Martin Fletcher
Win VIP tickets
It is the last day of my month in Baghdad and one of the Times drivers is bringing his children to meet me in my hotel. Nowhere else in the world would that be noteworthy, but in Iraq it is remarkable.
I had not seen his family since November 2003, a few months after the US invasion, when I visited their house in western Baghdad. Shortly after that, Iraq began its slide into mayhem. Westerners faced kidnapping and execution. Our driver and his family were forced from their home by sectarian death threats. They returned when the US troop “surge” finally restored a modicum of order last summer, but even then the children were locked inside the house.
As I await their arrival, I reflect that in five years of visiting Iraq this is the first time I have left feeling anything but deeply pessimistic. Even ardent opponents of the US invasion - myself included - could not deny that daily life for most Iraqis is now better, or at least markedly less awful, than it was.
There is less gunfire, and fewer explosions. No longer do I instinctively look for mutilated torsos floating down the Tigris. I have ventured out to shop and eat - albeit in one of Baghdad's safest districts. The night-time curfew has been relaxed. Schools, markets and the national theatre have reopened. Families visit refurbished parks. Men sit outside cafés drinking sweet, black tea. Children play soccer on side roads.
I found myself writing less about death than rising oil exports, the opening of Baghdad's first Chinese restaurant, and the resumption of a rudimentary passenger train service to Basra. It has been a welcome change.
American soldiers are increasingly focused on encouraging reconstruction, not preventing destruction, and for the first time I sensed that they felt good about their mission. The Iraqi security services - particularly the army - are gradually expanding and improving. Moqtada al-Sadr, the volatile Shia cleric, has just extended the six-month ceasefire of his infamous Mahdi Army militia that was responsible for so much sectarian killing. The threat of civil war has receded, and talk of Iraq breaking up has, for now, died away. The centre has held - just.
But all this must be set in context. What passes for normality in Iraq would be utterly abnormal anywhere else. The number of Iraqis killed in January was the lowest in 23 months, but still numbered 541. Hundreds of thousands of Baghdadis now live in walled-in, ethnically cleansed, heavily guarded enclaves that they are terrified to leave. Sunnis do not venture into Shia areas, and vice-versa. Sectarian hatreds have been contained, but not resolved.
The capital is choked by checkpoints and more than 100,000 sections of concrete blast barrier. Coils of razor wire roll across pavements like tumbleweed in Texas.
Some 50,000 exiles have returned from abroad since last autumn, but several thousand were so horrified by what they found that they left again. There are still four million displaced Iraqis.
Al-Qaeda, though on the defensive, is far from defeated. It still mounts spectacular attacks, notably last month's bombings of Baghdad's pet markets. Its killings of Sunni “traitors” - the concerned local citizens (CLCs) who switched allegiance to the Americans last year - have doubled since October. Headless bodies are found quite regularly in those provinces north of Baghdad where al-Qaeda is still a force.
The economy is forecast to grow 7 per cent this year, but mostly because of rising oil exports. Despite US efforts to nurture new Iraqi businesses, at least half the workforce lack proper jobs. Most of the rest work in the bloated public sector.
Iraq, blessed with the fertile, sun-soaked lands between the Tigris and Euphrates, used to be a net exporter of food. But agriculture has collapsed and the markets are now full of imported produce. The only foreign investment has been in the mobile telephone networks and three cement factories (building those blast walls is big business). Corruption is endemic.
To talk of America “winning” a conflict that has lasted longer than the First World War is now grotesque, whatever the outcome. There has been far too much suffering for that. This long ago became a salvage operation - and one whose success is still not assured.
Nouri al-Maliki's little-loved Shia-led Government has failed to secure the peace by creating more jobs or improving the country's abysmal public services, particularly water and electricity. It has not done nearly enough to promote reconciliation between Shias, Kurds and Sunnis. It has shown great reluctance to incorporate into its security services the 80,000 predominantly Sunni CLCs who have helped the US military to take on al-Qaeda.
Sunnis see the Government as a puppet of Iran, bent on domination, not reconciliation. Shias regard the CLCs as a fledgling Sunni militia, full of former al-Qaeda henchmen, whose alliance with the Americans is temporary and expedient. The Kurds are increasingly asserting their independence, signing bilateral contracts with Western oil companies, and a flashpoint looms in June with a referendum on the future status of the hotly contested, oil-rich city of Kirkuk, which the Kurds are determined to reclaim.
This is a dangerous state of affairs as the US troop surge starts winding down, but it is still hard to believe that anybody would want to return to the horrors of 2006 and 2007, or that a people who let the extremists lead them to the very brink of civil war would allow that to happen again.
