Pick up your copy of Love: Forever Changes at WHSmith today
Fern Britton, the likeable presenter of This Morning, has been shrinking before viewers’ eyes for the past year or so. Her total weight loss has amounted to five stone, from a size 22 (obese) to a size 16 (curvy but normal). Given that she appears in people's sitting rooms for a couple of hours every morning, there was enormous interest in how she was achieving the dramatic shrinkage, and a great deal of speculation.
It is possible to lose five stone by natural means – I did it myself a couple of years ago, by dumping sugar and carbohydrates – and Britton did indeed make little noises about “healthy eating” and the joys of cycling (though last week she denied having spoken about her weight-loss methods and says the relevant quotes were invented by journalists).
It now turns out, courtesy of the News of the World, that Britton was a little economical with the actualité and, in fact, had a gastric band fitted two years ago.
Cue outrage. She’s “a big fat liar”, “a fibber”, “dishonest” and worse, according to commentators. Part of the outcry centres on Britton’s contract with Ryvita, which she endorses in exchange for £200,000 a year.
Somebody has a problem but it’s not Britton – it’s the incensed public and its all-devouring sense of entitlement. The ads for Ryvita involve playful and obvious image manipulation: Britton’s round head superimposed on a tiny little stick body. You’d have to be extraordinarily stupid to take the resulting image as fact, diet or no diet, gastric band or not. Besides, even people with gastric bands need to eat, and frankly you’re better off nibbling Ryvita than falling face first into a bucket of doughnuts.
I don’t see how Britton has been dishonest, except in her entirely understandable refusal to “share” intimate details of her life. Personally, I’m all for less “sharing” (which, according to a report last week, is bad for you: being buttoned up is better for your health, as is picking yourself up and getting on with it. Alas, both are a dying art).
I’m bandying the words “gastric band” about breezily, but having one fitted is a serious piece of surgery. It can have unlovely side effects. It’s not something anybody goes into lightly, or a procedure that is recommended as anything other than a last resort. I would say that it is for people in despair.
Britton, for all her chirpy self-deprecation and proclamations of being happy with her original size, was clearly anything but, and no wonder. There is no such thing as a clinically obese woman who loves her body. There are just varying degrees of self-delusion, interspersed with the odd bolt of misery and self-disgust.
Britton is known for seeming jolly and friendly and approachable – but really her ability to persuade millions of women that she is their best friend has everything to do with her skills as a television presenter and nothing to do with real life.
Surely what a person, famous or otherwise, chooses to do with their internal organs is their business and nobody else’s. “Next time I have a facelift or haemorrhoids or something, I’ll ring the Sunday papers straight away,” Britton said after the News of the World story.
All of this fuss is tied up with the public’s weird and stalkerish desire to own famous people, and to fly into rages if famous people try to hold something back. The assumption is that anyone who puts herself in the public eye is some kind of exhibitionistic freak who “asks for it” and is automatically fair game.
Why should this be true? Does being 20 years old and top of your class at Rada mean there’s a part of you that longs for people to go through your bins at night? Does being good at writing music mean you secretly want people to sleep with you and then tell the papers how rubbish you were in bed? What are people supposed to do with their talents, if the rewards include having your life ripped apart in public?
No wonder we’re getting so many useless wannabes: the talented ones are probably quaking with fear and planning a career behind the scenes – and who’d blame them?
Some people manage in the eye of the storm: little is known, for instance, about Bob Dylan’s personal life. He is thought to live possibly in California, possibly by himself, possibly not. But then, he’s Bob Dylan. The majority of “stars” find themselves flattered by media attention, and almost all feel that they are able to “play the game” and win.
The other day at a party I met a young man whose undeniable talent has made him an overnight TV celebrity. I was outside having a cigarette when he arrived, and witnessed the whole paparazzi-frenzy thing as he stepped out of his taxi.
Later I asked him whether he enjoyed it, and where he thought it would lead. He quite liked the attention, he said, though it was annoying, too – he’d wanted to bring a female friend as his guest but didn’t because he knew any woman photographed with him would be on the next day’s front pages as his “girlfriend” and it just wasn't worth the hassle. Otherwise, yes, it was fun; and besides, he knew how to deal with it: he had it all worked out. Poor innocent fool.
