Camilla Cavendish
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Had I not known that it was Cuddly Ken on the radio yesterday, I would have thought I was listening to the dictator of a small Third World country.
The Mayor of London brushed aside every charge against him, on the ground that he had been put in power to do as he liked. Had he used public money to campaign against his old enemy, Trevor Phillips, and stop him becoming head of the new Equality and Human Rights Commission? “Not against Trevor, but what he was saying against multiculturalism... which was very damaging.” Had Ken Livingstone's officials campaigned for him at the last election while being paid by the taxpayer? “It would be 1984 if they couldn't have any political activity.” Is this a personal fiefdom? “That's what Tony Blair...set out to create.”
This interview exploded the myth that Mr Livingstone is the people's rebel, the honest outsider. He is the consummate insider, and disarmingly frank about it. Forget the petty gripes about his whisky drinking or his reliance on a bunch of old Trotskyites. If the best that Socialist Action can do is to sting SUV drivers, the revolution is over. It's not communism that matters, it's cronyism.
The charges of misusing public funds are serious. It is alleged that the London Development Agency (LDA) threw money at organisations that have little or nothing to show for it. Some were not even registered either as companies or charities, and some were run by friends of Lee Jasper, the mayor's equality adviser. Between 2003 and 2006 City Hall gave £1.8 million to companies that have since been struck off or liquidated, some only months after receiving the grants. A regeneration agency is bound to back some failures. But organisations that are now being investigated by the police should have been properly audited earlier.
On Tuesday Lee Jasper's deputy, Rosemary Emodi, resigned after admitting she had lied about a freebie trip to a Nigerian beach resort. Her companion was the head of Brixton Base, an organisation that has not yet satisfied LDA auditors as to what it has done with £510,000 of City Hall money. The patron of Brixton Base is Lee Jasper.
Sloppy accounting is one thing; harassment is another. The head of a ballet academy has won an injunction against two directors of the Green Badge Taxi School, a former LDA-funded project with whom she shared premises. She claims they mounted a campaign of intimidation after she started querying their finances. Her MP Kate Hoey describes the situation as “Thirties Chicago”.
Without Ms Hoey and the dogged reporting of Andrew Gilligan at the Evening Standard, none of these issues would have been aired. The country is awash with regulators but the mayor seems untouchable. The London Assembly, which is supposed to hold him to account, is unable to do so. It can only vote down his annual budget, for which it needs a two-thirds majority.
Mr Livingstone argues that his unfettered executive power was necessary to drive through changes such as the congestion charge. But he is wrong. American mayors are accountable to legislative councils, but they still get things done. In less time than Mr Livingstone has been mayor, Michael Bloomberg has reversed New York's fiscal crisis, built a record number of starter homes and taken control of all schools. It's hard to imagine Mr Bloomberg telling journalists to “go to Nigeria and find out” when asked about Ms Ebodi. But then it's hard to imagine him employing Mr Jasper.
Whitehall would not have blocked the congestion charge, as Mr Livingstone claimed yesterday, because Whitehall invented it. Nick Raynsford, the Minister for London, wrote “road user charging” into the legislation that created the role of mayor long before Mr Livingstone ran for office. Mr Raynsford spotted a chance to trial unpopular road pricing and foresaw that a mayor would jump at the chance to use it to raise revenue. Mr Livingstone implemented it; but it was not Ken against the world.
I was one of the people who campaigned for a mayor in the 1990s. Those of us who were trying to regenerate the city had to navigate a maze of quangos and boroughs. We wanted someone to adjudicate, someone to drive through strategic projects. Above all, we wanted accountability.
Mr Livingstone was the most capable man to stand, but his late conversion to the concept of elected mayors should have been a warning. Mr Livingstone, like his new friend Hugo Chávez, is not especially interested in democracy. His legacy will be a skyline of monuments to himself - many of them ugly offices and luxury flats - built by the developers and architects he befriended, legitimately enough, but with no consultation with the public.
It would be wrong to conclude from all this that the mayoralty should be abolished. The assembly needs proper powers of scrutiny. But the mayor's job also needs to be bigger, if we want our own Bloombergs to apply. Boris Johnson is not Bloomberg, and his new hair cut will not be enough to guarantee him a win on May 1 if his policies are still tangled. But he should put down a marker, now, by stating that he will not seek office for more than two terms.
Tony Travers, the LSE professor, likens Ken Livingstone to Jacques Chirac, because of his “tenacity and capacity for policy zig-zagging”. Professor Travers is too polite to draw the other obvious parallel: an almost Gallic arrogance that has grown with every year in power. Mr Chirac decided not to seek a third term in 2007 after allegations of cronyism and misusing public funds. Ken, take note.
