Gerard Baker
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
The Democratic presidential primary contest has provided yet more proof, if any were needed, of the validity of Churchill's old quip that, while members of the other political party may be your opposition, your enemies are definitely on your own side.
In South Carolina this week, the two leading Democratic candidates squared off in what was by far the most testy and unpleasant series of exchanges of the whole presidential campaign so far. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton spat accusations back and forth about the arcana of their various policy proposals and traded nastier gibes about who had been the bigger hypocrite in taking money from evil corporations while claiming to stand up for the little guy.
Then Mr Obama tried to shift the conversation to one of the many distortions by the Clinton team of things he had said on the campaign trail. Specifically he accused Mrs Clinton of misrepresenting some mildly positive remarks he made last week about Ronald Reagan.
“I did not mention (Reagan's) name,” Mrs Clinton said.
“Your husband did,” said Mr Obama
“Well, I'm here. He's not,” the former First Lady triumphantly shot back.
To which Mr Obama responded, almost ruefully: “OK. Well, I can't tell who I'm running against sometimes.”
It was a moment that captured not only the rapidly intensifying rancour of the Democratic race but the essence of what this presidential election is actually about.
If anyone ever doubted that the Hillary Clinton campaign was nothing less than a full-scale restoration of a political dynasty, the past two weeks will have surely disabused them.
Sixteen years ago, when her husband Bill first ran for president, he and his wife offered the US a famous bargain - “two for the price of one”. If they elected Bill, not only would they get the smart, roguish Rhodes scholar with the Southern drawl and the twinkling eyes. They would get, too, the cool, intellectually sharp, disciplined lawyer and policy wonk in her own right: Hillary - to many, the better half.
At the time the promise was regarded as a bit of a gaffe, a feminist leap too far for a country that liked its First Ladies to fuss about the gentler side of presidential labour - arranging seating plans for state dinners and espousing good, non-partisan causes such as tackling drug abuse and adult illiteracy. In their public rhetoric, at least, the Clintons dropped the idea.
But in office the plan went operational. Not only was Hillary a central figure in political decision-making, she was part of a symbiotic, co-dependent political relationship. Whenever Bill got into some scrape it was his wife's willingness to forgive - and go on the offensive against their political enemies - that saved his skin.
In her sharply insightful book, For Love of Politics, Sally Bedell Smith dissects the Clinton relationship, and says it is less like a traditional marriage and more like a vast and successful corporation that dominates the business of American politics. For eight years Bill was the President and Chief Executive Officer while Hillary was the top manager. When he left office, Hillary moved up to the CEO's suite and Bill took over as non-executive chairman. Now, the country is being invited to accept another takeover offer from Clinton Incorporated.
And so when the upstart young black senator from Illinois attempted to lead something of a shareholders' revolt against the proposal, he met the full force of the Clintons' wrath. Bill Clinton has been unleashed on the Obama candidacy like an ageing but still ferocious pitbull let loose on an elegant but slightly diffident Great Dane.
Starting when Mrs Clinton was at her low point just before the New Hampshire primary, the former President has sunk his teeth into the Obama hide and never let go. He dismissed Mr Obama's patently true claim that he had been the only candidate to firmly oppose the Iraq war from the start as “the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen”. In Nevada last week he virtually accused Mr Obama of rigging the vote in the Democratic caucuses there. And it was indeed, as Mrs Clinton gleefully pointed out in that South Carolina debate, her husband who has been accusing Mr Obama of the mortal Democratic sin of saying nice things about Ronald Reagan.
The spectacle has been unprecedented. When George W.Bush ran for president in 2000, his father, former President George H.W.Bush, who had himself been mauled by the Clintons in 1992, pointedly stayed out of the campaign. That might simply owe more to better breeding in the Brahmin Bushes from New England than you find in the dysfunctional family of street-brawling strivers from Arkansas. But it also true proof of how much is at stake for both Clintons this time.
Now you can think - as many Democrats do - that a return to the Clinton years is precisely what a battered and disillusioned America needs today. You can believe - as many independents do - that after seven years of a presidency that has done more to deplete America's strength and global standing than any in the past 30 years that it might not be so bad to venture back to those heady days when all anyone worried about was how to distribute the peace dividend and what to do with the budget surplus.
