David Aaronovitch
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Before the PM had shaken the first lean and sinewy business hand at his jobs summit yesterday, the selectively lugubrious duo behind the Balanced Migration group - the MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames - had declared the exercise as destined to fail.
Their argument was that, in certain categories, non-EU economic migrants are still allowed to seek or take up jobs “for which British unemployed people have not had the chance to apply”, and that unless “British unemployed individuals have a first crack at all jobs that become available” how could the Government's unemployment policies be taken seriously? Arrangements permitting foreigners to take up jobs not advertised in Britain, argued the pair, “should be suspended while the recession lasts”. However long that is, and however it is defined.
A flavour of Balanced Migration's attitude towards job-sucking outsiders can be gleaned from their proposals for graduates. They note that foreigners who have taken their degrees in the UK are allowed to stay and work for two years, at the end of which they may apply for a work permit and, if the employer so chooses, keep their jobs. Mr Field and Mr Soames discern a terrible injustice in this because of the “direct competition with British graduates who will have incurred heavy debts in acquiring their degrees” (they have no interest in whether foreign students, who typically pay higher fees, are similarly indebted). Their proposal is that employers should be forced to advertise the jobs of these foreigners, whether they want to or not.
I think this idea is both rhetorically unpleasant and practically daft. It is clear to me, if not to the parliamentary pair, that if such a policy were to be enacted any foreign students of reasonable talent would be entitled to feel that Britain does not want them, and act accordingly. We would also soon discover that not a few of these jobs will go abroad. And then there's the issue of retaliation.
Too bad, because the fact seems to be that we liberals are not winning this fight against the economic and cultural nationalists. I realised this when listening to a Radio 4 programme on the politics of immigration last Saturday. There was a report from Peterborough where some locals were complaining about foreign young men in vans and pressure on parking spaces, and employers were praising the same young men's willingness to pick fruit from orchards that indigenous youth preferred not to visit.
There was an economist, an interview with an under-führer in the BNP, another with Sir Andrew Green, the chairman of the anti-immigration Migration Watch UK, and then representatives of the three main parties. And it was this last segment that was so depressing that the radio (no more to blame for my distemper, of course, than immigrants are for the recession) nearly ended up as several garden ornaments.
Not one of the pols, Chris Huhne, of the Lib Dems, Damian Green, of the Tories, or Phil Woolas, of Labour, could find anything good to say about immigration, except in passing on quickly to how tough they would all be. Mr Huhne: “Clearly we made a big mistake in allowing entry for new entrants to the EU when others didn't.” But didn't we get a lot of talent, he was asked. “Yes, we did,” he conceded, “but there is a pace of change issue and an absorption issue...” Oh heroic Huhne! And so we should have a “points system as operated in Australia” and - incidentally - as recommended by Migration Watch.
Damian Green: “The central problem is the rate of change and the rate of increase that the Government has allowed over the last ten years. Services can't cope with the sheer numbers that have come in. That's what gives rise to the various complaints you have heard from Peterborough [parking spaces, Damian?]. And all those problems will get much sharper during a recession unless we do something about it.”
And Mr Woolas: “It's assumed that Labour is soft on immigration. In actual fact the largest influxes of migrants into this country came during Conservative periods of government - if you look at the 1950s and early 1960s and indeed the situation with Eastern Africa.”
“The situation with Eastern Africa”? He means the time when the Kenyan and Ugandan Asians were expelled, and arrived in a Britain for which they had passports, where they were called “Paki”, and where they became some of the most successful and dynamic citizens this nation has possessed. And this is used by a Labour minister, a Labour minister, to attack past Conservative governments for softness on immigration! I wanted to throw up.
Of course, they all tell us, none of this is about race and it is politically correct to suggest that it is, as well as an attempt to avoid necessary debate. It's about overcrowding and the prospect of 70 million Britons (a prospect that is most unlikely). It's about jobs (despite migration helping to create jobs). It's about pressure on services (despite migrants disproportionately providing them or paying for them).
