nashville, USA

You've got some important factors wrong. Like me, many people voting in the Democratic primary switched party affiliation to vote. The main reason that Obama is becoming less electable than Hillary is not race, but politics. He is as liberal as they come. I like Obama, but I can't vote for him.

Royal Meservy, Louisville, USA

I love to hear liberals babble. I not sure how Republicans vote, but I do know how conservatives vote. Barack is from the far left of the liberal spectrum. Unlike our leftist counterparts, conservatives don't care if the presidential candidate is a man, woman, black or white. Issues only!

John, Searcy,

"The fact that Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton are both such impressive candidates, intelligent, sincere, articulate and in command of the issues, while John McCain does not qualify on any of these criteria only makes matters worse."

Mrs Clinton = sincere? What in god's name are you talking about?

Chuck, Yourhouse, China

You could argue that Obama won't win because of his race. Or you could argue that he won't win because of: flag pins, his bowling score, his "bitter" remarks, his pastor, etc. No one in the US will readily admit they are racist. So they hide behind these other "issues" that don't really matter.

cass, Bayonne, USA

Our last two Secretary's of State are black, we've had at least one black UN Ambassador, we have black Senators and Representatives, and our current President has black Department Secretaries. I would gladly support Senator Obama if he were conservative. How about a black Prime Minister?

Fred, Amarillo, Texas, USA

Mr. Kaletsky's suggestion that McCain's election "would seem to overturn every principle of proper democracy" is hysterical. We should expect much better from this writer as he should of himself.

Derek Robertson, Annapolis, USA

Obama & Clinton are decidedly left-leaning. Most Americas, whether Democrat, Republican or Independent, are political moderates. McCain is a by the book moderate. This alone is why Obama cannot and will not be elected after he defeats Hillary. Skin color is not an issue -- just core values.

Jake , Pittsburgh, USA

I love your sweeping statements masquerading as "fact." Neither liberal candidate is impressive. They have thin résumés, are long on taxes and short on business and geo-politics. McCain wins in November precisely because they are both so bad.

Jim, Jacksonville, USA

I disagree big-time with the author of this article. There are Americans who would not vote for Sen. Obama simply because of the color of his skin...however, he brings in many more first time voters, and will energize the African American community to vote in numbers like never seen before.

Patrice Lumumba, Los Angeles, USA

Love reading articles and comments from European socialists. Spot on. No country should elect a black man as pandering, inexperienced and fake as Hussein Obama is. Your assesment of the two liberal candidates couldn't be more wrong.... and most Americans are smart enough to know it.

Tim Breyer, Westwood, NJ, USA

I would vote for a qualified black conservative candidate in a heartbeat. Never for an afro-centric Marxist like O'bama. The poster that described another Zibabwe is right on the money!

Ricardo Maxwell, Orange Park FL, USA

It isn't a question of whether America is ready for a black president or a female president. I think the proper question would be is American ready for a socialist president? The author to this piece is obviously clueless as to the thoughts of the average US taxpayer.

Name Withheld, Louisiana, USA

Victor, the Democrats are just as rich (if not richer) than the Republicans. Look at the Northeast United States and California. These are the two wealthiest areas of the country and they are dominated by Democrats. I could vote for a black President, but not one with ties to terrorists.

Stewart, Houston, USA

It's not that America will not vote for black guy, it's just that they won't vote for this black guy. He would be a disaster for this country with his proven far left advocacy.

Tom, Huntersville, U.S.A.

Obama's race is a huge advantage in the US. Imagine a white man who's close friends with an unrepentant terrorist and a raving racist pastor--running on a vague platform of "hope" and "change we can believe in." We'd love a black president with qualifications and judgment. Obama lacks the latter 2.

J White, Arizona, USA

To recap this appalling article: America is racist. How do we know this? Simple - Who would prefer "a militarily belligerent and economically unqualified Republican candidate who supports many of President Bush's worst policies?" Our choice - Prefer Obama to McCain, or be a racist.

jcambro, Chicago, USA

It is a shame that America is not a democracy. If it was then the
superdelegates would not be able to overrule the democratic wishes of the American people.