Admittedly the issue gets confused when we come across celebs who seem more addicted to fame than they are even to the old class As. The former child actress Lindsay Lohan, for instance, who, fresh out of rehab and with the whole of the California property market at her disposal, chooses to live at the Chateau Marmont, the world’s most louche hotel. Or Britney Spears, poor thing, who even in the throes of a public breakdown somehow finds time to start a relationship with one of the photographers who both hound her and give her a reason for living.
Britton, middle-aged British telly presenter and housewives’ favourite, is not Spears. She seems sufficiently well adjusted not to be verbally or emotionally incontinent, or so needy that seeing her face in the paper gives her a reason to get out of bed in the morning. She’s friendly and pleasant and reads the Autocue very nicely. She doesn’t want to be ours, to be eaten up and spat out; she just wants to do the job she’s good at and then retreat into her private life.
The public is making that difficult for her just because she has had a life-changing piece of surgery in the mistaken belief that her gastrointestinal tract is her own, to do with as she sees fit. Apparently not. Which says a lot about the great British public, none of it impressive.

India Knight was born in 1965. She lives in London with her three children, writes a weekly column for The Sunday Times, and a weblog, Isn't She Talking Yet?, on bringing up a child with special needs. She has also written two novels, My Life on a Plate and Don't You Want Me?
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
c. £90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
£
Not Specified
The Bar Standards Board
London
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Erm the public demand? I think you'll find it's the media that creates these so called "demands". Outraged shriek-age by tabloids, serious "no but reeelly" articles in the laughable hi-brows.
It's not the public that have insatiable attitudes for this rubbish it's the sad and tawdry British press
Victoria, Manchester, England
its none of our business what she does in her private life.
georgina scott, banbridge, down
Look, can you not see what is staring you in the face?
She sells stories to the press about her personal life. Her dieting is on her programme. She advertises diet products.
SHE MADE IT OUR BUSINESS.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
go for it fern, well done, why the hell should you tell anyone what your up too. caz, stafford west mids.
caz jeater, rugeley, england
please stop hounding the nicest person on tv. she does her job better than anyone standing in for her. its none of our business what she does in her private life. so she didnt shout it from the highest moutain about her private business, so what, please fern come back we love you.
georgina scott, banbridge, down
Well said, India. The papers 'slam' and 'blast', and the public are expected to be suitably 'disgusted' and 'outraged'. It's tiresome. Of course Fern is entitled to a private life.
Alice, Guildford,
I do not believe that Fern is dishonest or irresponsible. Irresponsible for having a gastric band fitted. Can't the British public 'get a grip'.
She has obviously saved herself years of ill health added years to her life and will be around for her kids now! that's responsible.
Go Fern your brill!
Kerry Horsman-Gray, Rugby, UK
Most of you - and the reactionary masses - have completely missed the point.
It was *Fern* who made her body and her weight our business. We didn't, she did. She has done interviews on it, she trades on it, she advertises products because of it, she details it in public.
Now she's lied.
Helen E., London, UK
I don't see anything wrong with Fern's behaviour so good for you India for speaking out. She can endorse Ryvita all she likes but no one is going to believe she eats it all the time and it's responsible for her weight loss. Gastric banding means changing eating habits anyway just like a diet
Jill, Boston, UK
I have no idea where the "she says ryvita is the reason she lost weight" is coming from. I agree with this article because it obviously supposed to be a bit of fun. So many people in this country are so small minded and the fact that the tabloids decided to call her a liar and cheat is ridiculous!
Peter, Banbridge, Northern Ireland
She did tell the truth when she said that her weight loss was caused by eating less. Well she couldn't eat as much, could she (without throwing up ...?)
Sue C, Manchester, England
I think anyone who loses a dramatic amount of weight should be congratulated whatever the method used . However, in Fern's case she has advertised Ryvita's crisp bread and claimed that she lost the weight by eating less and excerising.
But in the end it is her business.
P Bennett, Lewisham, LONDON
i wish i had the money to do it i am so desperate i am on the cambridge diet at the moment i just feel like crying i have no where to go i wish i was her.
tracy, west midlands, birmingham
Does it matter? if shes happy then good on her. Shes done something incredibly brave.
Sarah , Plymouth , UK
I would suspect that Fern Britton's contract with Ryvita had more to do with the pun that could be made from her surname.
"Britton loves Ryvita" is clearly true especially with a £300,000 sweatener while "Britain loves Ryvita" would be rapidly stamped on as fraudulent by Advertising Standards.