Camilla Cavendish has been a McKinsey management consultant, an aid worker, and CEO of a not-for-profit company. She is now a leader writer and columnist on The Times
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Banks, Accoutants, Solicitors and others working in Financial Servise (Independent Financial Advisors for instance) are all bound by increasingly beurocratic rules which force them to pay due care and attention to the identity of their clients as they act as part of the Governments defense against money laundering. (This is why you always need a bill and a photo ID to open a account).
Indeed failure to report actual or even suspected money laundering can carry a significant personal consequence for individuals involved.
That the Mayor's office should be able to disperse significant Public funds without similar levels of diligence and record keeping frankly beggars belief.
Bob, Reading,
Do you know what happened in Venezuela recently? The Chavistas have put a lot of referenda to the people, they have won most and after losing the recent election they graciously accepted defeat. A far higher percentage of people vote in Venezuela than the US and Hugo Chavez holds a popular mandate unheard of in the West. To claim he has "no interest in democracy" discredits your whole article. You'll have to think a bit deeper if you want to successfully execute your crusade on the left.
Paul, Melbourne, Australia
Livingstone supported the IRA during the hight of their London bombing campaign. Londoners were being brutally murdered on the streets of their own city. I was walking up Hans Crecent when the Harrods bomb went off and shall never forget the horror of it.
How any Londoner could vote for this man is beyond me.
Sedgwick Morrison, London,
Anybody still defending Chavez has clearly not been paying attention to South American news for the last few days. Keep up folks!
James, Monteria, Colombia
Hugo Chavez for your information is a democratically elected president in Venezuela. For once, you have a politician in England you should be proud of, someone who does what's best for London and who is not servile to whatever the Americans say as your government do.Good luck Ken in the elections.
Maria, Santiago, Spain
It;s a wonder he hasn't recruited George Galloway!
leila, manchester, uk
Minorities love him! Anyone from a Labour background is guaranteed blind loyalty with the masses from overseas.
John, London,
On what evidence do you base your assertion that Hugo Chavez is not interested in democracy? He has won more elections than virtually any other world leader, he abided by the results of the recent referendum which he lost, and he has instilled a deep political awareness amongst the people of Venezuela.
He is a great deal more interested in democracy than his opponents who tried to oust him in a coup 6 years ago, and whose interests you serve when you make unfounded allegations against him
Gabriel Vogt, Birmingham, UK
Poor old Ken then, such a bashing from people removed from London, judge him on what he has - or has not done, comparisons to Nazis / South American quasi dictators is distasteful in the least. Ken is not hijacking the constitution, nor would he be able to as ours (UK) is unwritten - thank god.
Peter Alexander, Ryde - Isle of Wight, UK
Livingstone has many similarities to the ex-prime minister, Teflon Tony Blair. As with Bliar, nothing sticks on Red Ken, he is more slippery than his newts.
Eight years of mayoral powers have totally gone to his head and London needs a breath of fresh air to blow away some of the unsavoury odours emanating from the mayor's office.
Richard, London, England
Mr Livingston may be an admirer of Chavez and Fidel but I bet he does not speak Spanish or has travelled around these countries on his own if he did both he might understand what goes on and would change his opinions
caroline Carr-Locke, edinburgh, scotland
I think that Ken Livingstone will have a nasty shock at his nbext exposure to the ballot box. There is a streak of immorality a mile wide running through all UK politics at the moment and people have had enough of it.
Bishop Dominic Stockford, Teddington, UK
"stinks of a witch hunt"
Nothing wrong with a witch hunt if you actually find a real witch!
Alex, London,
We got rid of Scargill - its long past time to get rid of Livingstone
David Cartright, Birmingham,
I'm only surprised that Londoners are surprised. This is the same currupt meglomaniac who ran the GLC. Does no one remember that? Does no one remember the warnings issued about this man?
Its the same old dodge. Claim that an organisation is for something nebulous, but politically correct, like 'ethnic awareness'.Those people who aren't too scared to question the cause, can't tie down where the money is being used.
He's done it before and he'll do it again.
Phil Bailey, Shrewsbury, united kingdom
Ken is obviously a wrong'un, so why do you Cockneys keep voting for him?