John, LONDON, ENGLAND

Iraq and Afghanistan have not been disasters for the USA, so this is where I stop reading the latest liberal drivel on world events. No, America is not ready for a black president - or a liberal woman as president - and anyone who follows American politics should know that

John, Charlottetown, Canada

America is far more open to a Black president than England is to an Indian or Jamaican PM, or France to an Arab one, or Germany to a Turk. Being a white republican, I would gladly vote for Colin Powell or Condi Rice. It's Obama's politics that are causing the problem, not race.

Dan C, Chicago, USA

The possible election of McCain is good thing- Bush has been unfairly slandered and libeled by the media and it eventually hurt his poll numbers.

Iraq and Afghanistan- disasters? Bush's disasters tower over most of other leaders' "successes."

'08? Still the Dems to lose- but they don't deserve it

Geoffrey, Washington, DC, USA

Senator Obama's chances have nothing to do with his race. Show me any presidential candidate that has had less experience as an elected official. There are NONE in the history of this country. Senator Obama is not ready to hold the most important public servant office in the world.

Harvey, Austin, USA

The REASON neither are electable is because there still are, thank GOD, too many Americans who recognize the dangers their policies with bring.

Jon, USA,

Obama even if elected would not be America's first black president. He would be America's first "Mixed Race" President. 50% White 50% Black, you can easily say he would be a White President just as easy if you say he is a Black President.

Brian, New York,

You fail to mention the 30-40% of Obama voters that will either vote Republican or not vote at all if Hillary wins. That figure would include this white Pennsylvanian. These are DEMOCRATIC primaries, not general elections. BTW, independents, 30% of the electorate, did not participate in PA and OH

Jeff, Pittsburgh. PA, USA

There is no reason for Republicans to launch personal attacks against Mr. Obama. All they have to do is replay those already launched by Ms. Clinton. Democrats have already built the fire that will burn down their bulding.

Rich, Miami, USA

Valid objections to Obama have nothing to do with race other than his apparent anti-white racism by association with his pastor, they have to do with his politics and culture. I would have no objections to Condi Rice or Colin Powell running for President if they had had a successful term as a gov.

Toby, Manchester, USA

Mr. Obama's problem is not going to be his race but his far Left and anti-American associations and positions. He is doing well in a Democratic primary because todays DNC is closer to MoveOn.org than to middle America. Too bad our media couldn't get behind a leader like Harold Ford or J.C. Watts.

Bernie Cross, North Attleboro, MA, USA

Isn't it amazing that if a white person votes for a white person, it's racism. If a minority votes for a minority, it's ethnic pride. It's getting tiresome to hear all the world's problems are the fault of American white men. Watch out for the building backlash.

Guy, Ypsilanti, USA

Hillary's dirty tricks will soon come back to haunt her, yes I see race as being an issue, because some states are more racist than others, there are people who would never vote Labour, and some might be swade, that is politics. I do feel Obama will win, it'll shock the world, because USA is Racist.

Daphne Kenward, Cambridge, UK

McCain wouldn´t continue Bush´s militarism. Recognising that America is stuck in Iraq with no easy options,he wouldn´t cut and run,leaving Iraq in chaos. An extremely gradual withdrawal of American ground troops over five years,possibly punctuated by mini-surges,is the likely McCain strategy.

patrick slattery, dublin, irish republic

"parties that care more about fairness than power"? certainatly not the dems who have for the last 2 years made the claim that only they can save the world. AND OBAMA has lied through his teeth trying to achieve power

Simon Adebisi, London,

Mr. Aletsky's analysis is largely accurate, but his assumptions of the candidates are wrong. Hillary is sincere? Among democrats her believability is only 39%, among republicans 20%. Barack has associated himself with racists, terrorists, and criminals. Bills' old cronies are no better.