It isn't the fault of Migration Watch UK - now so respected by all the parties - that it is described by the BNP as “the respected Migration Watch UK organisation”. And it isn't the fault of its gentlemanly chairman that an article of his in The Sunday Times 15 months ago was headlined “Hold back the immigrant flood”. And he cannot be blamed, either, if people don't bother to read carefully what he says.
He pointed out, rightly, that the Poles and Slovaks would stop coming, and that after May 2011 they would also work in EU countries, such as Germany and France, that had delayed admitting their workers. But others would come in, he said, and “failure to act now will mean that our society will be changed beyond recognition - and especially our cities... According to one academic study [from a Migration Watch supporter, Dr David Coleman, as it happens], the ethnic community in Britain will grow from 9 per cent to 29 per cent by mid-century.”
I spoke to Sir Andrew yesterday who, courteous as ever, confirmed to me that “ethnic community” denotes “non-white”. Not, please notice, non-British and also notice that this figure includes anyone classified as mixed-race. Therefore “our society will be changed out of all recognition” means, not to put too fine a point upon it, a Britain which is nearly a third touched with the tar brush.
No more cant. This is still part of what scares our pusillanimous partymen, who are all now involved in a revolting public auction to show who can be the “toughest” on the economic migrant - that miscreant who comes over and does our jobs and pays our taxes and adds to our pool of talent. And who may well, if Sir Andrew Green is right, be ethnic.
David Aaronovitch is a writer, broadcaster and commentator on international politics and the media. He writes for The Times Comment page on Tuesdays. He has previously written for The Guardian, The Observer and The Independent, winning numerous accolades, including Columnist of the Year 2003 and the 2001 Orwell prize for journalism. He has appeared on the satirical TV current affairs programme Have I Got News For You and made radio broadcasts on historical topics
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
To Ian from Cheshire:
What they really meant was that they wanted something closer to slaves and they can't enslave the Brits. The employers always prefer slaves duly delivered through overall-economic-prosperity-at-whatever-the-cost government immigration policies.
Asad, London,
That's the dilemma of being full rights yielding citizens of these so called civil and just societies: with full citizenship rights access to not all the jobs is not guaranteed especially those not requiring genuinely creative and/or large amount of brain cells and advanced linguistic ability.
Asad, London,
In a globalised world with Britain facing the prospect of prolonged recession perhaps its time for mass emigration, as a science graduate my job prospects are better abroad, its time people saw that open EU borders work both ways.
Joseph Rogers, Warwick, UK
I live in Australia. An American couple have moved in near us. They worked for an American company in the UK for just over 4 years and because of that they now have British Passports.
Life's weird ain't it.
Dinoz, Brisbane, Australia
I just think that over population is the main challenge facing the World. In other words "don't take up my space". Less is better when it comes to people.
William, London, UK
Chris K WRONG all thecountries mentioned have plenty of space and their cities are not overcrowded. Thats why they encourage immigrants because they need more people.
bill, ely,
"And then there's the issue of retaliation."
It's already a lot more difficult for Britons to get work permits for professional jobs in most non-EU developed countries than it is for their citizens to take up similar jobs here. It's us that needs to restore the balance.
Leo, York, UK
Another issue is that many British jobs are open to foreigners ONLY. I applied to a farm, picking fruit and packaging them... the pay was more than decent and I was an able worker. I got rejected outright! They said Brits tend to be unreliable - well, give me a chance at least!
Ian, Cheshire,
The challenge lies in insuring that immigrants reinforce our democracies. Otherwise, we create enclaves of intolerance, as in the novel "Up Dog Street" whose protagonist says "I'm not concerned about the browning of America, as long as its not a reference a reference to the color of their shirts."
