Peter Riddell: Analysis
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
It’s time to fight back, the title of the Conservatives’ crime statement yesterday, has a double meaning. It refers not only to the specific proposals but also to David Cameron’s personal counter-attack. For the past two months, he has been on the defensive in the face of the Gordon Brown onslaught, Labour’s advance in the polls and several self-inflicted errors.
But is the worst over for Mr Cameron, as the widely read conservative home site asked yesterday? Its “reasons for hope” were threefold: first, the bad polls are unlikely to get worse; secondly, what is called “Project Cameron” has more balance, with greater emphasis on immigration, cutting inheritance tax and Euroscepticism; thirdly, Mr Brown’s problems are mounting in view of headlines over lawlessness and social breakdown.
Mr Cameron seems to have caught the national mood after the Rhys Jones murder, in a way that, for all his authority on policy, Mr Brown finds hard to express. The Tories have found their voice and this has boosted Mr Cameron’s self-confidence.
At the same time, the Government has not shown the firm grip it had in July. Ministers have appeared to be reacting, rather than setting the agenda, on crime and on an EU referendum, while their attack on John Redwood’s competitiveness as “a lurch to the right” appeared vacuous and a reversion to the Brownite playbook of the late 1990s. It would have been better for Labour to challenge the Tories on which regulations are not needed.
The Tories still have plenty of problems. Mr Brown remains well ahead of Mr Cameron as preferred prime minister. The Tory policy review remains a muddle. No one knows what is a firm commitment especially when ideas clash, as between the quality of life and competitiveness groups. A leisurely two-year process based on the theme of “may a thousand flowers bloom” appealed early last year but now looks a luxury, even if there is no election until next spring. Talking about crime and the like is no substitute for a clear view on the role and size of the State.
There is always, however, a danger of overinterpreting events noticed only by those in the political world. My guess is that few voters, as opposed to Tory MPs and activists, have yet registered what the Tories have said. That is why, as Mr Brown showed in the mid-990s, opposition parties have to keep repeating the same message.
There is no evidence yet of any real shift in the polls. The latest ICM poll in The Guardian on Monday putting the Tories two points up at 34 per cent suggests that the party’s rating may have bottomed out, but to talk of the Labour lead being slashed or of a warning for Mr Brown is nonsense. Labour gained one point to 39 per cent, and, on the usual ready reckoner, would give Mr Brown an increased majority of 85 to 95, with the Liberal Democrats losing half their current seats. Of course, changes in votes may vary, with the Tories doing much better in southern England.
This poll was undertaken last Wednesday and Thursday and coming ones, including Populus in The Times next week, will show the impact of the focus on gun and street crime. The question for Mr Brown is not just what Labour’s poll lead is now, but whether it may disappear over the winter. At least for the moment, Mr Cameron and the Tories are no longer retreating.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The expression Hug a hoodie was never uttered by david cameron, as I recall it was a headline in a Left wing tabloid which was seriously misrepresenting his views.
His message then is remarkably enough consistent with the message now, that hoodies need not be feared and confrontation by adults is the way forward.
The fact remains however that I disagree with this stance and believe that the conservatives have not particularly captured the mood at all. Much as columnists in this paper have attempted to indicate that 'youths' are not to be feared, I think a lot of people take the view that the measures the government have taken need to be more strictly enforced. The problem of antisocial behaviour extends (perhaps moreso) to individuals in their twenties who continue to disrupt the lives of those around them, with whom there is no fear of other adults and who are incredibly likely to become violent. The message the tories should be preaching is one of tough law and order.
Robert McGuiness, London, England
Amiong the reasons the Tories lost in 1997 was that they had a perceived contempt for the electorate. They were considered corrupt, but in view of any political parties record over a long uninterrupted period (including of course this one with an unprecedented investigation by the police at the very heart) , allegations now seem to pale into insignificance. New Labour have learnt much from their spinmeisters including how to refresh their image. Mr. Brown may be re elected. Worryingly, the Tories under David Cameron are not talking to marginal electors. If they did they would note that there is much to capitalise on at the moment. They are not yet comfortable in their new role of sounding out against spivishness and spin, high taxes, lack of productivity (a mushrooming Local Authority and NHS salary roll), poor Home Office policy (including 'losing' serious criminals), poor foreign policy (going into Iraq - not a word when this happened), and lack of access to Justice.
Pete Balchin, Solicitor , Bristol, UK
Cameron never actually said 'hug a hoodie', but his political opponents did. His 'hug a hoodie' speach was in fact a call for rehabilitation, dealing with what you might call the causes of crime. The hood is a defence mechanism, as well as a disguise, which was his argument; and unless we can get to the damaged individual beneath and try to help, then all you can do is lock them up and throw away the key.
If we are to drive crime down we will need to combat all aspects of the street gang problem, not simply locking them up, but active prevention before it gets to that stage.
A curative is of course needed afterwards, something NuLab have failed abysmally on, both in the lack of Prison space and early release, but also a failure to provide proper rehabilitation beyond the cursory. Locking up large swathes of inner city youth is certainly not the answer in the long term is it Angela.
Gregor Hopkins, London, UK
I am no Cameroon, but he did not advocate hugging a hoodie. So the volte face is perceived not real. Cameron's problem is the same as Brown's. No credible party dare mention the truth - that neither this government nor any government in waiting has the will to tackle the principle (although not sole) root cause of apparently random street violence. Until the power of the drug dealers and distributors is broken, we cannot break out of the spiral of tit for tat and gang originated mayhem. It is not enough to bemoan absent parents and poor role models. The fuel for this fire is drugs. Time to nationalise them
Tim , Kingston,
This is just wishful thinking. Cameron blew it with "hug a hoodie". Who cares what a man fool enough to say that has got to say about anything else? I predict "hug a hoodie" is all anyone will remember about him in 2 years' time.
Redcliffe, London,
Cameron's comments on zero tolerance on crime are a bit of a volte face on his "hug-a-hoodie" comments. Will the real Mr Cameron please stand up?
Angela Watson, Belfast, Northern Ireland