Carol Midgley
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
I would like to raise a toast this week to Barney, a blue and gold parrot at a wildlife sanctuary in Nuneaton, who during an important civic visit told the local mayoress to “f*** off”. Not content with mortifying his keepers with merely one outburst, he then turned to two police officers and a vicar and added: “You can f*** off too, w****rs.” The rejoinder made national news.
I don't know about you but this is the sort of thing that keeps me snickering like a Viz-reading schoolboy for months. Maybe you think I have a puerile sense of humour. Maybe you are right (reading a new book on amusing names, it took me about a week to get over someone calling their child Fanny Tickler). But it was that final use of “w*****rs” that did it for me.
The idea of a parrot growing to resent the worthy but dull guests who troop round his home, snapping at them like a narky OAP and adding that extra profanity as a closing barb is just very funny. I envy Barney. He has his timing and context right. He is a talented swearer.
Unlike Madonna. Madonna is crap at swearing. She got on stage at the Live Earth concert which millions of children were watching and said: “If you want to save the planet I want you to start jumping up and down. Come on motherf****rs.”
Apart from being pathetically gratuitous (why should all these people who have, after all, come only to support the environment be accused of having carnal relations with their mothers?), how square does it sound? It's like an embarrassing auntie at a family wedding getting drunk and saying things like “gimme some skin”.
Where's the wit, Mrs Ritchie? The originality? This week the BBC was ordered by Ofcom to make a grovelling apology after viewers complained about this and various other p***poor swearers at Live Earth (that includes you, Phil Collins). It should serve as a lesson to the BBC. Few people mind if the swearing is funny. It's when it's done artlessly that it most aggrieves.
We should celebrate those who swear well. Genius swearers, in my book, include Eddie Izzard, Peter Capaldi in The Thick of It, Ricky Gervais, Jack Dee, Stephen Fry, Jo Brand, Ray Winstone, Robert De Niro, Kevin Spacey in Swimming With Sharks and, wonderfully, Richard E. Grant in Withnail & I (“Monty, you terrible c***”, being a favourite).
Morrissey, however, is someone who manages to be a lyrical genius without practically ever resorting to swearing.
Meanwhile, rubbish swearers include Gordon Ramsay (84 f***s in one episode? Less is more, Gordon), Richard Madeley, Donny Tourette (the plastic punk who sounds like he's still trying to shock his parents), Sharon Osbourne (who said “p*** off you pi**** bastard” to Vic Reeves at the Brits, sad old mare), Paris Hilton, Jade Goody and anyone under 16. As everyone knows, restraint is the key.
It is a fickle mistress, the F-word. If exploited, like alcohol, it makes a predictable, crashing bore of the user. If used sparingly and at precisely the right moment, it is unparalleled as a from-the-soul cuss. As even fifth-formers know, it is one of our most versatile tools, delivering equal verve as a noun, verb, adjective or adverb and creating splendid compound nouns (f***wit, f***face).
It always surprises me that, as a female, I'm supposed to be most affronted by the C-word. Far from it. Like many women, I think it a sensational word and believe that, actually, men get more het up about it than us. Being called a “bitch” can be far more vicious. Though, granted, coming from the mouth of, say, a London taxi driver it can be vile.
We seem to be confused by what should and shouldn't offend us (I am using asterisks throughout because this is how sweary words must appear in the press). Those red top newspapers that openly feature topless models will then, quite bafflingly, write tits as “t*ts”, as though four letters in formation will offend, but an actual pair of naked clackers won't.
In February there was a hoo-ha when the 70-year-old actress Jane Fonda inadvertently said “c***” during a live broadcast of NBC's Today show. “She certainly meant no disrespect. She was just quoting the title of her scene in The Vagina Monologues,” said her spokesman.
Well, exactly. A scene that is supposed to challenge our irrational fear and horror of this word and reclaim it, ended up with a craven apology to America. Oh, the sweet irony.
In Merseyside, where I live, there is a local campaign to change the name of the village of Lunt because scallies keep changing the sign to - guess what? Oh, please. Why is it that we laugh along with Chaucer's queynte (see, you can get round the asterisks with these olde worlde spellings), accept Pepys' cunny but recoil from Fonda's c*** and destroy a village's Viking heritage to defend our frail selves against one small word?
