Janice Turner
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
More than her cancelled gigs, that blood-spattered street scrap with her boyfriend, more even than her recent overdose, nothing bespeaks the inner mess of poor, brilliant Amy Winehouse than what is written on her body. At the Mercury awards this week she resembled a Barbie doll attacked by an additive-high, felt-tip wielding toddler: tattooed on her arms are crude, topless “pin-ups”, the sort once beloved of sailors and truckers, and then, incongruously, “Cynthia”, the name, apparently, of Winehouse’s late grandmother.
Her dear old gran must be turning in her urn to know that she’s been commemorated thus, I remarked to my hairdresser. But she gestured to a cherubic 19-year-old junior bent over the backwash, the word “Nan” visible on her upper arm. A friend says the worst tattoo he ever saw was on a young woman who, in thick, black type circling the nape of her neck, had the legend “I love you Granny and Grandad Wilkinson”.
On one level this desire to remember a loved, elderly relative is rather sweet and touching. Yet why not write a poem, frame a photo, place flowers on a grave? Why inscribe your body so permanently, so painfully? But we live in an age where the young believe their private feelings can be validated only when exhibited in a public domain. It is no coincidence that tattooing has grown over the past decade in parallel to the internet with its myriad opportunities for personal expression: the body as home page.
Once the mark of the criminal, rock star or squaddie, now one in five British people has a tattoo. Indeed, rare is the young woman I come across at the gym who lacks a butterfly on her shoulder blades, or some gnomic squiggle peeping over her hipsters. Tattooing is usually dismissed as fashion. And surely only a dim-bulb or lowlife would subscribe to something so permanent for such an ephemeral purpose? But while tattoo trends change – Celtic crosses are so mid-90s, Chinese characters totally last year, it’s all funky, elongated stars now – tattooing has endured, becoming ever more déclassé, until Samantha Cameron, a baronet’s daughter and Tory first lady, embellishes her ankle with a dolphin.
So why is this urge growing? While not everyone is sheepishly following David Beckham, his adventures in ink are illuminating. I recall a documentary early in his fame, when with Victoria spicing it up in America, Becks was alone in his Cheshire pad, pondering how best to mark his adoration. (Posh had already had the date of their first shag printed on to her foot.) In utter seriousness Beckham explained that he wanted his beloved’s name in a foreign script and, to see how it would look, had copied on to his arm in Biro some Chinese characters from a takeaway menu.
A surfeit of emotion with no satisfying medium – no poetry or liturgy – to express it, no way to pin down the moment, to express the spiritual or eternal: Beckham echoes his generation. An unprecedented confidence and pride in the physical self is combined with an absence of religious ritual. And so the body becomes literally a temple. The message is deliberately mystified: awkward or commonplace sentiments sound deeper, less banal in a foreign script. Latin is classy, magical. Angelina Jolie has “ Quod me nutrit me destruit” (What nourishes me also destroys me) besides, in English, “Know your rights”, like a walking billboard for the Citizens Advice Bureau. French is exotic enough for Robbie Williams, who is inscribed with “ Chacun à son goût” (Each to his own). Beckham eventually opted for Victoria in (misspelt) Hindi.
And there is egotism, too, that others would wish to be confronted, on first meeting, by your deepest feelings, your checklist of loved ones. This spring in Australia, I was amused to read about a fight between two Aussie Rules footballers. A player called Adam Sellwood, seeing what he assumed was a tattoo of a girlfriend on the forearm of his opponent, Des Headland, remarked, charmingly: “I f***ed her last night.” Yet the tattoo, it transpired, was of Headland’s six-year-old daughter Madison.
In Sellwood’s defence, Australia is the world capital of rubbish tattoos. But why try to capture something as fast-evolving as a young child’s face? Tattoos express an arrogance about time, that the present moment is all that matters, an inability to imagine that an arse rose etched at 25 won’t expand into a cauliflower by middle age.
Celebrities, who do not worry or care that a ragbag of clashing Cape Fear-esq daubings might scare away potential employers, are free to deface their bodies with every “deep” homily they come across on the internet or passing lover. But increasingly a tattoo is widely seen as an appropriate way to mark some spurious moment of “personal growth”: a baby, climbing Machu Picchu, a divorce – even though after 30 a tattoo, like wearing a slogan badge or an angry T-shirt, seems a juvenile means of self-expression. But if we are powerless to change our lives, at least we can change our bodies, mark a new chapter with a blurry rose or a quote from the Chemical Brothers.
And the growth of middle-class tattoos reveals how we all yearn to be rebels now. Among today’s sixtysomethings only Marianne Faithfull and Helen Mirren bear the needle marks of a rock’n’roll youth. George Orwell, it was revealed in recent documents, had his knuckles tattooed with blue grapefruit-like shapes, to signify to his fellow colonial civil servants in Burma – and to reassure himself – that he was no imperial lackey.
But in the age of the global brand we must all be a bit confrontational and hard-sell. A tattoo becomes the mark of our difference, our personal logo. Even though a Maori armband tattoo is about as individual as a barcode on a packet of biscuits. In her book Bodies of Inscription: A Cultural History of the Modern Tattoo Community Margo DeMello remarks that while the middle class regard working-class tattoos as formulaic and ugly, they regard their own as “art”: exclusive, unique and of intrinsic merit. How hard the TV presenter Fern Cotton must have struggled to choose a fern to adorn her hip. And did Sam Cameron pore over the book of designs, reject a tiger (too aggressive), a flower (not edgy enough), before alighting on the dolphin.
“Yes, that’s me – even as I sip tea with the Tory matrons of Reigate, not quite rockin’ Amy Housewine, but nonetheless, wild, playful and free.”
Janice Turner joined The Times in 2003 from The Guardian, and writes mainly, but not exclusively, on family matters and women's issues. Her column appears on Saturdays
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Having read some of the comments I just had to laugh. I have no tattoo's but my Husband who is consultant neurologist is covered in them !, does that make him lower class and of a lower inteligence then ?. Get a grip, it is down to personal choice and harm's nobody
AJW Essex UK
Ann, Brentwood, England
Tattoos are pug-ugly;particularly on women.
As for those awful "Tramp-Stamps" on the small of women's backs-yuck!
I hate Tattooos with a passion.Apparently the ink & paint they use is often the same paint they use for Car Paint.
It's the same principle as having a Mullet-hairstyle from the 80s & you cant change it,it's permanent.
A total waste of time & money.
In about 10 years time,Tattoo-Removal businesses will be booming.
Rob Wells, Newton Abbot, Devon
Some of you people are pathetic. If people want to have tattoos or piercings, it's none of your business. I don't, but I am not such a miserable, prejudiced snob that I would ever make judgments on a person who did, because of it.
In fact I wish I had a tattoo, if it means ignorant, nosey bigots will avoid me!
I think discriminating against people with body modifications is equatable with discriminating against a person for their religion- you have a choice about religion, you have a choice about what you do to your body- both are very personal things that aren't anything to do with narrow-minded busybodies!
Well said, Peter Hutchinson and Malinda Govoni.
C, UK,
Ah, spot on, Matthew Fields, of Enfield, move over, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Brooks, Munich, Germany
Tattoos are a form of self expression. and like any piece of art, behind it is a deeper meaning, i feel that you have only portayed one side of people's views and mayb you should consider the real meaning people get body art before you judge them.
Jez, Croydon, Surrey
I see tattoos in abundance at the local swimming pool. Many with people's names, or football teams gracing hairy- or overweight bodies. -As if people need painful body art to remind themselves. Tattoos of dolphins and flowers are common too, just in case one forgets what they look like. An utterly pointless waste of money!
Anthony, Oxford, UK
You guys seem just as obsessed with tattoos as those who want one -- or want one removed. Get over it. Some people do make the mistake of getting the wrong tattoo. Your mistakes may not be inked on your skin, but that doesn't give you the right to make sweeping judgments about tattooed people.
Call it a cliche, but I'd make a bet that you tattoo critics are throwing stones from glass houses.
Malinda Govoni, springfield,
As everyone tries their best to be more different they all end up being the same. What boring and unimaginative people we have these days, all trying the latest fad. zzzzzzzzz
Matthew Phillips, Enfield,
Bar coding for the underclass. No more, no less. These twerps who tag their arms, shins, neck or other safer parts of their anatomy but NOT their face only prove that they are weekend rebels. Real radicals would tattoo their faces but in reality they know what complete plonkers they would look, so in reality they play safe just like everyone else. In, say, ten years time having no tattoo will be the new black and only the obviously no-hopers and oldies will sport them, leaving the trendy young things to walk around unadulterated by this most cliqued of statements of rebellion.
Dave, Luton, England
Surely your dismissive tone in this article simply mirrors your own opinion that tattoos are unattractive?
I have 4 tattoos, one yet to be finished. None are instantly visible, a reaction to the fact that they are personal and hence not to be foisted on people who might discriminate against me on the basis of their own personal aesthetics.
All of my tattoos were designed simply because I liked how they looked, they are body decorations, not memorials of people or emotions.
I completely agree that their permanent nature should necessarily cause people to think carefully about why they want them, but to dismiss them is naff is as arrogant as dismissing another person's taste in clothes, fashion, lifestyle, politics or religion.
