Janice Turner
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
That young girls use abortion as a contraceptive - a theory popular only among those who have never endured the procedure - is debatable. That the Government uses abortion as a political prophylactic is undeniable. A grim and fractional victory is the best that you can call 28 more girls under 14 last year choosing a termination rather than abandoning their childhood and prospects.
The golden government target of halving teenage conceptions by 2010 looks an awful long way off: just a 13 per cent reduction, then, in seven years. But abortion, the ministers' little helper, is at least knocking down the percentage of live births. It is easier to roll out morning-after pills and drop-in abortion clinics than to address the bigger, more controversial question: why can't we talk to our young people about sex?
At Experimentia, the children's science museum in Copenhagen, I watched a film on puberty. A graphic cartoon depicting erections, wet dreams and burgeoning desire ended, well, rather climactically. It was earthy but not pornographic, droll but not smutty. And yet my outer grown-up had to tell my inner child to stop sniggering. A very British reaction, I guess. It is hard to imagine such public blitheness in a London museum. Young eyes might see it, would be the horror, when, of course, that is the point.
Sex and children is still an almighty national taboo. This year a coalition of youth groups urged the Government to begin compulsory sex education from primary-school level. To read the outraged headlines, you'd assume that five-year-olds would be given subscriptions to Razzle, when any parent knows that curiosity about bums and bits and life's eternal mysteries begins early, and that a child will not be prematurely “sexualised” if you explain why ladies lack willies.
And yet even with 20,000 girls under 18 having abortions every year, teenagers are required only to label a diagram of the Fallopian tubes, not learn how they might avoid getting pregnant. Why do we allow individual schools to decide whether Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) is taught at all or to omit anything they find unpalatable - homosexuality, abortion - or parents to hoick children out of lessons which could, more than anything else they learn, affect the course of their lives?
A friend who teaches PSHE to 14-year-old girls received, as is normal, no specialist training beyond being handed a dusty folder. Thankfully, after three children of her own, she is unembarrassable, a prerequisite when answering “Miss, can you get Aids from giving head?” (Often PSHE is dumped upon the youngest, most bashful teacher.) After a few lessons of handing out worksheets and, that new educational cliché, asking children to design a poster, perhaps on the dangers of sexually transmitted disease, she ordered the girls to down pens.
No more writing, only talking. It became clear that the girls' knowledge of sex consisted of sexy images acquired from reality television, but little biology.
“Their idea of a strong, sexual woman seemed to be Jodie Marsh,” she sighs. Few believed that sex was meant to give them pleasure. Most were unclear that girls could even have orgasms. Sex was still - after aeons of supposed progress - what you let a boy do to you to keep him.
And it struck my friend that, since these girls did not understand why they desire sex, they could not articulate why they might say no. So she devised a lesson about the sneaky, underhand time-honoured lines boys pull to lure a girl into bed: “If you won't do it I'll go out with your mate”, “Don't worry, I'll only put it in the once” etc.
Such explicit discussions are thought by the moral alarmists - those also most agitated by the teenage abortion figures - to sanction under-age sex. But she was giving them the wherewithal to choose, to assume control, the social smoothness to fend off the unwanted fumble. And she taught them a sexual language that wasn't rude or funny, embarrassed or appalled. As international studies show, the more sex education they get, the later a child remains a virgin. The billions thrown into US abstinence programmes have done nothing to reduce a teen pregnancy rate even grimmer than our own.
As Mel, a teacher of vulnerable young people just out of care or prison, says: “These kids find it easier to have sex than to talk about it.”
But who doesn't. As a nation our Carry On-esque sexual mores ricochet between licentiousness and prurience: we sit through five series of Big Brother waiting for someone to fornicate live on TV just so we can condemn it as a moral nadir.
Opponents of compulsory sex education say that it is most appropriately conducted at home by parents. And you would think that we liberal baby-boomers would have no trouble doing “the talk”. But we had scant sex education ourselves and certainly I - even after recourse to frank Scandi-style reading matter - can only hope that I'm forging mature sexual beings not future cases for therapy. It is easy to suppose that today's teens with their bare midriffs and copies of Nuts have no need of our groovy-dad lectures.
Certainly a generation of young men are receiving their sex education from the brutal mechanics of internet porn. As one young guy told Mel: “No one wears a condom in a porn movie.” Unprotected sex must, therefore, be the apogee of pleasure, so girls, frightened of denying them, take risks and boys take advantage.
