Gerard Baker
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
As America's government prepares to take a sudden and historic leftward turn, this might seem an odd moment to ponder what a conservative country it is.
On Wednesday morning, unless the political equivalent of a giant meteorite hits Earth before then, Democratic supporters in America, in happy union with almost the whole of the civilised world, will be singing hosannas to the new President-elect. They will expect the Obama proto-administration and the expanded Democratic caucus in Congress to press hard to implement quickly their agenda of wealth redistribution; a tougher and broader scope of government regulation; and an enthusiastic embrace of foreign policy multilateralism.
But the new rulers and their allies overseas would be well advised to tone down the rhetoric, play down expectations and rein in their wilder tendencies. The easiest mistake for the world to make would be to start believing the Left's own propaganda: that a vote for Barack Obama and for a Democrat in Congress on Tuesday is a vote to transform the country into a kind of social democratic paradise.
Perhaps the best supporting evidence for this claim is the likely outcome on Tuesday. Though there's no real doubt about who will win, the presidential election still looks like being a closer contest than it has any right to be.
Consider the objective facts of political life in late 2008.
You have the end of a two-term presidency, when the country is always hungry for change. You have an economy that has slipped, with almost exquisite political timing for Democrats, into what looks likely to be a deep recession. You have a global financial crisis the like of which has not been seen in 75 years.
You have deep dissatisfaction with America's standing in the world, widespread (albeit post-hoc) disapproval of the biggest Republican-driven foreign policy event of the past ten years, the decision to go to war in Iraq and something bordering on alarm about the prospects for success in the other continuing war in Afghanistan.
You have a Republican Party that has displayed an unpardonable level of incompetence, inadequacy and venality in the past four years. From the handling of Hurricane Katrina to a steady procession of members of Congress in legal trouble: a rogues' gallery with a record of crimes and misdemeanours ranging from taking bribes to soliciting sex in public toilets. Just this week, in a timely reminder of the toxicity of the Republican brand, Ted Stevens, of Alaska, became the first sitting senator to be convicted on felony charges since 1981.
In the campaign, you have a Democratic candidate who has raised twice as much money as the Republican, a jaw-dropping $650million, enabling him to blanket the country with advertisements and, culminating this week in an extraordinary 30 minutes of nationwide TV on the networks.
You have a fractious and visibly enfeebled Republican campaign that seems to be unable to suppress a disturbing psychological tendency towards self-harm. And, of course, you have media that have managed to exceed themselves in their obeisance towards the left-of-centre candidate, raising to new levels of absurdity their claims of objectivity.
What, in these circumstances, would a scientific model predict as the winning margin for the Democratic presidential candidate: 10, 15, 20 percentage points? In fact, as of yesterday, Mr Obama seemed to have a solid but by no means overwhelming advantage of between 5 and 6 percentage points.
If this were a football game, it would be one played on a field tilted at an angle of about 20 degrees, in which the teams did not change sides at half-time, and in which the one playing downhill had twice as many players on the field as its opponents, who, to make things a little bit more interesting, have bound their goalkeeper hand and foot to one of the goalposts. The final score? 3-2, after extra time.
Or put it another way: it has taken a mismanaged foreign policy that almost lost a war, a botched emergency response that almost lost a city, a Republican Party that almost lost its soul and an economic crisis that almost lost the country's financial system to break the Republican stranglehold on the White House.
The usual objection here is that Mr Obama would be doing much better if there weren't so many racists in America. That, in his own words, too many Americans have been prodded into worrying that he “doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills”.
I've been through this argument before. The main problem with it is that it has the question about Mr Obama's race almost precisely the wrong way round. In fact his skin colour has assisted, not hindered, Mr Obama in making the case that he represents change.
This is not to denigrate his remarkable talents; a great speaker, a lively mind, a remarkable self-discipline and organisation. It is to say that, looking at his actual record - a solid and wholly predictable left-of-centre stance on all the big issues - it is precisely that he doesn't look like any of America's other presidents that makes his claim to be something new most plausible. In every other political respect he is not much different from failed Democratic presidential candiates of the past.
Of course none of this is to deny that Americans will be voting for change on Tuesday. After the past eight years who could possibly blame them? But I sense that the change they want is for a welcome period of competence and decency. They would rather have a government that works than a new paradigm for the organisation of American society, a radical redistribution of income and wealth or a dramatically expanded public sector. And they certainly won't be voting for a “can't we all just get along?” foreign policy that subjugates US national security to the negotiated outcomes of debates in the UN Security Council.
