Charles Clarke
Win VIP tickets
We live, as is often said, in challenging times and Gordon Brown is absolutely right that Labour’s policies and people are far better equipped to lead Britain through this international financial crisis than any of our political opponents. But the difficult decisions which are necessary to address Britain’s economic difficulties also require strong leadership, clarity of purpose and public support. Labour has to regain and then retain the confidence of the British people and that means coming to terms with the political realities.
Three weeks ago, Peter Riddell wrote in The Times: “Most voters have given up on the Brown government and little it can say or do is likely to shift that hostility.” Almost no one – including at the top levels of government – believes that Labour can actually win the next general election as things stand.
Yet to air these problems, it is suggested, represents near-criminal political disloyalty. However, true loyalty, both to Labour and to our constituents, means recognising that the greatest betrayal would be by negligence to condemn the poorest in this country to a decade or more of Tory power.
If Gordon Brown is to remain prime minister and prove wrong those who doubt his capacity to change, he must establish his authority and offer clear leadership. Confident communication, great speeches, a strong and supportive team and a coherent programme of policies flow only from a clear sense of political direction.
There is no merit in just waiting for further dates or setting future tests. Although prevarication and evasion may appear attractive at the moment, they are actually the most dangerous course of all. The people we seek to serve will not be helped by a crippling lethargy or by just hoping that something will turn up.
The alternative is for Brown to depart with honour. A new leader will then be chosen to carry through a political programme which meets our economic challenges and enables Labour to rebuild its fortunes to contest the next general election with genuine confidence.
There are three often-repeated impediments to making such a dramatic change.
First, we are told, there are no strong alternatives.
It is certainly true that there have been limited opportunities for contenders to shine during the Blair-Brown decade and, as Brown’s elevation has shown, it is not easy to predict how someone will perform as leader before they are in office. Against that, the experience of David Cameron, Nick Clegg and even Sarah Palin shows how quickly exposure can raise profiles.
Brown himself has rightly stated that a number of his cabinet have the capacity to be prime minister and a properly conducted leadership election (in which he could participate himself if he wished to clear the air) would enable the alternatives to be properly assessed.
Another Labour “coronation” would be a serious mistake. The election would take four to five weeks and could be funded by party supporters who are not ready to donate to Labour in the current circumstances.
The second inhibition is a concern that another change of prime minister between general elections would inevitably lead to an immediate general election. The opposition parties and some parts of the media would call for this – and stridently.
However, such an appeal would have not the slightest constitutional basis. Provided that the new Labour leader could command a majority in the House of Commons, the Queen would be advised to invite him or her to form a government. After that point the timing of the next general election would be a matter for the political judgment of the new prime minister.
My political advice would be that the new prime minister should preannounce the date of the next general election, probably in 2010, and should then begin the process of legislating, preferably on a free vote, for fixed-term parliaments.
The third reservation is that any process of change would itself be bound to be a political bloodbath which would damage Labour fatally. This comes less from rational analysis than from an understandable fear of the unknown. There are no irreconcilable personality or policy rifts within Labour and there is every reason to believe that everyone would work with mutual respect.
The real danger is that the prime minister’s political weakness is not only damaging himself but would inexorably and disastrously transfer to Labour as a whole. In reality the extent of political damage to Labour will be determined mainly by Brown’s own behaviour and the decisiveness (or otherwise) with which the cabinet promotes change.
The impediments to change are real, but it is far better to face and overcome those challenges than to continue with inaction, drift and despair. The country needs strength and confidence to deal with the economic challenges and the Labour party needs those very same qualities if we are to avoid disaster in the future.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
and you would condemn the poor to another 5yrs of this government eh?
Mitch, Wolverhampton, England
Are you the elephant in the room?
ronnie, bucks, UK
I think that Charles has a point, Labour is going to be in opposition but they should try to be radical and go down fighting! Welfare sys needs reform, that beast called Incapacity Ben needs sorting out, Border control, Enforce the NMW. Repatriate foreign prisoners, reform NHS, why do docs earn £££?
Graham, St. Albans, uk
My reason for hating New Labour more than the Tories is that you lot have been eroding our basic rights and freedoms, and building a police state by (not much) stealth.
Only way to keep Tories out? Stand aside and make way for the Lib Dems. It's the only option you've got left.
Simon, Brentwood, UK
Even worse would be to condemn everyone to another term of Labour.
Pinkie, London, United Kingdom
Charlie Boy, you have supported Brown in his stealth taxes for years. So you are as an ex-Cabinet minister partly responsible for making the poor poorer in the last 11 years of NuLab rule. I thought that when you challenged Brown you had come to your senses. But apparently you haven't.
M. Cawdery, Portadown, Co. UK, EU
After the debt Labour have left us in, it will take the Tories a decade to sort it out just like the end of the 70's. Gordon boasts of low interest rates and inflation, but why are we still in a mess? Answer - debt an taxes.
David, Doncaster, UK
Labour cannot face the reality that they lost the moral
authority to continue to govern, when they denied the British
people the referendum on the Lisbon treaty, they had promised. This is how dictators behave, it is wrong and it
no longer matters who is leader, they MUST GO.