Sir David Attenborough, 81, this week lamented the overuse of swearing on television. “I was at BBC2 when the F-word was first broadcast and the uproar was extraordinary,” he said. “But now you hear it everywhere.” He's right, and I am as displeased as the next person by a lazy “f***”. What we need is for swearwords to be used with more skill.
But I'll never agree with those who say: “Ooh, is your vocabulary so limited that you haven't the imagination to think up another word?”
That's the point - there is no other word. Our swearwords are unique. And this is why in the right hands - hands such as Barney's - they are f*****g gold dust.
What a lotta Potter prattle
Though I never took to Harry Potter (airborne boarding school kids don't really do it for me), I have always, like most people, fiercely admired J.K. Rowling. As a one-time struggling single mother from Edinburgh, who wrote in a café to save on heating bills, she seemed, despite soaraway success, to have kept her feet firmly on the ground. Mmm. Time to reappraise. In a courtroom in Manhattan, where she is trying to stop Steve Vander Ark publishing a lexicon of Harry Potter, Ms Rowling seems to have transformed into a fully paid-up, precious luvvie. When a judge asked what her seven books meant to her she wobbled on the verge of tears, had to ask for a glass of water to regain her composure and said: “The closest that I can come is to say to someone, ‘How do you feel about your child?', adding ‘I really don't want to cry because I'm British'.”
Oh, do get a grip. We are talking here about a die-hard fan who is trying to publish an A-Z guide to Harry Potter. Like people write glossaries and guidesto, say, the Beatles' work, or Agatha Christie's.It's what tends to happen when you have been talented enough to have created a global phenomenon and a £545 million fortune. It comes with the territory that you're fortunate to inhabit. As they'd probably say back in Scotland: “Get over yourself, hen.”
A scoop on poop
My local paper reveals that Gordon Lorenz, who co-wrote the 1980 No1 hit There's No One Quite Like Grandma, sung by the St Winifred's School Choir, Stockport, has been fined £200 for twice failing to use the poop-scoop while out walking his dog, Bertie, in Llandudno. There's no punchline. I just thought you'd like to know.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Because, Jane Shaw, "What we need is..." is a written abbreviation of "No that isn't what we need, what we need is........"
in this case "banning swearwords isn't what we need, what we need is for swearwords to be used with more skill."
We need..... is a different thing altogether and doesn't convey the same meaning.
Alex Allison, Whithorn, Wigtownshire
So-called swear words are a genuine part of the language and an important relic of our diverse heritage.
Carol's got it spot on - littering your conversation 'willy-nilly' with expletives just makes you sound dull and inarticulate but a well placed and selected curse livens up your conversation and provides a conversational kick up the arse for the prosaic and boring.
And as for that parrot...it makes a welcome change form 'Pretty Polly, Pretty Polly'.....
Neil Watkinson, ipswich, uk
Swearing should be reserved for appropriate moments.
At other times, it is usually unnecessary, louche, not funny, and is almost invariably a thoughtless replacement for the Queen's English.
What I find most offensive is the sheer laziness and paucity of speech -- stand-up comedians take note.
David Jefferis, Brill, UK
Other examples of really bad swearers -
Middle class women 30-45 with loud and penetrating voices who are trying to convince everyone how cool and "one of the chaps" they are.
RB, Lauzun, France
How about simply less swear words for a change? It is probably less demanding for writers to put in a swear to express anger, but hey, in years past a little mnore creativity was used!
Bill, Yeovil, UK
there is no need to use foul language , period. only inadequate people think it is necessary.
watson, taunton,
I agree; the two best scenes in the film The Verdict, with Paul Newman, were when the James Mason character was described as the "Prince of F###ing Darkness", and Paul Newman giving Charlotte Rampling a right hook.
Bad "swearing" includes FCUK T-shirts, which are common, and one I saw on a girl in Edinburgh - CNUT - which is just plain,well, "common".
Bill Peter, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
This tool should be able to convert any text into a skillfully worded cuss filled sentence : http://www.ramsaytranslator.com/
Dave, Melbourne, Victoria
There's a world of difference between a swear word which expresses an emotion and one which is simply a bad use of language. It's a pity too many people know only the latter.
P Thomas, Merseyside, UK
With swearing, like flesh exposure, less is more. Well-timed, somewhat surprising but relevant use of cusses is always more effective than gratuitous, rampant overuse such as Mr. Ramsay does (as much as I enjoy his blunt style, I think his swearing would be far more effective in moderation).
Skin is much the same. It is surprising how many women, for example, elect to show large amounts of their personal real estate when an inch or two of exposed midriff can be more enticing.
It all boils down to the mentality that if this much is good, then more must be better, and it simply isn't true.
Incidentally, our tolerance for swearing in Canada seems far greater than that of our American neighbours. I hear the f-word on CBC quite routinely. The network doesn't feel it necessary to censor the word, although if harsh language is going to present itself during a news report, the presenter does warn the audience, which I think is entirely appropriate.
Jim MacKenzie, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Move to The Guardian, Carol. They wouldn't deface your glorious Anglo-Saxon with prim, bourgeois asterisks.
Tim Footman, London/Bangkok,
I could not agree more. Barney's comedy timing is SENSATIONAL. The fact that his last expletive was directed at two coppers and a vicar simply had me in stitches.
I tire of swearing on TV, unless its in some gritty drama like The Wire (i.e. it would be notable by its absence if not included). However, this is generally because the swearing serves no purpose and is clumsily used.
Stephen Fry uses swear words superbly. Though not quite as superbly as Barney the Parrot.
mike, Beijing, China
When I did some interviews on US radio recently about my book Filthy Shakespeare, I was under strict instructions to avoid uttering the salacious words. Having written the book to peel back four centuries of censorship, I was then having to gag what I'd ungagged. At least the book doesn't have asterisks.
Dr Pauline Kiernan, Oxford, UK
i agree, proper swearing is a joy to hear.
I am teaching my son to swear properly and that includes learning about appropriateness and delivery.
He is 3.
What is really annoying is inappropriate or poorly delivered swearing.
Bet this ruffles a few feathers...well you know what to do!
simon, london,
I have a zero tolerance of swearing. It is offensive and has ruined many otherwise decent programmes on television. Why is it necessary? And why is it all about bodily functions we would rather not talk about. Would we be alarmed if 5 year olds used such words? If not then I am shocked! If yes then why is it considered to be adult language?
Allan Ashworth, York, UK
On the subject of expletives, why would one say "What we need is..." rather than "We need...
Jane Shaw, Bristol, UK
I'd love to share a beer and cracker with ol' Barney. Sounds like my kind of bird.
Dennis B,, Girard, NE,
While I don't swear myself - I have always wondered why swearwords are considered to be socially unacceptable. As far as I can see, most swearwords refer to human sexuality (activities or bodyparts), or to human or animal excrement.
I would say that the subjects addressed by these words are somewhat overplayed these days (with the exception of the swearword referring to excretion) so maybe that is the reason for us to tiptoe around words that virtually all adults know.
Andre, Portland, USA
Brilliant article. Absolutely right too.
Did you ever read something of a similar theme by Nick Hornby in another paper, about ten years ago? Same sentiment. No asterisks. It was brilliant. I have this conversation fairly often with people.
Richard Want, KIRKBY STEPHEN, Cumbria
Very amusing article....and so very true.
I wonder however is Barney's keepers still in a job ?
alan, trondheim, norway
Fantastic article - really made me chuckle. Linda, can I borrow that parrot after you :-)
Ciaran, Milford/Surrey, UK
...and very rarely you have gratuitous and genius swearers...Derek and Clive.
Andy, Beijing, China
I want that parrot!
linda, berkshire, england
You're right, judicious swearing is a great thing, but there's also a lot to be said for a well-placed euphemism, as you demonstrate with your reference to "an actual pair of naked clackers."
Eddie, London,
Well said, the c-word is actually my favourite word and i've never actually understood why as a woman i'm supposed to be mortally offended by it.
There are sometimes when no other words will suffice and a good F or C is the best to be used.
Chonts, London, UK
Oh for goodness sake. If you consider running a column about swearing either have the nerve to print the words in full or spike the item. This censorship is unforgivably prissy.
Gatz, Cheslmford, UK