Gerard Baker
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Few big jobs have been reviled with as much intensity as the vice-presidency of the United States.
Thomas Marshall, Woodrow Wilson's veep, hated the pointless impotence of the post. He compared his role to that of “a man in a cataleptic state. He cannot move. He cannot speak. He suffers no pain and yet he is conscious of all that goes on around him.”
John Adams, the very first man to hold the job, described it as “the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived”. But the canny Adams also spotted its potential “As Vice-President, I am nothing” he wrote presciently. “But I may be everything.”
Lyndon Johnson made the same point with characteristically more force. Whenever President John Kennedy came into the room, he told friends, “I felt like a goddamn raven hovering over his shoulder.”
With the presidential primary election nearing its end, the US is entering that quadrennial period when the eyes of the world turn to this critically insignificant job. This week, John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, let it be known that he has begun the search for a running mate. It promises to be among the most important ever.
That's not because anyone expects the next vice-president to repeat the oddly exceptional role of the current one. There may have been times when people wished that Dick Cheney was in a cataleptic state, but he has been unusually engaged. It's a fair bet that his pre-eminence in the Bush administration is not going to be repeated. The usual significance of the vice presidential choice is that it is, as Adams foresaw, statistically the surest route to a subsequent presidency. Of the last eight veeps who have sought their party's nomination for the top job, only one has failed - Dan Quayle in 2000. Whoever emerges in the next few months as the vice-presidential candidate of one of the two parties is likely to become president himself at some point in the next 10 years.
In Mr McCain's case the choice could be especially important. He is 72 years old and would be the oldest man ever to become president. Though he likes to roll out his 95-year-old mother at rallies as a kind of talismanic testament to his good fortune in the genetic lottery, the chances that, actuarially speaking, he may not complete two full terms in office are quite high. That means his vice-president must truly be ready to take the reins from day one in the job.
Some of the early names getting attention seem to meet that criterion: Charlie Crist, the popular governor of Florida, Joe Lieberman, Mr McCain's closest ally in the US Senate. But they pose a problem. Mr McCain is still strongly distrusted by many conservatives in the party as a closet leftie and these notable moderates will only serve to reinforce that suspicion.
Mr McCain might try to neutralise those concerns by emulating Ronald Reagan in 1976. In an effort to assuage fears that he was too right-wing, Reagan announced - while the primary campaign was still in full swing - that he would have Senator Richard Schweiker, a moderate Republican, as his number two. Mr Reagan eventually lost the nomination at that year's convention by a hair's breadth to the incumbent Gerald Ford, who went on to lose the general election to Jimmy Carter. (When you think what happened to Mr Reagan's eventual running-mate four years later, the first George Bush, it's worth pondering how so much history shifts on the pivot of the vice-presidential choice: we could now be completing the second generation of Schweiker family presidencies.)
In Mr McCain's case the political objective would be the opposite of Mr Reagan's - to reassure the party that he was sufficiently right wing for them. If this is the goal, the names he might choose include Mark Sanford, the governor of South Carolina, and, perhaps the current favourite, Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor whom Mr McCain defeated for the nomination.
But these wouldn't help Mr McCain with another peculiar challenge he faces. For all his evident qualifications and genuine appeal, his campaign is going to lack a little bit of the glamour of the Democratic nominee. It will be hard for voters not to see him as the Grumpy Old White Man taking on the Hip Young Black Guy. That would argue strongly for a gender or ethnic, or at least youthful, dimension to the choice.
Some see Condoleezza Rice, the first African-American female to be Secretary of State, as the answer to this problem. But that probably won't work either.
Mr McCain is going to have to fight hard to dispel the opposition's highly effective claims that given his strong support for the Iraq war, he represents President Bush's Third Term. Having one of the architects of the war and the face of Bush foreign policy for the last eight years as his running-mate and presumed successor is not going to help. There is also Michael Steele, an attractive African-American former Senate candidate from Maryland, and Bobby Jindal, the sparklingly brilliant Indian-American young governor of Louisiana. But they don't truly overcome Mr McCain's initial challenge - finding someone who can plausibly be said to be ready for the presidency.
