Bronwen Maddox: World Briefing
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
It is possible that the deal struck yesterday between G8 countries will lift the burden from the US of being the villain of global warming. But not likely.
The determination of Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, to make climate change the target of her summit distracted attention from President Putin’s weekend outburst and put the heat on President Bush.
Merkel got part of what she wanted: the US’s agreement to join a pact that will try to set limits for emissions. But that is because the appetite in the US for taking action was already much greater than its critics allowed. They also fail to credit the obstacles that the US Constitution puts in the way of signing pacts, which European countries appear to regard not just as easy steps to take, but as proof of morality.
You cannot plausibly (although many do) accuse US politicians of lack of interest in global warming. If only because it seems easier to tackle than Iraq, there is no other debate. The new Democrat-controlled Congress has held almost daily hearings in the Senate and House of Representatives. Forty states have put forward more than 300 Bills this year. The Supreme Court ruled in April that the Environmental Protection Agency could not claim that it lacked the authority to treat greenhouse gases as pollution, a decision which could have huge implications for factories and cars. Meanwhile, Bush has called for cuts of a fifth of the US’s petrol use by 2017, as well as demanding rises in cars’ fuel economy.
This is not nothing, to appropriate one of the pithy, alliterative judgments which are the only valuable legacy of Donald Rumsfeld, former Secretary of Defence. But it also shows the complexity of the process by which the US takes decisions. It is lengthier than that of European governments, run by leaders who are less fettered than a US president. To portray it as pure unwillingness is wrong. Germany presents the closest parallel, and the fragile governing coalition is a much greater curb on Merkel than her lectures to the G8 imply. She has no game plan for broaching the notion of new nuclear power stations to that coalition, however much the sums show that Germany must consider it soon.
The structure of the US economy gives it good reason to be wary of emissions curbs. It has not failed to make that point, but has often seen it drowned out in gibes at its wasteful taste for sports utility vehicles.
Those tastes are real, but the demands of the sheer size of the territory show up in the attached table – the miles travelled per head are more than double those in Britain.
These US reflexes – the desire to “do something”, the fear of being shackled by rules crafted to fit smaller European economies, and the vow not to let any leader damage citizens’ lives – were present in a hearing by the House Committee on Science and Technology in March.
It was the best and worst of US government: examining the issues in limitless detail, but ricocheting between fears of the immeasurable, whether China or offending God’s will for the planet. Their prime witness, Al Gore (addressed by one member as “a thinker, a personality and now a movie star”) was lyrical about Europe’s virtues but skimped discussion of the costs.
Committee members, between the compliments, made that point trenchantly, and they were right to do so.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If I am ever invited to appear before the Gore Un-environmental Activities Committee (GUAC) and they ask me "Are you now or have you ever been a carbon criminal?" I will answer "No but I have a list of my neighbors. All of them are carbon criminals."
What I'm hoping is that they will ignore my obvious lies and go for a two-for-one deal. I would sacrifice everyone I know to stay out of jail and if Kyoto is ratified, I'll have to make up names because I don't have enough friends.
It's coming and you don't know how to stop it. Sniffle, snivel.
Colin Butts, Milton , Florida
I am so sad to hear sone peoples lack of will to do anything in any otherway. It was a reason the dinos died out. They didn't adapt... If we continiuet to live without making any sacrifices when i comes to saving this planet. This planet will die!
Why not try a Focus c-max turbo diesel with a particular filter? It has lots of room, grunt and can run on biodiesel(canola oil). I'ts bloody fun to drive too!
Want anything bigger? Try a VW van with a turbodiesel. Again with a particular filter. It will surely handle as well as any Suburban...
Driving in the city? Prius!
Honestly. i can't be that hard.
Demand that the American automakers get their act together and start producing some decent cars which have quality, clever packaging, good fuel economiy (less weight...) and are desireable. If they can't make them. Import them from there subsidaries! The cars exists!!!
Demand that the politicians builds some railway where it's needed so that there is some options!
Change now! Get a bicycle!
Bjorn, Borensberg, Sweden
I agree with your sentiments, Mark. Additionally, China and India have much larger populations than the United States and far less stringent environmental regulations. Even if the U.S. could drastically reduce Co2 emissions overnight, the effect would be negligible as long as those two behemoths keep belching it out.