Since parents assume that sex is covered at school - or sucked up by cultural osmosis - ignorance is endemic. ChildLine receives 50 calls a day from young people seeking advice about sex; a third of girls are not told about periods by their parents. Too often the default solution to all shortcomings in our children - from binge-drinking to table manners - is to bung a new subject on the national curriculum, so compulsory sex education by trained, creative, unblushing teachers could arrest a cycle of bad sexual practice. And it would mean that the next generation of parents will not be as tongue-tied as we are.
The Government must stop hopping from foot to foot like a PSHE rookie and face up to the shrieking minority of religious busybodies and alarmists. Make them copy it out 100 times: “Sex is part of life - get over it.” The alternative isn't a class of cross-legged virgins, but clinics brimming with wan-faced girls.

Janice Turner joined The Times in 2003 from The Guardian, and writes mainly, but not exclusively, on family matters and women's issues. Her column appears on Saturdays
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The problem is that young women are taught about pregnancy and STDs, but not about the damage that a period of early promiscuity does to their long term relationships.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
Schools seem to teach the technical and mechanical side of sex, but surely it's up to parents to reinforce that, explain relationships and the finer points rather than letting children find out for themselves from equally ill informed peers.
Incidentally 19 is still teenaged!
Carol Asacret, Cambridge, England
To the assorted godbotherers upthread: I agree that we need to employ greater moral certainty when talking to kids about sex. But I think we've had enough of taking our lead in the area from old men in frocks, thanks all the same.
Bill, Bangor, UK
I agree with the message! But it seems like responsibilites are heaped on the girls! Boys 'take advantage!' Like it's a right of passage for boys! So the girls must 'get the message!' Sexual revolution/rights of women; and we wind up back to the 'boys will be boys!'
Michael Sullivan, Toronto, Canada
Young girls should be taking the pill as soon as they have their early menstrual cycles and carry acondons with them. Males should always carry a condom to prevent disease spred. These matters should be taught in schools as most parents lack teaching skills and are also culture inhibited.
Jim Wills, Brisbane, Australia
Lack of confidence and self-worth are important considerations here. If young people feel loved and secure within their families and know they are valued, they will be more circumspect about sex and relationships and will not feel the need to appease or 'hold on to' abusive and selfish partners.
Karen S, London, UK
Sex is a word practically unspoken in tradtional Bengali parents. My mum and dad have never said anything about it to me. I learnt everything from school and just living life.
I hope when I become a father that I can be a 'good' parent and teach my children whats right and whats wrong about sex
Jabed, Wigan, UK
First Class! As a pharmacist issuing EHC to kids of 14 up, I suppose I should be glad that they at least know enough to come to me. But does no-one teach cause and effect, that sex is about making babies, for which they're going to be responsible for the best part of their lives?
John Dickinson, Alton, Hants,
My experience as a volunteer in a school is that everything stopped on PSHE sex day - the younger ones were told about what goes where, the older about relationships.'The Crucible' told of the dangers of sexual repression. More sex education = more 'sexually active' children= more abortions. See?
Maggie, London , England
Ms Turner,
I have just read your article in today's Times and have come on line to congratulate you. When i was eight years old my mother and father sat me down in the kitchen and explained everything, and i mean everything, about sex. It has guided me well.
Phillip Duffy, Aveley, Essex. RM15 $QS, England
What utter rubbish - the Tabloids have become obsessed with sex and there is little discipline in bringing up children - We are becoming a nation of rabbits - just animals. David Smith, Cannes
David Smith, Cannes, France
I've got bad news for this author. I live in the USA where for years there has been the comprehensive sex education you advocate. It hasn't worked to prevent premarital sex or pregnancies. There has been very little abstinence education. I agree with M. Wiiliams of Oxford
connie, New Orleans, USA
"Since parents assume that sex is covered at school - or sucked up by cultural osmosis - ignorance is endemic. " - This sums up the problem. If parents managed to bring children into a fit home, they should pass that skill on. If not, they should learn that skill.
Joseph, NYC, USA
US sex ed covers the whole range of lifestyles and contraceptive choices. By the time I earned my biology degree, I new every detail from ovulation to birth down to the molecular level. This knowledge did not help any of my relationships. Marriage requires knowing your spouse, not knowing molecules.
