Stephen Pollard
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
I’m mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore. If I hear another person refer to me as a “Times contributor”, I am going to explode with anger. When Matthew Parris writes, he does not write for me. When Alice Miles writes, she does not write for me. I am Stephen Pollard. No one else speaks for me.
The last straw was walking into a restaurant and being greeted as Mr Finkelstein. So what if we are both fortysomething ginger-haired Jews who write for The Times? Do I not have an identity of my own?
They get the chance to write every week. I have to make do with occasional appearances. I call that crude censorship, just because I hold different views. Surely I should be given the chance to write whenever they do, so that I can make clear to you, dear reader, that we do not all have the same opinions. But the powers that be at The Times won’t let me. They are, clearly, waging a campaign to silence me, by only allowing me to write every other week.
It seems I’m not the only one who is censored in this way. According to a new organisation, Independent Jewish Voices (IJV), those Jews who disagree with the policies of the Israeli Government are silenced by the rest of the Jewish community. As Brian Klug, one of the founders of IJV, writes: “Individual dissenting voices get lost or drowned out when weighty bodies (like the Board of Deputies or the Chief Rabbi) appear to speak on behalf of all Jews in Britain. It is the combination of these two factors that closes down a debate that should be open.”
Looking at the signatories to IJV’s founding statement, one can see what he means about voices being drowned out. There’s a bloke called Harold Pinter. No idea who he is or what he thinks about anything. There’s another one called Stephen Fry. Who is he? He seems to be wholly absent from the TV and newspapers. And there’s a Professor called Eric Hobsbawm. Some kind of historian, apparently. Never heard of him. Never read a word of his in the newspapers.
Anyway, Googling the Pinter chap, it turns out that he’s a playwright. Some of his plays have titles such as Old Times and The Homecoming, so he appears to be some kind of nostalgic Tory.
Forgive me for labouring the point, but really! There has never been a shortage of preposterous arguments emanating from intelligent minds, but few match the idea that Jewish opponents of the Israeli Government are somehow denied access to the media to put their point across.
IJV are far from the only people whose viewpoint somehow manages both to dominate the media but who also complain that their voices are squeezed out of it. Pinter barely has to think an anti Western thought and it’s splashed across every newspaper. Indeed, I do not recall a shortage of coverage when he wished it to be known that he was joining the International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic. Should there be other genocidal butchers he wishes to defend, I have no doubt it will be duly, and prominently, reported.
IJV’s complaint is simply a variation on the recurring theme of those whose shtick is that they are somehow brave dissenters against an overwhelming consensus. Whenever one reads the words “political correctness” it’s now more often than not in the context of a lamentation that it is impossible to stand up to the growing dominance of political correctness. That such a complaint is made in a weekly 1,000word column in the national press qualifies usually escapes the notice of the writer. I think the correct term is “unintentional irony”.
In The Wicked Son, David Mamet’s new book on antiSemitism, he describes a version of this trick as the Hot Hen’s Kiss – when proof is manufactured to buttress a belief that flies in the face of objective reality. Take the supposed evidence of those who claim that Shakespeare did not write “his” plays. He had little formal education, little exposure to the court and had not travelled. So he could not have written with the breadth and scope that the plays necessitate. To prove this, they cite a secret code devised by Francis Bacon, which is comprised of As and Bs. Examining Shakespeare’s works, they claim to find a similar code, which reveals the hidden word SASSOHHKINTE – an anagram for SHAKS IS NOT HE. Bingo!
The same letters, however, also read A HOT HEN’S KISS – proving nothing other than the willingness of those who wish to prove a point to distort objective reality to further their cause.
Those whose views dominate the media – that Israel is a criminal state, that Western foreign policy is the cause of terrorism, you know the sort of thing – but then complain their voices are never heard are classic Hot Hen Kissers. Their version of the “Shakespeare didn’t write his plays” trope is “we are silenced”. And their equivalent of the “evidence” of the Francis Bacon code is to point out the number of pieces written by those who take a different view from them. Neither proves anything.
Far from being silenced, the likes of IJV get, if anything, a disproportionate amount of space – just as do those such as Harold Pinter who believe that Slobodan Milosevic was a peace-loving leader concerned only with the material betterment of his people, rather than a genocidal butcher.
The truth, as any successful editor will tell, is that diversity sells. Yes, people like to have their prejudices confirmed. But they also like to be challenged, and to have a different take on the usual roster of subjects. Dull conformity is, well . . . dull.
Stephen Pollard is chairman of the European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism, a new think-tank that will be launched soon
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Deaths & Marriage announcements
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243
'"Pinter barely has to think an anti Western thought and its splashed across every newspaper"
An instance, please.'
Oh, lets think for a nano second. Try his Nobel lecture in 2005 or his rant at the stop the war march. Or the interviews on the Today programme and in other media outlets. Just try Google. Come on Steve, here is one man who can't complain about not being heard. Mind you the one thing I can't find is him saying much about his being Jewish until now.
amusednot, Chelmsford,
Its even more unfair... So should mine...!!!
And so should the views of the International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic - which, until today, I'd never even heard of... but whose voices deserve to be listened to above the raucous cacophony of anti-Serb ignorance, which, through repetition and nothing else, has been permitted to pass for accepted Western wisdom since 1992...!!!
John Jay, Walton on Thames, UK
Anti-Israeli Jews are a few individuals. For obvious reasons the Palestinian lobby wheel them out at every opportunity. They are not sufficient in number or calibre to shake the impression of the British public that the vast majority of Jews are pro-Israel.
