Carol Sarler
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Here’s a sad little note to temper the cheer: a study published last week, by University College London, concluded that children who are let out to play unsupervised grow up to be healthier and more sociable. Healthier because, it was found, children without adults in tow burn up more calories in heightened energy, thus warding off obesity, and more sociable as a result of independence and self-reliance benefits whose loss, says the leader of the study, Roger Mackett, carry many and grave implications. What makes this so sad is not that the professor is right; it is that there is scant chance of anyone taking a blind bit of notice.
Certainly the Government won’t. The “Children’s Plan”, as unveiled by Ed Balls earlier this month, is bent on increasing adult involvement in children’s lives: parents are to be encouraged to take a more active role in their children’s education, there are to be more hands-on “support services” (run by grown-ups), greater access to “high-quality cultural activities” (led by grown-ups) and the mass construction of “supervised adventure playgrounds” (spied on by grown-ups; Mr Balls appears serenely unaware of the oxymoron that is a “supervised adventure”).
To be fair, the Government is only playing to established, if relatively recent, public demand; at least among those old enough to vote. The contemporary perception of good parenting is to be as hands-on as the days are long, from the diligent morning school run to chauffeuring the rounds of after-school activities, even sitting in to watch whichever dance or music or sports class the parent has deemed to be a suitable use of his or her time; if the parent is willing to drive to, say, jazz ballet lessons but not to martial arts, then the child’s interests are determined for him. How could he even get to the martial arts? On a bus? On his own? Don’t be daft.
The University College study found that nearly half of children between 8 and 11 are never allowed to leave the house alone. Anxious, upright parents, among them those perfectly prepared to rail against the intrusion of CCTV or identity cards in their own lives, are buying into the equally new notion that it is part of their job to run 24/7 surveillance on their own children.
Privacy, it has been decided, is no longer a luxury that children can be afforded. I do not believe that my mother would have dreamt of reading my diary; I know that I did not read my daughter’s. Yet I recently heard the mother of a 14-year-old patting herself on the back for having cracked her daughter’s e-mail password, such that all the girl’s mail, in and out, is covertly copied to her mother’s PC. “Well,” she said, to much nodding agreement, “These days . . . you can’t be too careful, can you?”
Yes, you can. I further think that the biggest difference between “these days” and better days is not an increase in risk but a huge increase in artificially stimulated alarm, boosted by prurient gawping at the occasional, albeit dreadful, tales of a Sarah or a Madeleine, whose agonies handily provide an excuse to impose a constant, intrusive and ultimately counter-productive adult presence upon children who deserve better.
Let us have a bit of a Hovis-commercial moment and revisit the sepia of less modern childhood. No child ever thought the school holidays too long; no parent ever whined about the pressures of filling them empty days were, frankly, none of their business. Ours began with the knock, “Can Carol come out to play?”, and ended, as instructed before we scarpered, with the muddy return come teatime. Ish.
If our parents gave thought to the stranger danger of abduction and murder, they knew the chances: there were, on average, six each year. There still are. We didn’t have “groomers”, but we had flashers and let me tell you, when left to their own devices, there is no disdain quite as withering as that perfected by a bunch of nine-year-old girls faced with yet another silly willy.
Far more important than our interaction with smut and threat, however, was our interaction with each other. Small people, given their freedom, form small social orders: complete, valid microcosms of what is to come. Neither Enid Blyton’s cosy Famous Five nor, at the other extreme, William Golding’s Lord of the Flies were entirely wrong; most such orders, when allowed to flourish, fell somewhere between the two. Leaders emerged, as did the led. Courage, dishonesty, loyalty, enterprise, rejection, consensus, diplomacy, each was experienced in a way that they simply cannot be under the permanently vigilant eye of the adult who intercedes with his own judgment “That was your fault, Jill, say sorry to Jack”.
Those who seek by their constant presence to control childhood are stealing it from its rightful owners: children. It would, of course, be ridiculous to suggest that they be left to run feral. But there is a difference between intervention when it is needed and interference as a default position.
If half of our children are not allowed out alone until they are 12 or over, it is hardly surprising that one of two things then happen: either they emerge into streets so strange and fearful that they find structure and comfort only in gangs and weaponry, or less dramatically, but in its way just as dismal they join the thousands who, in this holiday week, will slump on a couch until their parents answer a question they have never learnt to answer for themselves: what are we doing today?
Of all the gifts, over all the Christmases they have enjoyed, it might well be that none would have been as enduringly precious as a charming little bauble of carefully crafted neglect.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The Australian experience is very similar. A child is now loosely defined as anybody living at home with the parent(s) and under the age of 20 or 25 years. They usually lack basic adult decision skills and life skills and tend to be over indulged and self centred leading to an arrogance that is very hard to counter. The prime reason for this has been their over-protective parent(s) reacting badly to the broadcasts pumped out by politicians looking for another term in office, "experts" with another book or program to push and the gutter end of mass media. It used to be that the first 8 or 9 years were the years to develop the basic mental and physical methodology needed for adulthood with the next few years refining and improving those skills so that by the mid-teens they could assimilate into the general population without major intervention. I have seen increasing numbers of school leavers that haven't started the process let alone devloped from the nappy stage.
John, Sydney, Australia
I brought my son up in North London. He played out, gradually further and further afield from about the age of four. He rode a bike all round London, went swimmng, played basketball (miles away), used the tube and buses from 11 or 12, went to the cinema. I warned him about strangers and what they might do to him, I taught him how to cross roads and deal with traffic, bullies and other human behaviour and no this not in the 1960s. He's only twenty-two now. The alarmism is all rot. If you pace your children's learning, they learn about the consequences of their actions and how to anticipate situations - seems to me that most of the parents can't do that yet..