But Bill Clinton's behaviour these past couple of weeks ought by now to be flashing warning signs for American voters. It is not just that his egregious interventions in the campaign have revived the near certain prospect of a demoralising replay of the stomach-churning bitterness and vicious partisanship of the 1990s - not all of which was the Clintons' fault.
It is that, if nothing else, the history of America, from its very founding, has been a history of the struggle to constrain the appetites of powerful men - and occasionally women. It was this fear of the monarchical tendency that persuaded Americans more than 50 years ago to limit presidents to two terms in office.
By cleverly reincorporating themselves as a political institution in their own right, the Clintons are offering an extra-constitutional detour around this impediment. Her husband's evident role in his family's restoration should give any reasonable American pause when considering the virtues of Mrs Clinton's own claim to the presidency.

Gerard Baker is United States Editor and an Assistant Editor of The Times. He joined in 2004 from the Financial Times, where he had spent over ten years as Tokyo correspondent and Washington Bureau Chief. His weekly oped column appears on Fridays
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
&nbs
I am an independent voter, I am appalled by the behavior of the Clintons and simply amazed that there has been no backlash against them from within the democratic party. If they continue on their current ethical trajectory, it should be about one week before they sprout horns, a tail and a pitchfork. There is no card, racial, gender or otherwise, that the Clintons will not play. As they move toward the white house, they degrade us all with their actions.
If the democrats nominate Bill and Hillary (let's face it, they are running together), they are going to reinvigorate the republicans. While I can accept most Clinton policies, I cannot tolerate or condone their behavior.
I don't know how to explain this country to those of you on the outside looking in. After Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush you probably think we are all crazy. But that is not so, we are just hampered by the tyranny of the majority . . . living in the demographic shadow of the baby-boomers has been no picnic. I assure you, younger generations in America are tired of what they have wrought. I for one, hope the pages of history turn, and take the dirty Clintons away.
Brooks of Sheffield, Sheffield, CT
Imagine the Brits speaking of nasty, bitchy, comments by Mr. Obama. Is this not the country that elected Tony "poodle" Blair? He worshiped at the feet of the American presidents. C-people, (Hill/Bill) are dysfunctional, and never worked out their inner demons. America does not want a monarchy, the UK pays welfare for the dysfunctional royals, and have the nerve to talk about our Mr. Obama. Tell us, do you have anyone in the UK as brilliant, skilled, and ready to take us Globally as Obama? No, you do not. If you want the Cs so bad, import them to Britain. Young people are engaged and will vote for Real Change. They know what playing in the mud is about, and they do not want the Clintons. Change is coming---Fast, and it's name is Barack Obama.
Rob, Charleston, SC
Enough of Bill Clinton's black pride, and let the truth be told.
Can someone clarify what qualifies Bill Clinton as the affectionately adopted first Black President?
Besides inheriting a decade of Black Academic Explosion and quasi black monolothic dislike of the Bible trouting slave master mentality of some Republicans, not all, exactly what did Bill Clinton did for African Americans beyond yellow political rhetoric?
Besides inappropriately going wayward with that woman _ Monica Lewinsky, where was he when genocide was raining in Rwanda? Didn't he coward to the right wing attack and withdrew the nomination of Prof. Lani Guinier?
We are grateful for the tireless work of the old Black Political Brigade. We the children will like to stake our future in real political shared aspiration, not the smearing at all cost tactics.
Let freedom ring _ not class, gender or divisive race tactics.
May the best democrat, independent or republican win the presidency.
God bless USA.
Dru DeWitts, Bollingbrook, IL
A Clinton dynasty criticising Putin for circumventing the Russian constitution. How interesting!
Fred Keeling, Almunecar, Spain
There is an inherent weakness in the American political system. How, on earth can you explain otherwise the appalling fact that Bush was elected not once but twice! I have followed all the twists and turns of the present presidential campaign and if the southern states are going to make it a black vote for a black candidate they are committing political suicide at this moment in time. I ask myself who do I want to be the leader of the "free world" this time next year. It certainly is not the smooth-talking vacuous senator with two years experience. I trust the American electorate will see through this hollow candidate but, and it is this that really worries me at the present time, this is the electorate that voted Bush into office for eight years!