Philip, Dorset, UK
After 11 years of this Labour government, I am closer to the poverty line now than I ever was under the Tories thanks to the minimum wage and uncontrolled immigration. Thats why I will not vote Labour again Mr Clarke.
Paul, West Midlands,
"Begin the process of legislating...for fixed-term parliaments": in other words, make whatever empty promise buys a few votes, as with PR pre-97, then airbrush it out if (mirabile dictu) the new guy gets in. Pitiful.
David Ball, Bristol,
Why blame Brown?
We are faced with the failure of the party system that leads to twenty something party hands into MPs who willingly act as mere lobby fodder uncritically parroting Government line for 10 years.
Why then blame it on Brown and Blair instead of owning up to their own failure
S Yogarajah, Harrow,
It's true to say the country faces challenges: one of the biggest challenges we face is the bunch of tired failures in this clapped out government.
It's time for a change.
Ian, London, UK
But that fact remains, Charles, that the poor have become poorer under Labour rule.
Labour have made this county bankrupt with their social engineering failures
General election now please.
Adrian, London, UK
We don't need to return to the tories - you have done it already. Taxes to go up 5p to pay for the bankers excesses, all of which Brown could have dealt with. No - it is socialism for the rich, and capitalism for the poor. New Labour - New Stasi - done for.
HOORAY
Jeremy Poynton, Frome, England
I respect you and think you would be a better alternative to Brown. You however presided over a failed Home Office which was allowing uncontrolled immigration and asylum through corruption and incompetence. It is fundamentally flawed even now. What would you do differently to regain peoples respect?
David Cartright, Birmingham,
Charles, it isn't JUST Gordon - it's the whole Labour Party that is hated by the voters. Yes, we want Gordon gone, but we want the rest of you wiped out as well. Why should we believe a word you say; you promised a Referendum on the EUSSR Constitution & then cancelled it when you thought you'd lose.
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
There is no poverty in Britain. I haven't worked in twenty years, have two houses , two cars and eight kids. The only poverty in this land is the poverty of the mind. The cultivation and importation of the squalid and inferior.
keith, Wigan, uk
Clark's emotional blackmail comment about condemning the poor to a decade or more of Tory power just highlights the whole problem with Labour, running an entire country with the oldest, sickest, poorest etc as the focus. Is it any wonder that Labour governments always end with the country broke?
Steven Davies, Cape Town, South Africa
1. Given that Labour policies have left no reserves and will therefore require yet more tax rises, on what grounds are they "best" ?
2. Support for Labour in the country is sufficiently questionable, that a general, not Labour leadership, election is warranted. Not in Labour's interests ? Tough.
D Murphy, Skipton,
We don't want socialism.
david, Bromley,
Come on Britain...give Brown a break! Unfortuntely he came into power at a bad time...to be honest another leader under such circumstances would probably have made worse choices. I think Brown has great potential and hasn't had the opportunity to show it give him more time and be patient.
K.Par
Kayma Param, Turin, Italy
Does Charles Clarke really believe that a new leader would make a difference for Labour? The present government is more discredited than the Labour goverment of the late 1970s - and that was a shambles on its good days.
The poorer people have less to fear from the Conservatives than from Labour.
Marcus, Worcester, UK
Frightening that ex cabinet minister cannot 'see' reality.
UK is in bad way. Reckless spending, huge debts, spin, lying over Iraq and having adventurer Blair as PM.
UK needs desperately, dedicated, talented, HONEST leader.
New politics. New thinking.
Leigh Vernier, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
What Charles Clark wants is a return to Blairism.
He has no chance.
Most people have seen thru the smoke and mirrors that Blaire and his followers surrounded themselves in. That includes you Charles Clark.
nilsey105, wigan, england Uk
Funny - ironic, the ex NUS leader has spilled the beans. Zero interest in the people just power. What a shame Pol Pot never got hold of you Clark , in which case generations would be laughing at things described as ears preserved in alcohol, the symbol of western intellect!
Tom Howard, Bordeaux, France
I thought I'd remind the voters of Norwich South of your part in putting the Identity Cards Act 2006 onto the statute books.
This vile betrayal of the British People will never be forgotten.
Considering your tiny majority (You - 15,904, Lib Dems - 12,251), your opinions won't mean much after 2010.
Brian Drury, London Colney, England
You really do'nt like Brown do you Charles?
The Poor in this country have had a decade of labour power, and guess what?
They are poorer now than they were in the days when things were only going to get better.
This is just political bile, thrown up to see where it lands.
katherine langton, blackburn,
"and should then begin the process of legislating, preferably on a free vote, for fixed-term parliaments."
Absolutely not! That would make us like the USA where they are in perpetual election mode.
Ian, sheffield, uk
Charles Clark has no moral or intellectual authority to tell us what is best for the country.
In a normal society, what he is doing would amount to treason.
Dorris, London, UK
There are two distinct levels of denial here. One is to think that after a year Brown has hidden depths we simply haven't discovered - silly us - and the second is to imagine that after a century of failure, socialism still has a secret plan to save us all. Also undiscovered?
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/USA