What's more, I suspect Mr Obama is easily clever enough to know that this will not be his mandate either. The real test of a President Obama's political skills will be his ability to recognise the limitations placed on him by what is still a deeply conservative country, and his willingness to stand up to those in his party who will be impatiently pressing him to go much farther.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
There are two sides to this story, sure his skin colour helped, but more than it hindered? I find that hard to believe. If the guy was white with an Anglo-Saxon name he would've probably one by a whole lot more. Obama will bring balance and inspiration, it'll be center but you'll think it's left.
R Wilson, Salisbury, UK
Clearly Obama understands the nature of his victory. He will take no radical-left positions, but he *will* have wide latitude to make sweeping changes. I agree that he was aided by his skin color. In a country that is crying out for change, a vote for Obama was self-evidently a vote for change.
Kevin Kidd, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Your analysis is substantially correct. Obama's victory shows how some things have changed profoundly in four decades. Yet, he has no mandate for a sweeping leftism. This election was about rejecting policies and a leadership that have stumbled, not ideology. He would be wise to heed that fact.
C.H. Rieper, Columbus, OH, USA
Mr. Fallai,
The US is not a liberal country that's been bamboozled as you state. If it were, Clinton wouldn't have lost control of Congress in 94. Also, why does each Democrat presidential candidate go left to get the nomination then move to the center to try and win the general election?
Michael, Folsom, usa
Most Americans seem to know very little about politics and society in other countries (Europe, Canada etc). So they use 'socialism' as a dirty word, not knowing that almost all other western democracies are social democracies, with high living standards, and a longer life expectancy than Americans.
Duke, Toronto, Canada
I hope we've learned from the mistakes of Ronald Reagan.
Old people shouldn't be running the free world.
Jim Rousch, Littleton, CO, USA
Precisely how far is the British economy outperforming the U.S. economy in terms of gross domestic product? If national service in the U,K. is so great, why are American companies forced to pay for additional coverage for their UK staffs to reach parity with US policy coverages?
HC Here, Washington, DC, USA
Gerard, Any chance we can tax you more and redistribute some of your wealth to those in less fortunate positions? It' sonly fair, you know. Why should you have more money than others. Why should you live better than the man on the park bench. Yes, I wish Obama could drain rich liberals like you.
Jay, Herndon, USA
The Democrats have been just as incompetent as the Republicans. The Democrat-led Congress' approval rating is lower than Bush's. The current financial crisis was created by a perfect storm of the worst of the Democrats' liberal social policies and the Republicans' deregulation policies.
Nancy, New Hampshire, US
Here in Boston, we have as governor a mini-Obama, Deval Patrick, who ran under the motto - "Together We Can". Today, disappointed voters have changed it to "Together We Con". That's what we'll see in Obama as well. The future is already here in Massachusetts and it's not pretty.
kef, Boston, US
America doesnt care about its own people and certainly doesnt care about anybody elses. The strangest thing is that Americans seem to despise health care for all, good education for everybody, help for those in need. What Americans call socialism, Europeans consider right wing. Very sad.
Paul, London, uk
If Obama wins, America will act like lemmings and follow Eurpean countries off the cliff of socialism.
Compare the US and European historical employment rates and GDP growth rates. The European model sounds good but the data shows it does not work.
Avanti, Los Angeles, USA
Chris of Littlerock - this is exactly the thinking that the rest of the world despises of a narrow minority of Americans, who given their Republican trumpet for 8 years, became the globally damaging majority. The reason the majority of Americans, me included, long for responsible multilateralism
Maxteej, Denver, USA
Sadly the world has been sold a bill of goods regarding the New Savior. The columnist thinks, like the rest of the Americans duped into believing the last 8 years were so terrible, that the Demos will fix the mess THEY created. Not likely. And global warming-- man made?? Another dupe. Hope?? No...
Rob, Newport Beach, USA
Thank you for an understanding of Americans that is far too rare in Europe. However, while agreeing that Republican corruption is inexcusable, I remind you that corrupt Democrats are just excused. Why isn't Rep. Jefferson (caught with $90,000 in cash in his freezer) not a convicted felon?
Dennis Duggan, Charlotte, NC, USA
What a lot of non-Americans fail to realize about presidential elections is that we are not voting for the leader of the free world, we are voting for the leader of OUR country. What the rest of the world thinks is irrelevant, what counts is what will it do for me in Littlerock, California?