Tom 0'Reilly, DERBY, Derbyshire
i am over the Clintons.
they have too many skeletons in their closet!
too many secrets and too many lies that I cannot trust
her nor Bill's judgement.
I cannot trust her ability to bring this country together.
please let me know what her 35 years of experience is.
and no, i don't see being a first lady counts.
an independant here and if she is elected, I will not vote DEM. and i am not the only one!!
ann, grand junction, CO
Bill looks like he's drunk on the campaign stump. It is amazing and sad to see. His legacy is dying before my eyes. I am disgusted with the Clinton's and turn off the television everytime either one of them comes on which is too much. Everyone is feeling weird about how they have conducted their campaign of shamelessness. The problem is if she gets the nomination tens of thousands of people are not gonna vote for her including me. They are gonna have to beg Obama to run on the ticket with her because that is the only way the Democrats are going to win this year. They have completely turned off half off of the Democratic voters. It is unbelievable! And very sad. And the real funny part of it all is, he may say "Hell No!"
Sandy, Novato, CA
It was a petty, bitchy, sexist, weak comment by Obama, a rare slip of the mask of someone who reminds me of one T Blair: a brilliant populist, a master of the empty but statesmanlike soundbite. Americans should be careful when buying snakeoil.
It's depressing that America of all countries should have ended up mirroring Pakistan in its tendancy to select its presidents from a small dynastic elite. But I don't remember any of this anti dynastic bile being directed at George W Bush, whose woeful and evident lack of intellect or spine surely made him one of the least qualified sons of a President ever to succeed. Hilary, in contrast, is at least a tested proven character, like her or not. It seems to me that most of those now discovering a dislike of the dynastic/elitist nature of US presidential politics have done so purely because of their dislike of her - a dislike not to be detatched from the fact she is a woman.
Anne, London, UK
As a Brit, I am fascinated by this election because there is so much more than America at stake after the disasterous Bush administration.
Barack Obama may inspire audiences with 'hope', but is he the man who can conceive, execute and deliver the plans that will bring substance and reality to an ideal? A demoralised America may look to him for 'change', but in reality, it looks as if his feet are made of clay.
Hillary Clinton may not have the rhetoric to inspire - precisely because she knows it takes more than words to get the job done. Bill Clinton may be treading on a few toes and ruffling a few feathers during this campaign, but he knows how much there is at stake.
The Republicans must be desperate for Obama to get the nomination - he would be an easy target. If he's found the last few days up against the Clintons tough, he ought to be asking himself if he's the right man for the job.
I wish I could vote, I know Hillary is the right candidate for the problems ahead.
Melanie, Bagshot, UK
If Obama can't stand up to the fairly tame criticisms he is receiving from the Clintons, how will he deal with the Republican sleaze machine that will hit him if he wins the nomination? The idea that Republicans will "unite" under his noble leadership is pure naivete - at least Hillary is living in the real world, and one thing we don't need is another president who can't tell fact from fantasy.
Joe, Detroit, Michigan
It really suprizes me when i see so many more shots being thrown at Hillary than anybody else and it makes me wonder why we are so fasinated in attacking the so called "status quo". It's time people realize we are electing the person who is best fit for the job, and weather Hillary has more flaws than Obama dose in running her campaine, it doesn't matter because she is still the better choice.
Amit Dow, San Francisco, California
More interesting is that this mud fight has made an opening for John Edwards, who is finally gaining attention for his wits and apparent sincerity rather than his haircut. I think Hillary is the best qualified to lead from "day 1," as she says, but her smiling snarkiness is very unattractive (note to Hillary: watch West Wing's CJ Craig and then practice in the mirror). Send Bill abroad to mend fences. Honestly, I'll happily take any of the top three Dems over 4 more years of Republican arrogance. I wish Obama had taken a few more years of policy-making and committee experience under belt...his time will come, if not now, later.
rbm, Columbia, SC, USA
The sight of Bill being Hillary's attack dog is pathetic.
We just don't need Bill in the White House again.
