Peter Sozou
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Couples who have difficulties conceiving can seek fertility treatment. At the same time, contraception is freely available to couples who want sex without producing a baby. Can this be right? As a society we value babies so much that we are prepared to allow - and fund - IVF. So how can we sanction - and fund - the deliberate prevention of babies being conceived? We can't have it both ways. Contraception should be banned.
Do you disagree with this? Perhaps, like most people, you believe that people should have control over their fertility. Couple X, who want a baby, benefit from fertility treatment. Couple Y, who do not want a baby, benefit from the availability of contraception. You see no contradiction in helping both couples. Enabling people to have wanted babies, you argue, is a completely separate matter from preventing unwanted pregnancies. You believe also that developments in fertility treatment should have no bearing on whether or not we allow people to use contraception.
You should therefore be baffled at the prevailing official view that the time limit for abortion should depend on the age at which premature babies can be saved. Some campaigners are calling for the abortion limit to be cut from 24 weeks to 20 weeks because an increasing proportion of babies born before 24 weeks' gestation can survive. Dawn Primarolo, the Health Minister, argues that survival rates for babies born at less than 24 weeks remain very poor, and therefore the abortion limit should be kept as it is. While she disagrees with the campaigners about the facts regarding the survival of premature babies, she has not questioned the notion that the abortion limit should be reduced when medical advances lead to a substantial improvement in the viability of premature babies.
This is nonsensical. The capacity of medicine to save a premature but much wanted baby is a completely separate matter from whether or not a woman should be permitted to abort a viable but unwanted pregnancy. In so far as ethics should determine a time limit on abortion, the relevant question is at what stage, if at all, a foetus should be regarded as a person, and in particular the extent to which it has a developed brain and can experience emotions. The state of incubator technology cannot answer that question, any more than progress in IVF technology should determine whether contraception should be permittted.
Advances in medicine normally lead to people having more choice. Linking the time limit on abortion to the age limit at which premature babies can be saved implies that medical progress should lead to less choice. This is perverse.
Dr Peter Sozou is a research Fellow at the London School of Economics
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
All the arguments for abortion are just so stupid. Its wrong. No ifs, ands or but.
travis, Austin, Texas, USA
Thanks Peter for your excellent article. You wrote:
"The capacity of medicine to save a premature but much wanted baby is a completely separate matter from whether or not a woman should be permitted to abort a viable but unwanted pregnancy."
I completely agree. I have long thought that a relationship between the abortion limit and viability outside the womb is purely arbitrary and unhelpful. More relevant is evidence that babies can feel pain before 24 weeks.
David Aldrich, Epsom,
ethics have always moved in tune with human/ technical development, and that is right in a wrold that is increasingly created by humans. ethics are in flux at a rate that is connected to human development -and human development is based largely on science. eg people once advocated locking people up with peculiar shaped heads as they argued certain shapes meant inbuilt criminality. on the other hand, there is now scientific proof behind genetic predispositions, so?
if one baby can survive in an incubator, or whatever, surely that means it is capable of birth and therefore a viable independent life. in that sense it ought not be possible to terminate at that stage. on the other hand...
ps medical advances / choice argument is perverse. safe abortion was a medical advance. choose your limit.
mount, dorset, gb
Virginia, conception isn't a "miracle" it's a fact of biology. A miracle would be an infertile women carrying a child to term. Or if we want to colour it with religious doctrine, immaculate conception is a miracle. This of course assumes that one believes miracles exist.
All pregnancies do not produce a baby. A woman can be pregnant for a very short period of time before a miscarriage occurs (often due to the body's responsive mechanism against genetically unviable fetuses). We can't argue it's not life, but it's life without personhood, and isn't much of an advancement past the gametes used to create it. So it isn't human life that can inherently rank in priority over the concerns of the pregnant woman. We can't substitute judgment of a person that hasn't yet become a societal agent, because we don't know what it wants or values. We do, however, know those things of the woman, and this provides us with a reasoned, if perhaps unsatisfactory for some, point of departure.
Alan Black, London, UK
I reluctantly agree with abortion. However, I cannot agree that it is "a woman's right to choose" what happens to her body, because whether she likes it or not she is responsible for the welbeing of another person's body: the baby inside her.
Matthew, Ringwood, UK
Peter Sozou is absolutey correct. The technology is irrelevant to the decision......if not we could reach a stage when a zealot
researcher could keep a conception alive from the moment a sperm fertilizes the egg. The natural limit - if natural is the correct word - is the time when a baby could not survive without technology, and we are already below that limit..
David Bowker, Manchester , UK
I believe any woman has the right to an abortion if she wants one. However, saying that I think the cut off time should be the end of the first trimester, unless medical urgency comes up later. I think a woman can decide within 2 1/2 months on whether she wants to keep this child and the procedure would be less traumatic on her. The longer the woman is pregnant, the harder the decision will be to make and if she chooses to terminate, the decision will be harder to live with the longer it goes on.
Robin Castelllanos, San Antonio, TX, USA
A viable, healthy pregnancy leads to a viable, healthy baby. The week/month does not matter. You can kill it at 4 weeks or at 28 weeks, the result is the same. 6,700,000 victims so far...
Sandy Cox, London,
If there was a market in babies, such as there is in cars for instance, then there would be neither the need for abortion or IVF treatment. However, there is no such market, nor is there likely to ever be one. Therefore each set of circumstances must, and should, be treated seperately. Whether a foetus can survive at a certain stage of gestation or not is totally irellevent.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
Abortion should be available on demand. It's the mother's body and the mother's life right up until the little guy/girl is out there with a lung full of air. Prior to that you have a collection of interesting cells upon which you can project a range of emotions, ability to understand and motivations.
Miracles don't enter into it either unless you're willing to say any highly unusual event you don't really understand is a miracle (and this would include miscarriages and most forms of politics).
The trauma of an abortion can be compared and contrasted with the trauma of giving a child up for adoption. I can't imagine any potential mother being pleased at having an abortion, but a choice is still a choice.
Warren, Sydney, Australia
l dont agree with abortions period. life is precious, the whole conception procedure in itself is a miracle. lt does not matter what stage it is, ultimately all pregnancies produce a baby. Contraception is easily available so pregancies should be avoided if a child is not wanted. Even if it is accidental or a rape case, the baby should be adopted out. Women comptemplating abortions should watch what happens to the foetus during the procedure. They might change their minds or it will haunt them for the rest of their lives.
Virginia, Brisbane, Australia