Surely every person has the right to express themselves as they see fit, it is their own body after all?
Peter Hutchinson, Birmingham, England
Love it! The ink virus, spreading faster even than cirrhosis and chlamydia through the population, degrades and uglifies all but the most beautiful people with the nicest and most well-placed tattoos. Off to the gym now. Let's see if I can see a single woman without one.
Roger Darce, London, UK
Perhaps a tattoo has become a personal anti-elitist symbol and token of democratic uniformity.
That could be apparent from splitting the word into its two syllables.
dr venables preller, Warminster, UK
Exceptions to every rule of course, but tattoos, like weird face-jewelry and body-piercings, are typically the province of under-achievers and no-hopers. Just about every middle-aged and tattooed man I met in the Navy during 22 years' service said he regretted having them. "I was drunk at the time I had it done"
was a frequent admission. It is expensive and painful to have tattoos removed and the scars are rarely concealable : "Ooh, you had a tattoo - what was it of?"....this gets wearying.
Advice is never welcome but mine would be : think hard and long before you go to the Tattooist - and then think again !
Don Bell, Plymouth, UK
This reminds me of German women: every german young woman who wants to be taken seriously needs to have had a piercing at one stage in her life before turning 30. Having a piercing appears to be a sign of conformity and conservatism. Not having one is 'different'.
steven, Birmingham,
No tattoo is the new tattoo.
Michael , Kirkcaldy,
What's sexiest (and most practical) is having tattoos that are primarily hidden away by clothing. It's like carrying around a dirty secret.
But yes, most tattoos are clichéd, pointless, and not very well thought-out. No, I'm not being judgmental - I have two, one of which most definitely falls into this category.
NH, London, UK
Very, very, well-written. I enjoyed it all.
Dean, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Tattoos of any kind are what we in the States refer to as "common" and indicative of someone of "trailer park trash" status. "Body Art" is a euphamism for the disgusting self-disfiguring practice of tatooing. There is nothing "cultural" in the United States about tatooing, except that it indicates one of exremely low self esteem or crude upbringing.
In a word, yuck. And by adulthood, youngsters will typically end up suffering the pain of laser removal.
Scott, Durham, NC, USA
I think different people have different reasons for getting tattooed. some do it because their favourite pop star does it, some probably because its fashionable. I did it at 43 (some years ago now) because I have always been thrilled by tattooed people. I already wanted to be tattooed as a teenager like Cher was and my tattooed biker friend (he had his upper arms tattooed) but, thanks to my dull existence as a catholic convent school girl with very conservative parents this was OUT OF THE DISCUSSION! Later I worked in conservative business where I had to wear elegant dresses and suits and at that time I didn´t dare to have a tattoo, it might have cost me my job. Today as I´m in the position of not having to show consideration for any employer I can sport my two beautiful tattoos (my favourite one is a demon) and enjoy it. I didn´t know that Helen Mirren is tattooed, by the way. was kind of surprised to learn that.
Asta, Hamburg, Germany
This obsession with tattoos is regrettable indeed, and is indicative of a civilization in decline. A tattoo, any tattoo, is, by its very nature, ugly. Anyone who sees beauty in a tattoo needs to consult his phrenologist! There are far better, more aesthetic, ways to rebel. One doesn't have to resort to tattoos. And yes, Mr Milner, they can call me old-fashioned, too.
Richard Lewis, Swansea, UK
I've always had something more useful to do with my money.
DAVID VINTER, Louth, Lincs., UK.
I don't care at all for Mr Milner associating soldiers and sailors with the term low life. Shame on you
Terry O'Connor, Nice, France
This obsession with tattoos is regrettable indeed, and is indicative of a civilization in decline. A tattoo, any tattoo, is, by its very nature, ugly. Anyone who sees beauty in a tattoo needs to consult his phrenologist! There are far better, more aesthetic, ways to rebel. One doesnât have to resort to tattoos. And yes, Mr Milner, they can call me old-fashioned, too.
Richard Lewis, Swansea, UK
Tatoos are repellent on women, luckily it's mostly a fad of the not so bright.
David Thijm, Storbridge, UK
Call me old-fashioned, but what does tattoo say about you? Sailor, soldier, violent criminal, social deviant and general low-life? Not the smartest move to provide authority with instant identification. Assuming the tattoo is permanent, this does so label you. The last time I was in UK (2005) I even saw misspelled tattoos.
At the onsens here in the Japan Alps, there are prim notices to the effect that entry is prohibited to those with tattoos. In Japan, largely only Yakuza (organised crime syndicate) members have tattoos. Not exactly the image you want to project.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Kanagawa