Bruce L. Northwood, Washington, D.C., USA
There will always be something to be said against women in leadership positions. Our perception of this will not change until the numbers of women and men in leadership positions are more equal. I congratulate Ms. Clinton for her courage to do what she is doing, and I sincerely hope that more women will follow on her footsteps.
Anne, LA, USA
It's a pity the Clintons will happily sacrifice their own party in their desperate attempt to regain power. Hillary is arguably the most divisive (and corrupt) woman the US has ever known and will end all respect for females in high office. The Clintons, once tolerable, are now old Toxic to our country.
Lauren, San Francisco, Ca
The fish-slapping contest between Clinton and Obama is nothing compared to one to come between the Republican nominee and the Democrat when the real contest gets going. With everything to play for that will be down and dirty!
The Repunblicans will stoke fears about the return of the Clintons - will Monica endorse Hilary? - and will play the race card if Obama should become the nomineee, however unlikely that seems at present..
The Democrats will have an easy target in the incompetence and corruption that surrounds the present Administration. McCain, if he is the nominee, will undoubtedly shoot himself in the foot a few times as well.
Ten more months of the Greatest Show on Earth! Barnum and bailey would've loved it.
oldasiahand, Guildford, UK
The main problem here is, (if the present state of things within the Democratic Party continues unabated), after the nomination is worn, what is going to remain of the Party!
Ade, Leeds,
"....Dear God the thought of the Clinton's in the white house again makes me cringe. Everyone may dislike Bush and his policies and that is their right, but we don't need another run around with that crowd. I happen to like my country's capitalism, and dislike socialism. I am afraid that Hillary and her husband would try to turn our country toward . We need a person with intelligence and foresight to fix real problems, not make them worse. For me, I quote the stickers still seen on some NY plates "Go Home Hillary!"
Christie Cali, Richmond, Virginia, USA..."
What utter nonsense.
Regardless of other issues, Clinton's presidency was highly successful for its running of the economy and raising of prosperity levels in the US. So, whatever else you want to call the Clintons to call them "Socialists" is laughable and smacks of ignorance of reality..
Rick, London,
Pres. Bill Clinton has continued to demean the office of the presidency. As many of us in "fly-over" country (the mid-west) think: who will actually be the president if Hillary wins? I'm all for having a female president; just not Hillary
Andrea Abbott, Davenport, Iowa USA
''It was this fear of the monarchical tendency that persuaded Americans more than 50 years ago to limit presidents to two terms in office.'' - Shame that was, as that paved way for 'president bush' ( note the small case letters) the clown, to lead not just the great nation of American but the free World.
Face it, the Republicans haven't got a chance in hell and it's only a matter of WHEN not IF for Democrats return to the White House. I wish there are other 'better' Democrats candidates, but of f the two we are presented with, Hilary and Obama, anyone with iota of sense will DARE NOT contemplate the latter.
No disrespect to Mr Obama, a fine Senator and a very bright prospect for the future, BUT NOW IS NOT THE TIME FOR ROOKIES!!
Robert King-Sarfo, London, UK
Dear God the thought of the Clinton's in the white house again makes me cringe. Everyone may dislike Bush and his policies and that is their right, but we don't need another run around with that crowd. I happen to like my country's capitalism, and dislike socialism. I am afraid that Hillary and her husband would try to turn our country toward . We need a person with intelligence and foresight to fix real problems, not make them worse. For me, I quote the stickers still seen on some NY plates "Go Home Hillary!"
Christie Cali, Richmond, Virginia, USA
As someone who was living in Washington DC during the Clinton and first Bush terms in office, I agree that the Democrats ought to look closely at an alternative to both Obama and Clinton, I don't think the Americans are ready for eitheer a Black/mixed race or Woman in the White House and will likely vote for the Republican candidate irregardless of who it is, It is time for the Democrat Party to review the candidates currently running for the President's job and perhaps they should put their backing wholly into an electable candidate - Bill Richardson, John Edwards come to mind!
Chips Westwood, Sarlat La Caneda, France
Ray Gurnee, do you have a middle name? What's in a name and what is your game? Hussein -- what is that to you?? I hope can respect others and yourself sometime soon.