On top of all that, I believe it's bunk to suggest that there's a "consensus" that CO2 emissions are the primary reason for global warming. There are plenty of big name scientists and climatologists who don't buy into that, such as Prof. William Gray of Colorado State University and Max Mayfield, who recently retired as director of the National Hurricane Center.
Consider that the thousands of underwater volcanic erputions affect ocean water temperatures, and the effects of solar flares and sunspots. There are powerful natural forces at work .
Finally, recall that the Chicken Little alarmists said 30 yrs. ago we were headed into an Ice Age. I remain skeptical.
Tom, East Lansing, Mich., USA
THanks for noticing- We Americans at the grassroots level ar VERY concerned, but we don't own the oil companies. Yes we drive far too much here in the vast west- Colorado is 3 times the size of the UK. We little people are pushing all we can now for renewable energy, battling a sluggish government. We point to the UK and Scandinavia and say Look! We need to follow their lead- it''s like holding a dog's head so they will see something. Once in a while they do.
LAurence Budd, Fort Collins, USA/colorado
I drive a short 50 miles a day round-trip to and from work in a high-performance Japanese made car. I pay USD 3.20 for petrol, it's cheap and I'm glad to do it. My kids are in private (public in the UK) school. I don't go to church, I consider religion a superstitious anachronism, and I vote Republican. My professional background is in science and engineering, and I lead a comfortable life. So if any politician legislates anything based upon unscientific and unproven Global Warming "research" which causes a rise in my cost of living, they will find themselves out of office come the next election cycle. I will certainly donate to any opposition candidate who doesn't preach UN / Greenpeace / Euro greenhouse gargbage.
Thomas, Atlanta, GA, USA
Mark makes good points, right up to the one where he needs an SUV. I own a 12-year-old minivan & have watched as the manufacturer has made its vans - not more accommodating - but increasingly heavy & inefficient. After 12 years & 350 000 mi. of trekking between Boston and Buffalo I am still getting 25 mi/gal. city, better than the newer cars of this size can do. I can take 3 bass drums, 3 drummers, a fifer, tents & camping equipment for a weekend from Albany to the Connecticut shore & back on 15 gal. & have enough left to do the commute for a couple of days. Forget the overgrown SUVs & monstrous pickup trucks. What we really need here is to go back to the frumpy but comparatively lightweight minivan & station wagon.
Linda, near Albany NY, US
Glutonous is a useful word indeed in this context. I live in Phoenix and every addvertisement segment on tv, has one for fast food and one for a big truck. There is a link here. Our whole society is built on consumption, the average American watches 8 hours of adverts a day telling the m to eat more and buy more in order to be happy. Do we Americans really believe like Mark seems to do, that just becasue we have appear to need more stuff, (do we?), that we deserve bigger cars and a greater share of global destruction?
John, Phoenix, AZ
How can anyone have the gall to questions whether an SUV is necessary?! OR COURSE IT'S NECESSARY. If you have three children who all have school, soccer schedules, friend etc, then you want your family in the BIGGEST, SAFEST automobile on the road; something which would CRUSH any other auto in any kind of accident. SUV have nothing to do with status, convenience, etc. They are safe, necessary and affordable to operate. In the US where daily travel distances are several times those travelled in Europe, you want make sure to err on the side of caution. To hell with anyone who doesn't understand that.
Thomas, Atlanta, GA, USA
Mark from Washington DC, unfortunately, engages in the same me first thought process that often plagues the US. He says how dare I attack his opinion. Mark, unfortunately your opinion has adverse affects on all of our futures.
Mark is clearly unwilling to make a small personal sacrifice by giving up his SUV for the betterment of mother Earth. I agree that SUVs are nice and do provide extra space. But are the necessary? Absolutely not. If European countries and other industrialized nations are able to survive with smaller vehicles, why can't Americans? We, as concerned Americans, should make concessions. SUVs merely fill our gluttonous need to have all conveniences available. Clearly, we can all do better, especially Americans.
Gene, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Finally, a European who at least will listen and try to understand our position. It's never been about not wanting to do something. The question is how and at what cost. Europeans can get away with one family fitting into a small wagon. I, however, own a sport utility vehicle simply because of the space. I need room for my family, dog, clothes and supplies for a trip for a week that's the distance of 2000 miles. We don't have your robust train system simply b/c it's too costly and too vast a territory. I need the space and flexibility that a large vehicle provides. I'm willing to pay for it but don't you dare attack my decision, way of life or my morals.
Mark, washington d.c., usa