India Knight
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Was Sir Alan Sugar’s decision to pick an affable bloke instead of a “rottweiler” (her words) woman as his apprentice last week a sign that he, and by extension the business world in general, is dinosaurishly sexist and retrograde? It has certainly been read that way by any number of female commentators. I find this old chestnut of a theory unbelievably tedious. Why are women so keen always to be seen to be victimised, even when they clearly aren’t victimised at all?
Sugar picked the right two finalists in Lee McQueen and Claire Young. The latter, a mouthy, bossy, go-getting sort with no humility, poor interpersonal skills and no sense of her own shortcomings, was a brilliant saleswoman - but also, as was amply demonstrated over 12 weeks, a piece of work. She wasn’t a piece of work because she was a woman - she was a piece of work because she was a piece of work.
Much was made in the series of the “amazing” progress that she had made personally by, er, learning to pipe down every now and then. This apparently constituted a “journey”, ergo she should have won.
If there was sexism in the programme this is surely where it lay: in the idea that knowing when to shut up was such a big ask of any member of the female race that Young should have been garlanded with a £100,000-a-year job for managing to wait her turn and not interrupt. Granted, you’d praise your toddler to the skies for learning to wait his or her turn at circle time, but we’re talking about an adult woman who had been explicitly told that gobbiness would probably result in her being fired. It’s really not that impressive, is it?
Sometimes - often - the best person wins and it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with gender. McQueen, also a brilliant salesman (as he demonstrated when asked, on the hoof, to sell a ballpoint pen to Karren Brady, the managing director of Birmingham City football club), clearly had the edge in that a) he’d never been brought back into the boardroom, thereby proving that he worked consistently hard and was liked by his teammates; and b) by showing a very endearing mixture of talent, enthusiasm and, it turned out, insecurity about his abysmal education record, which he lied about on his CV.
“I’ve got a chip on my shoulder about my education because I didn’t do very well at school,” he said last week. “I also once worked for four years as a catering manager at Harrow school, which was full of posh kids getting a great education. I think that might have something to do with my insecurities.”
(When he won anyway, despite having been caught lying and saying things such as “We was consciously appealing to the female genre”, my teenage sons immediately launched into a heartfelt rant about the utter futility of education and the utter rightness of leaving school immediately and running a stall in Camden market.)
McQueen is a sort of everyman, the kind of bloke you might bump into on any given night in any given bar and who’d make you laugh and entertain you without in any sense making you feel uncomfortable. This is, after all, the man who managed to sell a shedload of thongs at a bridal fair with charm and brio, but without ever overstepping the mark - easily done with an overfriendly bloke and women’s underwear.
He’s a nice, easy person, ambitious, keen, rough around the edges, likeable, determined - perfect Apprentice material. Why then does the “Claire Young was robbed” lobby feel that Sugar somehow has it in for women?
He doesn’t - but, incidentally, you could hardly blame him if he did. The female candidates in this year’s show spent their entire time bitching, backstabbing, bullying, scheming, lying and passing the buck. The men got on with it and managed to get over whatever petty arguments they had by the end of each episode. The women simply wouldn’t let theirs drop: some are continuing months after filming ended. This female trait is conveniently ignored when women complain of being overlooked or underpromoted, as if their gender exempted them from behaving decently.
In my experience, women are far harder to work with than men. Men don’t give you a crap task because they’re jealous of your shoes or mistrust you for months because you have good highlights or stand about “nursing her wrath to keep it warm”, as Robert Burns put it. Sometimes women don’t get jobs because they’re not very nice.
Anyway, let’s cut to the chase because there’s so much guff written about this. I’ll tell you what the issue is with women in business or women and work. It is extremely simple. It is not to do with sexist dinosaur male bosses or with male-dominated industries crushing our genius. It is not to do with glass ceilings. It is to do, very straightforwardly, with the number of hours we are prepared to put in. If you’re happy to work a 16-hour day and never see your children, you too can become a master of the universe. Simple as that, as McQueen might put it.
Men have been doing this for generations and the common interpretation is that they don’t mind, that there is no emotional cost, that they can just do it, guiltlessly, because they have a penis. It’s complete nonsense: ask any man who works impossible hours. There is a vast emotional cost. There are health costs. There is often a marital cost.
Why do we assume that men feel perfectly happy and breezy about never seeing their kids, living a truncated version of family life and claiming that it causes them no anguish? It clearly does but they do it anyway. Ask a woman to do it anyway and you’re a sexist pig. Why?
