Camilla Cavendish
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Tonight, Europe’s leaders will be picking over some Euro-trivia along with their hors d’oeuvres. The Austrians are worried that Germany might nick their medical students. The Poles want an extra court official on the European Court of Justice. The Bulgarians want to use the word “evro” instead of “euro” – which has upset the European Central Bank. These are, apparently, the last stumbling blocks to agreement on the draft EU treaty.
No one at this dinner will be asking why what was intended to be a free trading zone is steadily granting itself the power to legislate in almost every area of national life. No one will be expressing concern that a majority of citizens, in 16 out of 27 member states, say they want no extension of EU power. No one will ask whether it would be better to return to an à la carte menu rather than proceed with the fixed-price group dinner – same dish for everyone, only choice house white or house red – that leaves such a bad taste in the mouth. No. My guess is they’ll just keep munching.
Our Government keeps saying that this treaty is not the same as the old constitution, despite the mockery of almost everyone who has read it. But in one way it is different: it’s even less readable. And that, as senior politicians in Germany and Belgium and Italy have explained, is deliberate. This is an utterly cynical exercise, and our own politicians are cheapened by it.
What’s in the treaty? Britain will lose around 50 vetoes in areas including health, energy and laws for the self-employed. Our power to form blocking coalitions with other nations will also be considerably diminished, because the thresholds will be changed. So proposals that we have been successfully blocking – one of my favourites is making the police give every suspect a piece of A4, listing their EU rights – will almost certainly become law. That’s before you get to any “red lines”.
From a wider European point of view, the democratic gap between every nation and its citizens will grow again. Nation states will lose control of policing and justice matters. It used to be thought that the ability to define what was a crime and what was not, to police that crime and to determine the appropriate sentence for it, were matters for sovereign states alone. When the European Community was set up, justice and home affairs were kept strictly separate, as was foreign policy. This treaty waves those principles aside. That is why this treaty is historic, not the historical footnote that the politicians would have us believe.
Is this the right direction for Europe to take? Are we are really going to meet the Asian challenge by increasing regulations on business, creating a 3,500-strong diplomatic corps and spending £12 billion on an EU space programme? The Eurofighter airplanes that rolled off the production line last month were 20 years late and designed for the Cold War. There could hardly be a better symbol of Europe’s need to be nimbler, focused on fewer issues.
Yet no one in power seems prepared to make that argument. In the past few weeks, the British Government has sparred with the media over the meaning of its “red lines” – the few places where it has dared to stand up for its independence. But criticism from the European Scrutiny Committee and others has made it clear that these safeguards are not watertight, because they will be open to challenge in the courts.
The reality of today’s Europe is that politicians do not know the consequences of the laws they approve, because the European Court of Justice can extend the scope of EU powers in so many ways. The US Supreme Court, on which it is modelled, has extended its power far beyond that ever envisaged by the Founding Fathers. But at least America has a culture of judicial restraint. The EU has none. The British cannot evade this by saying that no Parliament can bind its successors. We voters cannot throw out EU laws by changing government.
Those who want the new treaty argue that it is just another step in the process of centralisation. But just because ordinary people are only gradually waking up to the drip-dripping away of their power does not mean that they should be denied a say in it. Some argue that a referendum would end up being a vote on the direction of the EU. But it should be. The EU needs to change direction, and its citizens want it to. The battleground is not Britain versus Europe, it is the elites versus the people.
The irony is that, six years ago, EU leaders seemed to agree. In the Laeken declaration of 2001, they specifically asked for more transparency, democracy and subsidiarity (powers returned to nation states). What they got was Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, who subverted the process and dismissed proposals by the Dutch and British, notably the Labour MP Gisela Stuart, for greater democracy. His constitution remained the template even after French and Dutch voters rejected it, I suspect partly for want of a clearly spelt-out alternative.
Tony Blair ducked making the case for a different kind of Europe. But the EU arguably needs Britain more than we need the EU. Britain is one of the biggest financial contributors to the Union. Its armed forces are central to EU hopes of wielding any real humanitarian or defence role. It is the world’s financial centre. The Dutch and French were not banished to Lapland when they said no to the constitution. But by acting as though he could be, Mr Blair left his successor in a tight spot.
The whole question of Gordon Brown’s premiership has now become one of trust. Can he risk being party to an EU stitch-up? He may not have the stomach to pick any real fight over dinner tonight. But if he could give Parliament a free vote, or better still give us all a vote, it might prove to be his salvation – and, ironically, that of the EU.
Camilla Cavendish has been a McKinsey management consultant, an aid worker, and CEO of a not-for-profit company. She is now a leader writer and columnist on The Times
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Thank you so much for taking your bold stand in this article! It seems that there are now movements upon every continent to unite their nations into EU-like continental unions. Here where I live in North America, we're facing similar problems with our politicians trying to quietly build upon NAFTA via SPP to create a "North American Community" that includes a common market, a customs union, and a security perimeter. And I've heard talk of a possible (eventual) North American monetary union, as well, under which a North American central bank would issue ameros. Sadly, too many Americans still don't seem to be aware that any of this is happening--or else they disbelieve it when they hear it. Within these next few decades, the USA may well find itself in the very same predicament in which Britain is now. So, although we're on opposite sides of the pond, your struggle is our struggle. And, as such, I wish you well with it.