Jon Tucker, Marriottsville, USA

Articles like this amaze me. If you want to address race in this democratic process, look at the percentage of black voters who vote for Obama simply because he is black. Secondly, maybe he is having issues because his voting record is the most liberal of every senator. Stick to economics, AK.

Lee, Texas, USA

look, people vote for whom they are confortable with. Things like values thoughts are important. I am so sorry the left trys to muddy the water all the time.

ben barr, cornwall, pei,ca

I disagree with Anatole. Obama needs a suitable Vice-president to capture Clinton's core supporters in November. Nancy Polsi would be ideal. Michael Bloomberg would bring expertise in economic matters and also carry the Jewish voters in Florida \ New York.

Stephen, New York, USA

I have no respect for those who make their judgements on the basis of 'skin colour' - this is outdated. Racism is a criminal offence, isn't it? Obama has the ability of being America's next president. I guess 'Blacks' , 'whites or Yellows have similar intelligence when given same opportunities.

Zoe , Birmingham,

Exit polls indicate 90% of Pennsylvania's African-Americans voted Obama. This is a nationwide pattern. That huge percentage clearly illustrates one thing. Complection is the principle issue for many voters. Blind devotion to an unelectable candidate will hand the presidency to Senator McCain.

JP Peterson, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Totally rediculous to say that America is not ready to elect a black person as President. Anatole is trying to frame the debate as a racist would. The question is "which black person?" or "which woman?" for that matter. Obama is the leftmost of the left. Give me a Colin Powell or a Condi Rice!

Matthew Morrison, Atlanta GA, USA

Wrong wrong wrong. America is ready to elect a black president. We are not ready to elect an American loathing white despising black person.

J Gostkowski, Knoxville TN, USA

Hilarious bleating from England, that emerald green island where Mohammad is the most popular boy's name for new parents.

Here's a clue, pal -- we're more than ready to elect a black President -- just not one who's clearly anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-American.
McCain/Rice '08!

Paul, Toledo, USA

Obama is a lousy candidate, far to the left of the mainstream, who associates with anti-Semites and former terrorists. He happens to be black.

Though Europeans like to feel superior to Americans by claiming that we are a bunch of racists, that argument just doesn't work in this case.

Jim, Los Angeles,

Miriam Kenney, Metheun, Mass. USA, please enlighten us about the "millions murdered by Castro", and before you ask, I am not "left wing" .

Maas Ramli, Colombo, Sri Lanka

Ironic...the whole story is based on a sweeping generalization of America. To assume that his skin color is the reason he cannot win (which i disagree with) is biased thinking in itself. Quit thinking you can sum up any aspect of American life in a few paragraphs. You can't. It's too complex.

Scot, Atlanta, USA

Your article is internally inconsistent: Mr. Obama received more votes than Ms. Clinton. Americans ARE voting for a black man to be President, just as they are voting for a woman to be President. Race matters but Mr. Obama is suffering most from a close analysis of his record and character.

Tom, Miami, FL, USA

Obama was seen as the candidate who would transcend racial divisions in the US but now looks more likely to polarize them. Given his long and close association with Jeremiah Wright, for whites to vote for Obama would be like turkeys voting for Chrismas.

Mike Woodman, Bradford, UK

Of course race matters. Obama gets over 90 percent of the black vote mainly because he's black. Political pundits seem to think it's logical and okay for blacks to vote for Obama based on race, so they should find it equally reasonable for whites to vote for Clinton.

Russell , Chicago, USA

Stupid article...Makes no sense...America is ready to elect a black person ...Not Barrack....Besides the story by Anatole Kaletsky was a Gop basher not a very welll written piece

Eugene Boyanton, Picayune/Issaquah, USA

Wonderfully refreshing - and patently obvious - deductions.

Bravo!

Paul Gladstone, Mallorca, Spain

Democrats may be a non-racist party but the American electorate who decide the outcome of Presidential election are still reluctant to elect a black president. Certainly not who associated with someone who said: " God damn America". Republicans will use it against him.

Daljit Sehbai, London, UK

America is ready to elect a black or a woman, just not THIS black and THIS woman! Make no mistake, Obama and Clinton are far left socialists.