TGonzalez, Spring Hill, USA
It is about race. I am an immigrant. I have heard the argument that the issue is not race while at the same time ranting against the influx of immigrants. No-one oddly has accused me of being a foreigner stealing "British" jobs. Maybe its because I have a white face and English is my first language
Alex, London,
Lucy from London you talk nonsense, We moved to rural France 5 years ago along with many other Brits, and I can honestly say that at 65 years work harder than ever I did sitting in an office keying into a computer. With 8 acres of land life is hard but good. crime is unknown around these parts,
AFJ, Launay Villiers, france
If the argument really was just about numbers, with the government concerned about overcrowding, where are the policies limiting the number of children you may have? Deciding that it's fine for benefits families to keep on pumping out kids while blocking immigration is clearly about something else.
Richard, Cambridge,
Very good article. I will vote for a party who says they want to encourage migration. If some one is keen enough to travel to another country to work, I want them here. Our problem is with native brits not working hard and moving likewise - they only emigrate to live the life of reily in spain
Lucy, London,
Economic immigration has helped disguise the government's failure to get the idle into work. Also, many migrants from Eastern EU have families there who become eligible for UK benefits and that together with the money sent 'home' by very many immigrant communities drains billions from the UK economy
Maddy, Worcester, England
I don't care about their "manners" (Marek, London). I want the children to be educated! Unfortunately, there's precious little chance of that, for their or anyone else's children unless they pay, and there aren't enough places for everyone to do that even if they could afford it.
Graham Rounce, London, UK
The UK has a welfare state which is funded by progressive taxation. This means that most immigrants, if they settle permanently, will consume more in services over the course of a lifetime than they pay in taxes. In the long run, this can only slow down our rate of economic growth.
Edward Hubbard, Tamworth, Staffordshire
Migrants aren't the problem, they get no benefits. Benefits and big governernment are the problem, in Scotland 1 in 4 is now State dependent either for work or benefits. Slash the benefit system and reduce government, force them to be productive and they will be, reduce the soft options!
Doug Bates, St. Albans,
And prevent British men in their fifties from ever working again if they find themselves redundant.........
Judy, Liverpool, England
I wouldn't mind half of these argument if the unemplyable could be bothered to work. They moan about foreigners "taking THEIR jobs" but either can't be bothered to work or think that certain jobs are below them!!!! Labour has encouraged this and being unemplyed certainly beats working for most!
James F, London,
"the island of 'Great' Britain having a population more than Canada, Australia and New Zealand put together" Well done for naming three countries which have huge areas that are uninhabital due to arctic temperatures, desert and huge mountains.
Chris Kirk, Loughborough, LEICS
We are now the most densely populated country in Europe. We have millions who could work but sit back on benefits. We have a growing, almost parasitical, class who rely on taxes from the rest of the population.
Surely time so say enough people and get more gainfully occupied to better us all?
Richard Painter, Aldbury, GB
Many people in the UK work for multinational companies, so good jobs are created here by "immigrants", are these jobs to be filled only by nationals? These companies pay good taxes to the British government as well as foreign workers.
Riccardo, Guildford, Surrey
The economic immigrants are not the problem . They find jobs. The key issues are;
1. Immigrants must integrate, as the East African Asians have.
2. The pace of immigration needs tobe at a rate that can be assimilated.
3. 'Peterborough' youth needs to do the work available.Benefits are too easy
R G James, Brasschaat, Belgium
With the island of 'Great' Britain having a population more than Canada, Australia and New Zealand put together, the real issue is how many more people can be squashed onto it.
Paul, Coventry,
I don't think it's racist or wrong to be concerned at levels of immigration to the UK. The work ethic of employees from abroad shames much of our indigenous (white) population, however New Labour allowed hundreds of thousands of people into Britain illegally and is now paying the price.
Stephen, Glasgow,
A country owes its citizens loyalty just as citizens owe their country loyalty.
A country (or the EU) owes its citizens loyalty in first crack at jobs ahead of foreigners.
Citizens own their country loyalty by keeping down the growth of human population and preserving the environment.
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada
Sun never sets on the British Empire
This is what all of us heard for the past 100 years.
Now due to the lure of more money, good jobs and better
treatment migrants come loaded in Boeing 777 you have no right to complain.
