Oliver Kamm
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
Ernest Bevin, described the treaty that established Nato, as “an endeavour to express on paper the underlying determination to preserve our way of life”. The former Foreign Secretary was right. The alliance has proved to be the most successful liberation movement in history.
That record was besmirched yesterday. Nato members, meeting in Bucharest, barred Georgia and Ukraine from the first stages of joining the alliance. It is a huge diplomatic success for President Putin. Ukraine and Georgia received support from the US, Canada and the nations of eastern and central Europe. There is no indication that Bevin's successors have any notion of the defeat inflicted on the cause of liberal democracy.
Defenders of Mr Putin's obduracy point to “legitimate grievances” that Nato's enlargement aggravates. Yet for two decades Nato has emphasised pacific intent, while Russia has become only more aggressive and threatening. On first meeting Mr Putin, President Bush gushed: “I looked the man in the eye. I was able to get a sense of his soul.” Yet since 9/11, no amount of brutality and authoritarianism on Putin's part has dissuaded Western governments from treating him as a valued ally in the struggle against Islamist terrorism.
There is no reason we should accede to Russia's demands and much justification for ostentatiously flouting them. Mr Putin has few talents on the international stage save bluster and obstructionism. Consider his crude meddling in the Ukrainian presidential election; his economic blockade of Georgia, and his posturing over its would-be breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia; his malign encouragement of Iran's nuclear deception; his unilateral overtures to Hamas, nicely designed to sabotage Western efforts at Middle East diplomacy. The hostility is calculated, not reactive.
But the reasons for deploring Nato's decision are not only negative. The coloured revolutions in Georgia in 2003 (Rose) and Ukraine in 2004 (Orange) marked the failure of the Kremlin's dealings with the former Soviet republics. Mr Putin was on the side of the corrupt administrations that popular pressure defeated.
The integration of these states into Nato is not only about security. It symbolises, and consolidates, democratic advance. Mr Putin is a ballot-rigging autocrat whose natural allies are those, such as the Uzbek dictator Islam Karimov, for whom the abuse of human rights is an end in itself. Any diplomatic posture adopted by Nato governments will be taken as provocative by Mr Putin. We might as well therefore do the right thing, not least by those who have to live alongside him.
Oliver Kamm is author of Anti-Totalitarianism: The Left-wing Case for a Neoconservative Foreign Policy
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
"his posturing over its would-be breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia"
- And what about US/European interference in the Serbian provence of Kosovo?
"his unilateral overtures to Hamas"
- Did Hamas not win a democratic election in the Palestinian territories? Do they not have a legitimate right to rule?
The Russians pulled their troops out of Europe after the collapse of the USSR. The Warsaw Pact was disbanded, but NATO have continued to expand and now sit on the doorstep of Russia.
"Mr Putin has few talents on the international stage save bluster and obstructionism"
- And what talents does Mr Bush and the former Mr Blair have? Apart from dragging us into wars in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Western policy on Russia is nonsensical and provocative.
Jamie, Edinburgh,
...NATO and the US have few talents on the international stage save bluster and obstructionism. Consider the crude meddling in the Serbian/Kosovar elections; the economic blockade of Irak leading to over 1million deaths; the malign deception about the Irak's WMD and of Iran's nuclear program which has not been found guilty!; the unilateral overtures to Ukraine and Georgia, aimed at thwarting Russian efforts at diplomacy. Let's not forget the failure if not complicity of the West in the Rwanda's genocode; the unwaivering support of Israel regardless of its policy towards the Palestinians; and the support of Pakistan with its nuclear program... The hostility is calculated, not reactive...
Mikhail, Edinburgh, Scotland
NATO should have invited Russia as the first EE member to join in mid-90s and we would not have today's problems. When Russian government asked for this informally back then, the answer was no. Russia does not see NATO as its enemy but NATO is becoming more and more political organization and defeating its initial military purpose. Russia has to defend its interests and object to further NATO expansion as a result.