Clinton has too much bad political "baggage" to be elected, and Obama has far too little experience. Neither are qualified to be president.

Christine, St. Louis, MO, USA

No matter what the qualifications or lack of, the press will turn this election into a race issue. The press needs to stop trying to make the decisions and just report all the news. Not just what they think will attain their ultimate goals.

Ruth, Hillsboro, USA

John McCain is far superior to either Hillary or Obama in all counts: experience, judgement, wisdom.

Hillary has long left a bad taste in the public's mouth as the cackling sidekick to Bill. It is not that Obama is black that is his downfall, but that his politics are too far to the Left.

David, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

Kaletsky is off the mark. Obama leads McCain nationally right now & the Dems have 6 months to tie him to Bush (70% disappoval rating).

HC didn't "win" Michigan - Obama's name wasn't on the ballot. ANY Dem will win NY and Calif. North C, Georgia & Virginia, among others, are in play with Obama.

Roger King, Toronto, Canada

Obama is not black. He's half white, half black and he made note of that in his speech a few weeks ago. Hillary, on the other hand, is a chameleon. Each place she visits, she changes her accent, her policies, her outlook on the world. I respect Obama's viewpoints because he, at least, has some.

Kevin, Virginia Beach,

Again, leave it to the liberals to 'play the race card'. This presidental election is not about gender or race but socialism versus representative democracy and their respective approaches to issues confronting the country. It is how much control federal government should have in our lives.

Brad, NYC , USA

To Anatole, do you think they have done well to get this far?

Jo, Olney, UK

Relax Mr. Kaletsky. That big fat knight in shining armor, Sir Al Gore, will charge in at the last moment and save the day for the feuding Dems. He won't pick Hillary for VP after the number the Clintons did on him the last time around. So watch for Obama to be his Sancho Panza as VP.

David, Edison, USA

Isn't it possible that Obama can't win not because of his skin color but because he's a weak candidate full stop? While I'm sure that there are regrettably still people out there who won't vote for a black man, if Obama loses it is more likely to be because he is simply too left wing for the voters.

D Hein, Exeter, UK

Doesn't have anything to do with his race - it has to do with his views. If Condaleeza Rice had run for president, my guess is she would win.

Robert, Kansas City, USA

It's simple math. Barrack Obama has to large of a lead in both the delegate count and in the popular vote to lose the nomination unless he makes a huge mistake or something very damaging comes out about his past and the Superdelegates side with Hillary in droves. Obama will be the nominee come June.

Troy, Fentin, MI , USA

Race is not really an issue for any significant number of people. Barack Obama will lose because he's a European-style Socialist. The guy's more left than the self-declared Socialist member of the Senate.
If it were Condi or Powell on the ballot, they'd get the votes that Barack will never get.

Jason, Washington, DC, USA

Fail to see how any EU news organization can make this statement. Every major city in the US has or does have a black mayor. How many EU cities can make that statement?

Glenn Suarez, Miami, USA

I would support and vote for the all, 100% black ticket of Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas. They are 2 of this counties greatest men! They are everything we need to lead this country and reverse the downward slide that has occured in my lifetime. Contrast these men with our current choices.

Larry Mitchiner, Temecula, U.S.A.

The judgement of the author is clouded by his desire to believe the worst in Republicans. I should remind you that McCain condemned the Swift Boat ads, and he has done the same for attack ads in this campaign. Additionally, McCain has introduced more campaign reform legislation than Hill or Obama.

Rob, Valparaiso,

It might have been missed that several republicans and independents numbering close to 200K changed their party affiliation in PA mostly to vote for Obama but were unable to do so due to irregulaties in voter records showing otherwise.