Few women are prepared to make that kind of sacrifice. This is entirely their right and good on them. However, it is surely both dishonest and intensely stupid to apportion blame - in the form of so-called corporate discrimination - to what is essentially a completely personal choice: power versus being there at bath time, conferences versus the park, business trips versus getting home in time for homework, giving “110%” versus sleeping more than five hours a night.
Why blame somebody else for a subjective decision? If you’re a woman who wants to run the world, giving up the things that everyone else in your position has also given up, go right ahead. If you don’t want to give the things up, do something else and stop whining. And if you’re Lee McQueen, good luck to you.
Nice guys finish first - something that not-so-nice women might do well to notice.
India Knight was born in 1965. She lives in London with her three children, writes a weekly column for The Sunday Times, and a weblog, Isn't She Talking Yet?, on bringing up a child with special needs. She has also written two novels, My Life on a Plate and Don't You Want Me?
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If Kate's summary is correct then she's put an argument for saying the feminists complaint was irrelevant to the case in point.
David, Sydney, Australia
I believe that both of them were good enough for the job, but I believe what the feminists are saying is that, if it was a nasty man against a nice woman then the nasty man would win every time, where as here you had a nasty woman against a nice man and she lost, so how does that work?
Kate, Tiverton, Devon
Yes. Women are manifestly much harder to work with. It's true. But it was a PC heresy to say so. Until now.
cluetrain, hong kong,
I went back to school in my 30s to become a professional. I went from a typical male job to an office environment. Although I am very respectful, cooperative and non-dominant, being male was the kiss of death. In short, my professional career is now over. They ran me off. 15 years down the drain.
Mike Frazier, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Females have a far more complex agenda attached to nearly everything. Working with primarily women for years (I'm an American school teacher) has proven it! Males handle things in an up-front manner and "what you see is what you get." My very best friends are usually blunt and honest, like males!
Tricia Summersfield, Boca Raton, FL, USA
I work with women, my boss is a woman and unfortunately I have to say that India Knight is right.
It has been really difficult for me and I have always been the person who supported sisterhood and always thought that women should help one another in a world dominated by men which is not happening.
SH.K , Prishtina, Kosova
Now that I am 8 just years off retirement, I can claim to have worked for many bosses in my time, male and female, and whilst not all those bosses were good, I have to say the majority of women I worked for were either unpleasant, not up to the job, or sadly in some cases outright bullies.
Rick, Oswestry, UK
I think part of the problem highlighted with the women only teams may also be down to management styles. The best all woman team I worked with had a manager who was focused on getting the job done, was a good example to the workers r.e. timekeeping, etc and did not engage in petty lunch room gossip.
ML, Aberdeen,
The office bully here is a female. She turns up late, can't even copy and paste between two MS Word documents, snaps her fingers at people then tries to deny staff their right to have a lunch break. Of course she's the first to complain of sexism whenever we don't want her to be our line manager.
Luke Nicolaides, London, UK
Fair point about lack of women in top jobs these days being more about choice than overt sexism (counterexamples still exist though). Problem is that women are damned either way, whereas men (even if many do suffer silently) at least have one choice - working - for which few will criticise them.
Margaret, Durham,
Well first of all, I don't see how anyone could accuse Siralun of being sexist. I seem to recall quite a few female apprentices in the past.
As for women being harder to work with and all backstabby and bitchy well that's just nonsense. Never had any problems with my female colleagues.
Kate, Cardiff,
I can't believe the negative generalisations about women in this piece, no wonder it produced responses like John from litchfield ie 'women don't like each other much - not even mothers and daughters'. It is far too subjective and doesn't relate female behaviour to broader socio-cultural factors
becky, London,
So now it's endearing to lie on your CV. Picture the head of a selection team: "We've discovered you lied about your First at Oxford, and I want to tell you that we find that most endearing."
Kevin Straw, Leicester,
It is always a mistake to use absolutes. Not all women hate each other, not all women managers are bad bosses and not all men are great bosses. Both Claire and Lee were rough around the edges but both had talent. In the end Lee was just more likable.