I don't really care whether Ukraine and Georgia become part of NATO since the organization is no longer united or really functional. US does not care to win the other members' support for its own military operations.
Olexiy, the brain washing can be surprisingly successful judging by your comments... Defend Ukraine from Russia? From cheap gas and ability for Ukrainians to come here and be successful? It is obviously better to compete for cleaning and plumber jobs in UK with Polish workers...
Elena, Novosibirsk, Russia
Oleg showed the situation quite well, almost nothing to add.
Generally, the article drastically reminds of the Cold War propaganda (including Soviet) in its most flagrant aggressive way.
History repeats itself.
Alexi, Brussels, Belgium
This is a shameful gesture on the part of the "Old Europe" and of Germany and France in particular. The article has it spot on - the Russians are bullies and the more you accede to their demands, the more they will ask for. This is a big victory for the Russian diplomacy and a sad day for the advancement of democracy in Europe. However, we see the same reluctance to give Ukraine an association agreement with the EU on the part of the same set of states, even though in reality the subsequent integration process may take decades (and may come to nothing as is the case with Turkey). As a Ukrainian, I am beginning to suspect that France and Germany are simply vary of the loss of their clout in Europe and of becoming much less relevant geopolitically. However, if they stay so servile, that will happen anyhow and much sooner. And let us have little doubts, Ukraine does not need security guarantees from Germany or France! They (such guarantees) are worthless as was perfectly demonstrated during the WW2 (in that case by France and the UK). The only country that may step up to the plate (at least in theory) is the US! As for Russia, they have also never been shy about using their military to expand their territory or geopolitical influence. Unfortunately they are unable to provide Ukraine with security guarantees against themselves in this particular case. I had a better opinion of Frau Merkel, but she turned out to be a dedicated heir to the Russian employee Herr Schroder...
Oleksiy, Kyiv, Ukraine
Mr. Kamm tries to convince us that we're aggressive and NATO and especially the US, forcing the alliance expansion, are not.
Some questions:
- how many military bases has the "aggressive" Russia and how many wars it started abroad in last 20 years? (answer: 5, none). Compare with NATO and US.
- what is the military budget of the "aggressive" Russia? (answer: $30 bln, 2,7% of GDP)? And the one of the US? (answer: $525 bln, 3,8% GDP)
- did Reagan and Koll promised to Gorbachev in 1990s a deal: united Germany and no NATO bases to the East from it? So, how 'bout the new US bases in Bulgaria and Romania?
- do we plan to install the missiles near the US border, or the US plan to install them near us? Just remember the Caribbean crisis and YOUR reaction.
- who bomb Yugoslavia w/o UN sanction in 1995? Yes, it proves NATOs peaceful intentions qute well.
- where is the Hussein's WMD?
Oleg, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
The great concern the west should be address today is the growing level of military co-operation between Russia and China. Both powers have already held exploratory military exercizes together and more are planned. The prospect of a Sino/Russian military axis is daunting. The west must work with Mr Medvedev to bring Russia closer to the west and not drive Russia into further military co-operation with China through diplomatic intransigence.
Tony Makara, Manchester,
âMr Putin is a ballot-rigging autocrat whose natural allies are those, such as the Uzbek dictator Islam Karimov,â¦â
Wow, no me, no the rest of 80% of Russian population supporting Putin look like uzbek Karimov...
Mr. Kamm should be more consistent in his noble struggle against the âscum of the worldâ and give at last a special priority to content of his own head.
Vasiliy, Sanct-Peterburg, Russia
NATO is the main world security threat today. You accuse Russia with agressive intentions having NATO realized its aggressive deeds in many globe regions.
Yaroslav, Pyatigorsk, Russia
"for two decades Nato has emphasised pacific intent"
Bombing of defenseless Yugoslavia hardly can be classified as "pacifism", and it happened less than 10 years ago. The view of NATO in Russia then changed overnight once the bombings started, as it became clear that the alliance can and will make aggressive moves in cases it is absolutely sure the victim cannot strike back.
Vadim, Moscow,