John, Dallas , USA

Race matters, but racial prejudice will not overcome the prejudice people feel toward the party who got us into to our current mess. The Democratic Party is growing while the Republicans shrink. Demographics and Bush-detestation will loom too large in the coming election. (God... I hope.)

kyle, washington dc,

Hillary Clinton has already run the Rove/Republican campaign against Obama and yet Obama is still winning. The idea that the loser in the nomination process would make the best candidate against McCain sounds straight out of a George Orwell fantasy. Get a grip. Obama can and will win.

steve dodson, new york city, usa

I thought for sure at the beginning of the Primaries that if McCain became the GOP candidate, we would lose. Now, I'm 100% convinced he will win. There is no way that Obama can win based on the things his wife and pastor of 20 years have said.

Eldridge Cleaver, Scranton, USA

You ignore another effect of Clinton clawing her way to the nomination: probable 25 percent McCain support from a massively depleted African American turnout, and a similarly low under 35s turnout.
And just how are Democrats going to 'force' Obama to accept the VP slot ?

Nigel, Halifax,

Seriously. Obama and Clinton are sincere, articulate, intelligent, and in command of the issues, and McCain is none of these. Always nice to be reminded that the foreign press is as unbiased as the American press. Obama and Clinton will lose because America values freedom over government control.

Darren, Indiana, United States

Already making up excuses..

Dan, middletown, usa

Mr Anatole Kaletsky writes that Americans may not be ready for a black president, (4th paragraph). Yet in the 11th paragraph concedes that Obama may be unbeatable by 2012 - after serving as Veep to HRC. How and why would 4 years make a difference?

Maxwell, London, UK

Unfortunately, there are still those that think that one race is better than another. Personally, as a woman, it would be wonderful to have Hillary as president. As a minority, I think Obama would be a strong leader too. However, I don't think that the US is ready for non-white president just yet.

M K Medders, Orlando, USA

Oh Please!!! To say that the US would not vote a black man into office is utter nonsense! Even though there are some who would not vote for him based on color, Obama would not be where he is right now without a good percentage of white voter's behind him. His problem is lack of experience. Period

Isabella, Ft. Lauderdale, USA

America could easily elect a black man or a woman to be president of the USA. However, America is not ready to elect a fringe leftist, no matter how smoothly he talks. The longer the democrat primaries go on, the more America sees the real Barack and the less they like him.

Michael R. Zboray, Montvale, USA

Hillary will not make up the deficit she faces before the DNC. The only way that she will is if the superdelegates decide to override the will of the people and nominate her anyways and McCain will end up being our next president. Why would anyone vote for a party that doesn't respect their vote?

jay, Killeen, USA

Pennsylvania is not America. The state has a large older and rural population of less well educated folks less likely to vote for a "black". Kids at schools in the USA over the last few years have been nurtured with Martin Luther King ideals. Race is not an issue for the young or the intelligent.

Grant, Scarsdale NY, USA

The primary election is a struggle between two prejudices, one against women, and the other against blacks. Hillary Cllinton is hated and despised by a majority of US citizens. Obama was a blank slate, and Hillary and Bill have played the race card from the start. It is McCain's election to lose.

jimT, Brewster, United States

The only problem with this article is that it treats Mr Obama's association with Rev. Wright only in terms of what the Republican attack machine will do with it. I think most people are more troubled by what it says about Obama himself.

William McIlhagga, Ilkley,

The one question I have , is it even possible for the two to run on the same ticket? They've chewed each other down to nubs,

The idea that the US is not ready for a black president is absurd. Most americans would be less inclined to vote for Obama if he were white

Bill , Chicago, IL

America has been ready for a black, or female president. Just not one of these. HRK is not desired, by to many. For all the obvious reasons. To many to go into here. Obama, on the other hand, where should I start. Smoke and mirrors, snake oil salesman, smooth talking, Elmer Gantry.

john walls, lancaster, U.S.A. CALIFORNIA

The Republicans will not win another election for the next generation at least, or the time it takes to repair all the damage they have inflicted on the nation. You underestimate the profound
HATRED, wide and deep that now exists again them and the Rich in general. It's finished.

victor compton, Cherbourg, France

What a brave article. Congratulations on saying what others are afraid to say. Come to think of it, and before we get too smug, it hard to imagine that we in the UK could readily accept a coloured Prime Minister. (the BNP is growing).