Plenty of views are censored or subjected to legal harassment by the British government, on subjects as varied as Mad Cow disease, court cases involving the custody of children, and homosexuality. However neither pro- nor anti-Israeli Jews are in these categories of silenced people.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
"Pinter barely has to think an anti Western thought and its splashed across every newspaper"
An instance, please.
Steve, Birmingham,
All this reminds me (pace another Times of London article) of the sickening spectacle of the Dixie Chicks. They and their supporters cry "censorship" in the media when their fans objected to one of their members saying something in London that they would never have the guts to say in the U.S. - all the while posing (naked) on the cover of `Entertainment Weekly.'
It makes me ill when multimillionaire rock stars with automatic access to the news media are posited as being `censored'
R.B. Glennie, Ottawa, Canada
Does MickJ of Brixton really consider that white, male, middle class and middle-aged is positioned in the "zero pH" band of ethnicity ? Zero pH implies extreme acidity and corrosiveness. What metaphor is being attempted here ?
ColinG, Doha, Qatar
"We do not hear anything else"
You obviously don't read the "Independent" for example, which is very clear on the subject. Especially the letters page.
The idea that anti-Israeli views are not heard in the British media is absurd. If anything, the opposite is true.
As for "the terrible humanitarian situation in Palestine", Palestinians could start fixing that tomorrow by abandoning violence (used even internally) as their first choice for settling disputes, if only by stopping spending money on weapons and starting to spend it on people. For extra points, they could cease their illegal attacks on the internationally-recognised sovereign state next door.
Alex Swanson, Milton Keynes, UK
Comprised of ? Comprised of ? If you can demonstrate that you have read and digested the Times Style Guide, they may promote you to a weekly column.
ColinG, Doha, Qatar
My, oh my, someone complaining that the pro-Israle voice is not heard enough. We do not hear anything else, be it from the USA or from Israel. Neither wants to recognize that after having been the victim of holocaust, Israel is now treating Palestinians as sub-humans (albeit without extermination camps, thank God).
The wall of shame and the terrible humanitarian situation in Palestine are more worthy of discussion than the supposed 'anti-semitic' noise in the media.
Bill Sullivan, Bristol, UK
Surely the issue is not that the IJV or the Board of Deputies are trying to "silence" each other (if only that were possible) but that both groups seem to think their opinions on Israel carry extra weight because their members are Jews. It's time to end this poisonous culture of privileging the views of "community leaders" , and with it the insulting assumption that ethnic or religious minorities are only capable of groupthink.
I'm lucky--I come from the "zero pH" band of British ethnicity, white, male, middle-class and middle-aged. No-one presumes to speak for me or my kind. Instead I have all one can reasonably ask for in a democracy--my views, my voice and my vote.
MickJ, Brixton,
I think that when they say "silenced", they are trying to be polite, and what they actually mean is that they are sick of getting more or less frivolously accused of anti-Semitism, by newspaper columnists and rinky-dink one-man-and-his-dog "thinktanks" (but I repeat myself).
Daniel Davies, London,
Cannot believe anyone on the Planet doesn't know Stephen Fry is? He stalks the Media scattering his views like corn, which they often are,
Pollard speaks the truth on other matters in this fine article.
Columnism is the new Red under the Bed.
skidmore, march, Cambs,England
Stephen Pollard regularly makes the claim that Slobodan Milosevic was a 'genocidal butcher' but when questioned he has repeatedly failed to produce any evidence to back up the claim. He should be aware that the four year trial of Milosevic at The Hague failed to produce any evidence to support the assertion that Milosevic was a 'genocidal butcher', or indeed that the former Yugoslav President ordered war crimes.
Can Pollard produce any evidence?
If not, he should desist from making such statements in a public arena.
Neil Clark, Oxford,
Surely Stephen Pollard has missed the point the IJV were attempting to make entirely?
Surely what they were suggesting is that Jews don't all speak with the same voice, and that to suggest otherwise is to deal in stereotypes, to think in cartoons? We are all far too good as trying to silence dissenting voices when it might be better to listen and take in what they have to say. That is a universally valid view, and one Mr Pollard might do well to adopt himself.
John Reid, Rotorua, New Zealand
I don't follow your argument vis-a-vis the title of your article and it's conclusion. I think there is a received wisdom which tends to prevail irrespective of the facts, and a perceived wisdom which doesn't but depends on the facts. Thus the received wisdom is that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon wrote the plays associated with his name and ignores the rationale of this assessment, but the perceived wisdom, in contradicting this view, relies on the surrounding facts to support it's opinion but has no affect in the matter of altering the received wisdom. Clearly opinion is a function of interest. One's opinions are in support of one's interest more than they will be of the facts in issue, and the size of one's interest will give a corresponding importance to any facts that are in support. The loudness of an argument is therefore more a function of the weight of the interest than the weight of the facts.
Henry Percy, London, UK
when he first mentioned that they only allowed him to write an article fortnightly, whilst other writers wrote weekly, i felt a little sorry for the guy. Having read his article in full, i question - on the basis of this article alone - if he should be allowed to write at all.
Marco, bhm, uk
I quite agree that Mr. Pollard should have equal opportunity if his content is of an equally high standard. I suspect this is just his ego talking, sorry I should say yelling. Or maybe it's about salaries?
If the gentleman is dissatisfied, presumably he is free to seek employment elsewhere?
mike cameron, Shenzhen, China