Mary Grant, Canterbury,
Women just don't like each other much. Even mothers and daughters. It must be pretty grim, especially when most know how ridiculous that is but cannot do anything about it. If they just got on they would take over the world. They are far more capable than us, just not very inventive. Not a dig.
john harris, lichfield, uk
The two worst bosses I have had are a childless woman in her late 40s and a married man with children. The former couldn't deal with the reality that I had children and she didn't whereas the latter was envious that I coped easily with raising my children whilst his stay at home wife didn't.
Mollie, uk,
I completely agree. The senior women I have worked with tell me that an issue is very political - and then plunge into it with relish. They use need to know as a management principle but seem to love to keep secrets. They are good at snap judgments - but when challenged, resort to intimidation
Lucas Jacks, London,
The problem lies with the work ethos currently prevalent, which forces both men and women to make a choice between work & family. Though men may feel equally rotten about not being there at bathtime, noone excoriates them in quite the same way as they do women guilty of the same.
Emma, Brussels,
"I promoted many women in the corporate governance ladder. None of them expounded the victimhood of being female."
Yeah right they didn't.
Paddy, Dublin, Ireland
What a load of tosh.
One of my favourite expressions is "Give a job to a woman. When you come back the job is done. Give a job to a man. When you come back he's down the pub"
To pretend the Glass Ceiling does not exist is a joke.
John Tuohy, Whitchurch Hill, UK.
Not at all; women, in my experience, are far easier to work with than men. I've found very few women that have an 'ego problem', or a 'chip on their shoulder'. Women are in fact better team players (provided it's a mixed team) and are happy to share the credit. However, beware of an all women team!
Bharat Jashanmal, Manama, Bahrain
Excellent article India.
Most of the women I spoke to did not want Claire to win....and I wondered why.
Nur, Hayes, UK
In the clamber to be equal opportunity employees, weak-kneed male managers promote talentless yet ambitious female corporate climbers, who exacerbate mens sexist stereo-typed view of female executives, leaving the truly talented female workforce to decide they're better off at home with the kids!
Peter, Wellington, NZ
Absolutely on the button. Noel Coward got it right when he said, ' I don't mind women wanting to be men, but why can't they be gentlemen?' In a nutshell, I'd say. Sandra Ramini, London.
Sandra Ramini, London, England
Bravo! As a retired senior male executive, I promoted many women in the corporate governance ladder. None of them expounded the victimhood of being female. The just did the damn job well. I recognized their effort via promotions. Just like the Blacks, Hispanics, Native-Americans that worked with me
Tom Smith, Henderson, NV, USA
Allowing someone to supervise a job they can't do themselves is a formula for disaster. This is partly why women have problems in the workplace.
Andrew Milner, Karuizawa, Japan
the only decent candidate was raef, after that, it fell to pieces in my eyes
christopher osunsami, hastings, england
Why is there always the assumption that women don't or don't want to work as hard as men because they want to spend time with their kids? There are plenty of women that I work with that don't have kids. Why should they immediately be discounted because they're women (& MIGHT have kids someday?).
April, Seattle, WA, USA
Most of the participants would not get "set on" at the local supermarket? Shallow,egotistical..petty.Shrill and intemperate,[thats just the "men" ] First series fine,liked it,but now?God,who on earth selects candidates?are there no "real" Men and Women left other than the nasty and vain
david, Barnsley, England
Men don't stitch you up?!!!
Try working at a well known US Consultancy with more than 150,000 people - then say that!
People are individuals and everyone acts differently in different environments.
Fred Amburg, Longmeadow, Mass, USA
Men are competative and will try to beat down anyone to win. Women(not all) will let a man win, as if its his right, but never a woman,they conspire with men & women to keep her down. When will men & women learn that a successful woman is not a threat to their own self worth?
Audrey H-G, Prestwick, Scotland
Just a teaser question
Can a person, man or woman, who has no family life, no hobbies, no life outside work be an emotionally balanced and intellectually 'complete'?
For a woman, as for a man, a family may be demanding, but isn't a familyless person prone to unresponsible teen-like behaviour?
Rui, Lisbon, Portugal
My girlfriend hates working with other women - in her own words, "men don't stitch you up like women do". I hate working with anyone who allows emotional immaturity, bitchiness and hostility to cloud their careers, and mostly (admittedly not exclusively) that applies to females rather than males.
Neil S, Glasgow, Scotland
Nice to read an objective view on gender politics from a woman writer - not a first, though not far off it. But be careful, look what "The Sisters" had to say about Erin Pizzey.
Watch your back!
Ken Leyland, Liverpool, U.K.
