Ben Macintyre
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The streets of Paris ask an insistent moral question, now more than half a century old but as pertinent as ever. On many street corners, small plaques commemorate those who faced up to Nazism: “Here died so-and-so, résistant de guerre.”
When I lived in Paris, I often pondered the question posed by these small memorials: what would I have done? Would I have done anything? Some Frenchmen and women actively collaborated during the war; many quietly acquiesced to protect themselves and their families. Those who chose to resist fascism did so in different ways: some secretly and discreetly, some with guns and actions, others with words. Those who spoke up, and out, were perhaps the bravest of all: the saints, and the martyrs.
Exactly 50 years after the death of Pope Pius XII, supporters of the wartime pontiff are demanding his beatification, the last step on the road to sainthood, reigniting a long-running battle over whether he did enough, early enough, to condemn the persecution of Jews.
The Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel carries a deliberately provocative depiction of the Pope's wartime role, including him among the “unjust”. Hardline supporters of Pius have tried to ram through the process of sainthood with little regard for Jewish sensitivities. Pius has been condemned as “Hitler's Pope” by some critics and lauded by Pope Benedict XVI as a great leader.
For all the fury and posturing, the story is essentially about how one very powerful man responded to the most pressing moral question of the age. This is not some distant historical dispute among scholars. It is a defining issue that asks, just as insistently as those Paris plaques: what would you have done? Eugenio Pacelli, who became Pius XII in 1939 and reigned at the Vatican until 1958, was an extraordinary man: compassionate, pious and utterly dedicated to his faith. He was no anti-Semite; far from being a Nazi sympathiser, he loathed Hitler with righteous passion, considering him “an untrustworthy scoundrel and a fundamentally wicked person”.
In Pope Benedict's words, Pius “worked secretly and silently” to “avoid the worst and save the greatest number of Jews possible”. There could be no direct orders to intervene, since the Vatican was officially neutral, but thousands of Jews were saved thanks to the Catholic Church, hidden in churches or issued with false passports.
But set against all this is the silence of the Pope. By the end of 1942, Pius had learnt details of the Holocaust's ghastly progress from at least nine different countries. Hungarian, Danish and Bulgarian church leaders spoke out, yet Pius made no formal protest or condemnation. A single sentence in his 26-page Christmas message of 1942 lamented “persons who, for no fault of their own, sometimes only because of their nationality or race, have been consigned to death”. He made no specific mention of the Jews, Hitler or the genocide then under way.
Under mounting pressure to make a stand, Pius was privately appalled but publicly cautious, even equivocal. The British envoy to the Holy See was astonished that the Pope seemed more concerned with the possibility that Rome might be bombed than “Hitler's massacre of the Jewish race”. One Foreign Office memo described Pius XII as the “greatest moral coward of our age”.
That is unfair. Pius's silence came not from cowardice, but calculation, his perceived duty to his Church, and fear of provoking Hitler to even greater crimes, endangering non-Aryan Catholics and Catholicism itself. “No doubt a protest would have gained me the respect and praise of the civilised world. But it would have submitted the Jews to an even worse fate,” he reflected. “The Pope cannot speak. If he spoke, things would be worse.” But how, in December 1942 with the gas chambers and crematoriums working day and night, could things possibly have got any worse? The argument that a condemnation of Nazi brutality would have made that brutality worse is unprovable.
Even the most powerfully worded encyclical might have had little effect on the accelerating brutality of the Nazi high command, but it would have placed the Church firmly on the moral high ground, and might even have galvanised anti-Nazi feeling among German Catholics.
After the Liberation of Rome, Pius could have threatened senior Nazis with excommunication. After the war, he could have explained why, as a virtual prisoner within the Vatican, he had opted not to make a solemn formal protest against the greatest crime of all time. He did not, offering neither regrets nor rationalisation for his silence.
Pius left no diary or notebook that we know of to explain his thinking. The Vatican archives that might finally answer these questions remain sealed, although a single word from Pope Benedict would open them. So far, the only evidence released has tended to bolster Pius's credentials for beatification. As a group of prominent Christian-Jewish scholars pointed out in a letter to The Times this week, without all the evidence there can be no consensus. The silence of the archives compounds the silence of Pius, and fatally undermines his claim to sainthood.