Chris Avison, Littlerock, CA, USA
I disagree strongly with this column's conclusion; if you ask Americans how they feel about a number of issues, they overwhelmingly support liberal positions or liberal government programs. They have been bamboozled by the GOP into voting against their interests with phony 'culture war' issues.
Michael Fallai, Phoenix, USA
Good analysis, but a little lacking in nuance about our society We're not deeply conservative, we're deeply divided. If Obama can manage expectations and give most a little of what they want, he'll be reelected and remembered as an agent of change. If he falls to ego or party pressure, then SNAFU
Mel, Bar Harbor ME, USA
The most momentous issue facing the world is global warming, so what are the McCain and Obama views on the matter? I do not recall their having said anything of substance about this. Do people care more about the temporary economic crisis, or skin colour?
Byron Jones, Melbourne, Australia
It's not overcoming race that has made it so difficult to break the Republican stronghold; it's overcoming stupidity. Most Americans are so self-absorbed and so uneducated about the facts and issues that they make horrible decisions in the voting booth.
Ryan, Nashville, USA
"Yes, Americans will be voting for Obama and change. But they don't want radicalism"
I agree about not wanting radicalism. Because many, like myself, feel that we were already in a period of radicalism for the last 8 years (to the right). Most Americans don't want lunatic fringe in
either direction
MB, NYC, USA
A Rupert Murdoch owned "media" outlet hoping that the changes they see happening aren't, and blaming the rest of the media (what's left of it he doesn't own) for being complicit in the rise of a liberal majority in the US. Shocking. Obama will be wonderful, and the US is progressive. Get used to it!
Christian, Washington, DC, USA
The rest of the world is about to be disappointed. Obama may be your choice, but don't expect radical change, especially in foreign policy. If he wants to be re-elected, and he will, he knows he can not be weak like Carter. Look for him to follow Clinton's example of pulling his party to center.
Sam, Mobile, USA
Barack Obama is no one's fool, and there is no "left" in US politics to speak of. You will see drastic changes from the last eight years. Less coddling of the rich, action on global warming & health care. But Obama is a moderate pragmatist.
David, Columbus, US
Having voted for Bush Sr, Dole, & Bush Jr twice for the US Presidency in the past, this will be my first time to vote a Democrat for President for reasons of decency and competence. Palin is riskier and reflects McCain's pandering. If Obama wins, he can still be voted out in 4 years (recall Carter).
Marlyn, Naperville, Illinois, USA
Liz - look at Obama's voting record, very little radical or socialist in it. Chip from NY - The House was Republican from 1994-2006.
Jim of Washington & James of Louisville both make good points. Obama, like Tony Blair in '97, will come to power on a wave of optimism, & sadly leave us disappointed.
Chas., London,
If after the tragedy of 9/11, a candidate is painted as sympathetic to terrorists, is it any wonder that he is not 10 points ahead? As for skin color, I find it risible as a black person, that a white journalist can say it is an advantage. I hope the Times publishes this ;are you being selective
Ekow Nelson, PINNER, UK
I think that you made some very good points. Are the electorate voting the Republicans out of power or the Democrats into power? Of course they are doing both but by how much? It could change the political landscape for years.
Daedalus, Cohasset, Ma., USA
I imagine this is election will be a kind of over-correction, a hard left to counter a long right-ward drift. Perhaps in another 200 years we'll learn to balance it evenly. For my part, I'd be happy enough with decency and competence.
Ryan, Bellingham, USA
Sadly race is an issue in this election but it is definitely from both sides. Some whites will not vote for Obama due to his color and an amazing amount of blacks will not vote for McCann because of his color. If Obama is elected we will become a socialist nation .
Stacey , Jacksonville, USA
We don't really know that 5-6 % is Senator Obama's real advantage. What if Senator Obama wins the election on Tuesday by 10-12 margin? Will Mr. Baker's analysis still hold? I don't think so. It is always dangerous for a columnist to base his/her argument on an "unknown."
Hakan Tunc, Ottawa, Canada
It is always amazing to me that the most insightful analyses of the American political situation usually come from foreigners (and by foreigners, I mean the British).
Wendy, Federal Way, WA, USA
Sadly in 2008, America is still one of the most racist and politically ignorant countries on earth.