I hope that is not naive, but it may be. Iraq's new-found “peace” is desperately fragile. My driver's family never made it to my hotel. Two car bombs exploded just down the road as they were nearing. They turned around and sped back home again.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Nice one to Madeleine. Ths country was built on people like you, fighting for what we see as right and just. And lets face it, this country is a hell of a lot more famous for its Armed forces than for it's over oppinionated media, its conscientious objectors or its desk bound feedbackers who rely on the former two for their limited knowledge of the real world. Of all the feedback pages I have read, less than one percent of the contributers have ever been to these war zones, speak the languages or have studied properly and genuinely understand what is going on out there. So, as I have experiance in all three, I will say this. Carry on having your say, it is your right. But just remember why you never see Iraqis/Afghans leaving romanitc little notions in these pages. And on the extremely few times you will bump into one, you can bet your life he/she wasnt educated in Iraq or Afghan. Enjoy your desks people.
Simo, Swindon, UK
Is this coumnist, like all of the others who write about Iraq, actually aware of the fact that on the day the US and UK invaded Iraq Britain had killed more Iraqis in the name of law and order than Saddam Hussein ever did? That we were the first to use poison gas and strategic bombing to "keep the locals in line"? And that that position has not yet changed and never will?
Face it, we went to war to secure a perceived strategic resource, just like many others before us. Its about money. Its always about money or population pressure, and this one is about money.
KR, Stockport,
The 541 violent deaths in fact makes Iraq a safer nation than Venezuela or Sth Africa.
I am sick of this new meme of "sure things are going well now but it was horrible so you can't claim a win".
I note that this COIN operation has been unfavourably compared to WWI because it has taken longer. Perhaps someone can explain the relevance of the earth circling the sun 5 times to evaluating counter-insurgency. Most successful ones take 10 years plus
I note that as bad as things might have been in Iraq that it is obviously nothing compared to the horrors of WWI yet last time I checked the Allies claimed victory of that.
The Left also have to accept responsiblity for the length of the insurgency. They consistently lost almost every military engagement but still the perservered, Why? because they knew they didn't need to win militarily only to create an impression of "all is lost" in the media and the political pressure would come to bear to withdraw. They were right!
kingsley, bunbury,
Iraq can go from zero to 100 in a short amount of time if the government change's and a true nationlist government that cares about its people comes to power. Its all about organaistion and the will to do something from the Iraqi government. The Iraqi people have no power in their hands.
The Iraqi government is to busy appeasing Iran and it is up to its eyes in corruption. Its like no one cares about the country.
But there is hope, if the momentim starts in Iraq, within few years people will be suprised that there was a civil war in Iraq.
But all hopes on the next elections.
omar al sayad, London, uk
For British and US military personnel serving in their respective countryâs armed forces, Iraq is the wrong war in the wrong country for the wrong cause. A wrong place at the wrong time misfortune that could leave the individual soldier dead or maimed. Sent into harm's way by devious, deceitful politicians that lack any semblance of humanity. After youâve signed up itâs too late, so don't do it Madeleine. Despite what you have been told, British and US forces in Iraq are not in Iraq to "fight for people that do not even speak our language". Presumably this renders Iraqis sub-human. They are there to protect the US dollar cycle and the US economy. Because when (not if) the US dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency, US living standards and the dollar will decline by some 50% (estimate). You might justify serving Iraq with the notion that you are trying to prevent or at least control a world economic collapse. But ask yourself, âIs this really a cause worth dying for?â
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan
There is a term for the integrity of analysis and understanding of Iraq. It is the term of shear - the effect of sideways crossing forces. Winds that at a moment can ground a passenger aircraft are examples. Shears are always close to the site of destruction. Engineers are fearful of the shear's ability to crack concrete, cut a bolt and wrench an unsuspecting bather away from bottom and out to sea. Iraq after our forced transformation is an area where shears affects all and it effects are the happiness in a restrurant next to the misery of an exploded IED. There is pleasure and quiet and horror all moving in crossing forces. This is the integrity of Iraq, it is in shear. Only our perceptions tend to moderate it.
Bill Keller, BASKING RIDGE, USA/New Jersey
I wouldnt start waving the flag quite so quickly. We have had Turkish troops invade northern Iraq so conflict on any number of religious/cultural/regional tensions is sure to beset Iraq long after we have left.
tim, london,
If you say so - I still feel it is a hopeless situation !!!
Ian Payne, WALSALL,
Facinating authoritative article! From what I have been able to glean from it, the situation in Iraq is absolutely dreadful, but, not as dreadful as it was, but, could quite easily return to how dreadful it was, although the author hopes it will not. As I say facinating article, can't wait for the next dispatch!
Kevin Sullivan, Roehampton, London
I would not say that there is anything hopeful about an airman dying in the shower on Saturday in Basra as the result of a militant rocket attack.
L Ellis, St Andrews,
Let's hope that the extremists are not just biding their time in the hope that a new US President will pull out the troops that are holding the (relative) peace.
Stan Rosenthal, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, England
As a young women planning to join HM Forces, I admire the courage of all the men and women (mainly the men on the front line) risking thier lives to save others. The hardship of losing members of the teams has not detered them from their duty to fight for people who do not even speak our language. I am proud that one day I will be one of them; as they join with stangers to fight side by side for those who cannot fight for themselves.
Madeleine Edwards, Banstead, England