Looking at those Paris plaques to resistance fighters, I wonder again whether I would have offered a similar reason to remain silent: fear for my family, fear of reprisal, fear of unleashing something worse. Pius argued that it would have been irresponsible to protest openly; you and I might well have made the same excuse. But irresponsibility is a part of true courage.
Pius suffered moral agonies over his decision; he acted for the best, as he saw it, in an excruciatingly difficult situation; he did much to help the Jews, but not enough. All this makes Pius XII fascinating, fallible and important. But it does not make him a saint.
Ben Macintyre is Writer at Large for The Times and contributes a regular Friday column. His earlier roles at The Times include being editor of the Weekend Review, parliamentary sketchwriter and bureau chief in Washington and Paris. He has also published a number of historical non-fiction books
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Pius Xll did much, but not, apparently, enough to satisfy everyone. What is it about the Catholic Church that has all the rest of the Christian denominations hiding behind whatever the Pope did - or didn't do - and not being held accountable for their own lack of moral compunction?
Daisy, NY, USA
If he made his protests too loud he could have ruined what opportunities he did have to help the Jews. The Church hid Jews in their churches and houses. If the Pope had made his protests too loud, those might have been even more scrutinized.
Bob , Tallahassee , US
How can you say he "feared" he would provoke Hitler "to even greater crimes"?? I must ask you, Mr Macintyre, what greater crimes could Hitler have committed? I think there is not a small amount of moral equivalence present in your defence of this coward.
Sam Einfeld, Berlin, Germany
By condemning Nazism, would the Pope not be seen as condoning Nazism's arch-enemy, Communism? And if the Pope condemned Communism as well, would he not be seen as condemning the West's ally Russia?
It would seem that the Pope had a moral dilemma that would have perplexed even Solomon.
Roy Weston, Vancouver, Canada
Harold Helbock:"Pius was obligated to excommunicate the whole of the Nazi party.."
He wasn't. Also it would have had the same effect as denouncing the persecution of Jews and instead of calling him weak you would be calling him a fool. He knew that Hitler was a psycho, and that it wouldn't help.
Greg Lorriman, Leatherhead, UK
What would I have done? I would have played it safe, of course. However, if I had been pope, I would have lowered the boom on Hitler and all his cronies. After all, I would have been God's representative on earth, which is no mean thing. No, this fellow was a calculating coward.
Ted Schrey, Montreal, Canada
A catholic's view,
Nothing, not the fate of catholics or the Vatican or the clergy was of greater moral obligation than the obligation to condem with fury the nazi muderers. Pius was obligated to excommunicate the whole of the Nazi party and the SS. He was not an evil man but he was a weak man
Harold Helbock, Vacaville, USA
Israeli diplomat Pinchas Lapides assessment Pius XIIs wartime activities: "The Catholic Church under the pontificate of Pius XII was instrumental in saving lives of as many as 860,000 Jews from certain death at Nazi hands. This figure far exceeds those saved by all other Churches and rescue organizations combined."
Julianne Wiley, Johnson City, TN, USA
The question is not, would his speaking out have resulted in more deaths. The question is, did his silence result in more deaths, or did it, as he claimed, allow him to help more Jews?
Ann , NYC,
The Pope claims to be the Vicar of Christ. As such he had a duty to behave as Christ would have done. He did not. Jesus was no coward. He never passed the buck. Perhaps Mr. Pacelli could be made the Patron Saint of Cowards.
Stuart Greif, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Just a footnote from me; throughout history popes have excommunicated emperors and kings. It never helped much.
J. P. Ward
j.p.ward, Vlaardingen, NETHERLANDS
None of us was sitting on the papal throne in 1942, contemplating the response to any statement we might have made. A statement might have resulted in thousands more deaths. After the war, I'm sure he was troubled over the whole affair and determined the best course was to put it behind .
