David Aaronovitch
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
At my daughter's Christmas concert on Monday night, none of the Tamil parents knew the words to the carols, so the Jews had to sing twice as loud. The next morning I read Libby Purves's elegant reproach to the great atheist Richard Dawkins on his admission that he too enjoys belting out Away in a Manger. “How honest is it to sing?” she demanded of Professor Dawkins. “How insulting to those who mean every word of it?”
This made me uneasy about the carolling Jews. True, they absolutely don't rubbish God, but Jews explicitly deny the possibility of Jesus being the Messiah, and therefore presumably ought to worry about causing offence to true believers when singing this, as they did: “Late in time behold Him come/ Offspring of a Virgin's womb/ Veiled in flesh the Godhead see/Hail the incarnate Deity.” You'll recognise there Charles Wesley's own interesting preoccupation with carnality, as well as one of the most famous not quite rhyming couplets in schoolboy history.
Fortunately both Jews and Hindu Tamils were — for reasons of time, I imagine — spared the verse from Once in Royal David's City, where the young Jesus's imagined relationship with his Virgin mother is extolled, continuing: “Christian children all must be/Mild, obedient, good as he.”
The author of the carol was a Victorian Ulsterwoman, C.F. Alexander, the wife of the Bishop of Derry and Raphoe, and Mrs Alexander was not averse to supplementing the scriptures when she felt the Spirit demanded it. In the version of Once in Royal David's City that we did sing on Monday, the final verse ended thus: “When like stars His children crowned/All in white shall wait around.” Now, it's been years since I took biblical instruction, but I am not aware of any authority for the exact colour of the clothes to be worn in Heaven by those eternally “waiting around”. Like any songwriter Mrs Alexander had just made it up.
It seems a bit harsh, therefore, to make belief any kind of test for joining in the song. Worse, I would say that anyone who “means every word of it”, given the provenance of many words, has problems much bigger than whether a Professor R. Dawkins denies God.
And it also raises a question over Libby's suggestion that Prof D might be more honest if he stuck to “a verse or two of Frosty the Snowman”. This an interesting parallel, since this, too, is a tale of resurrection, in which Frosty finally, “Had to hurry on his way/But he waved goodbye saying/‘Don't you cry, I'll be back again some day'.” And songwriters Jack Nelson and Steve Rollins had no less supernatural backing for their words than did Mrs Alexander, so one perhaps ought to add that Professor Dawkins may only sing their song if confident that he isn't in the company of those who believe that Frosty the Snowman is real.
David Aaronovitch is a writer, broadcaster and commentator on international politics and the media. He writes for The Times Comment page on Tuesdays. He has previously written for The Guardian, The Observer and The Independent, winning numerous accolades, including Columnist of the Year 2003 and the 2001 Orwell prize for journalism. He has appeared on the satirical TV current affairs programme Have I Got News For You and made radio broadcasts on historical topics
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If it is dishonest for an atheist to sing Christmas carols, it follows that it would also be true to say that it is dishonest for anyone to sing any song without first considering the implication of the lyrics and subsequently measuring those inferences against their beliefs. Such a move would prove too laborious to be maintained, and would destroy the vivacity that singing is founded on. On the bright side, far fewer people would find themselves moved to sing songs by the Cheeky Girlsâ¦
Becca, Horwich, England
Atheists should sing carols if they want to.
Robert Black, Glasgow, Scotland
If I fancied singing a bit of G&S and sang the words "three little girls from school are we", would it matter that I was (a) only one person, and not three and (b) not a girl? Should I be barred from singing it? Would you frown on me (bad singing apart)?
Andy Armitage, Hebron, Whitland, West Wales, UK
I thought the winter solstice was on December 21st? Don't quote me on this but I believe the First Ecumencal Council set the date for the celebration of the Nativity of Christ as December 25 (by the Julian calendar).
I have been looking up the carol "Pat a Pan" because I wanted to know the words. In doing so, I have found out that 'carols' were not originally songs. Carols were origianally medieval dances. Later, words were added to the tunes.
Pat a Pan, by the way, is not medieval. It was written about 1700 by a Burgundian and, therefor, was in French. That is why there are some many English versions and I'm not sure that any are accurtate tranlslations. But some of them sound pretty good.
What's wrong with athiests or Jews or Hindus singing Christmas carols? If they learn the Christian ones (as opposed to the secular ones), they may become Christians someday.
Mary, House Springs, USA
Zaphod of Cambridge, maybe our dna is similar because there are certain laws made by the Creator which come into play, enacting upon all created live creatures in the space-time continuum. But, as "they're none so blind as those who don't want to see", my prayer of faith is that you will perhaps one day understand and SEE that we are made in God's image. Don't wait until it's too late.