T, Kansas City, US
Perhaps the British mind has trouble understanding how the race can be somewhat close becuase you don't realize that both houses of Congress have been ruled by the Democrats for years. They can not escape blame for current calamities. The Dems are not some minority party with shadow ministers, etc.
Chip Sviokla, New York , USA
Your comments about race are laughable. I live in a rural town in Ohio where the economy is in shambles but almost every white person I know is voting for McCain just because the other guy is black. They don't even know the issues. They just can't bear the thought of a black president.
chris, Ohio, USA
America had better not become a social haven!
Otherwise when I have the means to leave this country the entire Western World will have stooped to the low level that social liberalism has taken us to.
Lorenzo, Salisbury, the sunny apple, UK
This race is so close because the US is not a 60-40 country. It's truly split down the middle in terms of party affiliation. Being an independent, I feel like the last 8 years of negative scare tactics have hurt this country and the world. And I see the same tactics coming from the McCain campaign.
Greg, Boulder, CO
The whole American election process has been fascinating, if prolonged. Obama has promised much. Will he deliver? the world waits!
Norm , Melbourne, Australia
McCain could still win be offering more 'green collar' jobs. Google: renewable energy jobs growth america, for an ASES report, p.51,from Ohio, showing ideas for increasing jobs from 446,000 to 7.9 million.
He could give a choice, $600 tax rebates a year, or $2,400 lump sum for solar/wind etc.
Hugo van Randwyck, London, UK
Savvy investors will be puting their money in companies who produce "Don't Blame Me , I Didn't Vote For Him" bumper stickers.
Kate, Maryland, USA
Team Obama is already laying the groundwork for reducing the unrealistic expectations that his rhetoric has produced. How disappointing it will be when the oceans don't recede, when Europe still hates us, when the redistribution of wealth wrecks what's left of our economy.
Cassandra Gleason, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA
Spot on Gerard! I will be voting for McCain simply because I believe that it is better if one party doesn't control both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. Gridlock brings about consensus and reasoned policy. That being said, there should be enough Blue Dogs to keep the left, somewhat, in line.
Jim Walton, Washington, DC,
Good analysis, as usual although I believe the vote in the presidential election will be very close. Obama, if he does win, is likely to win with only a minority of the votes cast. It's possible he may win the electoral vote but lose the poular vote.
kevin, cedar falls iowa, usa
I think most of us are just looking for a little decency, a little tolerance (moral and economic), a little modesty, and a little modernity of thought from our government. This realignment may not be radical but it is likely to be long lasting if the far right doesn't listen to its message.
James, Louisville, USA
The report is supporting a socialist government. I see nothing wrong with Bush's reign. I do feel that our Congress and it's give away funds are rotten. If Obama wins and the Democrats remain in total power then we will go down the economic tube to a level similar to pre-Thatcher in the U.K.
Neal, East Lansing, `USA
My Mother always said, "you are judged by the company you keep". Why cannot people in this country understand this about Barack Obama? I believe that this young man speaks with forked-tongue. He is a true radical, socialist, and very inexperienced in government. I am truly worried about our future
Liz Reilly, Kennett Square, USA
Even Bill Clinton has admitted that the elections of recent times were never about personality, morality or security - they were about who's financial interests would be advanced and who's would be disregarded.
This put's a new light on things. a colder light
glenn schaefer, holbrook, us
Mr. Baker's take on the situation here is realistic. I, myself, have been speculating on just how quickly the media will turn on Mr. Obama when he turns out not to be the Messiah...
MargaretC, Laramie, USA
Like it or not, if elected, Obama will be forced to enact as much liberal legislation as possible by the democratic leaders of his party and congress. There will be tax hikes, military cuts, social programs, more unions, and that's just the tip of the iceberg in the path of the USS America.
Doug, Baltimore,
Overall America is a successful country. The majority of people generally don't vote for radical change when the system in place benefits them.
Most populations in 'leading' western nations have a strongly conservative streak in the vein of 'if it ain't broke don't fix it'.
Rob, Leamington Spa,
You say Americans don't want a dramatically expanded public sector ; but they must have spent that 11 trillion dollars on something!
Glen, Melbourne,
Its good to see a commentator on this side of the Atlantic who is prepared to state the real issues. Reality is what is needed rather than the politically correct postures of the BBC and liberal left papers. Its going to be traumatic for those indoctrinated by the media over here if Obama loses
David Cartright, UK/US,
good eye for the obvious.
milan, london, uk