MaxC, London,

Right now, the white, blue-collar males are supporting Clinton because she is not Black.
In November, if she is a candidate, they will support McCain because he is not female.
If Obama is not a candidate the Black vote will sit at home.
Ergo, McCain wins in November no matter what.

Bill, Suzhou, China

In this year of election change, the 'first black, first woman, first Mormon' mantra, I will not be surprised to see much the same -- an older white protestant male become the next US President.

Sage, SLC, UT, USA and London, UK,

Commentators change their minds every five minutes in this race, I thought it was Clinton the Reps were happy to run against, not independent-attracting Obama.

Thanks for the best laugh of the week Sara in Pennsylvania - Obama and Clinton are 'marxists'! Seriously, hilarious!

Gavin, West Sussex, UK

As viewers of "House" will recall, "everyone lies". Saying you are not prejudiced does not make it so. Many people evidently reply to polls one way, then vote another. It looks as though the USA still thinks any white man better than anyone who is even slightly black.

Tom Welsh, Basingstoke,

Afetr all the mud slinging by Clinton I doubt she can win against McCain either.

David Leslie, Perth, Scotland

Jeremiah Wright has revealed Obama's true colours. An Obama administration would rapidly turn America into another Zimbabwe.

Tom , London, Great Britain

"The trouble is that Mr Obama's efforts to suppress the race issue are doomed to failure". Are you serious? Did you miss the 18/3 race speech, aka the most thoughtful, honest and incisive discussion of race in America from a modern politician?

Jay, London,

Why is this an election the Democrats ought to win? What new ideas do they bring? Raise taxes? Protectionism? Are they not recycling old recipes? Why is it no candidate is addressing issues thay may hurt the usual lobbies: e.g. the greenhouse effect of intensive animal farming and dairy production?

Nathan Halevy, Los Angeles, U.S.A.

Told as it is.

You can't say it here, but simply, old white people will vote for old white people, not young black people. This is where it's won and lost.

The Democrats should nominate someone who has the best chance of winning in November, carrying Ohio and Pa, and that's Clinton.

F.S.Summers, NY,

Clinton/Obama? Why not Obama/Clinton?

R James, Clifton, UK

Democrates will not vote for a black candidate? Aren't Deomcrates supposed to be the non-racist party?

Seems Dem's aren't the multicultural, diversity, all welcoming party they claim to be.

Time for Dem's to stop calling the kettle black and vote black.

Elliot Stevens, Los Angeles, USA

The left which 'care more about fairness than
about power,....'? Left-wing reporters do forget
the 30 million murdered or starved by 'fair'
left Communists and the millions raped and murdered
by the Kmer Rouge, the millions murdered by Castro
and so on. Oh, its unfair to mention left's legacy?

Miriam Kenney, Metheun, Mass. USA

As they say in chess, the winner, ultimately, is the player who makes the next-to-last mistake. Don't underestimate how badly McCain's tired old GOP mantras about keeping the tax cuts for the rich, "free choice" in health care, and staying in Iraq will be playing in November.

Elizabeth Renant, Santa Fe, NM, USA

For the Democrats the key strategic issue is which states did Obama win V's Clinton. The Democrats need to choose the best candidate to beat McCain in the states they can win and take all the Electoral College votes of that state. Being popular in small states and those McCain will win is pointless.

M.Elliott, Birmingham, UK

Neither Clinton nor Obama can win without the other? Really? Do you think two Marxists are more electable than one Marxist against a genuine experienced leader like McCain?

Sara, Pennsylvania, USA

People ask whether America is ready for a black President, but the question that America will answer is whether it will elect a particular politician. Who in modern history has been elected to that office with such a meager resume? Who has been elected with such a liberal viewpoint? No one.