FMcB, NYC,
I think the Obama campaign should bring this to the attention of the American people. These frenetic efforts from the Clinton couple to restore their dynasty into the White House certainly is not consistent with Hillary pledging she is a candidate for change. With her as president will have the same situation as in the 1990s. Only the formal roles of the two are shifted.
As to the Rezko connection: What about Whitewater?
Bernt Evensen, Stavanger, Norway
There's one firm belief of mine since before even this election cycle started in ernest and that's that the candidate to support in 2008 is simply "ABC", Anyone But Clinton.
They must never again get the keys to the White House.
Stan(expat), US, USA
As a conservative, I would love to see Hillary get the Democratic nomination. There is a deep mistrust of her in the American public, especially within the Mid-Western states. The Republicans lack unity right now. If Hillary/The Clintons get the Democratic nomination I believe the Republicans and Independents will unite to keep her out of office.
Jeff, Denver, CO
You can see the remarks here from people insinuating about Obama's name without actually saying anything.
You see the sort of cockroaches Bill Clinton has brought into the house with him? Maybe you can say they would have gotten in anyway, but here we have a former president of our own party who has brought them in, simply because he resents losing power for himself and his wife.
Christopher Hobe Morrison, Pine Bush, Ulster County, NY, USA
Bill is the only one who can put B. Hussein in a bad light. The US liberal press hides much from the public. A key financial backer goes on trial next month for questionable real estate deals. He entered into one that was very profitable to Obama about three years ago. Does our correspondent report on this sort of thing?
Ray, Gurnee, il.
This is an insightful article. I really believe that the Republicans will have a field day attacking the Clintons if Hillary Clinton is the nominee. So many Democrats have forgotten just how tired other Democrats and Independents were of all those Clinton scandals. "Clinton Fatigue" is the syndrome that caused Gore's defeat. With Obama, the Democrats would have a fighting chance to win the Presidency. But many of the Obama supporters (myself included) will never support the Clinton Dynastic return.
Jane Thomas, Shepherdstown , WV
Excellent article and factually true. Ive heard many people admit they are voting for Hillary just to get Bill back into the white house.Its the most astounding thing Ive ever heard. I pity the vice president or secretary of state in a Hillary administration. They will be nothing more than mere tokens as Bill will be the number 2 or maybe number 1 in her administration. And no doubt it will bring back the same bitterness and rancor that was a hallmark of Bill Clintons years as president. But i dont see any one stopping her. Obama is just too politically immature to put up a strong fight. And John Edwards is done. So world get ready for Clinton 2 playing in your Washington theater.
Al, Cburg, USA
Gerard Baker is right. Sadly, the truth is that Americans have a grudging respect for the street-brawlers from Arkansas. They are the classic "bad couple", simultaneously hated yet admired for their naked ambition and total lack of shame. Well, America, you deserve what you vote for.
Sinisa, Hamilton, Bermuda
What a shame Dubbya can't stand for re-election. I am going to miss his stand up comedy routine.
Jeremy, sydney, australia
The last person we need is Hilary Clinton. When investigations were being conducted about White Water, it was Hilary Clinton. When the booking hours for law work was being investigated it was Hilary Clinton. The problem with the travel office within the White House can be traced to Hilary Clinton. The Litany goes on and on and on. The last person we need is Hilary Clinton.
G Rollison, Fort Washington, USA, Maryland
Clinton is very smart, sure the most intelligent president of USA since Abraham Lincoln. What's the problem than he helps his wife ? The problem is Barack Youseff Obama.-
Joseph Marie Pena Puig, Buenos Aires, Argentina
What tosh. Hillary is just what America needs right now.
Duncan, London, England
Thanks for speaking out on this Gerard! It's been deeply disturbing to me to see Barack attacked with lies and distortions that you would typically expect to see from the Republican right.
I hope Democratic primary voters have the wisdom to choose a candidate that the whole country can get behind, instead of going for a Clinton redux, which as you point out, only looks good by comparison with 7 disastrous years of Bush II.
Mark, Berkeley, California
Excellent!!!!!... Couldn't agree more!
Alex, Los Angeles, CA