William, Bethany Beach, De, USA
What happened to the "advocatus diaboli"? When the Vatican investigated Mother Teresa's cause, they invited Chris Hitchens to testify precisely because he poured out hundreds of pages of vitriol against her.
Why put Mother Teresa through the wringer, and not Pope Pius XII.
Yamaneko, West Lafayette, IN, USA
This article is a subtle but poisionus distortion: it says nothing about the fact that when the Catholic Church DID speak out, in Holland, the Nazis in retailation rounded up and exterminated Jewish converts to Catholicism, such as the nun Edith Stein. So we know exactly what would have happened.
Hal G. P. Colebatch, Perth, Australia
- "some French men and women collaborated." It was the French police who rounded up foreign Jews. -Why is this issue only a matter of "Jewish sensitivities"? -MaCintyre has it both ways. He says we have no evidence of Pius's thinking and yet he also knows that he "suffered moral agonies."
Michael, Jerusalem,
In the end, I think, we have to agree with Mr. Macintyre's conclusions. Pope Pius was nowhere near a bad man; in many respects he was a good, even great man. But he is not a saint, because we demand the highest standards of morality and courage from our saints -- no matter how unjust or unfair.
Daryl Lim, Singapore, Singapore
In the end, I find it hard to disagree with Mr. Macintyre's conclusions. While Pope Pius was nowhere near a bad man, and was indeed, a good, even great, man, he is not a saint. This is because we demand the highest standards of morality and courage from saints -- no matter how unjust or unfair.
Daryl Lim, Singapore, Singapore
An immigrant to the U.S. from Eastern Europe, my grandmother sent 4 sons to fight in WWII; my best friend's grandma sent 8. Not far from here, in Pennsylvania, lived another good woman and good Catholic: she sent 12.
If Pius is a saint, what are these women?
What is "neutral"?
ES, Small, USA
The judgement as to whether Pius did enough soon enough is subjective, and subject to retroactive standards. Those who are biased against Catholics or religion will inevitably say not enough and not soon enough.
The benefit of the doubt should be given.
Greg Lorriman, Leatherhead, UK
The Roman Catholic church alone can decide upon beatification and sainthood.
This is done after a strict procedure allowing for detailed analysis of the individual and their actions,as well as a period of reflection and contemplation.
The researchers will have access to all relevant documents.
Manny Goldstein, London, UK
Hi,
Some say the Pope should have given more weight to "speak against Hitler" than the Christians being gas chambered!
If Osama as a mighty US president war against Iraq, they suggest the Pope to oppose Osama as he opposed Bush! They are blind to see the difference of terrorist and a states man!
Jose, Bangalore, India
No one questioned the help Pope Pius Xll provided Jews until the 1963 play promoted by communist sympathizers tried to tie him to hitler. Prior to that influential Jews like Golda Meir and Einstein praised the pope for all he did. Even the New York Times praised him as "A lone voice" of help.
Ramon Garcia, fair oaks, usa
Of course the Holocaust should have been condemned. So also should the napalming of Tokyo, the Dresden massacre, the Hamburg firestorm, Katyn forest. Would any of those condemnations been more effective than one directed at Hitler?
Augustin, Lausanne, Switzerland
If Pope Pius XII was so evil WHY did the Chief Rabbi of Rome convert to Cathoicism after the war and take the baptisimal name of "Eugenio" in honour of Pius XII - and WHY did the Jewish community of Rome hold a "funeral processions" for their formal Rabbi ? Was the Rabbi a "collaborator" as well ?
LMS, Roma, Italy
Chris from Dayton It was not "The Church" protesting the killing of the "Mentally Unfit etc." It was an open letter by the Bishop of Münster, Graf von Galen read from the pulpit, that stopped this practice
H W Hehmann, Fernandina Beach FL, usa
Had all the Catholics in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Poland, France and Germany been told by Pius to rise up (and in Spain's case enter the war on the Allied side, despite Franco's fascism) then history may have been both different and kinder to the Pope.
Ben, York,
It's a mortal sin to murder another human being Keith B of Wigan. The taking of life (and that includes abortion, so-called euthanasia and suicide) is a heinous act. It is not for us to end a human life. That is God's will.