My wife always hated working for other women.
She found that on the whole they were emotional, bullying, unreliable and catty.
Whilst I have worked with some realy great women I have always been struck how, when the going gets tough, women often turn on their colleagues. Men form a team.
Geoff M, Birmingham, England
It doesn't really matter who won, or who deserved to. All that mattered, and was ever going to decide the outcome, was Sir Alan's preference.
M Woolf , London, UK
Re: last comment, if we brought up our girls like our boys, they wouldn't have low self esteem. Every women suffers bitchiness from other women. Its depressing
Re: ridiculous hours - one can only demand equal treatment for equal work. Can't have cake and eat it.DAMN! Also how do we define succes
Audrey H-G, Prestwick, Scotland
Well, if you really want to waste your life chasing a £100,000 p/a job then why would you expect to get on with your colleagues, male or female.
If you go in for such selfish reasons then you desrve to be stabbed in the back, with an entire knife set from Claridges, several times, a week.
Ed, London,
On gender: the article sort of misses the point. A parent really ought to be bathing & putting the kids to bed if we want the next generation to grow up healthily and to look after us in our hard earned dotage. But who? Perhaps women would be happy to put in 16 hours a day knowing the men were home.
CT, London, UK
I've run a police operational control room with 70+ staff and the top 5 controllers included 3 women. Yet in the same building there was a department that was all female and it was gossip, moaning and emotional. What we need is a mix to get the best out of both.
Derek Smith, Brighton, UK
A well reasoned overview. Nicely done. The bra burners got our attention and had their say. They entered the workforce in droves and discovered that, while they may be capable of doing most any job a man can do, they might not want to. They just want to be asked.
Leo Muzzy, Newfield, United States
Try being the only male in the workplace and you will soon discover that women treat you the way women are treated in a largely male work environment. I have had such an experience and what I concluded is that both genders succumb to the tyranny of the majority and wreak vengeance on the minority.
Jim, New York City, USA
I totally agree that women are generally now treated equally in the workplace - if they aren't getting to the top it is because they value their quality of life and that shouldn't be seen as a bad thing - I am glad someone has finally pointed this out!
Emma, London, UK
Spot on India.
You've summed up in this article everything that is wrong with the modern work ethic where women are concerned.
Men have faults however I dread to think that those women on the show are typical of women in the workplace today.
Utterly disgracefull behaviour
Well done Lee
Shaun, Newcastle, Tyneside
Sexism at work: women making non-specific allegations about a man, refusing to cite specific examples. Repeating this then expecting a woman to rule over a woman complaining about man.
I'm telling you, both should be up before tribunals. One for not putting up, the other for process incompetence.
Rhys Jaggar, Leeds, UK
India Knight handily forgets - or perhaps didn't see - the episode when Lee merrily savaged one of the weakest, most vulnerable and least offensive candidates, an attack which resulted in a display of compassion from Raef, a million-carat gent.
bob gallagher, london,
My experience of working with women is that they are convinced they are hard done by and entitled to revenge on men. Very convenient if you simply like being unpleasant or see an advantage.
This was neatly summed up in the 1970s - when the worst began - by the phrase 'Men must be punished'.
Mike Newland, London, England
The apprentice is a sizable debacle, even by the yardsticks of absurdity which uderpins most modern television these days. It has naught to do with raw business acumen, and all to do with the choked cult of celebrity, show business and theatre. The real businessmen are the men who conjured this show
sadaat, London,
Everyone lies on their CV - yes about litle things like conversational french, reading poems and the like - not about attending Uni - are we now living in a society where we think a lie like that makes someone a "cheeky chappy"?
RD, Coatbridge
Richard, Coatbridge,
When I was an employer, I found male staff spent their time grandstanding, working out how 'underpaid' they were & palming off 'demeaning' jobs to female staff. The women multi-tasked, were quicker, responsive & put up with their lazy male colleagues while running homes & raising kids, too.
anne, bournemouth,
On working with men vs women debate, you really need both in any workplace to bring balance and a better synergy. As for which gender to work for, it doesn't matter, the requried attributes like 'inspiring' and 'proactive' aren't exclusive to any sex. Sweeping generalisations less and merit more!
Margaret, Dublin, Ireland
Wow - a great - and very insightful - article! Thank you Ms. Knight! I think one thing more should be said, though: if a male candidate for the job acted "as badly" (my words) as Ms. Young did, would it have mattered if that he was a man - would he have still been more likely to be chosen?