You're the one sitting in darkness!
Yank, Warrenton , Missouri
The Yank from Missouri sadly confuses the weight of evidence issue when ranting on about evolution. There is a huge weight of corroborating evidence that man shares a common ancestor with the apes. The fact that 90%+ of our DNA is shared with most mammals and 98%+ with Chimpanzees should be enough to convince most that it's true. Believing 'revealed truth' in 2000 year-old texts in preference to real understanding of how the world works can only come from those who were indoctrinated in youth. Christmas carols are just the tip of this particular iceberg - let's get religion out of our schools and ideally out of our societies. There is real truth to be discovered out there - but you won't find it in thoeology of any sort. Listen to this year's Chrismas lectures on the BBC, sit back and be enlightened. Merry Christmas!
Zaphod, Cambridge, UK
"but to adopt a conquered peoples' faith and change it is sociological evolution and political genius". Or, to be more objective, dishonest and sneaky. Not very Christ-like, but typically Christian.
Al, Weybridge, UQ
Think about the Christians who are forced to listen to the unbelieving teachers who are spouting their "beliefs" in the classrooms and in particular one belief about man descending from apes!
"The fool hath said in his heart that there is no God." Read the scriptures and throw out that spirit of unbelief before you wind up in hell with the unbelievers.
Yank, Warrenton , Missouri
"At Christmas, atheists are often damned if they do and damned if they don't."
Sorry to be pedantic but If you are an atheist you can't be damned. "Damnation" is just another one of those dreadful punishments dreamed up by the Christian religion to keep their flock in order.
Al, Weybridge, UQ
Everyone should sing and carols are what we sing at this time of year. The words can bring joy to the heart whether you believe in the Christian message or not. Furthermore, the origins of Carols are not necessarily rooted in Christianity, just as the timing of Christmas doubtless co-incides with some long-forgotten pagan festival. John Rutter has composed some of our most delightful recent carols, many with words explicit to the Christian faith and its Christmas message, and his attitude to Christianity is famously ambiguous! Christians shouldn't be so precious about carols - you never know when an atheist may see the light. After all, it's better to save one sinner . . . . . . . isn't it?
Unfortunately, despite a couple of decades of lusty carol singing, I am still a devout atheist. BUT YOU NEVER KNOW!
MadSkier, London, England
Atheists singing carols? Tch! They'll be hijacking Yule next!
AngieRS, Brighton, UK
TJ - -unfortunately your argument seems somewhat pointless.
I didn't hijack it, the the settled Roman forces of Europe did to appease the Celtic peoples and also assimilate their new found beliefs after their experience with Mithras. Which I'm sure you will agree is a canny ruse.
I am concious that Christ (according to theorists) was supposed to have been born around March but to adopt a conquered peoples' faith and change it is sociological evolution and political genius.
The fact remains however that a festival did exist on 25 of December back in the 'olden' days and so some sort of religious belief MUST have existed to celebrate the winter solstice. Yes it was a Pagan festival, not Christian but Pagans hardly fit into the category of atheism.
If you want to song Christmas carols in march - please, be my guest!
Barney, Liverpool, UK
David Aaronovitch should check his facts before suggesting that Mrs Alexander had supplemented the scriptures. As some one who knew and understood her Bible very well she was spot on with her lyrics. The final verse of "Once in Royal David's city" picks up imagery from Revelation chapter 7. Here John, in his vision of heaven, sees a great multitude wearing white robes. One of the elders then explains to John that "these are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb." So this is a vision of those who while on Earth have trusted the Lord Jesus as their saviour and have had their sins forgiven thorugh Jesus sacrifical death. They therefore now wear white robes as they praise their saviour in heaven. So the colour is hugely significant and Mrs Alexander certainly did not make it up.
Charles Farrar-Bell, London, UK
At Christmas, atheists are often damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they participate they're hypocrites ("How can you sing carols when it's not in your heart?"), but if they don't they're extremists ("It's just a song").
Peter Joyce, Nelson, New Zealand
For Barney, Liverpool, UK
The cult to which I belong (Old Al's Universal Church) celebrates the miracle of the "return of the sun" every morning. Presumably it would be OK with you if we took every day off?
Al, Weybridge, UQ
Libby Purves seems like an intolerant dolt.
Here's a question: should atheists be allowed to perform in Handel's Messiah or Bach's Xmas Oratorio? Seems if you leave out the atheists you may be short a few musicians here and there. How about the Jews who play in orchestras? They don't believe that Jesus was the Messiah. Should they be forbidden from playing in the orchestra and singing in a choir as well?
Here's another question for Ms Purves - what's a decent Christian like her to do when the religious work being performed was itself written by an atheist? Should we ban performances of Brahms' and Verdi's Requiems because the composers weren't believers in the Christian god? Perhaps Ms Purves believes that the annoying strains of Christian Rock trump the works of Verdi and Brahms when it comes to revealing things spiritual.
Oh, well. It's about what one can expect from a person who presumes that she can go head to head with the mind of Richard Dawkins.
Mr Mark, Los Angeles, USA/California
For Libby Purves to write âHow insulting to those who mean every word of it?â just indicates to me the innate intolerance of many of the religious, and their ever present ability to seek and find offence just about everywhere.
Let's all celebrate the Winter Solstice with an uplifting sing-song!
paul newbold, sheffield, uk
Er, sorry Barney in Liverpool, but you Christians actually pinched the Winter Solstice festivals when you decided to choose December the 25th as the birthday of Jesus. The festival had existed for thousands of years before you lot hijacked it - so stop lecturing us all on the real meaning of Christmas - we are not celebrating the same thing. I'll not bother you if you don't bother me.
TJ, newnham, uk
If Libby Purves thinks it's wrong for Dawkins to enjoy carols, then will she also be telling off Christians who enjoy the music of the atheist Delius?
Or are Christians who enjoy Delius really doing it to insult atheists?
What a petty, small-minded and neurotic little world Ms Purves lives in
Alistair, Edinburgh, Scotland
Atheists should be able to sing hymns - definitely. It shows appreciation of some of the most beautiful music in the world. It's like saying someone shouldn't be allowed to enjoy the music of John Lennon or Bob Dylan because they don't like their politics.
One thing atheists shouldn't be allowed to enjoy is the time off work that is given to celebrate the birth of Christ and other religious festivals. Muslims are allowed additional time off on Fridays, Jews - Saturdays, so Christians should allowed the relevant time off to enjoy celebrating the life of Jesus Christ. if the 25th December, Good Friday and Easter Sunday/Monday are just 'normal' days , THEN GO TO WORK!
I've got plenty of mates who refuse to believe in God but will happily accept presents and enjoy the revelry associated with Christmas and it seems very hippocritical. Incidentally 'hippocracy' is often a reason sited as to why they choose to not believe in God or religions!
Barney, Liverpool, UK
As the man said, "I count religion as but a childish toy and hold there is no sin but ignorance". Simple, really.
Al, Weybridge, UQ
I am not religious, but I refuse to ditch the tradition of singing and playing Christmas carols just for that reason. If you accept from the past only the things you can believe in you are a very poor person indeed. In my opinion, Christmas carols have more to do with living humans, their emotions and desires, than with God or Christ (whether you believe in them or not)
Hein Maassen, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
I am writing to correct David Aaronovitch, who accuses the author of Once in royal David's City of 'supplementing the scriptures' in the line "When like stars His children crowned/All in white shall wait around". I was amazed that such a seemingly well educated journalist is unaware of the many places in the Bible in which the redeemed in heaven are described as wearing white (eg. Revelation 7.9) I was also shocked that Mr. Aaronovitch didn't think of checking this out before submitting his article. I recommend the Bible to him - its a fantastic read.
Chloe Light, Biblical Studies Graduate, Norwich, Norfolk
Thank you David.
Kidd Garrett, Bristol, UK
I am a recent convert to atheism after most of my life as an orthodox agnostic Jew. If that appears to make little sense, suffice to say that when I got married I felt uncomfortable at the prospect of doing so in a reform or liberal synagogue.
We used to have very good friends in Guelph Ontario who were practising Christians and on one occasion we stayed with them over Christmas and joined them at midnight mass. For all that I did not share the experience in its entirety, I found it very uplifting in a way other religious music seems to lack. You need not be a believer to have a spiritual dimension and if you do not understand that I suggest you study ethics formally as I did at university, Aristotle and many others.
On Tuesday my mother had a Christmas party in the flats for senior citizens where she lives. The local vicar came along with his troupe to sing carols. They do so every year knowing that half the residents are Jewish. Why not? We should accept one another on equal terms.
Stephen Felce, Enfield, UK
In my humble opinion, as a practicing christian and priest, i have to say that you misunderstand the nature of believing as propositional rather than relational. To me, faith is an I-Thou encounter, and singing carols/hymns, or celebrating the eucharist or whatever the ritual medium is, means experiencing God. I take doctrine and the Bible to be reliable and tried and tested means of grace without any need to go down the road of infallibility. That would be to miss the point.
It's great that, to echo Churchill, people feel they can be 'flying buttresses' rather than pillars of the church. But staying outside looking in, wistfully or otherwise, is to me rather like discussing the merits or integrity of a menu but never enjoying the meal. Faith feeds me or it is just nice empty words.
David Grieve, Cockfield, Bishop Auckland, Co Durham