David Edward Garber, Provo, UT, USA
gordon has lost the trust of the people,by fooling us,over red
lines. gordon brown,david miliband,jim murphy and co its not a
copy cat treaty. what planet are they living on,it beggars belief
that everybody else knows the treaty is a copy of rejected eu
constitution.why is brown taking us for fools.
john cross, birmingham, england
The EU as well as its predecessors always has been an "ever closer Union" and not just a simple tariff zone. The EFTA was what the UK wanted, interestingly it left it in favor of the "ever closer Union".
Its ironic that Britain now complains about how the EU follows its founding key target. Britain could have sticked to EFTA like Switzerland if it rejects the idea of an "ever closer Union" so much.
It will remain a mystery why it did not.
Christoph, Vienna,
There is one fundamental problem there is no democratic control of the whole European Union. not from our joining until now have any of the people had a vote on anything that is decided and enacted
neil, warwks, uk
Red lines or no red lines, enshrined in this amendment is majority voting in a few years time, What then for the red lines, We will have lost complete control of our destiny,
Jon Frederics, Kingston, England
Everything about politics here in this country has a very grubby undertone to it. So how hard are the Kinnocks and the other fat labour cats working in Europe, what is their purpose?
This is probably what most ex/ redundant lefties aspire to, where they feel most comfortable,and rather like our P M,
actually have no idea what the country requires of them!
Political integrity is way off course, (look that one up)
This is backdoor socialism at its worst,oppression!
Let the country decide, by giving us a referendum now. Prove you are a democratic man Gordon Brown, not a Euro glove puppet.
To David Bracewell ,Canada, sit there smugly on the other side of the Atlantic, frothing, just be watchful of your next door neighbour!!
maggie snook, wool wareham, Dorset UK
If there was no Eurofighter jet, the UK would have to buy foreign made planes (American most likely) to replace aging planes. What's wrong in making stuff in Europe? What's wrong with spending money on Space programs? Should Europeans just sit and watch American, Chinese, Russian, Japanese and Indian firms and scientists develop space technologies? What a rotten and silly way to look at things... Don't think Europe can survive by simply relying on Financial transactions made in the city of London. We have to actually make stuff, invest and use our brains.
Talk2guy, Los Angeles,
I have not yet in all the years past heard any politician who gave the British a good reason WHY we have the need for overpaid, over bossy jobsworths telling us how we should live and behave in our country. Do you know why ? The EU is corrupt, everybody knows it and yet there is this great need by the political classes to give away their power.
In the last few days we have had that political upstart called a Foreign Secretary talking to everyone, including his pals in parliament as though they were gormless prats. This man doesn't deserve to hold the position, his general attitude is all wrong and he's arrrogant, just like the rest of this mob which they call a government.
What advantage will we have when this treaty is signed by a man who is pretending to look after our interests. NONE !
Phil de Buquet, Newport, England
What about British Common Law under these treaties and under the governance of the EU civil "servants?" Will you be able to keep trial by jury vs. magistrates, habeas corpus and the like? Not likely.
john b., Baltimore, USA, Maryland
If the choice is disappearing into obscurity or being a member of the EU, I choose obscurity. However, this is a false choice, and one that is typical of the 'Federasts' own ofallacious arguments which are made up of straw-men, red herrings and non sequiteurs.
To succeed in the global economy we need to be nimble and quick, not big and slow. The EU, whose accounts have not been ratified by the auditors for over 10 years now, provides us very little and constricts us very much.
Set the people FREE!!! EU Referendum NOW!
Jez B, London, England
This argument is not about whether the E.S.S.R comes into being it is all about whether, as citizens of a supposedly democratic Britain, we get a vote on the matter as is our right!
The fact Pro-Europeans posters miss is the left-wing idiots are giving our freedoms away. It is bad enough being governed by an elected British government I despise, let alone a bunch of unelected European ministers. It is not about whether we are still 'Great' it is about selling our democracy down the river. The question people should be asking is why this is happening? If there was a vote and everyone said yes to Europe then that would be the choice made. As it is the choice has been made by the political leaders of this country and that is not democracy.
Get a grip and open your eyes to what is happening!
David Thijm, Stourbridge, UK
Canada...Hmmmmm.....
poocherama, london,
I fear we are facing the end of democracy. The EU has turned into a morass of unelected bureaucrats who have exactly the same philosophy as Bottler Brown, control tax & spend. The fact that it's our money and our lives their controlling is of no importance to this political elite.
Did our forefathers fight for the democratic freedom from King John, Magna Carta 1215, only to be ruled by pen pushers from Belgium.