David Jackson, Des Moines, USA

Mr kaletsky, could you please explain how Obama will be'' unbeatable candidat in 2012 '' will he hasn't any chance in 2008(according to you) because of his race? wil America change in between and only in 4 years time?!!!

mr K you need to convince yours valuable readers.

thanks

ossy, birmingham, w. midland

This article assumes that Clinton is electable - given her horrible, vicious, meanspirited campaign so far that has pushed her negatives into the stratosphere, I think she has even less of a chance than Obama. He would be a far better president than her - I hope enough of America wakes up in time.

Phil, New York City,

Seems to me as an uninformed but interested Englishman that the sooner Mr Gore comes over the hill, the better it will be for the Democrats.

The current pair are lightweight and generate antipathy both within and without their party.

David Williams, Eastnor, England

The only "tragedy of left-wing politics" is that sometimes they prevail. Let's hope they don't in this case.

j griffiths, manchester, england

Excellent article, its thesis is not confirmed by any of the polls I have seen and, yet, i cannot help feeling, when push comes to shove in the polling booth in November, that great swathes of the American public will let race affect their final decisiion when faced with the reality of the choice.

Name Withheld, Guildford, UK

I have just spent two months amongst the American snowbirds in various parts of southern California, Texas and Arizona. The prevailing opinion is that many of the votes cast for Senator Obama are Republican will end up voting for John McCain in the presidential election. This is grass roots research

Richard Shaw, Campbell River, Canada

Will someone please realize the fact that Senator Clinton nor Senator Obama can win the National Election without the other! Clinton can't win enough votes in the Border South, Deep South, Midwest Plains and Mountain West! Obama can win in three of those areas! Reps. will win once again!

Dee Bingham, Cullman, US

I wouldn't count on the super-delegates. Most of them are from districts where it pays to be a political coward, and besides, their power is increasing with every day - best to be the last man standing.

Brett, Salt Lake City, USA

Also in Anatole Kaletsky

Also in Columnists

Times Recommends

OUR COLUMNISTS

Anatole Kaletsky

Anatole Kaletsky writes for The Times Comment pages on Thursdays. One of the country's leading commentators on economics, he was formerly Economics Editor and is now Editor-at-large of The Times. He has won many awards for his financial and political journalism. Before joining The Times, he worked for 12 years on the Financial Times

Read more from Anatole Kaletsky

Focus Zone

Northern Lights:

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here

Business Solutions:

Risk, resilience and embracing new technology

Need to Know:

Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast

Business Wisdom:

Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder

Social Entrepreneurs:

The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors

Business Travel:

Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Great British Summer :

Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday

Corsica Travel:

Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination

More reports:

Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more

Classifieds

Cars

Skip Cars of the Week

Car leasing

The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™

Audi Q7 3.0 TDI quattro (237 PS) S-Line

2009
42,945

Audi R8 Coupe 42 Fsi Quattro 2dr

2008
71,450

Great car insurance deals online

Car Insurance

Search for more cars and bikes

Jobs

Skip Jobs of the Week

Operational Officers

Not Specified
MI6
UK-based

Finance & Corporate Services Manager

£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol

Programme Manager

Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands

Sales Professionals

OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities

Search more Jobs

Properties

Looking to Buy? Looking to Sell? Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward

Completely London

Rushmore Condo's

Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views

Diadem Homes

The best new homes in Wimbledon?

Times Online Property Search

Nationwide

Search for more properties

Holidays

Skip Travel of the Week

Seychelles Beach Beauty

Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort

Leave the queues behind at the airport

and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns

Bored of life?

Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available

Canada for Less.. fly from £129 one way inc taxes

8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper

Search for more holidays

Place your advert now

Where am I?

Home

Comment Columnists Anatole Kaletsky

Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.

News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround

This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.

Navigation - link to other main sections from here

Yes it's politically incorrect but race matters

The Democrats must admit it: Obama would lose to McCain

Have your say

Also in Anatole Kaletsky

Also in Columnists

Times Recommends

OUR COLUMNISTS

Cartoon

Most Read

Today

MOST COMMENTED

Today

MOST CURIOUS

Today

Focus Zone

Simplify Digital

Popular Searches on Times Online

Cars

Jobs

Properties

Holidays