Bob, Moorpark, USA
I have often heard the same observation, almost always from women who don't have a chip on the shoulder, that they would rather be the only female in a work group of men than work in an office filled with other women.
And good point about making choices and sacrifices. Very good article.
gb, Austin, USA
Excellent article! I have female colleagues who say how difficult it is to work with other women, esp. those in more senior positions. The main complaint is that women dish out personal attacks that have nothing to do with the task at hand. They also take criticism personally and hold grudges.
Alistair, London,
I am so glad I chose to dump the career rat-race; give me my home, hubby and kids anytime.
wendy, belfast, northern ireland
In my opinion, the problem lies with greedy and exploiting attitude of the company rather than with one's personality... no one, woman or man, should be asked or expected to work long hours. We should all start giving more importance to other aspects of our lives and not only to money.... idealist?
gabriella, london, uk
A very disappointing article India. I have worked in male and female environments, and have come across good and bad bosses and colleagues of both sexes. However, the worst behaviour I have ever experienced was in a male dominated environment where female staff were bullied relentlessly.
MC, Birmingham, UK
A journalist with some good sense. Cohesive, comprehensible, accurate, and a thoroughly concise explanation of why women are so often negatively viewed by people like me, as hypocritical, double standard, 'do as we say, not as we do' individuals. Kudos for telling it like it is.
TheRockofAges, Tampa, USA/FL
Perhaps the difference is in how men learn to be competitive while playing within teams. And that women, to date, have had less opportunity and desire to do the same.
It might explain the competitiveness of men during the task but the ability to get over it following the task.
Paul, Toronto, Canada
On his CV 'mis-writing':
'I suppose I should have shared the actual situation more correctly'.
Nice. And how you get to finish first.
Peter , Ross on Wye, UK
I assume then, that if it was Fred Knight who wrote this piece, the Times would have had a million and one comments from women in a strop by now?
John, Malta,
Great article. Lee was by far the most worthy winner and not just because he did an excellent job but because he is such a great, humble & honest bloke.
I'm a woman (have been working for over 20 years) and have had women bosses and your comments are 100% correct.
Well done Lee & Sir Alan.
Kim, London,
A well balanced article. Thank goodness for India Knight.
Jez, London,
No one mentions it, but Lee did have good ideas as well, like on the advertising episode, he would happily spout ideas until something stuck instead of just criticising
adrian, London,
Here here, how refreshing to read some common sense!
Andrew, Wirral,
As you hold, men, too, are unhappy with working 16 hours a day. We are not blaming men for a subjective decision - their decision or "personal sacrifice", as you call it, inflicts on the entire work force, keeping the demands of employers perhaps too high.
Christine, Copenhagen, Denmark
Surely some blame must lie with the macho long hours culture?
Presenteeism is a major problem with British employers. There's no incentive to work smarter rather than harder, because there's the attitude that, if you're not there 12+ hours per day, you're not working hard enough.
Emma, London, United Kingdom
What CAN you say ?.
Well put..... that is all !
Nigel Thain, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire
I have worked under a variety of men and women. The men are always more worried about, "Is the job done and is it done correctly?" while the women are always worried about what people are wearing and a million little stupid things. Women can be catty and I would much rather work under a male boss.
Virginia, Los Angeles, USA
The entire conceit of the show is ridiculous." I am so great at business because my friends and family tell me so." I am a market trader in Amsterdam. Many of us make at least 100,000 pounds a year. Never having to work beyond 6 p.m. I say no thank you to monkey suit culture. Who is best off?
Lamont , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
80s mags showed women had to be surgeons etc - women are realising that many need talent and drive- hence the return of the dom. goddess. I'm man - if I dont put in the hours my wife, daughter and I have no home or money. simple as that. I dont work for fun . I have no choice.
andy, milnthorpe, cumbria
I am a woman and I totally agree!! Lee was better. He won more than Claire and performed better in the tasks. I can't understand the statement that says "Claire was robbed"!! No she was not.
Anne, raeding, uk
As a woman I can't agree more with you about how tough it is to work with other women. I have always said that women should be more like men at work; and learn to take things on the chin and not take things personally. Women can't expect to succeed whilst wanting to be treated with kid gloves.
MP, London, UK
Well put, as only a woman would be allowed to say, of course.
mike, Rennes, France