BP Vallance, Corfu, Greece
Totally agree with Laura. If Fern takes the advertising dollar floggin slimmers' snack, Ryvita Mini's, then she is putting herself in the front line. Check out the ads on Youtube.
Hugh Szymonowsi, London,
She's being paid some £700,000 a year for sitting in front of a camera.
You go girl...............
John, London,
In todays world of reality TV coupled with microscopic media intrusion, we are increasingly discovering that celebrities are ordinary human beings, just like us.
Being a celebrity shouldn't eternally forfeit your right to any sort of privacy.
Dave, Home Counties,
India , Fern was always going to be damned if she did damned if she didnt but she took the money for Ryvita , a product well associated with diets, it smacks of double standards. She is a role model and perhaps she underestimated the influence she has.Rights to choose come with responsibilities.
Susan, France.,
If you are interested in Fern's gut then you need to check your mental health. What passes for media in UK has been feeding on it like Fern on a pork pie, and just shows how hungry and desperate it is for junk to fill it's cancerous bowels, regurgitating bile into the minds of a depressive populace.
Carl, London, UK
is the same braying media who some time ago stated she was so fat she was putting her life in danger and that if she cared for her children she would lose the weight?
Andy, london,
Fern Britton has been paid a small fortune to endorse Ryvita, implying fibre in her diet has been responsible for her weight loss - and that is deceptive. Catholics are all over this; it's lying by omission. She can do whatever she likes but when she colludes with duping people, she invites this
Ed, Cardiff,
Surely the point is not the surgery in itself, but the fact that she made a conscious decision to publicly attribute her weight loss to other, more difficult, more "virtuous" causes, and presumably benefited financially (or at least avoided financial loss) from these claims?
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
Leave her alone, she has lost weight and keeping off.
Well done Fern.....
Valerie Andrews, Wokingham, Berkshire
Absolutely incorrect. She herself made her body our business by telling us about it, making claims, advising the public on weight loss activities. If she hadn't done this, then yes it's just her business, but that is NOT the case.
She's a fraud.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
"the publics weird and stalkerish desire to own famous people" , "The public is making that difficult for her "- since when does the public go around photographing celebs, digging into their private lives, writing articles and publishing papers? I thought that was what people in the media did!
maria, athens,
Fern has made a fortune from discussing celeb gossip, inside info on the royals, who's having affairs with whom and just about every subject you can mention!
She REVELS in it and she ADORES getting a piece of juicy gossip but she doesn't like it when the tables are turned!
She WAS dishonest
Mary , East Anglia, UK
Absolutely spot on. Tabloid media attacks on anyone in the public eye disgust me. Fern's weight loss and how she achieved it is nobody's business than her own. It's good to see her defended so articulately.
Jane, Cambridge,
Why are you blaming the british public? It was the decision of the new of the world to run this story - the 'great british public' didn't demand that they do so.
Lorraine, Surrey,
Sorry, what Fern did was dishonest & irresponsible. She knows she is a role model for millions & held herself out as an example of what could be done with a diet of almost malnutrition proportions which no doubt influenced some women. Then to find she had private surgery to achieve the results!
JT, Lisbane,
Well said, India.
Fame has become a toxic curse.
The media has no sense of restraint.
I can't stop paparazzi pursuing the famous and making their lives a living hell, but I can stop buying the publications that use paparazzi shots.
Just my little bit towards restoring some sanity.
Dale, Wellington,
The media did the same thing that Fern does when it comes to other celebs on This Morning. She sits there with their gossip reporter and question other people's life choices as if she knows it all. Well, if she can't stand the heat then she should get out of the kitchen.
Amy, Catford, UK
Hear hear! Shame on the News of the World for trivialising such a difficult decision. Being overweight is not a joke. The paper could have used this situation as a way to promote healthy living, exercise and the benefits of weight loss instead of using it as a reason to attack someone.
S. Clark, London,
Well said ! Fern Britton is a seasoned professional, who works tirelessly with the GM team to educate people in a number of topics. Going some way to encourage the sort of society that we would all like to live in, ie a tolerant and understanding one. It isn't for anyone to judge !
Catherine , Lyneham, UK
good article, india. i don't understand why other people feel they have the right to interfere with one's personal business. i lost 5 stones as well on a strict diet and found that people often had unasked for opinions when i was both fat and once i got thin
amber, london,