Joseph, NYC, USA
I attended a girls' grammar school in the late 1950s and never heard of another girl getting pregnant When it happened outside school, there was heavy pressure on the young man to do the decent thing. Of course teach them the facts, but isn't the real problem our over-preoccupation with sex?
M. Williams, Oxford, UK
i do wish commentators would stop repeating the cliches of sexual liberationists; such as `international evidence shows that the more sex education a child has the later they remain a virgin.` If anything, the actual evidence shows the opposite.The word`evidence` is not a talisman.
patsy, london, uk
You don't have to teach young folk about sex because they already know. All you have to do is make sure they don't make a mess of their lives as a result of doing it. Sound advice without hand wringing judgements would be best. Young folk are entitled to privacy and respect just like everyone else.
Colin, Carmarthen, UK
50 years ago without formal sex education I knew what caused pregnancy, Strangely enough the girls knew.
Result I did not know of pre-marital babies.
bob, Shrewsbury,
Couldn't agree more with this article. As a School Nurse I deliver sex and relationship to year 6 kids. At the beginning of the sessions I always ask how many of them have spoken to Mums,Dads, Carers about puberty etc..You would be amazed at how many of them say that this subject is never discussed
Sharrow, Luton, UK
References to shame and morality, as in some comments here, are part of the problem. Teachers and parents need to say that sex is fun, not a matter for any shame, that you should follow your instincts and do it as and when you fancy, in or out of a relationship, and that you should use condoms.
Richard Baron, London,
Sex education should be about love, values and respect as much as mechanics. Value and respect yourself and others.
Andrew, Exeter, UK
In Bethlehem there are almost no teenage pregnancies, almost no STDs, no drug problem among young people, a girl can walk down the street safe at night and families stay together. 15 kms away in Jerusalem the situation is like in London, or Paris or New York. Wonder what they have that we have lost?
ijak, Cheltenham, UK
Amazing isn't it, that with the evidence of parental failure around discipline etc (knife carrying and use, dysfunctional classrooms, parents threatening/attacking teachers who try to discipline their kids) how on earth do we expect them to magically teach kids about sex and relationships?
Tony, London,
By all means, but it should be part of physiology, and creating a deeper understanding of the miracle of life. Sex, by definition, involves attraction and desire. It defies control, it brings on chaos, it defeats theory. Neither Labour nor the church has ever succeeded in controlling it.
David, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Is there really less sex education than fifty years ago ? We were taught all that Mrs Turner's friend had to tell her pupils, plus that adoption, not abortion, would be the fate of the unwary.
Also our Religious Education included information on what The Bible said the unmarried should not do.
Joyce Hackney, Littleover,Derby, England, United Kingdom
Back in the old days the nuns used to say that it was never to early for a girl to learn about shame. Now we only teach children to be ashamed of putting the recycling in with the rubbish.
But Labour ministers shaming us about teenage pregnancy? That I utterly deplore.
Christopher Chantrill, Seattle, USA
I agree that it is time to teach our kids that sex is part of life and not something to be ashamed of. For the British I think it's a question of learning to be more comfortable in gender roles and sexuality and to learn about sex in the context of self respect & respect for one's partner also.
RK, London,
Then why not provide classes for the parents, to help them teach their own children?
The best way to teach this material is at the child's own pace of maturity and curiosity, in the privacy of the family. If parents aren't comfortable doing this job, help them.
AMT, New York, USA
"children learn from internet porn"
haha. Too true. I know I certainly did.
I must have been on of the first of a new generation too!
pete, york, uk
Anyone of any age who doesn't know more than they need to about sex must never read a 'paper or watch television.
The politically incorrect answer is that we live in a society where everyone, including children, are fully informed of their rights but morality is a alien concept.
Bernard, Edinburgh, Scotland
Hear, hear! I'm 18 and my sex education was worse than useless. Luckily I had supportive parents and did my own research about what sex is meant to be about. Sadly, this is not the same for my peers- over 10 girls out of my year group of 200 are either expecting, or on their first/second child.
Amy, Canterbury,
I hate the term teenage pregnancies. It's legal to marry at 16 so teenage pregnancies should be normal, with a young father and mother.
Andrew Chapman, Newcastle upon Tyne, England