So Mr McCain is left looking for a young, experienced, capable conservative Republican, preferably with a particular gender or ethnic appeal. There aren't too many of those about, even in America.
Meanwhile, on the Democratic side, the task ought to be easier. Assuming that Barack Obama wins the party's nomination, then surely he will punch the Dream Ticket? After the closest Democratic primary contest in 40 years, it is widely felt that the party will want to unify behind Mr Obama and his narrowly defeated rival, Hillary Clinton, as his vice president.
Dream on, Democrats. Mr Obama has spent the past six months being told by Bill and Hillary Clinton that he is unelectable, unworthy and unprepared for the presidency. Something tells me he won't want, to use Lyndon Johnson's colourful imagery, that particularly opportunistic pair of ravens hovering over his shoulder in the West Wing.
Gerard Baker is United States Editor and an Assistant Editor of The Times. He joined in 2004 from the Financial Times, where he had spent over ten years as Tokyo correspondent and Washington Bureau Chief. His weekly oped column appears on Fridays
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Deaths & Marriage announcements
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Actually, the most insignificant job ever is the Queen of all England.
George Tietjen, Floral Park, New York, USA
Of course Mr McCain could always step to the "left". Perhaps a surprising number of Democrats are prepared to vote for him judging by a recent forum run by The Economist. McCain has shown himself willing to cross the aisle in the past. How about the highly popular ex-Governor of Virginia Mark Warner (D) ? A pipe dream admittedly but Warner was popular with Republicans and Democrats alike in conservative Virginia. Cuddling up to the right wing of the Republican Party will put off a lot of Independents. One thing is for sure - McCain has to be ultra careful in his choice of a running mate. Never has the selection of a running mate been more critical.
Michael John, Charlottesville Virginia,
One would think that conservatives would take the "lesser of two evils", but the extreme right-wing conservatives may instead rally behind a minor party candidate (such as a Libertarian) or independent. This could take a crucial 1-2% of the vote from McCain, thus deciding the election.
On the other hand, choosing a conservative running mate will probably not have the same effect on the moderate voters, since they are voting for McCain due to his image as a reformer & Washington outsider.
Joshua, Dallas, Texas, USA
To TG's comment, Schwarzenegger is ineligible to become president, so presumably can not run for vice president either.
Bob Kelly, Issaquah, WA, USA
Romney is the obvious choice for McCain to pick as VP. There would be such a groundswell of support that would come out of the woodwork to give support for the ticket. It would help energize the campaign on the Republican side and get the country excited again about the race. Romney is the only choice that already has the name recognition and the votes of millions of people across the country.
McCain/Romney in 2008!
MK in Arizona, Gilbert,
Bill Richardson would mean a double minority ticket, that's probably too much for most Americans. I hope Obama picks Senator Chuck Hagel, a moderate Republican who's said he'd be willing to be on a Democratic ticket. Or Jim Webb, a former Reagan big wig but now the Democratic Senator from Virginia. Either of those two would be a moderates dream. He'd get the Democratic vote, the Independent vote, and a lot of moderate Republicans, and with those the White House.
But first he has to finish off Hilary.
Sam, Boulder, Colorado , USA
I would say Bill Richardson as a good VP for Obama, thanks to the fact he is the reverse of what McCain is looking for (older and white) as a counterbalance. But, quite frankly, I can picture thousands of vindictive Hillary-ites scuppering that for him with ease.
Shame Schwarzenegger isn't a Dem (officially)!
TG, Christchurch, NZ
Surely when it comes to the crunch, conservatives will vote for McCain rather than the opposition. So why not win the centre with say Joseph Lieberman?
Andrew Chapman, Newcastle upon Tyne, England