RW, Istanbul,
I like the phrase "carefully crafted neglect". Parents have an obligation to keep their children safe. That is the "carefully crafted" part. Allowing freedom within the bounds of safety is a good idea.
Joseph, NYC, USA
My mother goes through my handbag - I'm 36, and she cannot give up her so-called "control" - it's appalling ....
Kerry, London,
We live in an upper middle class subdivision in America suburbia and have two registered sex offenders in our neighborhood. The sexual revolution that brought us a billion dollar porn industry now pumps filth out of the pit of hell into homes across our country. What used to have to be purchased in a seedy store out on the highway is now available for the neighbor's adolescent son to view night and day on his computer. The greatest concern I have is for my young daughter's safety and protection from men and boys who are viewing this garbage. It isn't the same world. We're told there is no right and wrong any more, it's all relative. With traditional moral values howled down, don't blame parents for doing all they can to ensure their children's safety. We can't have it all. We can't have sexual anarchy and expect our children to be safe like they once were. Moral meltdown in a society has consequences and our children are the victims.
Ingrid, Waukesha, WI USA
There is a third consequence of the abusive over-protective parenting - Road Accidents.
By the time of teenage rebellion, children have never learned the simple act of crossing a road alone. This was previously taught at about age 7. And bingo. ..do not pass 'go', or collect £200, go directly to hospital/cemetary.....
Brian Vallance, Corfu, Greece
Raised 4 children to young adulthood you ignore a number of practical problems facing parents today. In my late 60s I was raised in the kind of world you hope for. One problem is with most parents working fulltime there's no longer the street play with moms checking on the kids looking out the kitchen window. Also true we no longer have a shared culture and widely shared social values so one must be very choosey, particularly with younger children, who they play with.
MARK KLEIN, M.D., OAKLAND, CA
Robert Rampton is right. The other effect of the motorcar is that the street becomes an unpleasant place. So only teenagers, or adults too poor or disorganised to own cars, tend be there, successful working adults walk briskly, head down, anytime they happen to be without a car, offering no form of social control. So parents keep younger children in, which makes the teenagers behave badly - they see themselves as the responsible ones when little children are about.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
A far, far greater threat to childhood is the constant pressure, from birth, of girls to be sex objects and men to be openly questioning their sexuality. As for playing outside, would you trust a Government to control the movements of 'paedophiles' or 'care in the community' problems? They can't even keep half a dozen NHS records safe. When it's too late they will claim, as they always do, that it was a 'mistake'. Your children are too precious for their 'mistakes'. My advice would be to keep your eye on them, despite what Government 'experts' are peddling.
Judy , Liverpool, england
It may be better to learn that hot objects should be treated with respect from accidentally touching one than from being constantly being told not â or being kept always at a safe distance without fully understanding why.
dr venables preller, Warminster, UK
As a university lecturer I became sadly familiar with 'kidults'; students who assumed that all adults should be at their beck and call and were totally helpless to fend for themselves.
Glen, Melbourne, Australia
Do you really think it is safe to let children run off and play on their own in parts of, say, South and Northwest London, as if this were the Britain of the 50s and 60s? What will they play at? Hunting the drug dealer?Slaying the fuzz?
The authoress of this article is presumably dreaming of some ivory tower Little England, which disappeared long ago.
Francis Tuttle, Madrid,
I used to go out all day on my bike, fishing, playing and having any adventure that happened to come my way, but it seems that that is no longer available to our children today. I know it is simplistic but in my opinion the chief culprit for this has to be the car, and until measures are taken to make it safe for children to go about unsupervised once again on foot or on cycle without the fear of them being run over (and as a cyclist I know how utterly dangerous it has become) then there is no way that our children as a whole will ever be able to have freedom and opportunity to grow and develop as we did. The bottom line is (and I know this as a motorist) that WE are the only ones who can give this back to our children.
Robert Rampton, Birmingham, UK
Brilliant article. Those who have commented so far prove that we are all terrified of modern life. But really it isn't that bad. The problem is that whenever anything foul happens, it is inflated in the media one hundred fold, so that we believe that if we let our children outside without a stab vest on they will, not maybe, nay, they WILL be killed. I will (i hope!!) let my children be just that, children who can play and build up thier defences against all that is foul by confronting it head on, rather than being shown it in a book or on the television. It is and never has been 'safe' to let your children roam anywhere, but that I'm afraid is the chance we all have to take.
Steffan, Meltford, Suffolk
Parents are damned for whatever the do these days, especially mothers who work for money outside of the home.
Seems to be that in the "good old days" children were left alone by working parents to make their own mistakes and go to their parents when they needed money or plasters. What's changed now?
The media has nothing to with this, of course.
Sarah, Gillingham,
I used to walk to and from school alone [ well over a mile] at the age of 6 years.From 8 got a very ancient old bicycle and would often disappear for a whole morning or afternoon!
David Vinter, Louth, Lincs., UK.
One of the reasons my children don't want to return to the UK is the amount of freedom they have here in the US and have done pretty much we moved here when they were 4 and 7. Possibly to do with the neighbourhood we live in and where every one knows whose children belong to each family. But they have been out playing since then and, after age 9, going to the pool alone (lifeguard on duty) in the summer.
The main problem I think here or back in London is not, I think, "stranger danger" it is traffic. Here we have a 25mph limit in residential areas (and outside schools as well for the 45 minutes before and after the start and end of the school day. Even now that my children are 15 & 12 I would hesitate to let them out unsupervised outside out London home because of the behaviour of the drivers using the road for commuting.
Jane, Edison, NJ