Firenzio, London, UK
Sounds remarkably like a policy of appeasement to me, and we all know how Chamberlain went down in history for adopting such an attitude.
Aside from that, one can sum up why the Catholic Church should never have opted for neutrality in four simple words, taken from the Bible, "Thou shalt not kill"!
Alex, London,
All the usual and often cheap arguments come out of the woodwork. The current pope did not voluntarily join the Hitler Jugend, so that's just an ignorant argument. Pope Pius XII did indeed rescue Jews, as I have Jewish ancestors who were actually saved by hiding in an Italian monastery. Yes: saint!
dennis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
As a 'moral leader' on the world stage Pius XII's duty ought to have been obvious to him. He should have set an example and spoken out against the Holocaust. He would then have had to take the consequences, no doubt, but he would have set a moral lead - like the Catholic martyrs of history.
Peter Preston, London, England
A coward and (effectively) a villain. If this passes for saintliness, my view of the Catholic church sinks even lower. I'm with John Cornwell on this.
'The Pope cannot speak' - what power, what bravery!
David, Manchester, UK
I thought the driver for beatification was that the candidate had done something outstandingly marvellous. It seems here that Pius will pass the test unless it can be proved beyond reasonable doubt that he was a war criminal. This seems to be setting the bar quite low.
Andrew Forbes, Thames Ditton, Surrey
I saw a TV documentary about the Nazis' systematic murder of mentally disabled children labeled as "unfit".The Catholic Church strongly protested, saying that all life was sacred. The Nazis backed down and the murders stopped. Pius could have spoken out. I believe it would have saved Jewish lives.
Chris, Dayton, USA
Just checking: Is the standard for sainthood that historians and other men consider a person to have lived a "good" life free of disastrous and condemnable mistakes? Or is it that that, as evidenced by supposed "miracles", it appears to the Church that God has had mercy on his soul in Heaven?
Matt, Denver, USA
Why did so many Jewish leaders praise PIus after the war? No less than Albert Einstien, Golda Meier and others. The New York Times in its Christmas editorial 1942 praised Pius. Please read comments from contemporary sources to learn the truth.
Anne Kahn, New York City,
Wow Keith, you're a scary man!
DAve T, London,
Whether Pius XII is cannonized in the near future or later is not relavant. Immediately upon the death of Pius XII, Padre Pio had a vision of Pope Pius rejoicing with the saints in heaven. He is in heaven, as are many uncannonized saints.
James, Denver, USA
Shame that the Vatican's keeping the archives closed to prevent people investigating him.
Hugh, London,
But surely one of the reasons for his silence was the increase in persecution that occurred after publication of "With Burning Sorrow" lamenting the breaking of the Concordat? The decision for silence was a prudential judgement based on past experience.
Elizabeth, Glen Ridge, United States
Why is "irresponsibility a part of true courage"? That is just an assertion. It is easy to think of countless instances where irresponsibility is just selfish and nothing to do with courage at all.
Peter, Maidstone,
The conduct of Pius XII after the war is also relevant. He stymied Jewish attempts to reclaim Jewish orphans who were in Catholic hands after the war. He approved Vatican help to Nazis fleeing to South America. And he tried to prevent the establishment of the State of Israel, on theological grounds.
Ben, San Francisco, USA
Pius XII was consistent in his beliefs & actions.
His codification of Canon Law put the needs of the Church before abused children. His German diplomacy put Communist evil before Genocide. Mother and Child put theology before life. A saintly Holy Father would have put his flock first - so no saint.
Tom Kernan, Camberley, England
Why should it matter if people are killed or die? They go to a better place don't they? death is only momentary and then they are in heaven. People should remember this worldly life counts for nothing in the eyes of God.
keith b, Wigan, uk
This sounds like Roman Catholic white-washing eg you fail to mention the concordat & the role of the church in Hitler 's rise to power. I've read Cornwell's book & checked the sources. I can't see there's anyway Pacelli could be regarded as a saint. But present pope is ex-Hitler Youth so ......
Stanley, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil