Libby Purves
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
What with tumbleweed blowing through the marble banking halls, repossessions up by half and Mr Bradford and Mr Bingley creeping beneath the shelter of Gordon Rock like babes in the wood, you may think my topic footling. It is regional TV programming. But hear me out: my modest proposal might drape quite becomingly and warmly over the chill green bones of the coming recession.
For what do you do, when money is short and fuel is dear? You look for comfort and security close to home, that's what. Assuming you still have a home - and most will - you want reachable diversions and steady basic services. You are consoled and entertained by the reinforcement of your daily life. Wider news and exotic entertainments matter too, but these are piped to us from every direction anyway, and mainly they just aggravate the ubiquitous modern sense that we're: a) all doomed and b) somehow missing the fab celebrity party.
Whether your village be urban or country, there is solid comfort in local amusements and memories (it was uplifting, on Nelson's birthday at the weekend, to see a squad of cyclists dressed in 18th-century naval uniforms and hats making for his birthplace at Burnham Thorpe). Local news also counts for more in times of upheaval: strikes, power cuts, storms, disasters.
Yet at this very moment the ITV network is busy cutting its regional and local news and abandoning its regional features. Until this year all ITV regions produced short daily programmes, demonstrating the features, characters, histories and idiosyncrasies of their patch. Rootless metropolitans may scoff and titter “parish pump!”, but many of these documentaries were little jewels, made with love and low budgets and attracting immense appreciation.
The BBC, of course, also does regional programming: but it is more prone to be worthily consumerish, hence somewhat dull and grumbly. ITV's mini-documentaries - in this patch at least - were far more fun. They made you pleased to be here, keen to go for a walk and look around.
But given the financial need for every show to fetch high ratings nationwide and include Ant, Dec, celebrities, prizes or imaginary policemen, Ofcom has loosened the rules. It admits that “some types of UK-made public service content are increasingly commercially unattractive, such as current affairs, nations and regions programming...this is made worse by the deterioration in the advertising market.”
So out it goes. This was always going to happen, from that baleful moment in 1990 when in the name of deregulation Margaret Thatcher kneecapped the Independent Broadcasting Authority and decided that, rather than give ITV franchises to companies with good ideas and local roots, they would be sold to the highest bidder with only the feeblest of quality thresholds. There is a viable argument that this marked a turning-point also for BBC standards, because a regulated ITV “kept the industry honest”. It's a theory.
It is the BBC that sits at the core of my proposal. The dear old Corp is in a quandary. It has to decide what it thinks it is: rival or resource? Either it is a powerful, self-protecting rival of every other broadcaster (in which case, how is it fair to give it the whole licence fee?), or else it is a precious, justly funded national resource like clean water or safe roads or the NHS. Either it is the best-fed tiger in the jungle, or else it is a cooling stream, fertilising everything.
If it is the latter, why should it not share and collaborate? If reliable local news and well-made features are good things, then why not have the BBC offer to share cost, ideas and staff with any other broadcaster which wants to play? Regional output is the ideal place to start. Each could carry the programme or bulletin when it wished, and Auntie could keep her modesty by doing it without an ad break. You may argue that viewers can always just tune to the BBC, but independent television in the regions has a bank of ideas and talent that need not be lost. And frankly, left to itself the BBC at this level does get - well, a bit prim and PC. Teamwork might produce some little jewels of documentaries, well fit to emerge later on the national networks.
At times you could even take it farther - let the friendly tiger collaborate with local newspapers, announcing on occasion “Edward X of the Eastern Daily Press has the details” or running a series on river pilots of the North East in conjunction with a Teesside magazine. There are moments when local media feel far more kinship with one another than with their parent organisations: when Ipswich was suffering its wave of murders, for instance, or the West Country its floods.
You could take the philosophy farther. Why should the BBC iPlayer - a clever development enabling you to watch programmes on your computer - only carry BBC output? A real national resource should be anxious to throw doors open. Have local radio stations share, too: instead of the current embarrassing situation where late-night output from half a dozen BBC local stations combines in one long vapid DJ show, let it combine by night with commercial rivals to serve smaller, tighter locations. Indeed one of the things viewers and listeners most complain about is the insane vastness of “regions” - one ITV region stretches from Penzance to Tewkesbury, and people in Walsingham find it odd when the BBC news - patronisingly announced as “from where you live” - is all about Southend.
Suppose we didn't have two struggling, overstretched local “public services” but one healthy, careful collaboration, serving properly sized areas with news and programmes for that modest hour a day? It would cost the BBC, but would be far closer to its historic task than a lot of the things on which it spends millions now.
I hear a cacophony of protest. “Dreadful ignorant woman! She wants a monopoly.” (No, she doesn't. Just a bit of co-operation for an hour a day). “Anyway ITV is about naked profit, while the BBC has high cultural standards!” (Yeah, right). “Besides, it would be morally quite dreadful if programmes part-funded by the licence fee helped to attract advertising from SofaWorld!” (Why?) And ITV wouldn't play anyway.” (No harm asking).
But a choice has to be made. Is the BBC a snarling competitor in the piranha pool or a precious shared resource? Which would you rather be? Or indeed, in hard times, which would you rather pay for?
Libby Purves worked for some years for BBC Radio 4, as a reporter and a presenter on the Today programme and, since 1983, has presented Midweek. She joined The Times as a columnist in 1990. She received an OBE in 1999 for her services to journalism and was Columnist of the Year in the same year. In her spare time she writes bestselling novels. Her opinion column appears in the The Times on Mondays
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
"watch BBC and pay £140 a year OR watch ITV and pay nothing."
You don't watch ITV for nothing, and I'm fed up of paying for it every time I buy washing powder or baked beans.
Let ITV viewers pay for it by subscription, and let the rest of us non-viewers pay less for our groceries
Mark, Manchester,
I would be happy to pay more in licence and have another channel or two of quality and substance.
Dee (ex-pat), Paralimni, Cyprus
Living in Cyprus you wouldn't be paying the licence fee anyway
Jeff (ex-pat) Seacaves, Cyprus
Jeff Hyman, Seacaves, Cyprus
First off the BBC is a left wing mouthpiece of political correctness. However half an hour with American TV should be enough to persuede anyone of the worth of the BBC. And US TV is not free. Almost everyone buys satellite or cable at around $600 a year to get decent programs.
M Chisholm, Dereham, UK
Why pay Jonathan Ross a fortune from our money - to stop us watching him on another channel!?
Ed, Solihull, UK
Axe the licence fee and do it quickly. Put them out of their misery.
Overstaffed, biased and not fit for purpose.
Get rid!
Dave Clemo, Kettering,
would someone explain to me why tax payers are forced to pay for bbc radio? its not even paid for by the license fee!. there are independent radio stations all over britain, why should the bbc get tax payers money to compete with legitimate business?
will, grimsby, uk
The BBC is a state sponsored dinosaur that has grown fat on coercion. Sky, ITV etc don't send me endless threatening letters because I don't pay the license fee (and never will). Anything I want to watch these days comes over the Net. When the BBC catches on they will be braying for an ISP tax.
Dirk Bruere, Bedford, England
A good point.
If the BBC is so good and popular.
Then allow us the choice to have it or not.
We have no Choice..
Let those who want the BBC pay for it.
I'm scrapping my TV anyway.
Get no more licence fees from me.
rick, newcastle, uK
The BBC is an instrument of statecraft, and must go, if we are in a free democracy. Their license goons harass people, and present the ugly face of 'dear old auntie beeb' Start by cutting salaries, and reduce two newsreaders to one - and stop reading the papers on air -- we do that ourselves!
M.O., London, United Kingdom
The BBC is primarily the mouthpeice of the Labour party. Not only is it bias, it seems less and less bothered about disguising the fact!
Anything else is an afterthought.
Phil Bailey, Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Just tune into any BBC local radio station and then ask yourself the simple question - 'What is the point of this garbage?' . It exists simply as a result of Frank Gillard's successful political campaign against local commercial radio back in 1967. It is a waste of money - as is regional TV.
Millsy, Chichester,
The BBC was supposed to be a public service broadcaster & never in it's wildest dreams will it ever compete with the commercial stations! I feel where it lets the public down most is in it's biased reporting which I suspect is controlled by this government! No one will debate the Family law issue!
Dave Farmer, Broxbourne, England
Tthe World Service is almost totally in thrall to the USA. The language ("ahead of", "this hour"), so many "experts" being from the USA and much else I can't explain in 300 characters means the BBC has totally lost its identity. Reform it or get shot of it, but don't leave it to look ridiculous.
John Orford, Balingasag, Philippines
"The BBC is quality broadcasting with no tiresome ads four times per hour".
You may say or think this depending on your views and bank balence, but I would like to be given a choice as to whether I watch BBC and pay £140 a year OR watch ITV and pay nothing.
Sid Jacques, Durham,
The BBC should be left to die a natural death. I am sick of watching lies on climate change it is so desperate to persuade those of us able to research to prove them wrong, the over reliance on Scottish presenters and the political bias towards Labour. The panic now because they fear Tory success.
Vanessa, London,
Dean in Oxford, the BBC is not fundamental to the lives of the majority and it certainly is not a media company. To describe the BBC as a company would suggest it has willing customers rather than poll tax it enforces with threats of prison.
Digital switch over, perfect time to encrypt and CHOOSE.
Mike, Leeds, UK
Advertising isn't going to be an option for the Beeb, since the advent of on-demand and the fast forward button, it's no longer going to be a major source of income for commercial broadcasters.
The alternative to the license fee is too horrific to contemplate, just look at the standard of TV abroad
Charles, Doncaster,
I live in Paris & have to watch BBC Prime as one of my few English language channels. It's not unusual to have 2 or 3 episodes of the same programme (normally 2 or 3 years old), one after the other. eg tonight we have (ancient) "My Family" at 6 & 6.30 & then at 10 & 10.30. Ah, the mighty BBC.
Jeff, Paris, France
Try this little exercise on your next local news programme (ITV or BBC).
Count how many reports are based on a crime, details of which are provided by the local police. Count how many actually begin with the words "Police are..."
Regional output is expensive and vapid - let it go.
Andrew, Darlington,
The BBC should not be able to access more financial resources than it's commercial rivals. Either the licence fee should be distributed or the BBC should become a subscription channel and stand on its own two feet. Otherwise we end up as we were pre 1955, with a monopoly broadcaster.
Mark B, Hull, UK
Very interesting to listen to the phone-ins on Fox Talk radio etc where the public can criticise government actions. The BBC hosted no such debate, it maintained its propaganda role and the bail out went ahead unquestioned. I can't see the BBC serves any purpose at all. O for freedom of speech!
John Ledbury, Kings Lynn, England
The BBC should be scrapped now. Its stifling the creativity of new media companies in this country. For the money it costs it doesnt produce anything like the necessary quality you'd get from private enterprise.
Simon Harper, Reading Berks, UK
I totally disagree. The BBC is the greatest media company in the world and is fundamental to the everyday life of most of the people in the this country - certainly for us students. Frankly, commerical TV can go down the tube for all I care, so long as the BBC remains well funded and independent.
Dean Rodrigues, Oxford, UK
Local schmocal!! Who needs more cat up a tree stories, or endless film of pensioners rummaging through the photo album and making each other cups of tea? The BBC decided long ago that its role was to out-trash the competition and to ignore its public service role. Scrap the tellytax
John Ledbury, Kings Lynn, England
The BBC is quality broadcasting with no tiresome ads four times per hour.
Who else can make historical drama and educational science programmes like Aunty does?
I would be happy to pay more in licence and have another channel or two of quality and substance.
Dee (ex-pat), Paralimni, Cyprus
Years ago,the BBC was the last word in quality programes& impartial news.Now,it's nothing more than the governments mouth,a propaganda machine churning out what the government wants us to see.I can't be the only one who really resents being forced to pay for it.Let it sink or swim on its own.
Sue, Highlands, Scotland
Matthew, Bucks...
England football? What about Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland? It's the BRITISH BC, not the English BC.....
Andrew Boyd-Bell, Hitchin, United Kingdom
The BBC have contributed to the housing collapse by doling out programmes on "how to get rich quick"with buying property to sell on......They should also be barred from paying out CASH to winners of quiz shows....as for Jonathon Ross...and the £10Million on air fares.. 400 staff at the olympics Etc
Tony, Derby, UK
Scrap the licence and let the beeb survive on handouts from advertisers. At a time where everyone is having to be careful with their money, this huge wasteful goliath needs to be brought down to earth.
Stiv, London,
The BBC should go back to being a pure TV or Radio Auntie.
For many years it has fallen back on market reaction rather than broadcast innovation. As night follows day--this has resulted in countless examples of poor financial decision making and a subsequent slicing or merging of services.
William Grierson, kIMPTON, UK
The BBC should not be competing for overpaid staff or content. If they demand more than is reasonable let the commercial stations pick up the tab. Reserve content that is of national interest - England football, cricket, rugby the Commonwealth games, Olympics etc for the BBC to be show.
Matthew, Bucks, UK
Well, I vote for the BBC any time, advertisment now spoils a programme - don't we have to suffer approx 15min of advertisment in an hour programme.
Now in hard times the competitor want BBC to help, well guess what my answer is.
Charles, Huddersfield, UK
Get rid of the licence tax so we can stop paying millions to the likes of Jonathan Ross and the "actors" of eastenders Make it compete in the real world like we and all the other TV stations have too. i have got better things to do with my cash than pay into Fiona Bruce's ISA /holiday fund.
Carl, Manchester, UK
But today's BBC is neither. It's a vast and growing self-serving bureaucracy, barely distinguishable in output from the rest of the media, and whose contribution to public service is minimal.
Trim it down to 2 quality TV and radio channels or make the lot selectively subscription based.
gordon, wallingford, UK
Sell the BBC and use the money to help pay towards some of these endless bank bailouts and axe the license fee. Then we will have a level playing field
Steve, Derby, England