Only option is to make way for the unskilled and semi skilled
migrants
S.Venkateshwaran, mumbai , india
Liberal open immigration policies keep wages down, cut the cost of education (we don't need to educate our own if we can import the already educated), and boosting the wealth of property owners by increasing demand for property while making humans cheaper. To heck with British plants and animals.
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada
The poles can now work here in France, the significant difference is that they will not get a job unless they can speak french fluently, also proof of qualifications or work experience are required before a SIRET is granted, no dodgy plumbers here.
N Harding, Ladapeyre, France
So where Mr Aaronovitch is your limit 100 million, 150 million, 2 billion? The only diffenece between some of us and you is that we feel the limit is at or below 60 million. The rest is morale posturing
Mark wilson, Nottinham,
The unfettered immigration of the past 11 years has had a few positive effects on the UK but far more negatives. Our society - which was tolerant & fairly cohesive has become divided & intolerant. We want our country back. Brits SHD be put first with jobs, housing etc over newly arrived immigrants
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
Sorry, David, but you've lost the argument. A projected unemployment level of three million suggests that the employment rights of immigrants are going to be rather low on people's priority list in the next year or two.
Colin MacKinnon, Oxford, United Kingdom
Was it not Brown who said "British jobs for British workers"? The basic point David is that no people like to see their native culture threatened by a large influx of foreigners from different cultures. The British are no different from other nationalities in this respect. It is all about numbers.
Richard, Kidderminster, England
As elsewhere in the world the UK is already suffering from overpopulation as witnessed by traffic jams, housing shortages, litter etc. Inviting in people with the required skills s ok when these skills are in demand but what happens when they are not. Retrainingis the solution to skill shortages.
Graham, Nes, Norway
Strong words Ged.
Strong, ridiculous words.
Paul, Singapore,
I agree with every one of you points. But it is what you fail to mention that I worry about. With the exception of a small educated elite grown over the last 2 generations in a handful of select developed nations, human beings all over do not seem ready yet to enter a post-racial society.
Dave, Beijing, China
I recently had a conversation with an Edinburgh friend who complained about immigration....
Has an immigrant ever bothered you ?
No.
Ever robbed you?
No, but my house has been broken into several times by locals.
Ever been rude to you?
No, usually gangs of local lads do that.
Where is the problem?
mark, Munich,
If Poles are discriminated against for jobs in Britain, can we kick out Tesco, BP and, last not least, Ernst & Young from Poland?
Mariusz Kuklinski, London, UK
Our society has already been changed out of all recognition. But it wasn't immigrants who did it - it was New Labour. They have turned Britain into an authoritarian land where the state intrudes more and more into personal life and we are beset by petty bureaucrats.
Jamie Gilmour, Bolton, UK
'It's about pressure on services (despite migrants disproportionately providing them or paying for them'.
You are spot on there. Last week a government minister said 80% of Ethnic Minorities work in the Public sector.
The Migration Watch site does categorise East-Europeans as Ethnic Minorities.
Richard, London, England
How ridiculous - we've had a decade of unlimited massive levels of immigration with the native population never consulted, and even now the main parties are only pretending they want a change in this deliberate policy. GB is a country more fragmented and divided than any time I can ever remember.
Steve Jacks, London,
Interesting article.
Adi, Reading, UK
Our economy is in a mess. Do we really need a massive outflow of cash from workers whose hearts and minds are really elsewhere? We are in a baby boom with over 70% born to foreign born mothers. We are short of skills, English students pay fees, Scottish do not. What is right?
Harry H, London, UK
To believe that it is simply about economics is to reveal a lack of love and understanding for this country.
This analysis displays a cold, money orientated approach to life which is alien to the British spirit.
We simply don't want the country to be over crowded by people with different manners.
Marek, London,
As long as you people get everything cheap why worry about exploitation. People worked in terrible conditions for years then when they said enough, and demanded better, Immigrants were allowed in and jobs moved overseas. Now we have people on starvation wages here to supply you. you disgust me.
ged , manchester,