Did our soldiers die in two world wars fighting Germany only for our sovereignty to be given up by a quisling wimp without a fight.
God save the Queen and Britain.
Vernon Moat, Exeter, UK
Well said Peter Goddard. Britain does need the EU or it will disappear into obscurity.
Globalisation is a fact of life and will continue whether people like it or not.. you either adapt or disappear. Those are the real choices. Whilst most Brits are slow to accept change or new ideas, they are going to have to start waking up and moving along.
Chantel, UK,
I totally agree with Mr Goddard and am incensed by the petty and backwards attitudes of so many of my compatriots. Britain is not so Great anymore and hasn't been for a long time. The reasons for this have absolutely nothing to do with Europe. If the UK is to be able to prosper and retain what clout it still has in a world of new 'superpowers' then it cannot do so alone. Our options are the USA or the EU and I for one know which I would choose. We can buddy up with a self-destructing, declining empire, who chooses to listen to us only when we can be of use to them or we can make ourselves a dominant force in a still-evolving grouping of nation states. The EU is not perfect, but it cannot even try to become so if its attempts to improve itself continue to be blocked by those who fear loss of their 'sovereignty'. Personally I'm not all that thrilled about my sovereignty being in the hands of a man who was not democratically placed in his position and who does not listen to the people.
Zandra Culliford, Brussels,
1. The British people deserve to have a say whether we lose any powers to govern ourselves - even if we do lose our democracy, we should at least have one last democratic vote to decide about it...
2. There should be a referendum on principle - we were promised it, therefore we should get it. Is it any wonder no-one trusts politicians any more? And anyone saying that the Treaty is not the same as the Constitution is either gullible or stupid, as even the people who wrote the thing have admitted it's basically the same
sam, farnham, uk
I am English and proud to call myself European.
You are WRONG in saying that everyone is against a more United Europe. Many of us want more Europe, not less, because that is the way forward, and we believe in a European future, not one that says no to our fellow Europeans and just nods through whatever the USA says!
We need the treaty to help Europe work beter, it is as simple as that!
Peter Goddard, Epsom, England, EU
The majority of the British people do not and never have wanted to see their country subsumed into a European Empire. We are a sovereign state with our own queen, laws and parliament. If Gordon Brown is not prepared to defend us against such an imposition, then he is clearly not fit to be Prime Minister. Indeed by signing such a Treaty he is behaving like a traitor to the people he claims to represent.
Now is the time for the Conservatives to find their voice over Europe. Enough of this stupid adventure. Enough of filling the pockets of corrupt oligarchs. Enough of having our laws, customs and way of life corrupted by this evil organization. We must get out, the sooner the better.
Adrian Gilbert, Tonbridge,
The British public is resolutely against this and yet we are ignored. Brown keeps talking about standing up for Britain yet refuses to consult the British people either in an election or a referendum. This red lines talk is just cynical smoke and mirrors to distract us.
The EU is a cosy club in which ministers and Eurocrats make decisions and deals without the inconvenience of having to make an argument for it and pass legislation through parliament. It is fundamentally undemocratic and actively undermines our democratic institutions. The whole shabby system needs wholesale re-design and reform. Most of its areas of competence are wholly unnecessary anyway. A free trade area, which is all the British people have ever approved electorally, does not require the vast bureacracy and powers the EU has accumulated. That is a federal superstate. If that is the direction they want us to take then say so, set it up democratically and ask for our approval.
We demand a referendum.
Paul Owen, Birmingham, UK
As a British citizen by birth I am saddened by how much your sovereignty has diminished, however there is no one to blame but yourselves. Your citizens have been asleep at the switch through successive governments that bit by bit either gave away or allowed your laws and freedoms to be erroded by Brussels. All you have to look forward to now is being governed by unelected and unaccountable bureauocrats who will micromanage every aspect of your lives. There will be little recourse and if you don't toe the Brussels line they will land on you like a ton of bricks. I remember when this began as a Common Market scheme for ease of trade and goods but of course like all bureaucracies they must expand or die and did this one ever expand!
Long live the United States of Europe.
I. KELLY, Toledo, Oregon, USA
The EU doesn't need Britain, because Britain, which often has a reasonably useful take on Euro-policy, chooses to be obstructive, unctuous and arrogant in everything it does.
The British economy, mired in useless service industries, low wages, failed privatisations and a coming housing crisis, may have been attractive as a +third way+ economy 2 years ago, may have seemed a good model then, but now that the economy's weak underpinnings are showing I'm sure no one in Europe would grieve the loss of your startling brilliance.
David Bracewell, Nelson, Canada
Has Guy Fawkes any living relatives in Europe; Brussels preferably ?
Stan(expat), Texas, USA
The question is, can the Tories take us out of the treaty if they are elected, and do they wish to?
Stephen Rothbart, Prague, Czech Republic
I have lived in the centre of Brussels for five years. I have found no trace of democracy but met many nice people who believe they govern in the name of the people.
Rosa Friedman, Brussels, Belgium