Frank Upton, Solihull,
Even if he had a clean record - and it is clear that he has not ( I don't care about the whisky although I hope he pays for it himself, rather than us or is the entire GLA entitled to the same perks?) - I would still think that it is time for new blood. Brian Paddick has my vote : he truly knows the city and he is young witha fresh approach.
sandrine, London
sandrine, london, UK
Livingstone is a disgarce to London, a tin-pot dictator sure of his own omniscience and full of petty hatreds and prejudices. He is a fraud, jumping on the Green bandwagon to justify his class war and teenage sociaism. As for democracy, he has demonstrated time and time again that he will ignore the will of the people whenever it runs contrary to what he wants to do - look at the sham consultations he undertakes.
Tim, London,
Chavez and Livingston... for people that supposedly dont care much for democracy, they win a fair few elections!
Matt, Birmingham, UK
Living in the London area in the 80's I remember a news article asking people to say what they thought Ken did with his massive budget. All sorts of suggestions came in, but he didn't provide any of it. The only thing the public got right on the list of things paid for by Ken and his gang was the London Fire Brigade.
Complain all you like London, but this is the second time you've handed him your money. Now, while we're at it, I have a car I'd like you to look at ...
KR, Stockport,
I was crushed when Ken won again. But do you remember how many people voted? A fraction of the London population, some ridiculous number (a hundred thousand?). People, those of you who are registered, please vote this time!
Merivel, London,
I'm a Londoner born and bred and Ken Livingstone has done so much to make London a great place. Anyone who thinks that corruption is bad under Ken obviously didn't live under Thatcher where corruption was rife (Dame Shirley Porter). Ken will be getting my vote.
Kim, London,
He was a joker, but now Ken Livingstone has turned into a nasty piece of work. It would be great for London when Boris Johnson or Brian Paddick will beat him.
Jerome, Greenwich, London
People should compare the horrible similarities between Livingstones relationship with his tame architects to the 'friendship' between Newcastle council leader T Dan Smith & architect Poulson in the 1960's... they ended up in jail for mispending public money on nasty tower blocks. As with Livingstone, Smith started off a Trotskyist and ended up something rather different....
Peter, Nottingham, UK
I would like to know what qualifications 'Red Ken' has to run as Mayor of London. The English are so 'Laiseez-Faire' about who they elect as their leaders, witness NuLabour's, Blair, Clarke, Blears, Hewitt, Jowell, Hain plus all the other charlatans posing as 'Poiliticians'. Why do you think Hitler rose to power ? Think about it - Shame it won't happen in England because the Brits are too comfortable - living on other people's money. David Smith, Cannes.
David Smith, Cannes, France
Yes, I also think Livingstone reminds me uncomfortably of Mugabe.
JJ Spader, Greater London,
kingkerouac
can you briefly list these positives?
sc,london
schatterton, London, uk
Not such a surprise; Ken has spent his life admiring various dictators and autocrats, so these are his role models and influences. Maybe socialists who have a contempt for democracy except when it suits them need to be seen for what they are, and London needs someone who does not see it as an extension of their own ego.
Vincent Egan, Lubenham,
Utter, utter drivel. (Boris Johnson supporter, eh?)
I'm am surprised by The Times.
I'm no fan of long-term leadership, but the positives, in Livingstone's case, far outweigh the negatives.
This stinks to high heaven of a witch-hunt.
Kingkerouac, London,
Have to agree with Eugene on this one. You guys in London got what you deserved.
Lie in it.
Phill , The Wirral, England
Watching Livingstone is like a flash back to the 80s - a bunch of Trots with 1950s concepts of class war, rolling in cash, carrying out inept but highly politicised administration, with a vague whiff of violence for those who require 're-education'. I remember the branch meetings with members of 'Militant' waiting outside to 'talk matters over' with their opponents.
Livingstone hasn't changed from the man who ran London into the ground in the early 80s. With a weak assembly and no political opposition to speak of it is going to get worse before it gets better.
Mark, Berkhamsted,
Ken Livingstone said in his radio interview that he'd "trust Lee Jasper with his life". Let's hope it really does come to that. I resent someone who supposedly represents me as a Londoner thinking it's OK to liken a Jewish journalist to a concentration camp guard. Tony Travers likens Livingstone to Jacques Chirac - it's such a\a shame I cannot mention who I'd liken Livingstone to. A couple of clues - Zimbabwe and it's not Ian Smith !
Robert Rees, London, U.K.
he must go or else we must leave
terry sullivan, morden, london england
Britain deserves it for joining the decadent West in allowing crackpots, such as Communists (even worse than Nazis) to run for office in the first place. To allow the enemies of freedom to take part in an election leading to power in a free system is not only an abject oxymoron, it is blatant moral cowardice.
eugene, heidelberg, germany